{"id":31147,"date":"2009-03-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009"},"modified":"2017-05-10T01:37:20","modified_gmt":"2017-05-09T20:07:20","slug":"gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Gunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Gunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
:1: THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKKVVV '  '- \" '\ncmcurr BENCH AT D\u00a7fA.RW#;i3\" -- if '  VV\nmrrsn THIS THE 6*\u00bb DAY  125009 '1; ;\n353083 V V V V V V\nTHE HOBPBLE MR. Jvs\ufb01\u00e9m g;.s.VVB'aVV1\u00a7A'i\\IH\u00a75.\nc.1=t.:2\"'raro.\u00a3iVs6\u00a7\\ --  _ V\nBETWEEN; \"\nSri. Gunja\ufb02i  -  V \nAga\u00e9 abmzt 68 yesz\ufb01s '\n81:3, Hire: v\ufb01ggappa \nAgzicnitlsfist \"  V; _  _\nGangavathi, Kappa}.  .. '\n . M      PETITIONER\n\n(83: Sri. JaymV}i'it.\u00e91\"RaQ\u00ab_ Acivocatrz)\n\n        \n\nV V '  '  \u00abV  '\ufb01cqiiisition C}f\ufb01n:::er\n\n*--. (As\u00a34i\u00a7;7ta11t.Coti\u00a7:x331issioner)\nKoi\u00e9pal \" \"\n\n *2. '\u00a7'heVVVS\u00bb:c:Vi*gtaVVryVV , Ag1'i-::u3.tur3.Z Produce\n\n MarkcVt.CGm3sittee, Gangavathi\n\n ., Gagugavathi Taiuk, Kappa]. Distrrict\n\n _b7'3;,_:it\u00a7; Eieczwetary\n'  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
 . _ –\u00abV_4V{‘8’3f;’Sri, 5. N. Kuikazni, may for R4 ; Sri. at 3. Patil, ,&dv:x2ai:e far
\n Ems;\n<\/p>\n
.i<\/p>\n
4′<\/p>\n
in.)<\/p>\n
CR? FILED U\/S. :15 OF (:90 AGAINST
\n26.03.2004 PASSED IN CIVIL MESC. 920.1\/03 ON. ,’I”i’~IE’~\u00a7T’IL E\u00a7 OF’ ._ <\/p>\n
THE CIVIL JUIQGE (SR. ma}, GANGP;.’J}X’i’–HI, I’}IS\u00a7\\\u00a7iS$\u00a7P\u00e9xL}._TFH’E
\nPETITION RLE3 [}\/S. 152 R\/W Sm. 1EE\u00bb.\u00a7 \u00e9’.}1\u00a5’ CZPC— sE%’a.\u00a7s:I:+:.G\u00e9
\nT0 AMENB THE AWARD. *    ~.\n<\/p>\n
THIS PE’I’\u00a7’I’iON COMING (:~:\u20ac”‘:2%0R Vm3;A;:=2;Tr\u00a7Iv\u00a73’V”:\u00a7\u00a7?i’1:<3".\u00a7A'y',"<\/p>\n
THE COURT MADE THE FOL'\u00a7.,OVsf1_Z\u00a7E{}: K<\/p>\n
  "\u00a3~f\u00a7i..,.'..w….A..%'%I*'%-'15E:L;i\u00a7 %i "  <\/p>\n
The   'gtgas\ufb01on the order
\ndated   P\ufb01i\u00e9\ufb01ge\ufb02a\ufb01gous No. 1\/2003. By
\nthe  "o1\ufb02r:;\u00a7';v".   Dn), Garxgavathi has
\ndismissevid\u00e9 tbgfi   h' the petitioner herein under<\/p>\n
Sectiexx }52 f_ CP\u00a2  tea the judgment and award passed<\/p>\n
 in L.z*x>5$ N58\/2d6:\u00bb..  %%%%% <\/p>\n
  ‘V2;  Shri Jayavittai Rat) K0131″, learned senior<\/p>\n
Cxzatm\ufb01el  for the pc\ufb01tionezr, Shri. D. N. Kuikafni,<\/p>\n
 ~’~__ it:aI11ed”{}f\u00a7ver31m:::x:t Advacate appearing for Respondent N31<\/p>\n
  H (L S. Patil, if.Zi8.3Lf”.1’1\u20aci{‘I Counsei appearing far Respandent<\/p>\n
