{"id":30420,"date":"2010-02-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010"},"modified":"2015-03-17T10:21:15","modified_gmt":"2015-03-17T04:51:15","slug":"veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Veera Reddy S\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Veera Reddy S\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Jawad Rahim<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
IN THE %”iE@H COURT 3? KARN\ufb01’\u00a5?\ufb01sKA
\nCIRCLEIT BENCH \u00a33″? GUL\u00a7\ufb01aF%\u00a7\ufb01.<\/p>\n
m;\u00a7*E:;\u00bb \u00a7’HIS THE :8? my 8? FEBRUARY 2&3}-‘.’_; _ __= ‘.:  <\/p>\n
SEFORE<\/p>\n
THE HSENYELE EVERJEESTICE 3;;\u00e9\u00a7vJ,\u00e9gfb ‘s;%,,ai;s3;::\\4z; % .1: ‘– V  %’<\/p>\n
C:\u00ab:.Rm\\z@.2\u00a7::”;_ 2339<\/p>\n
8\u00a7TWEE\u00a7\\E<\/p>\n
VEERA Rmm<\/p>\n
S;\/0 GGVENS REDQY<\/p>\n
mg: 39 YEARS<\/p>\n
90:: AGRICULYURE’   _  – <\/p>\n
\n\npm \u00a7;m:_%';.V  4  Q'    ?ETi\"\u00a7\"I@i\\\u00e9ER\n\n<\/pre>\n
a_ iBg\u00e9 $’r\u00a7. &f’\u00a7;Vf\u00a7;;4\u00a7\u00a7i:_3.\u00a7\u00abf\u20ac;s:’:R N_&’=\u00a7’ \u00a7\u00a7\u00a7AS\u00a7_, ,amc,j;<\/p>\n
ANS<\/p>\n
. ms \u00a7f:’5.;a\u00e9”m*2\u00bb\u00ab: Rd L;%’:;’;’\u00a7.E%%_<\/p>\n
C’r\u00bbs”\u00a7\u00abs*\u00ab:’m{3i:,3:,cE S?;&1;’\u00a7*:7\u00a7\u00a7\\2<\/p>\n
“vimgas;-&zs’:f’3,;’\u00ab\u00a7f>-:$*\u00a7*”.,gzma.  Rggmmgm”<\/p>\n
  *:\u00a7:*\u00a7 \u00a7U8%\u20ac%,SH %\u00ab’?\u00a7:LL\u00a7=:?EJR; %i C{E\u00a7?}<\/p>\n
 FELED U\/’SEQ? RXW 4&3 \u00a7F \u00a7:R:\u00a75C E\u00a7”:” “\u00a7%iE<\/p>\n
– 4′ ,\u00e9jgi2af\u20ac3*::;\u00a2x”\u00a7”E FQR “ma @ET\u00a7”\u20ac”1\u00a7\u00a7’xEER ?RA’fE\u00a7’*\u00e9S mm” THES
\n  .%\u00b0%:Z7%Vj\u00a7i;%”\u00bb\u00a7%..;E \ufb01\ufb01ii\ufb01i? 5\u00bb-mos: $3 PLEASES m SE”? ASESE THE\n<\/p>\n
-if.._ “}%.Ef::\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7*=\u00ab>’\u00a7E\u00a7’2\u00a3’\u00a7’ \u00a7,\ufb01{?E\u00a7 \u00a7$\u00a7;>g&2@a<3 <32? ?'TC~\u00a7E 333% :3:<\/p>\n
.j"\u00a7\u00bba':;,\u00a7,???E\u00a7z_ mkgggzee\u00e9 @223 ?i\u00a7?;T%\u00ab%\u00a7%3; 35 QMSQSES "SQ<\/p>\n
6, Sri Aniikumar \u00a7'xiax:adag\u00a7, ieamed Cemse\u00e9 fjsr<\/p>\n
the petitioner wsuid centenci that 'she \u00a7rG8\u20acf\u20acZ\u00a33\u00a7'j\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01 ex;i:.jii;:*2\u00e9":\u00e9j4:–e_{"'-VVA<\/p>\n
mo \u00e9ozgbt rev\u00e9a\ufb01s that almost 31% the w\u00e9tmegses haixke   *<\/p>\n
