{"id":30363,"date":"2009-07-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-05-21T18:40:58","modified_gmt":"2017-05-21T13:10:58","slug":"vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Vijaya Bank (A Body Corporate … vs M\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Vijaya Bank (A Body Corporate … vs M\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar And Gowda<\/div>\n
-1-\n\nIN THE HIEH comm\" or KARNATA KA A3\" 2AN6ALo:22\nomen THIS we 22% my OF JULY, . \nPRESENT  V  K E V\nTHE HCZNBLE    \nAND.' \u00e9     '   %\nTHE :-to:xr3a.E MR.JL}5TICEg\u00a7J{E\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7U\ufb01\u00a7{\u00a7P--#\u00e9LV;\u00a7 g\u00e9iawoa\n;2,F,A. \u00a7JC+,s3'S\/aim \n;:s;::*1'w:<:e;N:     1   \n\n(A bo\u00e9}? cc\u00e9rpoxiate <:\u20ac\u00a7):1:i' 3:5 kirajaches-~::-\u00a35 'Gand1:1i Bazaar\n\n ' Rep.1\u00bb;_y' its GPA imlder and\n ';}s'\u00a3a1;ag;\u00e9;:.'i\ufb01\/E.;*X.\u00a7'oonac3na .. APPELLANT\n\n    Decors Pvt. Ltd.\n\n' Ba\ufb01gai\u00e9re -4 \" \u00ab \n\n{By'~S:ri ,i;s.'i*A:;t;\u00a7t;etty, Adv.,}\n\nE Reg.{)f\u00a3icc # IE3 Haudin Road\n7 Bangaicre-42\n\nR313. by its Directcm \u00bb\n\\;\u00bb\/\n\n \n\n\n\n2, Udayamini Biiergde\nW7 0. B. 8. Fiegde\nMajor, # 166, 3\"' Cross\nHanumant Nagar   ..\nBat1ga}0re-- 3.9 I\n\n3. Santhosh, iztkiegde\nS\/a.B.B.Hcgde\n34 years\nDimctor   V\nM] s.S11khi Decors  Ltd. \"  j'\n#15, Haudin Road\"-.  _   j\nBaI1gaIort:~4i2. T  \"\n4. C.A.Sa.kthrid_ \" _\nBangalgr\u00e9r.-\u00ab=32 '  ' . \n5. 1:'._.1:s.Hcg'ci?e_--v     . _'\nSf.0.;*3;na11thy_jL*;3\u20ac S}:!,efty \" __\nMagm'#:5\u00e9s,_3ui'Crc\u00a7m\"'\u00ab \"\nHantnzgaxzt Nagaii \" '  \n, B.a1:1gal\u00e9rt:~1'9 = '- .. \u00a7ESF'ONDENTS\n\n  is \ufb01led under Order 4} Rule 1 r\/W. Section\n9:'; efV__fE}1\u00bb'f3.f\"against the judgment and decree dated 28.5.2001\npa3S:':d i-in (.}.8.P~i0.142'7\/2996 by the\" mix Aciditjonal City\n\n AA Civ\ufb02 Judge, Bangalore, partly decreeing the suit \ufb01led by the\n ._ Vaipfje\ufb02antj piaintiff for money as against\n\n\\a\/\"\n\n \n\n\n\n  its registemd o\ufb01icc at New Timber\n  \ufb01angajore. Defezidanis 2 to .3 are\n\n _ the  of the first defenda.nt-c0mpan3:. 4th\n\n.1 , H  was the Director of the company and h\u00e9\n\n.'.'T&'_.r\u00e9s\u00a7 g1i\u00e9d \ufb01am the Directsrshig of the coI:z1pan\u00a7: in the\n\nxwespondent\/de\ufb01andani No.1 and dismissing the  as\n\nagainst respondents] defendants 2 ts 5-V<\/pre>\n