 –.  Nof2.\n<\/p>\n
3\u00bb Having heard this respec\ufb02w: ieaxned Counsei,
\ngemsed the papers. The brief facts isadixig in the present 933$<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
is that the land belonging to the peti\ufb01omzr was actqg1i1″\u00bb\u00e9(iV’<\/p>\n
b\ufb01n\ufb01\ufb01t of the 1511 Respondent. E11 resspcct  _ <\/p>\n
campensation awarclad by the <\/p>\n
inadequate: was cailcad for c1:1ha;;cen:1?:–ni”~by   <\/p>\n
under Section 18 of the Land Ac\ufb01ii1?E%’\u00a3i\ufb01.0n A\u00e9\ufb02  [.};;1′(iI’V(\u00e9iI1Eii’?;t3I’ V<\/p>\n
caiied as ‘the Act’ for sh5{ft’},_  \ufb01\u00e9ti\ufb01ien {\u00a7%\u00e91s}v’t%ferred {O
\nthe Refertznce Coilrt in    respect of the
\ncompensation aw:\u00a7@.=.\u00bbd   were in appea}
\nbefore the   Bench of this Court
\nin  7.:L;’ppe5;\u00a71 had been \ufb01led by the
\nbene\ufb01ai\ufb01fy-;\u00a7PMx’J3:.VVV\ufb01flfi\ufb01\ufb01’  Bench Vidf: its G1’d\u20ac’:r dated<\/p>\n
19.08.2802  o:17.Vtb’11:%’~’bLVappea} with only the modificatimz<\/p>\n
  to ui:\u00a3c:\u20ac113.:::\u00ab\ufb01;io;1 of the tievelopmental charges.<\/p>\n
 the parties were before: the Exacuting Court<\/p>\n
axiii.  \\?i\u20ac?\u00e9\u00a7j }:’:f the modi\ufb01cations macis, the mamas of<\/p>\n
 ::a1cui:ati{}”x1 sk\u00e9s i\ufb01led b\u20ac’3f()I’\u20ac the Court. Sinc\ufb01 there was dispute<\/p>\n
V’  to the slama, they were 01123:: again befmre: the<\/p>\n
 Bench sf this C_ouri:, this tma before; {hrs Eearna\u00e9.<\/p>\n
” Singie Judg\ufb01t in 09.? M338\/2003. In th::: said petition, this<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
“.1<\/p>\n
Colzrt Wh\ufb02\ufb01 dispasing of the petition on 14.02.2(I_)\u00a7I;3;3– <\/p>\n
213 foiiows im para 6 of the cmzlcr.\n<\/p>\n
” it. is also Imedless to make an Qbservaijon  ‘V ‘ H
\nin this order regarding the”}..5%
\ninterest upon the awarded Compengsa\ufb01o\ufb01 ‘
\nas provi\u00e9ed under  fh(\u00a7’~.pI’OViS’\u00a7(}IiS of
\nof Land Acquisition At*:.1;,”*} 894 is .\u00a7:c5i1c{:r1:i.\u00a3:d,
\nit is open for the zesp;>i;.:1ex7:V;\/decreceiaoldizr
\n\u00a30 \ufb01le neceeiszgxy \u00abapis\ufb01ca\ufb01\u00e9zx before “tha
\nreference co1z:rt.Vlse\u20ac:1;in\u00a7:,’x’eV\u00a7f\u20aciv”<3f its award
\nand demte under' thaaforc\u00e9\u00e9ai\u00e9. provisions
\nof the Act  also  (sf-:)Iif\u20ac3r\ufb01iity 'with the
\ndecisionsf the  SUNDEER
\n.vs,.ijuN;;G_N Q}? ii'\u00a7DIA[(?J!i}\u00a3}'E)'3'*'S{3C 211]. If
\ns,uc1.%._'<–.aiiv"apialication is'2 \ufb011V\u20ac:1 by him, the
\nsa_m;\u00a31_\u00a7I;gay :\u00a5\ufb01C4.C(ii13i{i'6:i'ed'\u00a7 after hearing the<\/p>\n