by the vers\u00e9cm of the Camgiainant,.but._4cE0$'\u00e9H%\u00e9$'\u20aci%h'g  <\/p>\n
their Evieience brings mat i:*;<::0nsi.?\u00a7ter:'*\u00a7.A<_i\u00a7fs a\ufb01~:i_A"%i\u00e9;C%{<\/p>\n
mrraborat\u00e9o\ufb01 cf materiai partic\u00e9z-i\u00a7k=s_ E'\u20ac\u00a7 Z'2f'gCfi:'v2}C} \ufb02T'\u00a7\u00a7':..\u00a7\u00a7"\u00a7x'\u00a7.g{3;\u00a7
\ncwertacts at' th@ ac:c:u,..<;.\u00a7d. ;Ev4;–5.321"" a;v'\u20ac;-:.,s,i.\u20aci  $ubmifcE that
\ninvestigating officer has  _investigatEcn
\nwas partisan; oE:ue;.:\u00a7i:*E;ec\u00a7 \u00a353 \u00ab\u00a7"E;\u00e9:i'\u00e9%Ey impiicate
\nthe get\u00e9tionerf    :%’\u00a7:\u00a7A:  *\u00a7’@*–:;\u00a7f\u00a7.te:ag;’ate the find\u00e9mg 9? the<\/p>\n
triai Cau\u00e9t-,. * ‘<\/p>\n
33.. LA ie\u00e9’r:<.2feAd 7' Csa\u00e9i\ufb01ei further gubmits that<\/p>\n
 .::"t'::\u00a3'o;\u00e9:Lbft\u00a7e:Ei"'E\u00b0g 7:i=<fs @ aii\u00e9g\u00e9\u00e9y Enci\ufb01ent $333 takes giace in the<\/p>\n
\u00a7::.E!VV\u00a7Vr:_g'VV?:",u:3{\u00a7(:\u00bb*%?.Ef:; \u00a7~:\ufb01\u00a7i\u00a3h 333$ free access is the vsmrs, am<\/p>\n
2  \u00a7?'%LESA\u00e9;1\u00a7_\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3\u00a7:'\u00a7\u00a7fZ L'\u00a7?\u00a7\u00a7C\u20ac, Fhg Chasga \u00a7ar affenm ii\ufb01d\u00e9f Saat\u00e9en<\/p>\n
 *-s:c;:.z"E<i,_.%20t i\u00e9e as we ai\u00e9egat\u00e9es\u00e9 itseif it that he wa\u00a7 \ufb01ne<\/p>\n
'i;%?2a_ '.-'zzateg', w\u00a7':$ i\u00e9a\u00e9 \ufb01\ufb01i\u00e9f\ufb01\ufb01 {ha gscg\u00e9mg math, \u00a35<\/p>\n
'"=.;\u00b0\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9g*a\u20ac$ charge agzz\u00e9si \ufb01aci\u00e9zgn E36 $5 C\u00a7?"E\u00a7\u20acE'\u00a7'\u00b0\u00a7\u20ac\u00a7\u00a7 Ewe vaggs\u00e9\u00e9<\/p>\n
pretext of cagtmg his vate, AH the wit\ufb01egses have spskgerz<\/p>\n
ta the presence of the accuse\u00e9 part\u00e9cuiarly ?W.1-Srisa\u00a7}._:i-\ufb01e-..v<\/p>\n
Pregi\u00e9\u00e9rzg Gfficer fer that boezth. Each af the__~=\u00a7}\u00ab\u00a7.tij?e'}:,\u00a7'e.\u00e9<\/p>\n
referred to above have seen big erztr3s…ar}_<;\u00a3 3\u00a7'\u00a7\u00e9%\ufb01\u00a73'%.._':t{g'.'\ufb02Q'L\u00a7F <\/p>\n
\ufb01nk an the bane': box. The C\u00a7L.E\u20ac\u00a7StEOI""s \u00a312.;<\/p>\n
Whether he ceufd be ciT\u00e9…\u00a7iS~iffeci 535' 5a". _\u20acfa4\u00a7;S ;'};'\u00a7*"*:::r\u00e9\u00a7&a’:*\u00a3 ?$\u00a7”:a\u00a7 Code ma\ufb01a?
