{"id":30616,"date":"2008-04-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008"},"modified":"2016-01-16T11:57:41","modified_gmt":"2016-01-16T06:27:41","slug":"bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"Bhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Bhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri<\/div>\n
 \n\n' BETWEEN\n\n.. B_HIMANA'GO_UDA      M A \n'$.10.NA!.=APPAG0\ufb02DA'!~!AC.\"RA;.Dl\u00a7\u00a3f     -\nL \"AGED-ABOUT 47 YEARS i k  \n\nmo. -BANAHAT\ufb02,..-'mLUKA- % t \n\n'_.BI3r'\\r\"\"L3R'i-'I'p'wi 5363._12'\u20acg_.L,V- 'V 'V '\n\nGEE: AG%C'J!..'!'..!RE . ~.\n.. Pemzereea\n\ni\ufb01y :1-'sri :ayak:umarT%%s. \ufb01at\ufb01, sr.  f'\" Sr\ufb01t-S.-'__\". %su.1.-%} \n\n  AM:\n\n \u00ab R1o:MADABAL\n\n \n\n1 THE 'A-SSIsTAN_'F.C0--. Mzsszouen mm % %\n..f\u00a7HE1RETURNIN_G_0F.F\"ICE_R_ 34;. L %\n%%%3s,; KAMNOLU;  PANCHAYAT\n \"CONST1'\ufb01~.'!ENCY % L L\n%   g13.qpurcp1s\"rR:cT - 536 1o1:._\n\n2-  *GIRISH:--..  k 1 % 3 : J\n sio.IARPasAHI=aTTcH1KK;-12 %\n\n\"A E-D 235_YEA'_l'2\u00a7  '%\n~ o.=.c::.-x-9..-=\\-Ir.:u:_':*%-..--=-==\n\nT'i.'u'i< sin.-\u00abnae: '-536 123' . .\n\nT  ;:  SIDDh\ufb01AGOUi'5A--\n\n-S\/Q;uSl_7|f\\[|KARAPPAGOUDA_T'BIRADARI\nAGED AaoUT;?.? TEARS * __ \n\n- OCC:_AGRICULTURE_ .  '\nR\/o. KERUTAGI'V_ILlAGE- : %\n\n\n\nTALUKA SINDAGI\nDIST BIJAPUR - 586 128\n\n4 AWANAGOUDA\n\ns\/o. NILAKANTRAYAGOUDA   \nAGED 32 YEARS  \nocc: comnncroa\n\nRm H.A.R.A!\\!.A.L P s \u00ab\nTALUK SINDAGI - 586 128  \n\n5 BASANGOUDA\n\nc-In um I Aunt:-nu lf'\\A nanny  \n'3] 'J: I'II'"-I_rII'l'I\\J\\I\\JI-'E"-  'v.\n\nAGED ABOUT 37 mans\n6CC:i'\\GR'iCu'i.'iURE   I\n. R\/o.MAoBALv1LALGE - I\nIALUK 5.|.NDAi.'1P5.V-  1153.' .2 ..\nmsr a1JAeu2:s..2TI:2  2  -  \n5 MADIWALA'i'.%'A""""--V._ I   ', '\n5\/o. BAs.AwA;MA're-I   '- & \nAGE\ufb02"ABOU'l'   \nma. <sua5ewAo<\u00bbv1uxee, mm\nSINDAGI - 5352123    I\nDISTBISAAPUR,    \n\n7 SHANKKI-iAYVA..  I\n\n\u00a33\/0. *SIDDARa"""VV - "3\n\n"'.\\,l'I"Il I 'I I'Il"IllI\n\n7_A"GE_D ABOUT 37"1*Ei\\RS .\n\n\u00ab \ufb02\ufb01a i?lP'_'I'lI'I"'l II 11 II'):\n'. \\aNru\\.an~.f'|'-:-.3I'\\-EXJLFI-I\\JI'\\Iu\n\nI R.(o.T miuiaob VILLAGE,\n I '-'__'i':'\\i;'tii\u20ac\u00ab.$i'F-5DiaGI -- 536 vs\nH DIST anapun.\n\n _ I " 'nay sn Ramesh B. Anneppanavar, AGA for R1,\n\n'A , a Sr! R.L. Patli, Advocate for C\/R 2 and 3]\n  THIS wan PETITION IS FILED umen ARTICLES 225 AND 227\n\nI   ETHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE\n~, C30MMU!\\!IC.A'!IQN D12 '2\ufb01J-$2008 ISSUED BY R1 VIBE .A..\ufb01!!'!EXiDa\n\nfALONGWITH THE WRIT PETITION; DIRECT THE RESPONDENT N0.1 T<\/pre>\n
I  AIAIAIT TI-IF DFQI IIT GI: Tl-I33 Fl 1:!-“‘l”‘I'(‘iM ADDISLI Q D\ufb02IIl”I’llI!’2 llll\ufb02fl\ufb02\ufb02
\nnvvrui llll. I\\I.uv:.| vu urn rlrr I-unis: uh!<\/p>\n
III-I– I-5-I-\\-ill W ITI-I’ VII\\In-\n<\/p>\n
‘i”i’ii:’ i_E\ufb01\\Rl’*I’El’5 l’5′”i\\iCIPI”\\i. Di\u00a7TRT\ufb01 3UDGE, BHAFUP
\n1 A 2<\/p>\n