 ~~~~ -VT;;1AeTfcitio11ieI:  j1:.g\u00a5g.mcni.—-v….d\u00e9bto1' and pass
\naypmpziafc  in accordance: with law.'<\/p>\n
45. ‘Ps3.:Es’ua.;1i_ t:()~.V_1~:fm?.”‘b:’}1b0ve ordsgr, rim petitizmer fzie\u00e9 the<\/p>\n
 .\u00a7:*ss:;\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7i. b\u00a7ILi:sc\u00a2}},anA\u00a3\u00e9'()us.=…?etitio:1 under Seciian 152 r\/W Section<\/p>\n
1E”5.3  bf +:~:;\u20ac’:vc::I::<';i..*\u00ab':g {Gr amandment of the judgment and award<\/p>\n
gmss\u00e9\u00e9 inv  200}. While dismissing the petiiii-on, the<\/p>\n
 R\ufb01f!f3E'Eu1Zi';)\u00e9' C\u00e9urt was of the Vi\u20acW that it does not harm<\/p>\n
V' \u00a7:1ii$\u00e9i\u00a7:ti<;3:1 to do so since the ju\ufb01gment and award passed has<\/p>\n
 in the proceedings befere ihe High (hurt. Sacondly, it<\/p>\n
"i5\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01s \u00a31616: that {ha petition was not maintainabie since the Saree<\/p>\n
was 1739!; it}. the natuxt 0f mview and the amendment sought for<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
'''c<\/p>\n
is 30$ 3 clezica} mistake to be COI'I"'tE:C\u00a7{':\u00a3i I:;.\ufb01s\u00e9d" iihi\u00e9<\/p>\n
appl\ufb01cation \ufb01led undar Section 1552 of QPC.<\/p>\n
5. While assailing the  \u00e9\ufb02\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a7ted*.\n<\/p>\n
Reference: Conn, the lcarned’\u00abv__$’\u00a3::1iorVh\ufb01ouns\u00e9l iiza\u00e9 placedV<\/p>\n
reiiance on the _}’1i\u00a7g1I1E31}t,..{;Ef Dis{i.*3i{“,;:i”L_:B{\u00e9i*zr:.}; of C\u00bbb;urt in the
\nCase of SHIVAPPA  — vs. THE LAND
\nACQUISI’1’iON O\u00a7?E’\u00a7{__’\u00a7ER A;zxr;:3%L;:  \u00e9omzsarssiomaa,
\nKOP?AL Aim  {?;Q\u00a7;4(3;–..'”; \ufb01ivision Bench of this
\nCcmrt    .. cf ” merger and the nature of<\/p>\n
considera\ufb01loisz in su\u00e9h \u00e9;5\u00a7pve\u00a2i;.\n<\/p>\n
  P21r\u00a3hc\u00a7\ufb01’  ‘icamed senior Counsel has also reliitd<\/p>\n
Kan wipe ‘j;1eEvg:&\u00e9,ntQ:’of.this Court in the c:a$\u20ac 0f ERAPPA Va SFATE<\/p>\n
  Tactic}; S\u00e9:\u00e9;\u00a2.:*A:, LAND Acquzsmon OFFKZER, {EPPER<\/p>\n
 4 ‘\u00a7{ia*1sHM”RR’0JEcr, AURAD, GULBARGA [)iS”I’R\u00a3CfT’ {1997(2)<\/p>\n
  to: contend with tagazti tn the power of tha Court<\/p>\n
  make Iiecassary carrasctions even under Sectgiea 151 cf CFC<\/p>\n
“”.i\u00a7\u00e9i\u00a3r0iei fa.i1z1.1ie: of jus\ufb01ce. T113 Iearne\u00e9 senior Counsel has alga<\/p>\n
‘ placed rt:}:E.,a11ce an the judgmani to cont\ufb01nd that mere \ufb01ling 0?<\/p>\n
J!<\/p>\n
‘T<\/p>\n
petition under di\ufb01emnt provision Wonk} not take: away tbs right.