‘i\u00b0’h;is \u00a3\u20acl*’A coming on for heax\ufb01jg, tnis.day UL, ” ”<\/p>\n
deiivered the followi::1g:–\n<\/p>\n
J\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01
\nThis is the  ~-agg\u00e9inst the judgment
\nand decree of t\u00a3j1_e:  the suit of the<\/p>\n
piaiI1tiff agai:3_i:s4.t\u00ab\u00a7;\u00a7’\u00a3i\u00e9f_7\u20ac:I1E\u00a3saI’it:SV. 2 1495, \u00e9wsbanea by time.<\/p>\n
2._v”1<'or_tj;me  c\u00e9\ufb01v\u00e9r\ufb01ence, the parties are
\nreferz'e\ufb01;t;c$ as'th\u00e9\u00a75:\u00bb3.re v3"T \u20ac f:3–I\u00a7'IT3d to in the: orig"1:1a\u00a3 suit.<\/p>\n
_;3; ,'i'hei  dezfendant is a Private Lixllited<\/p>\n
nleeting of Board Oi? mrectors heid 911 12.3.1990. <\/p>\n
defendant is the guarantor of the first   _,_ A' <\/p>\n
company in respect of the a\u00e9vanee\/f'aei\u00a3ity__ .:s..veIi}ed'–t.:::b}z<\/p>\n
the company. 5th defendant is alse    A ;_e .'<\/p>\n
the first defendant in respect 01' tile tidxteinee
\nthe first (1\u20acf\u20acI"1d8Ilt-C0\ufb02}p81"1y   '\u00a7ee}t1K.':Vf;'\u00a7\\;1e
\nsecond defendant on   \ufb01eiendent and
\nalso her behali' along requested<\/p>\n
 Loan Cash<\/p>\n
the piaimi\ufb01z
\nCredit) faeiitty iet   working Capital
\nrequiremeiet K  ':~V.f;;i:'st'"..tiei"e1'1c.\u00a7ant–compa3:1y for the
\npurpeee of  plastic furr1iture<\/p>\n
of the fi"1f:_\u00a7j=,\u00a7':}:1'ef'ende2*:1~.1*….V::'l'h3e \u00a30.31) was sanctioned. in this<\/p>\n
  defendant executed on demand
\n   \ufb01ettetter of uxzdertaking. an agreemezit
\n  OLCC an hypothecatien of movable
\n  62.7. 198?' in faveur of the piaixlti\ufb01ibank,<\/p>\n
 ._g12e;'e';}teeiI2g the repayment ofthe advance made to the<\/p>\n
T<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
first defendant–compa1}y to the extent of i~\u00a3s.i3,:”i(),4{,}.Qi-J”_\/’>r,_<\/p>\n
{)1} 13.1990, the third defendant is app0i_iH1’te\u20ac\u00a7_’ _<\/p>\n
Additional i)irec’\u00a3or of the c0mpanyV.>AA>VAfter.acijvtiS;:i1\u00e9g the  <\/p>\n
amounts paid by the defendants, :’\u00a3he\u00a7f”a:\u00a3:e  ‘If<\/p>\n
pay a sum of 1<s.9,e9,512e.e';-3.  the"<\/p>\n
statement of aceounfs in %';4ei0 :gea:V,VNo\u00a7S;e?Lf  The
\ndefendants did not    in spite of
\nrepeated requestse\u00e9md   'iiable to pay
\nthe interest at   compoundame
\nquar{erly_    ::,V.715t3\u00bbEerefore, the plaintiff
\nfiled a s\ufb01it for  15 together with<\/p>\n
interest at tBe_r'ate 0f 4V2.};:3:S";\/o p.a. and for a direction to<\/p>\n
