{"id":29529,"date":"2009-09-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009"},"modified":"2017-01-10T20:29:00","modified_gmt":"2017-01-10T14:59:00","slug":"state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"State By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
State By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n
;o' \"H \n\nCRL.A.NO.E E OF 2002\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS ON THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2009\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE LNARAYANA  A' \n\nCRIMINAL APPEAL No.11 OF 299A2Eii.  \n\nBETWEEN\n\nSTATE BY P.S.I., _\nCHITRADURGA KOTE  A .   A   \n \n(BY SR1 A.V.RAMAK__R1sHNAE,. Hm?) \" \n\nH.PEER SAB    \"\n\nSON Aorr' AI3i)ULi:'fi{i--\u00a5A>[)AR SAB,\n\nAGED ABOUT. '.70Y_EARS,   ~\n\nRE'I'IRED-- COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER,\nMANDAKKI BHATTI \nHQLALKERE ROAD, \nc.}:{1TRADURG1ATQx:vN.\n\nA B1\n\nwH\u00ab'12.[*QF E-I:P?'cT.ER SAB,\n\nA * AGED  65 YEARS,\n\nHOUSEHOLD WORK.\nMANDAKK1 BHATTI AREA,\n\n *' HOLALKERE ROAD.\n\nA '~T_* VVCHITRADURGA T0w1%.\n\n\n\nEx.)\n\nCRL.A.N0.1 I OF 2002\n\n3. KUMSUFIYA\n\nSON OF PEER SAB,\n\nAGED ABOUT 23 YEARS,\nMANDAKKI BHATTI AREA,\nHOLALKERE ROAD,\nCHITRADURGA TOWN.\n\n4. SABJAN SAB\n\nSON OF HPEER SAB,\n\nAGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,\nMANDAKKI BHATT1 AREA?\nHOLALKERE ROAD, \" \nCHITRADURGA TOWN.\n\n5. MAMAJIGNU _  ;   , \nWIFE OF DADAPEER,'  *  A} A  \nPINJAR GALLLJAIN :\u00e9ETE,\/_ j'  '\nDAVANAGERE;  \"  \n\n6. NAJMUNNISSA    Y\nWIFE OF'ALLA\"~BAKASH--,_   ~\nAGED YAEOUT 239} \nCHAMRAJPET;'_ A \nDAVANGERE.' . \n\n    AAAAA  ...RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
 ‘(BY  PLI-LANUMANTHAPPA, ADVOCATE
\n  EOEEL3 3 R5 3 6)<\/p>\n
  U\/8.378(1) 3; (3) CR.P.C. BY THE spp<\/p>\n
 “”‘”E?’OR THE STATE’ PRAYING THAT THIS I-ION’BLE COURT MAY<\/p>\n
 PLEASED’ TO GRANT LEAVE TO FILE AN APPEAL<\/p>\n
:.”.AGA{NST THE JUDGMENT DT.15.9.2001 PASSED BY THE
\n 4JMFC.’,”‘~._(II COURT), CHITRADURGA IN cc NO.721\/96
\n AcQUm’1NG THE RESPONDENT\/ACCUSED FOR THE
\nA  ___OFFE3NCES U\/S.498(A) R\/W 341pc, SE03 3 4 OF’ D.P. ACT<\/p>\n
3 .13;\/w– 34 IPC, 323 R\/W 34 IPC AND 504 R\/W 34 IPC.<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
4 CRL.A.NO.l 1 OF 2002<\/p>\n
additional dowry of Rs.20,000\/-. The mother of Asha Begum
\nwas not allowed to meet their daughter. PW–l was abused in
\nfilthy language. Therefore, mother of Asha Begum PW–l<\/p>\n
lodged complaint before the police.  up\n<\/p>\n
3. The prosecution has examined in all PW–1 <\/p>\n
got marked EX.Pl to P6. The defence of the accuseclgislv’ <\/p>\n
total denial. Neither the vxritnessesvvurlere’  any 7<\/p>\n
documents were produced on behalf of accus.ed;’ A’<\/p>\n
4. Thejflrial’ of materials on record
\nhas passedthe “acquittal. Aggrieved by the same<\/p>\n
the present   filed  the State.\n<\/p>\n
  lrieardxthearguments addressed by the learned<\/p>\n
 Pleader and the learned counsel for<\/p>\n
T  “the respondent accused. The learned HCGP submitted that<\/p>\n
”  Trial C.ourt has committed error in passing the impugned<\/p>\n
 judgrn.en*’t. Though there are sufficient materials placed on<\/p>\n
5 CRL.A.N0.l 1 OF 2002<\/p>\n
record, the Trial Court has not appreciated them properly.
