{"id":30463,"date":"2011-11-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-11-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011"},"modified":"2015-07-20T09:51:18","modified_gmt":"2015-07-20T04:21:18","slug":"bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011","title":{"rendered":"Bansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Madhya Pradesh High Court<\/div>\n
Bansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011<\/div>\n
                                         1\n\n          HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH ; JABALPUR\n                               Cr.R.No. 1514\/2011\n                               Bansilal and others\n                                        Vs.\n                                   State of M.P\n\n\nFor the Applicants        : Shri R.K.Nagar, Advocate.\nFor Respondent            : Smt. Nirmala Nayak, GA.\n\n\n\n                                     ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
                                   (11\/11\/2011)
\nPer : U.C.Maheshwari J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      The applicants\/accused, have filed this revision being aggrieved by the<\/p>\n
order dated 8.7.2011 passed by the Special Judge, Schedule Caste and Schedule<\/p>\n
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act (in short `the Act’), Jabalpur in Special Case<\/p>\n
No.34\/11 framing the charges against each of the applicants for the offence of<\/p>\n
section 294\/34, 323\/34 of the IPC and section 3(1)(x) of the Act.<\/p>\n
2.    The facts giving rise to this revision in short are that on 26.4.2011 on<\/p>\n
receiving the information of some quarrel and incident from the complainant<\/p>\n
Gend Singh R\/o Uchehra at Police Station Kundam, District Jabalpur, the same<\/p>\n
was recorded in the Rojnamcha Sanha No.860.           On holding the preliminary<\/p>\n
inquiry, it was revealed that some cognizable offence has been committed, on<\/p>\n
which, the FIR was registered as Crime No.82\/11 against the applicants for the<\/p>\n
offence of section 294,323,506 and 34 of the IPC and section 3(i)(x) of the Act.<\/p>\n
As per averment of it on dated 23.4.2011 said complainant Gend Singh was in<\/p>\n
need of tractor for bringing his grain from his village to some place, for which, at<\/p>\n
the fare of Rs.300\/-, he hired the tractor from applicant No.1 Bansilal. On the<\/p>\n
way, near Bus stand Kundam, said Bansilal refused to bring his grain on his
\n                                          2<\/span><\/p>\n
tractor and returned the sum of the fare. Thereafter, the complainant hired the<\/p>\n
tractor of one Panchamlal Chakrawarty for the same, on which, the applicants<\/p>\n
abused the complainant on account of his caste “Gond” and also to said<\/p>\n
Chakrawarty and Preeti and also beaten them. On lodging the report at PS<\/p>\n
Kundam, the same was recorded in the Rojnamcha sanha No.860 of dated<\/p>\n
23.4.2011 and thereafter the victims were sent to hospital, where on medical<\/p>\n
examination, their MLC reports were prepared.          Subsequent to it, on dated<\/p>\n
26.4.2011, a report in writing was also given by the complainant to said police<\/p>\n
station contending that on 23.4.2011, for bringing his grain from his village he<\/p>\n
hired the tractor of Bansilal. On the way at Bus stand Kundam, he refused to<\/p>\n
bring his grain from village, on which, on account of returning their sum of fare,<\/p>\n
some quarrel took place between him and applicant No.1 Bansilal, in which all the<\/p>\n
applicants with intention to humiliate the complainant on account of his caste<\/p>\n
covered under the Act, abused him with filthy languages and also beaten them.<\/p>\n
When Panchamlal and Preeti Chakrawarty came to rescue him then they were also<\/p>\n
subjected to abuse and beating by them, on which, the complainant fled away and<\/p>\n
came to police station to lodge the report. At the time of lodging the earlier report<\/p>\n
due to fear of the applicants, he did not mention the name of applicants No.2 and 3<\/p>\n
as culprits of the incident and the same was lodged only against applicant No.1<\/p>\n
Bansilal, while he and aforesaid two victims, were abused and beaten by all the<\/p>\n
applicants. In the above-mentioned circumstances, on establishing the cognizable<\/p>\n
offence, the FIR was registered against the applicants as Crime No.82\/11 for the<\/p>\n
offence of section 294,323,506\/34 of the IPC and of section 3(1)(x) of the Act.<\/p>\n
Said Panchamlal and Preeti were also sent to hospital for examination where their<\/p>\n
MLC reports were prepared. Caste certificate of the complainant was taken from<\/p>\n
the concerning Gram Panchayat.          The applicants were arrested and also
\n                                          3<\/span><\/p>\n
interrogatory statements of the witnesses were recorded. On completion of the<\/p>\n
investigation, the applicants were charge sheeted for the alleged offence.<\/p>\n
3.     The trial Court on evaluation of the papers of the charge sheet framed the<\/p>\n
aforesaid charge against the applicants, on which, they, have come to this court<\/p>\n
with this revision.\n<\/p>\n
4.     Shri R.K.Nagar, counsel of the applicants, after taking me through the copy<\/p>\n
of the charge sheet along with the impugned order and the charges framed, argued<\/p>\n
that at the initial stage the complainant did not stated anything regarding beating<\/p>\n
with Preeti Chakrawarty.     Even the specific allegation showing        the alleged<\/p>\n
incident took place with intention to humiliate the complainant on account of his<\/p>\n
caste covered under the Act had not been stated and, such allegations were alleged<\/p>\n
in the subsequent report in writing submitted by the complainant. In such premises<\/p>\n