\naf the Court to corxtct the mistake. The refemncc is {.1139 made<\/p>\n
to the judgment in the case 0f KOTUR <\/p>\n
KARNATAKA Houszm BOARD (rm 2008 KAR   <\/p>\n
bcna\ufb01ts wart: p\u00e9xmitt\ufb02d if}. an app\ufb01ca\ufb01og u11<fZ\u00e9f'S\u00e9j..   "<\/p>\n
With regard is the right for  <\/p>\n
Counsel has placed reliancs an-4…:1;e {iecision   \ufb01g-zise of V *<\/p>\n
summiz vs. UNION 012' INDIA (AIf\u00a7"'i?f)G} sC'35j\u00a75 j. V:<\/p>\n
"F. The learned  f\u00a3'o,:~  fr-.;s}1;:s;nde:1t haztsw\ufb01ver,<\/p>\n
soughi  m.;;c1 fVii;.i  _\u00abi;:x:\u00bb;1%:its5*2_.1"i IL-iy placing reliancts on the Very<\/p>\n
same judggac\ufb01t 1m1\u00a7\u00e9""s\u00a7w\u00a31VA?9A MALL-APPA JIGALUR<\/p>\n
V (supsrggj 't:3L.::911\u00a7:\u20ac'z';<?\u00a7V_ t11:at vihs {iocirinc sf merger wauid agpiy in<\/p>\n
    c%\u00a7,s:_, While: the iearrmd Gevt. Advecate has placed<\/p>\n
 .\u00a7Vu.\u00a7igment of \ufb02ue Hon'\u00a5::1e Supreme Court in the<\/p>\n
'  ease-ai G;A\u00a7~:1j'\u00a3PRAsAm Am OTHERS vs. JAYAPRASAD AND<\/p>\n
 "'*–__'\u00a73';jHTERS-g;\u00a7;1R 2094 SAR CIVIL 9:3). Rerliance is .3130 piaccd in<\/p>\n
:f'\u00a33..\u00a2'–c9;:\u00a7a: 0f GURPREEE' 3:943}; vs. USEGN SF gzxzsm {AIR<\/p>\n
   i$\u00a7);f36(2) mac 59.1}? J<\/p>\n
~J<\/p>\n
8. Having noticed the said contentions, what has to<\/p>\n
be considered at the eutset is with rsgard to tha dociifine of<\/p>\n
merger, which has been put forth While <\/p>\n
applicavlcm and as ta Whether in the  %  V’ <\/p>\n
present case the same weuid be : \u00e91\u00bbfA3HpbIi(:;a_b’;1\u00a2. -1′  <\/p>\n
learned Govt. Advocate had placed miiga\ufb01c\ufb01an  <\/p>\n
the I~io1z’b}.cz Slzprttma Court 12o\ufb01c=t;;i”~supfa,— .1it’iS_ se\u00ab\u00a3%:3V’Vf}i2\u00a7t th\u00e9w<\/p>\n
Divisicn Bench ju\u00e9gment   the c\u00e9\u00a3S\u00e9”ofSHIVAPPA<\/p>\n
MALLAP?A u\u00a5I(?rALUR is quit\u00e9 ‘c;E\u00a7n\u00a7;ia:_\u00a2:\u00a7ng all aspects
\nwhere    :b:*;\u00a7?\u00a71;; p}\u00ab$_\u00a3:\u00e9d’V’cn the View summatized<\/p>\n
by the H (3-1:;’\u00a5:::1e ‘ v(\u00a76’;1%t;:…re1ating to Booking caf margin”.<\/p>\n
B\u20actf()i”\u20ac aciv\ufb01tin g \u00a3;~:1f:}.:.;eATp1*:e:~*;z:*;1i1t facts cf the case, what requires<\/p>\n
 , 13;;  gs tki\u00a7;it’ix:…t\u00a71e: said decisimz, the illivisien Bench of<\/p>\n
‘C41u1’tV’I3a\u00a7s<vA.e\u00a7\u00a7itracted the reieva\ufb02t por\ufb01on of the judgment cf<\/p>\n
