{"id":29589,"date":"2008-11-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008"},"modified":"2017-09-25T15:42:35","modified_gmt":"2017-09-25T10:12:35","slug":"k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 14425 of 2008(P)\n\n\n1. K.V.HASEENA,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. K.V.MEHBOOB,PALIYALIYIL HOUSE,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA,REP. BY SECRETARY TO\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION\n\n3. DISTRICT EUDCATIONAL OFFICER,WANDOOR.\n\n4. ASSISTANT EDUCATRIONAL OFFICER,AREECODE,\n\n5. MANAGER,M.K.K.H.M.A.U.P.SCHOOL,\n\n6. K.K.RAJEENA,M.K.K.H.M.A.U.P.SCHOOL,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.V.A.MUHAMMED\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.SAMSUDIN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC\n\n Dated :07\/11\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                     ANTONY DOMINIC, J\n\n    -----------------------------------------------------------\n                    W.P.(C).No.14425\/2008\n    -----------------------------------------------------------\n           Dated this the 7th day of November, 2008\n\n\n                           JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>     Petitioners are the children of late K.V. Moosa, who was<\/p>\n<p>an Arabic teacher in the school, of which the 5th respondent<\/p>\n<p>is the Manager. Sri. Moosa expired on 18.5.1996. In June,<\/p>\n<p>1996, the first petitioner, one of the daughters of Late<\/p>\n<p>Moosa,   was appointed as Arabic Teacher in the school.<\/p>\n<p>That appointment was approved.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2. Long thereafter, in February, 2006, another vacancy<\/p>\n<p>arose in the school. It is stated that the second petitioner,<\/p>\n<p>an youngest son of late Moosa moved an application before<\/p>\n<p>the 4th respondent, who in turn issued Ext.P2 directing the<\/p>\n<p>Manager to appoint the 2nd petitioner extending the benefit<\/p>\n<p>of Rule 51-B Chapter XIV-A KER. In the meanwhile, the 6th<\/p>\n<p>respondent was appointed in the vacancy that arose in June,<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Wp(c).No.14425\/08          2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2006 and the approval of appointment sought for was<\/p>\n<p>declined by the AEO as per Ext.P3. The Manager pursued<\/p>\n<p>the matter in appeal before the DEO who            by Ext.P4<\/p>\n<p>confirmed Exts.P2 and P3.The DPI also confirmed the orders<\/p>\n<p>passed by the Subordinate Officers as per Ext.P5.<\/p>\n<p>      3. The Manager thereupon filed a revision before the<\/p>\n<p>Government and that resulted in Ext.P6. By Ext.P6, the<\/p>\n<p>Government allowed the revision and took the view that the<\/p>\n<p>first petitioner was appointed extending the benefit of rule<\/p>\n<p>51-B Chapter XIV-A KER and that with that appointment,<\/p>\n<p>the Manager discharged his obligation under the Rule and<\/p>\n<p>therefore there was no substance in the claim raised by the<\/p>\n<p>2nd petitioner for appointment under Rule 51-B Chapter<\/p>\n<p>XIV-A KER. It was directed that the 6th respondent&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>appointment made as early as in 2006 shall be approved.<\/p>\n<p>Contending that Ext.P6 order was passed without notice to<\/p>\n<p>the first petitioner, she filed Ext.P7 review before the<\/p>\n<p>Government and thereafter filed this writ petition praying to<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Wp(c).No.14425\/08           3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>quash Ext.P6 and directing the 5th respondent to grant<\/p>\n<p>appointment to the 2nd petitioner under Rule 51-B, Chapter<\/p>\n<p>XIV-A KER.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4. Learned counsel for the writ petitioners may<\/p>\n<p>contended that the Government itself had stayed          the<\/p>\n<p>operation of Rule 51-B chapter XIV-A KER       and that this<\/p>\n<p>continued until the said order of stay was lifted with effect<\/p>\n<p>from 16.1.1997. Therefore the claim of the Manager that in<\/p>\n<p>June 1996, the the first petitioner was appointed under rule<\/p>\n<p>51-B is unsustainable. It is also their case that the<\/p>\n<p>procedures laid down for appointment under rule 51-B<\/p>\n<p>Chapter XIV-A KER have not been complied with. It is<\/p>\n<p>therefore stated that the claim that the appointment was<\/p>\n<p>made under rule 51-B is devoid of merit. It is also his case<\/p>\n<p>that the first petitioner had ceased to be the dependent of<\/p>\n<p>the deceased by virtue of her marriage in 1990 and<\/p>\n<p>therefore the appointment was not under Rule 51-B but was<\/p>\n<p>a regular appointment. It is stated that this could not<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Wp(c).No.14425\/08           4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>deprive the second petitioner, of his entitlement for the<\/p>\n<p>benefit of Rule 51-B. Counsel also placed reliance on the<\/p>\n<p>Division Bench judgment in S.N.G.S High School V. Raj<\/p>\n<p>Sagar(2008(1)KLT 1026) and contended that as an when a<\/p>\n<p>vacancy arose it was the obligation of the Manager to offer<\/p>\n<p>appointment to the rightful claimant under Rule 51B Chapter<\/p>\n<p>XIV-A KER and that this obligation is not diluted even if an<\/p>\n<p>application is not made by the claimant.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5. Respondents 5 and 6, the Manager and the Teacher<\/p>\n<p>contested the claim of the petitioner.  