{"id":30832,"date":"2009-09-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009"},"modified":"2015-09-05T20:40:53","modified_gmt":"2015-09-05T15:10:53","slug":"a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COUET OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\nDATED THIS THE 9'\" DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2009'\"---.\u00bb\n\nBEFORE\n\n'mE HON'BLE MEJUSTICE HULUVADI G.   \"\n\nCRL.P. No.2o27\/2005 C\/W. CRL.-P';\"NG..39_80\/\ufb01che AND \n\nCRL.P. N0.72367.20Q_\u00a7, \n\nCRL.P.NO.2027\/2005:\nBETWEEN\n\n1. A ARVIND RAO .7\ns\/0 A RAMESHRAG  \nAGED ABOUT 4,5 YEARS\u00bb \n\nR\/{O N0 G188\/A,i*~;_' _ \"  .\n6TH MAIN DE'\u00a3?ENCE.Ct').LOE\\IY\n\nINDIRANAGAR;  ._ __   \n\nBANGALORE \"38 \" A --  ...PETI'1'IONER\n\n SR1 RAIVIACEJANDRA MALI, ADVOCATE)\n\n     SEESHAGIRI NAYAK\n\n. 'S\/0\" NOT KNOWN\n' ._AGED 53. YEARS\nLINEIMATH GALLI\nSIRSIL ...RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p> V. _  SR1 S R HEGDE HUDLAMANE, ADVOCATE)<\/p>\n<p>y<\/p>\n<p>CRL.P.NO.2027\/2005 FIEED U\/S.40&#8217;7 R\/W 482 cR.P.c<\/p>\n<p>BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT<br \/>\nTHIS I-ION&#8217;BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO QUASH THE<br \/>\nCOMPLAINT\/PROCEEDINGS IN SO FAR AS THE PETITIONER<\/p>\n<p>IS CONCERNED IN C.C.I\\\u00a5O.3860\/2004 (<br \/>\nON THE FILE OF I ADDL. JMFC., SIRSI.<\/p>\n<p>CRL<\/p>\n<p>PCR NO. 126\/2004)<\/p>\n<p>.P.I\\EO.3980\/2006<\/p>\n<p>BETWEEN<\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>A ARVIND RAO<\/p>\n<p>S \/O A RAMESHRAO<\/p>\n<p>AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,<br \/>\nR\/AT NO.188\/A, 6TH MAIN,_ A A.<br \/>\nDEFENCE COLONY, INDIRANAGAR; V<br \/>\nBANGALORE 38. V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>(BY SR1 RAMACHANDRA 1\\_\u00abiAL_I, L&#8217;ADT\/EJCATE)<\/p>\n<p>STATE&#8217; BY&#8217; RS1 &#8216;EXTENSION BELGAUM<br \/>\n(DELETED VIDITORCDAER DATED 1 1.9.2006)<\/p>\n<p>NICKHAT RATIVMA<\/p>\n<p>L_&#8217;jW.\/ ABDUL &#8216;RA-HMAN SOUNKAD<\/p>\n<p> AGED 3_1&#8217;=YEARS,<\/p>\n<p> &#8221; e~\u00bb2,\/_3~,L  QUARTERS,<br \/>\n~ . v\u00ab.L-_NEA.R-WATER TANK,<\/p>\n<p>1 VISHVVESHWARA NAGAR,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8216;BEL_\u20ac\u00a73\u00bbAUM.  RESPONDENT<\/p>\n<p>T  F.V&#8217;.PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R2, R-1 DELETED)<\/p>\n<p>,  ~ _   &#8216;&#8221;CARL.R.NO.39S0\/2006 FILED U\/S482 CR.P.C BY THE<\/p>\n<p>OCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS<\/p>\n<p>JR,\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>&#8221;   \u00a7.PEfrI*fIONER V<\/p>\n<p>THE ABOVE PETITIONS \ufb01RE COMING ON FOR ORDERS<br \/>\nTHIS DAY, THE COURT  FOLLOWING:<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner has sought to quash the<\/p>\n<p>complaints\/proceedings against him in <\/p>\n<p>3860\/2004, C.C.No.462\/2004 and<br \/>\nAccording to the petitioner, he  I-Iono1*a:3r_, <\/p>\n<p>Director of M \/ s. Karnataka  <\/p>\n<p>Mr. Sadashiva Rao is the Chairman._of the <\/p>\n<p>Mr. Ra;&#8217;aram&#8221;is thev~&#8211;E&#8217;xecutive Director, who<\/p>\n<p>iooked afte&#8217;r,&#8217;da3r  of the company. It is the<\/p>\n<p>contentioniiof &#8220;the, that he never signed the<\/p>\n<p>  questio&#8217;r1&#8217;*&#8217;*&#8217;and apart from that, he has also<\/p>\n<p> order on 29.1.2004 directing that<\/p>\n<p>the ppetitivoneij shall not be represented as a Director.<\/p>\n<p> A  as the grievance of the petitioner is concerned,<\/p>\n<p>A  jthe&#8211;._aforesaid complaints are filed against the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>Jib&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>S<\/p>\n<p>and other persons and in reply to the said complaints, the<br \/>\npetitioner has produced the resignation letter tendered to<br \/>\nthe Registrar of Companies, which is recei*.re&#8217;d_l&#8221;&#8216;-Von<\/p>\n<p>18.3.2003.