BOL':.'\u00a7)}%3  Court which has bean f\ufb01f\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01d by the<\/p>\n
'V\ufb01ivisieaiz\ufb01  Tha said conciusion would indicate that \ufb01i\ufb01<\/p>\n
'  sf merger is not a \u00e9ocfrinc af imiversai er the<\/p>\n
 apylicatien which wi\ufb01 depend an the naturc cf the<\/p>\n
"–\u00ab:ij\u20ac:ii$dicti0I: \u20acX\u20ac?.'(2iS-fid by the Sumrior Forum and the centent<\/p>\n
' x or subject matttr of Cthaiienge laid or capable of baing laid 31131}<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
"5<\/p>\n
be detmminative of the appiicability or merger. 'I'Ir11.i\u00e9:"'\u00bb e',a5e.it;1<\/p>\n
<.:<)3:13V::1″<3 c.'\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01 g\u00e9 in award but Calctliatioau
\nthereto  i:L1a\u20ac1t:–  Court '\u00a7'hV<}i'i:V\ufb01cation of the judgment and when the<\/p>\n
 \u20ac}IIlf3I1('{}.'k1\u20acI;i1\u00ab:t \u00e9f \ufb01xtigzaatznt and \u00e9eczte was sought, the matter<\/p>\n
  ha??? been vicarwed di\ufb01hrtn\ufb01y,<\/p>\n
9, Hawever, in the instant case, as already Ixoiiccd<\/p>\n
  .. \u00abivhile uaxrating the brief facts of the case, the parties were 02:02:<\/p>\n
again before: the 1ea.z*r2.:”538[ 2003. This relevant  <\/p>\n
order made in the said revigion pe\ufb01tion,    <\/p>\n
petitio::1 on 14.03.2003 has already tfiee\ufb01i\u00e9xtz\u00e9gted’  <\/p>\n
above. in the said por’\u00a3io1i1,, $31613″-.iS”‘..Sp6Ci\ufb01fi.f3fii)$\u20acI’\\l’?3fi01i”g<\/p>\n
permitting liberty in the r\u20ac:sg5\u00bbi3:ii:isvnt\/ decI_;\u00a2\u00e9~T,t;\u00a7olc\u00a7i;rVV Wthere3′;1V<\/p>\n
namely, the petitioner iimjz\ufb01in  VV%i13;1\u00a7r}ica\u00ab1:’iV(5i’1 “i:\u00a7efore the
\nReference Court seekixng   decme under
\nthe provisions the   u  and also in
\ncanfcrmity wr;1::i1  s\ufb01zpreme Court in SUNDER
\nvs.  there is a diI’ffC1ii{)I1 1:0
\nconsider  $–11V(::h  said dimction would indicate<\/p>\n
that this_v{3Q1.i’:*i  c\ufb01ias\u00e9\u00e9ious of the fact of earlier litigation<\/p>\n
   paAr{ies;Vb’efor\u20ac the Court hefare {Division Bench and<\/p>\n
 z:_\u00a7;-azicing. fizz\u00e9i, .,7pu\u00a7*s1;ant therein the execution petition ha\u00e9 been<\/p>\n
}e:vi E:d \u00e93 nc1  proceedings the parties were before: it, had<\/p>\n
 _ 44 \u00e9gsueci \u20ac115 speci\ufb01c direction to appmach. the Reference Co1;1r1E.<\/p>\n
 I T\ufb01izsreiiam, considezing the said i\u00a3iitE:i’V\u20acI2ing circumstance in the<\/p>\n