.se1\u00a3  iyxjmevaginle A praperties which are hypothecated<\/p>\n
 seczmiy for  _aforesa.id loan amount.<\/p>\n
4… After. \u00e9senriee of summons, defendants 1, 2, 3<\/p>\n
” ” ‘T 5;%f1ie\u20aci—{vritten statement. They coniende\u00e9 that the<\/p>\n
is  by time. The suit is aiso bad for nan\u00bb-<\/p>\n
ljjijemcier of necessary parties. ‘I’hey contended that the<\/p>\n
defendants are stiil due in any amount, they majfhe<\/p>\n
permitted to pay the decretal amount in A’ <\/p>\n
instaixnent of i<Is.5',()U()\/ -.<\/p>\n
E2. on the aforesaici pie3.di1.9ig:s,:1.–'_A_T\u00a5ilr;\u20ac-3  <\/p>\n
framed the Ib\ufb02owing five iSS':1es:_\u00a7<\/p>\n
1. Wheth\u20acr,1’h.;\u00a2 pla’ejiitii;f’ pr\u00e9if\u00e9s the
\nborr0wi:1g ”  \u00a7:”‘     on the
\nguarantee “0’i’- the  ”  4 and<\/p>\n
 \u00e9     Vthc’: piaint as<\/p>\n
   ”  V’<\/p>\n
 ;\u00a7:ajnti:1′:oan;: is entitled
\n  rV\u00e9<;-'._'0\\Ar.:*;:" vtf\ufb01e compound ixlterest at<\/p>\n
tf51\u20ac3v–I;\u00a7t\u20ac \ufb01harged and ciaimeci?<\/p>\n
.:V"-\ufb01izetfler the suit is i3aI'red by<\/p>\n
 '  \ufb01g\ufb01imtion?\n<\/p>\n
” ..  Whether the suit is not maintainabie<\/p>\n
as contended?\n<\/p>\n
-3-<\/span><\/p>\n
5. Whether the defendants are joi;:1tly ~—_,
\nand sev\u00e9ra\ufb02y \ufb01able to pay the su_it.:
\nclaim?  9′<\/p>\n
7. In support of their CJ.3.i.IP;.’,””th\u00a2
\nexamined three witnesses as  7.:\n<\/p>\n
22 documents which are
\nbehalf 9:’ the defez1dants,.zthe  \u20ac.1’V\u00a2ft\u00a7i’\u00a3\u20aciaI1t”iS”{3}:3i:niI1\u20ac:d
\nas DW 1 and they got  ti7;E:;:’ci(\u00a7g\u00a7:{:ir3,:(\u00e911j:s as h3x.1)}<\/p>\n
to D4.\n<\/p>\n
8.  “0n’–.a\u00a7prec:i\u00e9tion of the aforesaid
\nOra} a1}dV”\u00e9Qo\u00a3:u1T1<3iit.?\u00a7iIry 'c31;fi\u20ac:'.\u00a7;i";::e on record categorically<\/p>\n
held that  %deft::fI:d\u00e9.*ji'ts~–"'\u00bbLVhave executed a\ufb02 the suit<\/p>\n
"  and th\u00e9'agreemez1ts. it further held that the<\/p>\n
ge\u00a2a;1j%a: on behalf of the first defendant has<\/p>\n
   exe\u00e9u\u00e9\u00e9d _ ;ac1mowiedgemem: of liability dated<\/p>\n
–.  199{}V__\u20ac3nd therefore in so far as the first defendant<\/p>\n
  V'<j;*<::\u00ab1f;x\u00a7;\u00e9:%;I'1zec\u00a3, the: suit is in tima. it i'1i1*ther hel\u00e9 that the<\/p>\n
  5-ggt\u00e9ment cf accounts shows that as at the end of<\/p>\n
– 9-\n<\/p>\n
Qecember 1992, the defendants are liabie to pay a.:e\u00a71m
\nof 1<s.4,4e,04\u00bb1.15. The plaintiff failed to esta\u00bb'Vl;;\u00a7.l.ii:4\u00e9.V:i91': V.
