{"id":30310,"date":"2009-06-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009"},"modified":"2015-01-10T01:18:05","modified_gmt":"2015-01-09T19:48:05","slug":"sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 29 June, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 29 June, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.K.Patil<\/div>\n
IN THE 11161} CQURT OF \u00a7{AR2\"~iATAKA AT EANGALGRIE W.P.}--\u00a7::s.\u00a78l84 OF 2839\n3\n\nN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED 'mas THE 29\"' DAY OF JUNE, \nassess    % u\nTHE HON'BL.E Ma, .3UST_\u00a3C;.E>__\u00a74.K7--F\u00a5AT\u00a7i','_~;v.  %\n\nwan' ysrrrmn i'Io.18184 A0: 2:59  \n\nBETW BEN:\n\n32: RAMESH A\ufb01HAR':\"\n3:9' A.'\\iNA\u00a3AH ACHARY\nAGES ABOUT 49's'EA$7i\u00a7-3, A\nREA? DQOR NO. 4-:55_  ,\nAGAFEAEDANDE House; i\ufb01zaaa   .\nNEAR OVERHEA5 WATER 'gmx 1\nKUTEr~iYARViL!_AGE    _ A\nUC}L3P%TA;.L}\u00a7:{ AND agsrazcf;  \n\n2  , 1. =- '   PETiTi{}NEFi\n\ngay S\ufb01 ; Paasagmagg 5%: %\u00a7%kAm-mgxg  \n\nANS; _ V  b _ _\n1 T:\u00ab%:r.:s':* I5' ::;_=' ':~\u00a2\u00a7\u00e9R\u00bb:A\"-2f{;\u00a7<A"'\nREP;er;,3\u00a35:TEa B'%' \u00a3TSSEECFs';ETARY\n_ DEPAR?\u00a5s\u20ac&"3'\u20ac\u00a5",,\u00a3'F REVENUE\n :v:$aa.:::.c::m::333\"';'=:?:c:\"\n  \n\nTHE? I-'_s$jS\u00e9STANT EXECU VE '{;\";%x\u00a3Gif\\\u00a3EE\u00a3R\n\n' P\"--'iv' E?' PQRT 8: E{'~%3'ERNAL WATER TR!-'%.N3PC2RT\n*~-'SUE G%'=JiS\u00a7GN\nSE39?\n\n\u00a399.'\n\n   mg EQLETHYAR GRAMA PAN{2HA\"{'ATH\n\nA RE? BY HS SECRETARY\n\u00a7~\u00a7A'v'Ei'~K3 W3 C)FF\u20ac'a3E AT K%.JT\\'AR 'JILLAGE\n\u00a5J\u00a7U\u00a7:'i TALUK \/-'$38 E}i$TR\u00a3{3T\n\n '\u00a7'\u00a7i\ufb01W\u00a7\ufb01U\u00e9\u00e9 \u00e9;3\u20ac}L\u00a7i{1\"Q1~=' K.-5:\u00a73.i\"=:':%'i}%.biA A'? 2~s};E~\u00a72\"{3;~.:,L:;:;:\u00bb:: v+.:.p.2=2o. :g\u00a7\u00e9}\u00a7_rf:E\u00ab' 2:329\n\n\n\nLN THEE IEIGIE COURT OF i\u00e9\ufb01i-i}~3ATAKA AT BAERTLALOILE 's?J.P.Ne. 1 81852 O? 299'?\nQ ,\n\nA\n\n5 EMT SHRNGARE {'3 HEGSE\nWK}; PANDURANGA HEGBE\nRGED ABGUT 58 YEARS\nRSAT \"JA\u00a3,r\"-'s{3E's\":.7Tl5'-\"' KUTYAR VELLAGE\n':J$U\"r\"-'E TALUK AND 'GKSTRET\n\n {gigs-\u00e9i>N::E\u00a7\u00e9T\u00e9 '  K \" \n\n{By Sri : NB. VESHNANATH, AGA FOR R'! T'{;IYR3'}\n\n9&1'\n\n\"mzswan s:v\u00a7'r:\":*:e:=: as FtLE\u00a7,'.:-%,}\u00a3*dSE\u00a7'%?3\u00a7RF%CLE\u00a3~:V'i52?$f\u00a2;VN{} 2212?\u00bb\nmg CQNSTETUTEGN oar tum pRAar::~:<3 "re. CEHASH '?\u00ab%E"QRDER V\n\n\u00a33T3E$.$.C2Q,Pi&SSEa BY mg R3: T\u00a7:%.\u00a3Ez._Q<}PY wH%$H*;3-'PR-ecucaa AT\ngums. ma Ti) GERECT THE RE$?