{"id":31023,"date":"2009-11-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-11-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009"},"modified":"2017-01-06T07:57:58","modified_gmt":"2017-01-06T02:27:58","slug":"sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Rajesh S\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Rajesh S\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 27\"' DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2009,-.__\n\nBEFORE\n\nHON' BLE MR. EUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPAl...A   '\n\nCRIMINAL REVISION PETITION \u00bbNQ.6_:2.v7I\/V020-fJ\"6'.VV'   \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri. Rajesh,\n\nS\/0. Jayadev Singh,\n\nAge 29 years,   _  \n\nR\/0. Ramraagar, Ta_l\"uE&lt; J-aide,&quot;  \n\nUttara Kannada DiStriCt.&#039;s..f*    .\n\n    &quot;    Petitioner\n\n(By SriIv;I&quot;\\\/&#039;eVe&#039;re.sh RAiRI?3&#039;iI&#039;di&#039;:haO.JR; Adyid\u00e9\u00e9te)\nThe  of. i&lt;ar&quot;nat&#039;aka,\n\n..  Represen&#039;t&#039;ed by its State\n &#039;PI;i&#039;bIic~ Proseczitdr,\n\nA  _ H,ig&#039;hC,01:.rt of Karnataka,\n\n&#039; Bya&#039;nga|b*V:e&#039;,j..\n  *    Respondent<\/pre>\n<p>(By._Sri. VPJ-_|E&#8217;.4j{5Otkhindi, HCGP)<\/p>\n<p>T\u00a7&#8217;1_5_A&#8221;3 Cri.R.P is filed I;\/S 397 and 401 Cr.P.C by the<\/p>\n<p>I Ig.,Advo_cate for the petitioner praying that this Horfble Court\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; T &#8220;rrsay_A&#8217;De pleased to set aside the Order dated 11.08.2004\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;  passed by the JMFC, Dandeli, in C.C.No.870\/2001 and the<\/p>\n<p>prove the guilt of the petitioner and hence, the conviction<\/p>\n<p>and sentence imposed is illegal. It was contentedthat,<\/p>\n<p>mere possession of an unlawfully manufactured in&#8211;\u00abto&gt;r;&#8217;ifca&#8217;ritA4<\/p>\n<p>is not made punishable under Section 34 of  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>is punishable under the Act is poss.e\u00bbs\u00bbslon &#8216;rruI,rilawf_L:llly.,, <\/p>\n<p>manufactured intoxicant with the;-Ekiiowilledlgepii&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>unlawfully manufactured andisbeing&#8221;&#8216;transplo-rted\ufb01&#8221;Since &#8221; V<\/p>\n<p>the basic fact of knowledge&#8212;-utha_t&#8221;vthehintoxicaint was<br \/>\nunlawfully manufacturedh&#8212; vriesitablished, the<br \/>\npresumption unde&#8217;r.__Sec:tionQCV_of,?th.&#8217;e..VAct not attracted<br \/>\nand hence Vlowevr&#8217;a_npHellate court to the<\/p>\n<p>effect   liquor should be<br \/>\nDresumed tollkn\u00e9ow carrying on the liquor<br \/>\nwithout  .i&#8221;lez&#8217;ga| finding and calls for<br \/>\n revlianlce was placed on the Division<\/p>\n<p>Bench : d.iecilsion&#8211;\u00ab._:of.l&#8217;.i&#8217;VVtl&#8217;i&#8217;is court, in the case of State of<\/p>\n<p>l&#8221;vv:_&#8217;ll&#8221;M;&#8217;sore &#8220;ills.  Kush Gowda reported in 1973(1)<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>5. On the other hand, Sri P.H.Gotkhindi, Learned<\/p>\n<p>HCGP invited my attention to the provisions con_taVi_r&#8217;i.ed.,_in<\/p>\n<p>Sections 32, 34 &amp; 40 of the Act and submittedgthat,&#8217;~i.irijiti.ew_T&#8217; .<\/p>\n<p>of the concurrent finding recorded  the C.0&#8217;U&#8217;i&#8217;t\u00e9::i&#8217;3e&#8217;|VO:\\.Ai&#8221;vyltlfi &#8216;*<\/p>\n<p>regard to seizure of the liquor V=frorn-the&#8217;ea.;joss&#8217;esslC&gt;n<\/p>\n<p>Accusecl&#8211;1, who was driving&#8217; -the lot&#8217;-ry&#8217;, the=&#8217;V:&#8217;pres.u,ifh_otioin <\/p>\n<p>raised that, he was carrying   permit, is<br \/>\njustified and hence   the sentence<br \/>\nimposed are legal &#8216;interference is<br \/>\ncalled for.   in support of<br \/>\nthe findings.   below, insofar as<\/p>\n<p>the co nviction&#8221; &#8216;a.nd,,V.s3e.nte,ncirig . oi&#8217; Accused&#8211; 1.<\/p>\n<p>6.  View-__of..,the~7rival contentions, the point for<\/p>\n<p>.&#8211;v..,_dete&#8217;riT.1in__ation is:V&#8230;. &#8230;.. <\/p>\n<p>   Whether the Trial court below is justified<br \/>\n convicting and sentencing the<br \/>\npetitioner\/Acciised&#8211;l for the offence<br \/>\npiinishable under Section 34 of Karnataka<br \/>\nExcise Act and whether the Appellate<br \/>\nCourt is justified in affirming the findings<\/p>\n<p>of Trial Court&#8217;?\n<\/p>\n<p>(&#8220;K<\/p>\n<p>5\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">12<\/span><\/p>\n<p>opinion that in such cases the presumption that can<br \/>\nbe raised under Sec\/10 of the Mysore Excise Act is in<\/p>\n<p>regard to the knowledge which is a necessary<\/p>\n<p>ingredient of an offence under S34 of<\/p>\n<p>Excise Act. When once the prosecutio\u00e9iesta.b?:isi&#8217;1\u00e9$<\/p>\n<p>that an accused was in posses_sion_~&#8217;ofintoziicartst it<\/p>\n<p>and that intoxicant :.._wasI_  &#8220;\u00abuniawfu11y<\/p>\n<p>inanufactured&#8230;.etc., then a&#8217;V__p;r&#8217;e_sump:t1jon&#8221; thatl&#8217;the&#8217;&#8211;..<\/p>\n<p>accused has the requisite&#8221;&#8216;V}gnovv.I&#8217;ed__ge of i.e.,l&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>that it was unlawfully 1na&#8217;11t11&#8217;actureCi;,._.v_Etc:\u00a7, can be<br \/>\nraised by virtue &#8216;uMysore Excise Act.