APPEAL no. no or zoos AND NOT TO pnEc1p1TA’1:re~aw1′.-an;
\nAND ETC.  .   e <\/p>\n
THIS PETITION comma on FoRPREuM1ivAIw7H:5AWtr1i9G <\/p>\n
DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWIN\u20ac.3:  ‘
\n=—an-.-“‘j”c'”‘A’e. A%% v
\nSri Rarnesh B. Anneppaithe\ufb01ar, theiee:*nedRAdditionei
\nGovernment Advocate ,is..V_4’dlrected.f; to*.._take’VVnot’lce for the<\/p>\n
respondent No.1.\n<\/p>\n
2. Chaiieri\u00a7e::1ii\ufb01__.this Eftitiert.  the communication,<\/p>\n
dated 25* M.ereh,;.%%2oo%afth%r{Aeeexure\u00e9o) Issued by the first-<\/p>\n
mspondent I%n1.%eempneece.w:t.h 3,-_h_–.3 order, dated 3rd March, zoos<\/p>\n
passed bythe’  (Senior Division) and J.M.FIc.,<\/p>\n
SIndhefgi’~ In  Petition No.1 of 2007 connected with<\/p>\n
.er%eaee..e I5\u00e9jt5t\u00a7han.1No.3″”‘of zooy. The con! Judge eppetnted the<\/p>\n
Z  for the purpesieof recounting the baiiot papers of Kannoiii Zllla<\/p>\n
‘””.5i.”.f-.Panchaydt…AAtonstltuency, Buapur for which the elections were<\/p>\n
  \ufb01end  23″‘ December, zoos. He has further directed the first<\/p>\n
 “j vtespondent Assistant Commissioner to complete the recounting<\/p>\n
   process on or before 15″‘ April 2008 and report the same to the<\/p>\n
man<\/p>\n
Court immediately thereafter. Acting on the sale’ direi:ti:ons–,__the<\/p>\n
first respondent Assistant Commissioner has  <\/p>\n
April 2008) for holding the recountlng.\u00bbss\u00bbrl\u00bb–..<\/p>\n
3. Piieanwhiie the petitioner prefent’d to the<\/p>\n
Court of the Principal District Judge. auapurslsmng ‘section
\n171(2) of the Karnataka ‘il\u00a7anch_a’)’ra_t   The District
\nJudge has orderedemergent   2008 as the<\/p>\n
date for the ap\ufb02rearance of  l<\/p>\n
4. s_r_l__  learned senior counsel
\nappearing for -for’ the petitioner submits that<\/p>\n
the statutory: appeal “”.:5iendi-rig’consideration before the District<\/p>\n
 Judge. is being renteredviinfructuous, as the recounting begins at<\/p>\n
“‘~’   5″” “-rii 2098 en… the sitt: g of the Cot.\u00a2 s-..-+.—-. at
\nif’ ‘\u00e9iock”oi_:.,.Fi\u00a5ew\u00a7ame day. He therefore prays f’r the stay of<\/p>\n
V V’ . the commencement of the recounting process until the disposal<\/p>\n
‘ H H 1’  the petitioner’s IA for stay In-the appeal.<\/p>\n
‘5. Sri Ravindra L. Fatal, the learned coenset appearing for<\/p>\n
 1′ the caveator\/respondents No.2 and 3 [election petitioners before<\/p>\n
the court of the Civil Judge’: (Sr. Dn.)], submits that what is
\ntau
\n2<\/span><\/p>\n
 ,t’nis page<\/p>\n
challenged in these proceedings is only a consequentiejt-r.:o–.<\/p>\n
The order passed by the Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.) iejifeneiieteeeeetlbyy<\/p>\n
way of appeal before the District- Judges; ..|.-lye 4_it_is-._note. <\/p>\n
permissible for the petitioner to cha!lVengfe’fVthe\u00ab ifndrderyin <\/p>\n
one Court and the consequentistjtirder in someether’-wco\ufb01rt.