{.2s3_DE\u00a3\u00a7E1"S NQT._TQ Evgcr THE\nPETFHONER mom THE ::w,ELL:N<3 H{1%,.,J3E"B\u20acARIN<3 new NQ4-155\n{GL8 :~so.4u:3sg AS %g1Er~\u00a7TtC3%x\u00a7Ef\u00a7--3 zgxzwug VLE~."\u00e9_'TE\u00a7?Z<DT'1Q.6L\u00a33Q, 2:223:53 3*;\nTHE R4; mug cow GF WHECH as 9Rc:3uvcEc:M.Aram;--a.\n\nms WRET r*?*.-:.T:T2or;4Awa:a:x:z\u00a7sa;<\u00a7 ';:~:_{=\u00e9;:s%\u00a7 Pf\u00e9'2e:L:\u00e9%.\u00ab::\u00a2Ai~2~( HEARRJG,\n'saga 3.90:1 we Q\u00a7.'3L\u00a7\u00a5\u00a7T\"*-MASLE THE_\u00a7aL:,ow;:4;3: 5\n\n  % %%;%kA_5.4~'1I-38] as mentioned in tha zetter dated '\u00a5Q*\"'\ufb01\"\".';3.une\u00b0:\n\n2809, iasued by the feurth mspancient, true 5393*. \n\nis preducad at Armexure D.\n\n3. The un\u00e9isputed facts  thg jC:%a\u00e9\u20ac\u00a7\n\nfifth respondent hef\u20ac=:it'1  hgd  fii\u00a7\u00e9d <\/pre>\n
f\\io.6828z’2009 . The sgsd wriiv:4_\u00a7;:iii\u00a7r:_f: \u00a7\u00a7asVVl_&j\u00a7pV\u00a7?$ad cavf by
\nthis Court by its erder”%’:%\u00e9%\u00a7\u00e9a:e\u00e9%%1 ccpy of which
\n353 pro\ufb01uced at  Tir\ufb01s Court
\nwhiie  V;g’%~v:e \u00a7;;tiar2, directed the
\nre$pci%::u?’\u00a7\u00e9Vaji\u00a7;’3__v   ‘  Vtiizg\ufb01sidei” the re presentatian
\nsubmefte\ufb01-bg  dated 30*’ September 2008<\/p>\n
and’d\u00a7s;f;\u20ac3:\u00a7a..,\u00a2f~\u00e9ha ‘s\u00e9\ufb01rss, in asasrdance with iaw as<\/p>\n
 $;c \u00a73a\ufb015’i%\u00a7m.._\u00a7$$g as pasgibie, at any rate, within 3 periad sf<\/p>\n
   ihe data af receipt 3%’ the said erder after<\/p>\n
a%?i:r:di’\u00e9j\u00a7’vf’:ea$onabie cppertun\u00e9ty ta peiiticner and fifth<\/p>\n
 .. “:’e::;\u00a7\u00e9\u00e9”dent_ in mmpi\u00e9arme 3f the direc\ufb01oh imaged by this<\/p>\n
 the third raspandent hag taken up the matter an\ufb01<\/p>\n
igsued the impugned cammunica\ufb01on dated 18%’ Jane<\/p>\n
\u00a7;\u00a7~?:*:r:2\u00ab; \u00a7<:2<.\u00a7\u00e9 f;f{}i.\u00a7R.'%f 413% \u00a7<.;*\u00ab}_\u00a7\u00e9.:~\u00a7:.\u00e9x"a',s*a\u00a7;%;:*\u00a7: M .e\u00bb;,a.z\u00a7.?\u00e9;;.a.L9<\/p>\n
Eh? TEE E1161} CETQLE T , i? \u00a7{AI~i?\u00bb\u00a7’A'{‘AKA AT B ?”~E\u20acZ1;’~’iLOIi33 ‘S-4\u00a5.:\u00a7\u00a3>}’EiC5.\u00a78\u00a7$5*’: SF 2609
\nW 1%-\n<\/p>\n
QQQQ saiiing upan the petiticzmf ta vacate v’\u00a7\u00a7*\u00e9\u00a7”‘\u00bb?.\u00a7jn-<\/p>\n
authorized occzupat\u00e9en within 23″‘: June H<\/p>\n
aggrieved by the impugned communica%\u00a7;*:z;i’::j~d:a”%}\u00a7:\u00e9d.A’%’Qi5*~. <\/p>\n
June QGDS and seeking appmpriiate <\/p>\n
presented this peti\ufb01on.\n<\/p>\n
1+. E iwave heard \u00a7ear–$\u00e9’d..cz*;\u00a7;1n\u00a7\u00e9i’–\u00a7’.\u00a73%3E\u00a7\u00e9r\u00a7r’*sg fa?