<br \/>\nBut to contendllthlatll presuxnfgtion provided<br \/>\nunder Section 4,\\&#8221;)&#8221;&#8221;of Alt:\/\u00a7yvfsore\u00ab.:.t&#8217;I\u00a5idccise Act would<br \/>\nextend   lupfesuming that an<br \/>\ninto1Eica_izi&#8217;t_&#8217;Vis  .ama131ufactured. . .etc. , as laid<br \/>\n  of _Mysore Excise Act would be,<br \/>\nin_o&#8217;u&#8217;_1~ opilnio:1:,&#8217;i&#8217;te&#8217;arl:i&#8217;1;g&#8221;too much into S.40 of the<br \/>\nMysore&#8217;   and would lead to disastrous<br \/>\n;&#8217;eo_1.1secV1uen&#8217;ce1s iierhich would be contrary to the<\/p>\n<p>V  intenvdmeritl 6f&#8221;tl1e Legislature.<\/p>\n<p>[Emphasis supplied by me)<\/p>\n<p>u13..:.VThere is no evidence on record, which<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;..jfv.esta&#8217;taiishes that the petitioner\/Accused-*1 had the<\/p>\n<p> kijolvtiedge that the intoxicant found in the lorry was<\/p>\n<p>I3<\/p>\n<p>illegally manufactured and is being transported. The two<\/p>\n<p>courts below have not taken into considerati.C5tn_&lt;:&quot;&#039;rtehe<\/p>\n<p>aforesaid decision of this court into considerat_io&#039;n&#039;.&#039;-\u00ab\\Iif&#8211;it:h&quot;o;;rt&#039;\u00ab _<\/p>\n<p>there being any evidence placed on  <\/p>\n<p>prosecution to the effect that <\/p>\n<p>authority in his possession had.___theVintoxicant&quot;knoyyingl they<\/p>\n<p>same to be unlawfully manuf&#039;a&#039;ct&#039;ur&#039;ed &#039;._tra&#039;:nspforting it,<br \/>\nhave convicted and   has not<br \/>\nalleged that, the Accusedfl  tihee\ufb01kin-o&#039;wledge of the<br \/>\nintoxicant  mvaV.n&#039;Vu&#039;fa&#039;ctured and was<br \/>\ntransportin\u20acg__Etj_u_&quot;fflahe&#039;  of S34 of the Act<br \/>\nhas   has failed to prove its<br \/>\ncase  In my view, the impugned<\/p>\n<p>judgments are_p&#039;e&#039;rver&#039;se and manifestly erroneous, also<\/p>\n<p>.\ufb01&quot;b.eeiVn&quot;g. ciontrlary to the\u00e9law declared by this court in the said<\/p>\n<p>A ,rJe&#039;c&#039;i sieo ni    &#8211; . V <\/p>\n<p> }\u00a7n&quot;v.the&quot;result, the revision petition is allowed and the<\/p>\n<p>luv&#039;ligirraputgneld judgments are hereby set~aside and accused<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;   hereby acquitted. The fine amount if any paid by<\/p>\n<p>\/<\/p>\n<p>r<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">14<\/span><\/p>\n<p>him, is directed to be refunded and bail bond stands<\/p>\n<p>cancened.\n<\/p>\n<p>Ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<p> \u00a7\u00a7ud9n]fir*~<\/p>\n<p>Yi3\/ &#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Rajesh S\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 27&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2009,-.__ BEFORE HON&#8217; BLE MR. EUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPAl&#8230;A &#8216; CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION \u00bbNQ.6_:2.v7I\/V020-fJ&#8221;6&#8242;.VV&#8217; BETWEEN: Sri. Rajesh, S\/0. Jayadev Singh, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31023","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Rajesh S\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Rajesh S\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-11-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-01-06T02:27:58+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Rajesh S\\\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-06T02:27:58+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009\"},\"wordCount\":805,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Rajesh S\\\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-11-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-01-06T02:27:58+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Rajesh S\\\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Rajesh S\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Rajesh S\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-11-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-01-06T02:27:58+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Rajesh S\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009","datePublished":"2009-11-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-06T02:27:58+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009"},"wordCount":805,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009","name":"Sri Rajesh S\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-11-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-01-06T02:27:58+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-rajesh-so-jayadev-singh-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-27-november-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Rajesh S\/O Jayadev Singh vs The State Of Karnataka on 27 November, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31023","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31023"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31023\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31023"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31023"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31023"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}