\n\u00a7\u20acc’:\u00a7::::”‘: $41,  w\u00a7*\u00a7iV:E’2_A
\n    trespasswwfmever
\n:e:*;\u00a7@rs “;’n\u20ac\u00a7} :3r’V._:;,:rQr2>;\u00a7?0per\u20acy sir: we pcsgsegsiarz
\n~’5z}2′”\u00a7::o:’\u00a73ef”w\u00a3\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7__’\u00a7;:teni* is C<3mm\u00a7\u20ac 3:? Qffenge as'
\nA  ' \u00a7'3 'A\u00a7?f\u00a7$\u00a7S?3?i\u00a7_Z?5\u00a7?\u20ac; ingask $5" arsnsy any gersan 5;':
\nV  ;Qa$'5.53\u00a7s:V\u00e9\u00a7.*;:3 i:3f gm??? property,
\nH _ ';ii:f=\u00a7?\u00a7vi;7\u00a7 favaifgiify mfereaf mm 9;" \u00e9f\ufb01\ufb01f?
\n"gs;;}::f3 hp\u00e9mgeriyf asniawfsjf\u00e9y rema\ufb01mg mere w\u00e9f\u00e9z
\nV n  in\u00e9ieai {hereby is :'n\u20ac\u00a7mid\u00a7\u00a3"e, ingui\u00e9 gr anrsey
\n_ .-3:2}; $525!": persan; {gr with \u00e9n\u00e9ent 5:9 wmmi: an<\/p>\n
afferma, "\n<\/p>\n
T’ .__\u00a7i;’:\u00a7:’*?:e\u00a72abE\u00a7;.._<\/p>\n
\u00b0-4″a.K;g&–i:\ufb01-$i”*%:\u00e9%:\u00e9} “\u00e9i\u00e9\u00e9e aiiegat\u00e9azz aga\u00e9agi mm \u00e9s very {fear he is<\/p>\n
. ‘\u00bb._.a%\u00a7\u00a3’=’\u00a7::%:.%;’\u00a7”%\u00a7> %:a2:a awiere\u00e9 \u00a7\u00a7’E& bsx. aiiemgia\u00e9 \u00e9zg mm” \u00a7;’:;E<: as<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
Pram the defirait\u00e9an, E: Ea aim? that twa g\u00e9tuat\u00e9ttms \ufb01fe
\nc0ntem\u00a7Eated:–~ V<\/p>\n
The First gituat\u00e9on entry cf 3 \u00a7Ef’f\u00a7(}f”\u00e9
\nQreperty is’: posseas\u00e9erz af anather” wit%*;\u00bb~\u00bbir:_t3e;zt_”5tQ\u00a775’\u00a7t\u00a5’%*j:f\u00a7;\u00e9’i’\u00a7  a :jg
\nefferice or to intimidate, \u00e9nsuii 32′
\npossession; TV ” 2  ‘<\/p>\n
The second situatiqn is h;aV.xz:iurVj’gLv._Eayyfu%.E\u00a7;”ehlie\u00e9jggs mtg
\npassessicsrz, Erzcfuigmg in a”:?z’=,;.c::”%r’*’r1_%V:f\u00a7’s:–3:iV $'{:*\ufb01’.’:\u00a7:.r;%:<:.a;;s<I: anmy ta)<\/p>\n
such person, :32' vv\u00e9iii'; .i_nte;"1\u00a3tG'e.ff\u00e9hm\u00a7tted___to<\/p>\n
Palice has cieariy spelied am: that he wag the 9:”E\u00a7\u00a7;’iw{\u00a7:i’F}>\u00a7:}f’~._<\/p>\n
Qfacer Qf tha Eeczth aim 23.12.2995′ A’: 1.30 \u00a7.:*’\u00a7”.:—a’\u00a7f;f\u00a3\u00a7.\u00a7:{feg\u00a7<\/p>\n
entered peiiing math and rem0xse.d~\u00bb~8:_4b0_t\u20ac\u00a7\u00e9””%’E:\u00a5&;;.r%\u00e9”‘his <\/p>\n
packet sf his pant and Qaure\ufb01 we t:i*:1%::e1’_’_3\u00ab::’\u00a7:’\u00e9\u00a7u1rT~.\u00a7\u00a7*s%{‘csf\u00e9 :\u00a7i=:g\u00b0<_:<\/p>\n
ba\u00e9let gape? box am the ageh:{3 s-i:Qpp'\u00e9d f\u00e9\u00e9i
\non the baiiet pager beg; ar7;;jV_…L:z\u00a2\u00a7%'z:._:'\u00a71_\u00bba:\u00e9r..\u00a7'i::–\u00a72,gg\u00e9cused
\nremoved a knife with arz E:i{t;r3.r:'t\u00e9}_Qi\u00a7. ?;<$""\u00a3E\u00a5\u00a7_:'%\u00a7\u00a7teVs1 and in the