\npetitiener arsci iearraeefi Advacate
\nappearing fog”\n<\/p>\n
5.   1:53 maferiai an reccf\ufb01,
\nit emgz-\u00a7*g\u00e9sA’V;the direc\ufb01ens i$$z3ed by
\nhis c;A”cs;f:\u00ab ..20:09 passed in Writ Pet\u00e9ticn<\/p>\n
z~sa,6a23;2\u00a7a9 k%;:%-.::a%% 532 fi\ufb01h -regpandeni against ihe<\/p>\n
 – \u00a7\u00e9i\u00a7tibf3’*er \u00e9ryd c?\u00a7*2\u00e9%\u00e9 , ihe ihirci regpende\ufb01t has issue\ufb01 the<\/p>\n
   \ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01municatien dated ‘ESE’ Jana 2039 v\u00e9de<\/p>\n
A\ufb01\ufb01exigre-.i\u20ac\u00a7. $3′: the sa\u00e9\u00e9 cammam\u00e9zsa\ufb01a\ufb01, ii is Siam ‘ that<\/p>\n
  \u00a7.s1,s_;p\u00e9t\u00e9’hf asking Em pe\u00e9\u00e9iiomr Ea ciear we agnaut\u00e9sm\ufb01zed<\/p>\n
“‘;’%”.\u00a7i\u00a7i’2\u00a7\u00a7f’i:**:g put esp by him, he has mt c\u00e9aared the same. \u00a7f<\/p>\n
V’ “\ufb01etii\u00e9sz\u00e9sar has get anyth\u00e9r\u00e9g ta gay’ regarding \ufb01\ufb01\u00e9 game’ he<\/p>\n
2%\u00bb;  E-\u00e9i\u20ac;;?\u00a7~\u00a7 r;5:_::z__.:R’:’ i;%i–‘ siA\u00a7\u00e9’\u00a7\u20ac:”}\u00a7’E”}{};}5\u00a5;gafiE%:2.\ufb01:s;a:&:_:\u00a72,2s ‘==3:.;=z~=:::41g2x;: LEE-‘ Mm<\/p>\n
 “gm: EH43}:  \u00a321?   25:’ 13.m:mL0:e3: *9-.:’J:*.\u00a7\u00e9e.28: 3.: :32′? 2%?
\nQ<\/p>\n
can \ufb01e: 33 as eariy as poss\u00e9bie game the gaid _4:a=;s:,,:f?;-%?3_f\u20ac\u00a7r.\u00a7;’\u00a3y<\/p>\n
hag it} ‘EQKE 3 decision within eight weeks as:;’;VQr’d::\u00e9;*5\u00e9tdT\u00ab  ~<\/p>\n
this Cmirf in the eari\u00e9er rcxun\u00e9i .r3f~ i.\u00a7i4iga\u20ac\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9ii 2.%\u00a7d ‘f:,i.%”3\u00a7\u00a776\u00a5TT <\/p>\n
dimcted the peiiiiener ta dear ih\u00e9\u00abu\u00e9*T;\u00e9:;2%%*:f.V’5i\u00a5\u00b0i;:\u00a7”ia;E’e._<\/p>\n
w\ufb01hin 23″~” June 2999. i\ufb01st\u00e9\u00e9a af.V.rapEy\u00a7r:\u00a7i;; %3:2: f%s”e’V$aid”‘<\/p>\n
communicatien, pe\u20ac\u00a7%ie%:e r ha\u00a7W;:;e’\u00e9$g%’\ufb01ga* ih\u00a3$”writ pefi\ufb01an<\/p>\n
Eherefare, \ufb021\u00a7sVw:’it amsiained ms’
\n\u00a7\u20ac:iit\u00e9a\ufb01e:* i13$”t1?’:\u00a7g2s*}i$   is cangider {ha
\nrei\u00e9ef  ihfrit pe\ufb01t\u00e9cbn ‘\ufb02ied by
\n\u00a73et\u00a7ti5:v\u00a7%:jer__V\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a7Ai*:iif$:\u00a7\u00a7r:z%\u00e9\u00a7  3 gw\u00e9jregiion \ufb01g petiiiez\u00e9er \ufb01g fiig
\n:*e\u00a7\u00a5y i:c   \u00a7vvf;\u00a5”‘iVf\u00a7’\u00a35’i+\u00a3\u00e9.y%\u00a7.\u00a7:’;V’\u00a7%:”‘-%’._; {)L3%’?\u00a7’?’\u00a7i3E3\u00a7C8’\u00a7\ufb01?”i dated 33%’: June<\/p>\n
 izisie A\ufb01’rge\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7,;\u00a7*e ?~\u00a7 bafsziara \ufb01ve \ufb01z\u00e9rd resg3c\u00a7:<3*e.:%i am<\/p>\n
\u00bbihe_:?:\u00a7.s%\u00a7\u00ab.m${\u00a7Q;f2z:i<a:*s\u20ac is \u00e9irecfg\u00e9 to receive $23 sama arz\ufb01<\/p>\n