\nthe defendants are liable ts pay the    '
\nof 21.25% p.a. on the said amoteii
\nsuit. am it held that the % a  by?\n<\/p>\n
defendants is 16.5′:\/o p.a. ‘1’i”\ufb01.e.i*’efere,”‘
\ndeereed the suit for  with
\ninterest at the rate of   1992 up to
\nthe date of     at 16.5.9\/o<\/p>\n
p.a._. but sif}1pi\u20ac:4_”Q{;>weve’:f, ‘it heid that the suit<\/p>\n
agaizlstwivother  dearly barred by ij111i’\u00a3;a1:ion<\/p>\n
and thereiTe.1je .  .die1i1’i\u00a7\u00a75sed the suit against them.<\/p>\n
  by the”dis_m.issa\u00a3 of the suit against the other<\/p>\n
–not deereeing the claim of the plainti\ufb01’<\/p>\n
asg’ g}r\u00a2\u00a33.zed_\u00ab   piain\ufb01\ufb01” has preferred this appeal’.<\/p>\n
  A.  \ufb01earne\u00e9 counsei appearing fer the appeiiam,<\/p>\n
 the impugned judgrzent. and decree, contended<\/p>\n
T ~ the}: as per the statement of accounts a sum ef’<\/p>\n
  \u00bb ‘ \u00ab.t-\u00a7l\u00e9:”s%;_p0I:deI2tS though served, have remained<\/p>\n
“:3,%5:\u00a7\u00e9n\u00a3\u00a7 * j <\/p>\n
uh! if} ..\n<\/p>\n
I~:s.4,4~{),{)41.15 is due from the defendants  \u00a3:g the
\nplaizntiff. The said account was deciarefff
\nparforming account. Hawever, before I\ufb02\ufb01i\u00e9’ \u00abf.?i{
\ninterest is Calcmated and tha{gi\u00e9”I1ew_
\nis arrived at. The interest _ is
\nand then compounded.   th\u00e9
\nQthfii’ defenziants, .    have
\nexecuted the Qeed  is a C01’ltiI11.iiI3.g
\nguarantee  \u00a7\u00e9>a.\u00a71..:V.};fc:cou:1t beixig an
\nOpen   ;;;\u00a7;coi1nt, the guarantee
\nc0:1ti\u00a71ues;’.9f –si1it along with the loan and
\ntheref<:'i;*e  \ufb01committed a serious error in<\/p>\n
disi\ufb01iissing the_ $\u00a71it {:11 the geund of bar of limitation.<\/p>\n
–  ..\n<\/p>\n
11. In the Light cf the aibresaid materiai an rgcofd,
\nthe points that arisg for our consideration in   _<\/p>\n
are as undert-\n<\/p>\n
1) Whether mg *m.%;;:%  % %
\njusuified in n<$L~.:g\ufb01va1*diiig.__int\u00a7;i't:si'~\u00ab;it'
\n21.5% p__.a. and}…\u00a71je3<;3:;<a:\u00a7;:iI1gh't;has:_sf;;5it<\/p>\n
only at th\u00e9rat\u00e9 V 'p:a.?\n<\/p>\n
ii) W_f:e.t11e:f”‘ii:e::’\u00a7’iif:df:1g cf\ufb01sge Court
\n  t.hat .{;he__..Sf_uit VVi:S”‘barred by<\/p>\n
1 _ ‘i;_ti;;e 15 j~’u1$~:i1fi\u00abe;d2>A\u00bb’<\/p>\n
 From’  material on recorci, it is<\/p>\n
ciear that .\u00e9i\u00a7l_ the  productad by the piaintiffs,<\/p>\n
.,:1n s1:.\ufb011p\u00a7;1*t sf  are all duiy executeci by the<\/p>\n
V”._di~\ufb01?512dan:s.%*.._’I’h\u20ac Ageement provides for an ijzterest<\/p>\n
pag\ufb01bie ai  V:*\ufb01te\u00a7\u20ac>.5’\u00a7\/o 13.3. However, the imerest rate<\/p>\n
 Ts_tipulxa:e\u00a7fig_i$ 5% p.a. over the Reserve Bank of India,<\/p>\n
  ‘\u00a7*atA\u00a2VTLi%?ith a minimum interesi of 16.5% pa. an tbs<\/p>\n
 …_ ‘ :&IIi\u00a3)UI’l3Z Of \u00a3_\/- which is the loan faci\ufb01ty gven<\/p>\n
bx\/’<\/p>\n
-13 –\n<\/p>\n
that H.s.4,4U,i)41.1f”> is due as at the end of
\nBecause, the account was treated as not  ,,
\naccount, the interest was not compounded  1
\nand entry is not made in the  j;  . e
\nl:\u00a7\u20acf0}i’C filing of the suit, there i\ufb01 \ufb029th\u00a71\u00a7%’.\/f’  ..