\nThe learned counsel for the respondent accused has<\/p>\n
supported the impugned judgment.\n<\/p>\n
6. The point that arises for my consideration:.~\u00abis\u00a7<\/p>\n
the Trial Court has committed any illegality..i,nf~pas.sing <\/p>\n
impugned judgment calling for interference ‘<\/p>\n
finding on the point is in th’e-.___negatiike <\/p>\n
reasons.\n<\/p>\n
7. This:v’dise'”a”c:a;’s_e ‘recorded by the Trial Court.
\nAgainst the;-J-ijdgment’.V the Appellate Court should<\/p>\n
be slow. in reversing “L-he’ll said judgment unless serious<\/p>\n
l:o1\u00a5.”ipeii’vpersit$\/hellish’pointed out in the judgment “passed<\/p>\n
by T<\/p>\n
he 4,8;  ..  the informant and mother of Asha Begum. PW~<\/p>\n
.?l”are the son, husband and daughter of informant PW–l.<\/p>\n
it  Ramiza Bi and PW–6 Sabiha Banu are the eye<\/p>\n
T<\/p>\n
6 CRL.A.NO.1 1 OF 2002<\/p>\n
witnesses, PW–‘7 Syed Shoukath Ali is the Government Khazi
\nwho is said to have performed the marriage of A-4 and-PTWW4.
\nPW–8 Gurusiddappa is a panch witness to <\/p>\n
rnahazar.\n<\/p>\n
9. PW–1 and 3 are the parents_ of  Beg1Vivrrri.’..<\/p>\n
deposed about the demand of  and  giving dowry
\nand the demand made by;…_t};e a-cc1;.sed.v_perusons. “The evidence
\nof PW—4 corroborates the  her PW–5 & 6<\/p>\n
who are said to_1:3e t;tie__.r1ei’ghours_ have riot; supported the case<\/p>\n
of the prosbecutiiufl. 33:’; hav_eWturned hostiie and their
\nevidence isof no asVsis_taneeiA”tovthe prosecution. PW–7 who is<\/p>\n
said to be the  performed the marriage of A-4<\/p>\n
 PW–a4*-as “per the\ufb02wcase of the prosecution, has admitted<\/p>\n
thdatimarriage of A-4 and PW–4, he was not the<\/p>\n
 but hisiather was the Khazi. Therefore, his evidence<\/p>\n
34.asVw_”regiards”‘the dowry received by the accused persons is not<\/p>\n
   and it cannot be believed. Ex.P3 & P4 are said to<\/p>\n
T -be”‘the letters written by PW–4 to PW~\u00bb3 regarding the i11-<\/p>\n
*3<\/p>\n
7 CRL.A.NO.i 1 OF 2002<\/p>\n
treatment meted out to her. It is admitted by PW–3 in his
\nevidence that the address on the said letters is writtenby the<\/p>\n
hand of PW–3 himself. Besides it is found that  of<\/p>\n
these two ltters did not give clear picture of  <\/p>\n
said to have been meted out to  on  if<\/p>\n
that cc No.1167\/96 filed by A–p4 Sabjan Sab’..”agai1’1svt*: W\/;i1.op<\/p>\n
and others was pending between\ufb01lthe pai\ufb01tiesf  has also
\ncome out in the evidence.”‘~of toi3W–4  there was
\ndifference of opinion between theacciisedfpersonsf and PW-1<\/p>\n
to 4. In View  I31ate;\ufb01al;s”;V.\\ itis difficult to believe<\/p>\n
the theoryfof out to PW–4 and the<\/p>\n
demand ofid  as  ~ . Q’\n<\/p>\n
10. As regar.ds_the.’ offences punishable u\/s 323 & 504<\/p>\n
sthougljg’theievidence\u00abO.f..P’WS–1 to 4 speaks of the same, in the<\/p>\n
absence. po’f__an’_’y-. in-dependent evidence, their evidence cannot<\/p>\n
 cube relield upon to come to the conclusion that accused<\/p>\n
 have coinrnitted offences punishable u \/ s 323 8: 504 IPC.<\/p>\n
T<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court State By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009 Author: L.Narayana Swamy ;o’ “H CRL.A.NO.E E OF 2002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS ON THE 17TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2009 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE LNARAYANA A’ CRIMINAL APPEAL […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29529","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nState By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-10T14:59:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\\\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-10T14:59:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":724,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009\",\"name\":\"State By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\\\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-10T14:59:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\\\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-10T14:59:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-10T14:59:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009"},"wordCount":724,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009","name":"State By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-10T14:59:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-by-psi-chitradurga-kote-ps-vs-h-peer-sab-so-abdul-khadar-sab-on-17-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State By Psi Chitradurga Kote Ps vs H Peer Sab S\/O Abdul Khadar Sab on 17 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29529","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29529"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29529\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29529"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29529"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29529"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}