\nme;-mwhiie the t:ys.rjlicaf”‘{i\u00e9’n’\u00e93\u00a7:ab:ie\u00abg\u00a7 .{:;%%iiiv:\u00e9\u00a7x\u00a7:’=\u00a7\u00a7ugi*xt ham of
\naccused az”1d::.xa\u00e9~;:;f~*4″:’;’:~’.;__V%.i::’\u00bb;:;\ufb01;\u00bb:I\u00a71<,'js%_f;'";" Q}?  He was Cmssw<\/p>\n
exam\u00e9ne;E.–i.9;,e E"s'e:Et 3%;-;a;.:EcV\u00a73\u00a7' <V v\u00bb;_'a\u00a7S_Q\u00a7'  12 feet, E: \u00a33 a vary smai\u00e9<\/p>\n
.-v.,\u00a7_9e\u00a7Ei:f_1\u00a75, bV\u00a7@\u00e9:"3-#3': aV.?\u00a7Ai\u20ac5-v:\u00a7fif?__\u00a75f\u20ac.~E'fC=:*\u20ac, E $3 net fired thai it was<\/p>\n
V"._{d;f\u00a7E'C-:s_Et f\u00a7:*\u00ab.;as?~;.7\u00a7"':%:fwe ta \u00e9\u00e9eni\u00e9fy him.<\/p>\n
 .  32-%';\u00e9-E'*~\u00e9ara5i:":'1:.:\u00a7as E3 3 \u00a7\u00a7%"Z\u00a3\u00a7'\u00a7 w\u00e9taegs $0 5x 93;,<\/p>\n
 %1af\u00a7_ \u00e9\u00a7\u00a7E<an ta 3? having witnesse\u00e9 the seimra :2?<\/p>\n
A  l \u00e9'3G":(i.\u00a7.\u00e9 :–'&r:\u00a7 knife and a\u00e9ge im sham \ufb01e ms mar: 2:939<\/p>\n
"- \u00a7'\u00a7%\u00a7'::{&-\u00a7's%ga:e%i,,\u00a7?%\u00b0:e mge and sgeaks sf having recmxe\u00e9 the
\n having su\u00e9m\u00e9tie\u00e9 the aharge S3"\u00a5\u20acEE aim?\n<\/p>\n
 E%”:i\u00a7& $\u00a7j\u00a7%\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7Z\u00a7QE’;,<\/p>\n
28. PW,1G\u00bbChandrakanth\u00a7 first G<:33\u00a7iF'}(_} affiscer 53-3
\nalse apaken its about the attempt ma\ufb01a by the  <\/p>\n
causirsg ichreat sf' assauit<\/p>\n
21' PW,1"i~Babura\u00e90Ei–..%_A\u00a7’:Tg’TV Off\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9fn, <\/p>\n
gveaks simiiariy and a\u00e9so about”: e’izg:re eff M\ufb01\ufb01fi :t’\u20ac:}:’3′.”‘~~~ <\/p>\n
22: pw.:2~Mae-Wf \u00a7s;_the”\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9ggf;’_g:%\u00a7ngta\u00a7\u00e9\u00e9;”‘w&\u00a7 was
\none 9f the mab\u00e9le squad .AA%ijE_~*e%\u00a2.’.eiect%9n and
\nhe regeris Qf h_”a%\u00e9i%j\u00a7Vrg\u00a7.:eiz?};e\u00a7’: t’h\u00e9\u00a7: \u00a7:i;E’T;:.Q:iT3i\u00bb:*2’r:-Ex P1 and<\/p>\n
hav\u00e9rzg Eransmitt\u00e9\u00e9  W,
\n2.3, is\ufb01zestigating afficer whe
\nhag 2″\u20acC\u20ac\u00a7’}~”\u20acv\u00a7u @\u00a7I– <:1f\u00e9::\u00bbL.:V:r":9{\u00a7fer'2::\u20ac ihmugh wireiegs arz\ufb01<\/p>\n
'e'\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9'r:*z;3e:\u00a7.,\u00a7E":e."s::t%'%-e?' \u00a7G\u00a7VE\u00e95\u00e9"\u00a7%f\u00a7<:er".<\/p>\n
 @:Ar','_:}:%.4}\u00e9ba:.:: Rahmm :3 the PS3, wh\u00e9<\/p>\n
%'::-\n<\/p>\n
Q?’ tvm menths frem \u00a7’iOW. in case \u00bb::\u00bb~f defauit, {ha accuged<\/p>\n
shat? grant 15 simple \u00e9mgrisonment an each 31′ the <\/p>\n
which shes! ran censecutiveiyk<\/p>\n
29: The”3\u00a7’3~ ” therefore }:’sta>t’f%; \u00a7’s~;;, <\/p>\n
cmfiyming the c:c>:”;v%ct%0n ef the _2;%j\u00a7p@Eiag’1 t–far :h\u00e9 :\u00a7ff\u00e9nC:3is:”v% V<\/p>\n