According to the 5th<\/p>\n<p>respondent Manager, Rule 51-B Chapter XIV-A KER created<\/p>\n<p>a statutory liability on the manager to provide employment<\/p>\n<p>assistance to a dependent of the deceased teacher. It is<\/p>\n<p>stated that the Rule was in the statute book as early as from<\/p>\n<p>March, 1990 and the executive order issued by the<\/p>\n<p>Government could not have affected its efficacy. It is stated<\/p>\n<p>that     the first petitioner was appointed on 3.6.1996<\/p>\n<p>extending the benefit of compassionate appointment and<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Wp(c).No.14425\/08          5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>that this appointment was approved and the fact that the<\/p>\n<p>appointment was under the compassionate category is<\/p>\n<p>mentioned in the service book. It was stated that during the<\/p>\n<p>hearing of the revision, this fact was disclosed to the<\/p>\n<p>Government and the service book and a certificate to that<\/p>\n<p>effect was also produced. Yet another contention raised by<\/p>\n<p>the Manager is that the first petitioner is not aggrieved by<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P6 and that irrespective of Ext.P6 her service in the<\/p>\n<p>school continues undisturbed     and therefore she has no<\/p>\n<p>locus standi to challenge Ext.P6. Yet another plea that is<\/p>\n<p>raised is that the second petitioner has not so far made any<\/p>\n<p>application for appointment and that even according to him<\/p>\n<p>the claim raised was before the AEO.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6. I have considered the submissions made by both<\/p>\n<p>sides. The only question that arises for consideration is<\/p>\n<p>whether the appointment of the first petitioner can be said<\/p>\n<p>to be one under Rule 51-B Chapter XIV-A KER. Admittedly<\/p>\n<p>the Rule inserted in the statute book with effect from 3rd<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Wp(c).No.14425\/08          6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>March, 1990. Irrespective of     the effect of the executive<\/p>\n<p>order suspending the rule, the fact remains that soon after<\/p>\n<p>the death occurred on 18.5.1996, the first petitioner was<\/p>\n<p>appointed in the School with effect from 3.6.1996. This<\/p>\n<p>appointment was also approved. It is also to be noticed that<\/p>\n<p>no other dependent of the deceased teacher has raised any<\/p>\n<p>claim in this behalf so far. It is stated in Ext.P6 that, it is<\/p>\n<p>noted in the service book of the first petitioner that the<\/p>\n<p>appointment is a compassionate appointment and that she<\/p>\n<p>is the only qualified member in the family. The fact that<\/p>\n<p>appointment was under compassionate ground is also<\/p>\n<p>certified by the AEO.     Therefore, the fact remains that<\/p>\n<p>irrespective of the efficacy     or otherwise of Rule 51-B<\/p>\n<p>Chapter XIV-A KER, the first petitioner was appointed<\/p>\n<p>extending      the benefit of   compassionate    employment<\/p>\n<p>scheme. If that be so, having regard to the fact that the<\/p>\n<p>employment assistance was once extended to the family at<\/p>\n<p>the time when it was in distress and enjoyed by the first<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Wp(c).No.14425\/08            7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>petitioner, in my view, it is not open to the first petitioner to<\/p>\n<p>contend that at the time when she was appointed, she had<\/p>\n<p>ceased to be a dependent of the deceased, and therefore<\/p>\n<p>the employment should not be counted as one under the<\/p>\n<p>compassionate employment category. Therefore, I find no<\/p>\n<p>illegality in the order impugned. Writ Petition fails and is<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Now that, by Ext.P6 the appointment of the 6th<\/p>\n<p>respondent is ordered to be approved, needless to say that<\/p>\n<p>he will be entitled to all consequential benefits.<\/p>\n<p>                                ANTONY DOMINIC<br \/>\n                                    JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>vi.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">Wp(c).No.14425\/08    8<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 14425 of 2008(P) 1. K.V.HASEENA, &#8230; Petitioner 2. K.V.MEHBOOB,PALIYALIYIL HOUSE, Vs 1. STATE OF KERALA,REP. BY SECRETARY TO &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION 3. DISTRICT EUDCATIONAL OFFICER,WANDOOR. 4. ASSISTANT EDUCATRIONAL OFFICER,AREECODE, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-25T10:12:35+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-25T10:12:35+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1110,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008\",\"name\":\"K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-25T10:12:35+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-25T10:12:35+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-25T10:12:35+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008"},"wordCount":1110,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008","name":"K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-25T10:12:35+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-v-haseena-vs-state-of-kerala-on-7-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.V.Haseena vs State Of Kerala on 7 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29589"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29589\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}