\n<\/p>\n<p>have resigned and also into cireumstai1Ces&#8217;,&#8230;li&#8217;t- is&#8221;&#8216;Vstat1ed<\/p>\n<p>The petitioner is only a Director .. <\/p>\n<p>Rajaram Khandage who is thee-.Elxeoi1t._il\\?e  <\/p>\n<p>Sadashiv Rao, the Chairman__l_l:of:_&#8217;th_e comiplanyiiare only<\/p>\n<p>responsible for manage&#8217;ml:enAt&#8217;&#8211;of atheu of the Company<\/p>\n<p>and sine-er-soother..pe&#8217;t\u00a7;rtioner&#8217;&#8211;._isll seeid.\u00bb&#8221;lto be only a honorary<br \/>\nDirector;._in &#8216;lmy  thyee-.plro__oeedings initiated against the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in&#8221;-aforesaid..Voas:es are required to be quashed.<br \/>\n_.;ACcordingly_,Vl&#8217;the Criminal Petitions are allowed. The<\/p>\n<p> pdrooeed_iings._4&#8243;ainitiated against the petitioner in<\/p>\n<p>725,004 (PCR No.l26\/2004), before the JMFC,<\/p>\n<p>  eVs1rei&#8221;,i&#8217; e.ee.i\\:o.4o2\/2004 (PCR No.908\/2003) before the<\/p>\n<p>l l::elNH&lt;&#039;=Cu-I\\l&#039;lll Court, Belgaurn and C.C.No.437\/200&#039;7(PCR<\/p>\n<p>(J\/&#039;-\n<\/p>\n<p>No.1l30\/2004), before JMFC III Court, Belgaurn are<\/p>\n<p>quashed.\n<\/p>\n<p>However there is libertywto th&#8217;e&#8221;&#8221;&#8216; &#8216;~rle:spOn&#8217;de11t&#8211;&#8220;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>complainant to proceed against the persons &#8216;avl1o&#8221;ar&#8217;e.3f:I1}~<\/p>\n<p>charge and who are responsible for .the..veond1.1ot of<\/p>\n<p>business, i.e., Chairman and  Further,<br \/>\nin all these cases  dispose of the<br \/>\nmatter pending are imcharge of<br \/>\naffairs of the   Si};\n<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/-4\u00bb<br \/>\nIudg\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>Vrp\/- 1. &#8212; ..<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh IN THE HIGH COUET OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9&#8242;&#8221; DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2009&#8242;&#8221;&#8212;.\u00bb BEFORE &#8216;mE HON&#8217;BLE MEJUSTICE HULUVADI G. &#8221; CRL.P. No.2o27\/2005 C\/W. CRL.-P&#8217;;&#8221;NG..39_80\/\ufb01che AND CRL.P. N0.72367.20Q_\u00a7, CRL.P.NO.2027\/2005: BETWEEN 1. A ARVIND RAO [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30832","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-05T15:10:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-05T15:10:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":533,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009\",\"name\":\"A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-05T15:10:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-05T15:10:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-05T15:10:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009"},"wordCount":533,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009","name":"A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-05T15:10:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/a-arvind-rao-vs-ramesh-sheshagiri-nayak-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"A Arvind Rao vs Ramesh Sheshagiri Nayak on 9 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30832","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=30832"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30832\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=30832"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=30832"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=30832"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}