gs-3$';:*~:~:' 3\u00a7::\u00a7?j\u00e9:rg\u00a7{r\u00e9\u00e9f& \u00e9f\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9f in acmrda\ufb01ae with \u00a7aw a\ufb01zsr<\/p>\n
ai%r3;:?:\u00a7.\u00a7\u00a7ig_ vraagansb\u00e9e e\ufb01pa\ufb01un\ufb01y ta pefiiimer am<\/p>\n
{_* ;=e\u00a7\u00a7:3~;ff:nd\u00e9nis 4 3:36 5 and \ufb01\u00e9gpam mf as expe\ufb01\u00e9iinug\u00e9y ag<\/p>\n
  ..\u00a7.':\u00a7.4:\u00a7-i:;\u00a7;\u00a7….'\u00a7,::%\u00e91,.3 {.25 \u00a7<;.:*a3<.r\u00a7s':\u00e9%;"\u00e9Ti\u00a5\u00e9{\u00e9:\u00a7.\ufb02 A7'z7'b::;_;g1:e\u00a7;=a\u00a7e;\u00a3 2A;\\y_=*~e:a; 2 352:: {:24 22%:<\/p>\n
5&3 TE '=" Eii\ufb02ii \u20ac;',{I5\u00a3\u00a7{'i" Q}? E<LA.,R}=\u00a7_z%'{'A3<'lA AT BAEKSALORIE W. 330.1838-'\u00a5 OF 2809<\/p>\n
U<\/p>\n
6: Learned Adciiti\ufb01nai Government Advmate is
\npa:'mit\u00b0t\u00e9:c:1 ta \ufb01ie memo sf appearance an  :31'
\nrespondents 'i be 3 within three weeks frem t{_;:;fi'a*}\u00a7=.;  _<\/p>\n
V   *    %<\/p>\n
BMV*<\/p>\n
\u00a7';$M:.\u00a7"'.\ufb01\u00a7'i.ii Hfigiii C5313 an =2}? \u00a7\u00ab\u20ac:\u00e9a\u00a7\u20ac.?4.A.'E'_4%}<.A .\u00e9\u00a7'E\u00a7}*\u00a7;ra:<3.~*s \u00a7.\u20ac,}\u00a3%?.\u00a3\u00a3 w_m2e.mix:z aw 2?\u00a7\u00e9{r<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 29 June, 2009 Author: N.K.Patil IN THE 11161} CQURT OF \u00a7{AR2″~iATAKA AT EANGALGRIE W.P.}–\u00a7::s.\u00a78l84 OF 2839 3 N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED ‘mas THE 29″‘ DAY OF JUNE, assess % u THE HON’BL.E Ma, .3UST_\u00a3C;.E>__\u00a74.K7–F\u00a5AT\u00a7i’,’_~;v. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-09T19:48:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 29 June, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-09T19:48:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009\"},\"wordCount\":715,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-09T19:48:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 29 June, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-09T19:48:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 29 June, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-09T19:48:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009"},"wordCount":715,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009","name":"Sri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its ... on 29 June, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-09T19:48:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-ramesh-achary-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-rep-by-its-on-29-june-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Ramesh Achary vs The State Of Karnataka Rep By Its … on 29 June, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30310"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30310\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}