\nalso brings to my notice that  itself is
\nnot disposed of. It has on’iyA’dir\ufb01_’:tfedhtiiefgefsiftant Commissioner
\nto hold the reconrsting arid  matter to Itself.
\nSri Patil strenudesl%s9ntends.._thatlthe:V petitioner is not entitled
\nto any interirn”A”orde:r:;;pf tfhespgproceedlnos, as he has not
\neven \ufb02ledany pending appeal. In support of<\/p>\n
his subrn!ss!’e.n,! he’hesV.’eie\u00a7’*..\u00bbpiaced the affidavit on the record of<\/p>\n
teday.’ ”\n<\/p>\n
    6. :(3*rjj’tvhe4:c”a.refui consideration of the submissions made at<\/p>\n
  ‘wauld l:u’-:-“I- secured b”\n<\/p>\n
thehar, 151- the considered view that the ends of justice<\/p>\n
  “expressing any opinion on the merits of the case:<\/p>\n
(a)<\/p>\n
(“D3<\/p>\n
The first respondent Assistant Commissiien\ufb01ri-4.ii,<\/p>\n
shall commence the process of recc.-*1:i.:i+ivn’;Av;:i:: eh  <\/p>\n
5″‘ April, 2003;\n<\/p>\n
However the outceme “oI_”r~the ,r”e_co:untingg.”‘d V’<\/p>\n
Process shall not be declared wiugoutiuie am
\nof the Appelsipte.  ‘VA(ith_e.it:ourt  Principal
\nDistrict Judge,V_V:’Buep_pr:v  where the<\/p>\n
eiect’ion;.e:i?sppe.els;  of 2008 are<\/p>\n
 ThevVVi3’r’injciipei”‘District -‘Judge, euapur is directed<\/p>\n
‘to_’1dispo*se”‘ofthe appeals as expeditiously<\/p>\n
 the petitioner and the respondents No.2<\/p>\n
~~ ix\ufb02end 3 are directed to co-operate with the<\/p>\n
disposai of the matter.\n<\/p>\n
93.13.14<\/p>\n
(e) Without waiting for any notice from the
\nthe petitioner and the respondents N-o:.”2
\nand\/or their advocates shat’!appepar?_:h’ei’tsrettvhe  V
\nCourt of the Principal DIstri_ct’:_Ju’doe;
\n11\u00b0 algal: an 5″‘ Le-\u00a7tI;..V2nn\u00a7=.__ V . T’ ‘A V’ 2<\/p>\n
7. The petition Is daspmsecjwdo\ufb02 rmaorder as to costs.<\/p>\n
8. \u00a7ri Rame:-in B.   iearned Additionai<\/p>\n
Government  is ‘d!rected;-tocorn\ufb01nunlcate the operative<\/p>\n
portion ofp___toda:y’s:.;xiiordiejr ”  f\ufb02rst respondent Assistant<\/p>\n
Commissioner’ fovrtrnnltit  ‘   ‘  ., ‘ 7<\/p>\n
A_carbo’n.cop\ufb01’V–.of’~tod~ay’s order Is to be made over to Srl<\/p>\n
sdl-_
\nIudqe<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Bhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008 Author: Ashok B.Hinchigeri ‘ BETWEEN .. B_HIMANA’GO_UDA M A ‘$.10.NA!.=APPAG0\ufb02DA’!~!AC.”RA;.Dl\u00a7\u00a3f – L “AGED-ABOUT 47 YEARS i k mo. -BANAHAT\ufb02,..-‘mLUKA- % t ‘_.BI3r’\\r””L3R’i-‘I’p’wi 5363._12’\u20acg_.L,V- ‘V ‘V ‘ GEE: AG%C’J!..’!’..!RE . ~. .. Pemzereea i\ufb01y :1-‘sri :ayak:umarT%%s. \ufb01at\ufb01, sr. f'” Sr\ufb01t-S.-‘__”. %su.1.-%} AM: \u00ab […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30616","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nBhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-04-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-16T06:27:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-16T06:27:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":781,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008\",\"name\":\"Bhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-16T06:27:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-04-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-16T06:27:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-04-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-16T06:27:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008"},"wordCount":781,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008","name":"Bhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-16T06:27:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bhimanagouda-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-indi-on-3-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bhimanagouda vs The Assistant Commissioner Indi on 3 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30616","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30616"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30616\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30616"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30616"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30616"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}