Lander Sections 448, 353 amV’L’%:\u00e9_a’I6 _0f VIf>_CZiVV’3\u00e9’2d. ‘;:z:rzVc:ier
\nSectians :36 (8) am {f’}: 0’\u00a7 Re.\u00a7Vfjre:\u00a7 er$.\u00a7a,.\u00a7f%’en cf f\u00a7*:e VvPe0p\u00a7e
\nAct, but we 0rde:j:”egar\u00e9Vi_:}\u00a7 .se r\u00a3_ft e-}1\u00a3c\u00a7~..V\u00a7.S -\u00bb.I’;%:j1_;c’:’:iif\u00a7ed E9 the<\/p>\n
extent \u00a7s2\u00e9%<:ated%_"%ri\u00ab:jF:z-\u00e9is s3\u00a7;%iat=?, <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Veera Reddy S\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010 Author: Jawad Rahim IN THE %”iE@H COURT 3? KARN\ufb01’\u00a5?\ufb01sKA CIRCLEIT BENCH \u00a33″? GUL\u00a7\ufb01aF%\u00a7\ufb01. m;\u00a7*E:;\u00bb \u00a7’HIS THE :8? my 8? FEBRUARY 2&3}-‘.’_; _ __= ‘.: SEFORE THE HSENYELE EVERJEESTICE 3;;\u00e9\u00a7vJ,\u00e9gfb ‘s;%,,ai;s3;::\\4z; % .1: ‘– V %’ C:\u00ab:.Rm\\z@.2\u00a7::”;_ 2339 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30420","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVeera Reddy S\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Veera Reddy S\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-03-17T04:51:15+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Veera Reddy S\\\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-17T04:51:15+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1267,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Veera Reddy S\\\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-03-17T04:51:15+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Veera Reddy S\\\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Veera Reddy S\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Veera Reddy S\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-03-17T04:51:15+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Veera Reddy S\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-17T04:51:15+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010"},"wordCount":1267,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010","name":"Veera Reddy S\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-03-17T04:51:15+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/veera-reddy-so-govind-reddy-vs-the-state-through-chintaki-ps-on-1-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Veera Reddy S\/O Govind Reddy vs The State Through Chintaki Ps on 1 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30420","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30420"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30420\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30420"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30420"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30420"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}