on proper evaluation of the charge sheet, the alleged charges or, in any case, in the<\/p>\n
available factual matrix as appeared from the charge sheet, the charge of section<\/p>\n
3(1)(x) of the Act deserves to be set aside. He also said that in the interrogatory<\/p>\n
statements of the witnesses just to implicate the applicants with the alleged<\/p>\n
offence, exaggerated version has been stated by them. The same being contrary to<\/p>\n
initial FIR, could not be considered for framing the charges and prayed for<\/p>\n
discharging all the applicants from the alleged charge by admitting and allowing<\/p>\n
this revision. He also placed his reliance on a decision of this Court in the matter<\/p>\n
of Sushila Devi Sharma Vs. State of MP- 2005(3) MPLJ 152.\n<\/p>\n
5.     Keeping in view his arguments, I have carefully gone through the papers of<\/p>\n
the charge sheet placed on the record along with the impugned order and the<\/p>\n
framed charges. It is apparent from the FIR as well as report in writing given by<\/p>\n
the complainant that during the course of alleged quarrel, applicant No.1 Bansilal<\/p>\n
abused the complainant just to humiliate him on account of his caste and also
\n                                          4<\/span><\/p>\n
abused the other victims and, in continuation, they were beaten also by the<\/p>\n
applicant Bansilal. In subsequent report in writing, the complainant categorically<\/p>\n
stated the act of each of the applicants attributed by them in the alleged incident.<\/p>\n
It is apparent from both the reports that the applicants abused the complainant<\/p>\n
with intention to humiliate him on account of his caste and in continuation, not<\/p>\n
only the complainants but other victims were also beaten by them. In such<\/p>\n
background the entire investigation was carried out. As per MLC report all the<\/p>\n
three victims sustained the injuries on their person. Even on recording the<\/p>\n
interrogatory statements of witnesses, namely, Gend Singh Gond, Panchamlal,<\/p>\n
and Preeti Chakrawarty, Shambu Singh, Rajju, Ramu and Sufali, they have<\/p>\n
categorically stated the same version as stated by the complainant in the aforesaid<\/p>\n
reports. On going through such entire evidence collected by the investigation<\/p>\n
agency, I am of the considered view that prima facie circumstances for framing<\/p>\n
the impugned charge are available in it. At the stage of framing the charge, no<\/p>\n
Court is empowered to ignore any part of the evidence collected by the<\/p>\n
investigation agency and discharge the accused from the alleged offence. As per<\/p>\n
settled proposition, at the stage of framing the charge, the Court has not to<\/p>\n
evaluate the evidence keeping in view whether on holding the trial the accused<\/p>\n
like the applicants may be convicted in the matter or not.        In the aforesaid<\/p>\n
premises, I have not found any error , perversity or irregularity in the order<\/p>\n
impugned framing the above mentioned charges against the applicants.<\/p>\n
6.    In view of the aforesaid overwhelming evidence in the charge sheet<\/p>\n
showing that the complainant Gend Singh Gond was humiliated on account of his<\/p>\n
caste also, the aforesaid cited case of this court in the matter of Sushila Devi<\/p>\n
Sharma (supra) is not helping to the applicants.\n<\/p>\n
7.    In view of the aforesaid discussion, I have not found any error or perversity
\n                                        5<\/span><\/p>\n
in the order impugned requiring interference at this stage to discharge the<\/p>\n
applicants under the revisional jurisdiction of this court.   Consequently, this<\/p>\n
revision being devoid of any merits is hereby dismissed at the stage of motion<\/p>\n
hearing.\n<\/p>\n
                                           (U.C.Maheshwari)
\n                                                 Judge
\nMKL
\n 6<\/span>
\n 7<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Madhya Pradesh High Court Bansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011 1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH ; JABALPUR Cr.R.No. 1514\/2011 Bansilal and others Vs. State of M.P For the Applicants : Shri R.K.Nagar, Advocate. For Respondent : Smt. Nirmala Nayak, GA. ORDER (11\/11\/2011) Per : U.C.Maheshwari J. The applicants\/accused, have […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,24],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madhya-pradesh-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-07-20T04:21:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-20T04:21:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1263,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madhya Pradesh High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011\",\"name\":\"Bansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-11-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-07-20T04:21:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-07-20T04:21:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011","datePublished":"2011-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-20T04:21:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011"},"wordCount":1263,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madhya Pradesh High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011","name":"Bansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-11-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-07-20T04:21:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bansilal-vs-the-state-of-madhya-pradesh-on-11-november-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bansilal vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 11 November, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30463","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30463"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30463\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}