\nthe amount is calculated to  _ a\u00a3  1 of
\n9,623,511-1.3.5.   m\ufb01eed at<\/p>\n
by calculating 2 1.iJ3,’139f’o    it<\/p>\n
is under   is }usu’I’1ed<\/p>\n
\ufb01x decreei1f;g__Vt%1e.\u00a7fVV_i;5s;Ve},4U,041. 15 with<\/p>\n
the admiftlg\ufb02  at 16.5% p.a. from<\/p>\n
1.4. 2992 {iii \u00a3h\u00a2% da1V:Ve._ef1he:_”..;euit. ‘1’heref0re, the finding<\/p>\n
the beI0wve_11__Athis question is in accordance<\/p>\n
x%\u00e9*–i.I:I; V..i\u00e9;=\u00a2~.z  1101; Gail for any interference.<\/p>\n
 hf;  as the suit being barred by time is<\/p>\n
:’iE:ef_\u00a3cert;ed;”-‘ihe suit is fiieci on 25.2.1995. The ioan<\/p>\n
 {macaw is dated err: 293?. The first defendant has<\/p>\n
T egeicuted the aeknewledgements of debt 011 29.5.1990<\/p>\n
it\/e<\/p>\n
-15-<\/span><\/p>\n
ether loans apart from the suit ioan. The <\/p>\n
one and the other defendants stood as __  <\/p>\n
respect of ma said loan   cief\u00e9zlcigagit ‘ T<\/p>\n
\u20acX(i'{:\u00a5Jt&d an acknowledggmgnt \u20ac3\u00e9i”–.   L’
\nE1ft\u20ac1’\ufb02H1itati()I1. Therefore, VC}0:1\u00a7fi”t: -i5AV\ufb023;’:?1\\$V1V:Vit’ied
\ndismissifzg the suit    \u00e9gazinst the
\nsecond defendant    defendants, as
\nthere is no  Therefore, the
\njucignent\u00e9 Q3′   Ig\ufb01fl\u00e9\ufb01ceptionable.\n<\/p>\n
Henc\u00e9i,    in this appeai.\nAccordingly \n\n \n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Vijaya Bank (A Body Corporate … vs M\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009 Author: N.Kumar And Gowda -1- IN THE HIEH comm” or KARNATA KA A3″ 2AN6ALo:22 omen THIS we 22% my OF JULY, . PRESENT V K E V THE HCZNBLE AND.’ \u00e9 ‘ % THE :-to:xr3a.E MR.JL}5TICEg\u00a7J{E\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7U\ufb01\u00a7{\u00a7P–#\u00e9LV;\u00a7 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30363","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVijaya Bank (A Body Corporate ... vs M\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vijaya Bank (A Body Corporate ... vs M\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-21T13:10:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vijaya Bank (A Body Corporate … vs M\\\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-21T13:10:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1409,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Vijaya Bank (A Body Corporate ... vs M\\\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-21T13:10:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vijaya Bank (A Body Corporate … vs M\\\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vijaya Bank (A Body Corporate ... vs M\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vijaya Bank (A Body Corporate ... vs M\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-21T13:10:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vijaya Bank (A Body Corporate … vs M\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-21T13:10:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009"},"wordCount":1409,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009","name":"Vijaya Bank (A Body Corporate ... vs M\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-21T13:10:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijaya-bank-a-body-corporate-vs-ms-sukhi-decors-pvt-ltd-on-22-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vijaya Bank (A Body Corporate … vs M\/S Sukhi Decors Pvt Ltd on 22 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30363","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30363"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30363\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30363"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30363"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30363"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}