 __”‘ \u00a7}I’$V\u00a7’3\ufb01I1t case, thfi doctrine of merger as ixzdicatsd by Hoxfble<\/p>\n
 *D’1;’L’\\i”.:iSi(I)3\ufb01 Bench of this Court Wouid have ‘\u00a39 he naticed and<\/p>\n
more partictzlarly, whezx 13.1 the instant case ‘Eh: pe\ufb01\ufb01aner is the<\/p>\n
J7<\/p>\n
“‘r<\/p>\n
ii}
\nowner seeking fer certain statutory bene\ufb01ts which amvetreifaahle<\/p>\n
to him un\u00e9er the Act, were particularly when  <\/p>\n
permitted the liberty by xaaoticing the   3 <\/p>\n
SUNDER’s case (supra).\n<\/p>\n
10. Therefore, in the pxtesexzt cam’: am oi”th.e4_view;e tliat ” L.<\/p>\n
the Reference Court was I}Gt’v’4′>”jjV\u00a3’i$ti\ufb01\u20acd”   the
\nappiicaiion by invoking’  “mergerH geld in the
\npresent facts and eizcuiestareeee  the ‘Was open for the<\/p>\n
Reference Ceurt2_’te”\u00a7;1:e\u00e91ke  if the land loser ._<\/p>\n
;3e\u00a5:itione}:i_we.s e1Vitit\u00a7er1:’*\u00a33_’\ufb023e”v:e\ufb01ei’ sought. for by relying on the<\/p>\n
SUNDEFFS ‘c’as5ee(su1pr2;).f _  J<\/p>\n
 ‘F};1e ee$:tv’~~ae*pect cf the matter Whicrirl arises for<\/p>\n
“m1see:ae\u00a7::eigmm regard to {he rejeciien of the application<\/p>\n
on  the same had been filed under Seetien 152<\/p>\n
 _  (ZIP(3. ..Ifa.’\u00a7h$s regard, is: is net necessary ten eiziecese the matter<\/p>\n
    Siiifj\ufb02 the {ieeisien in the ease ef ERAPPA (supra),<\/p>\n
  see by the Eearned seejer \ufb01ezmsel weuid squarely aeply to<\/p>\n
 *.th\u20aci’: preeeni facts of the case, since the said decision was<\/p>\n
ren\u00e9ered by the lear\ufb02eei Single Judge ef thi\ufb01 Court While<\/p>\n
J<\/p>\n
P’.\n<\/p>\n
1?;\n<\/p>\n
Ccnurt: has erred in the matter. This View is farrti\ufb01ed by the<\/p>\n
dercisian in the ease of GANGA BOW vs. SHANK’A_R..4:’SEVA<\/p>\n
SAMITHI (R), ‘\u00a3’UMKUR 3996(1) KAR L.J.238].<\/p>\n
112. Therefom, 3 am of the Vview that”   \u00a5\u00a5f:\u00a7f(‘i’:j5:12.;cut:””<\/p>\n
Cmlrt Wouid have to restore the Civ\ufb01 M130. A. 33e tit;i.;01iV”?~I’G:V1:'{_\u00a7}?:a:1Vt{)<\/p>\n
its file and consider the case 02:1 its me\ufb01gs’. W}\ufb011\u20ac’._;w:a\ufb01mg that  ><\/p>\n
there shouid be reconsidera\ufb01on Vtht; R\u00e9ibz\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9e Qou\ufb01 with<\/p>\n
regard in tha peiiti\ufb01n  Es f;b.<\u00e9 decision ciied by<\/p>\n
the iemned Govt. A1\u00a7.:;\u00a7voc:a1;\u00a2._Vi:;–.VtE.i\u00a5\u00a2 {:as;\u00e9~,\u00a7'f~1'.\u00e9:;~I;"RPRE}3'r smea<\/p>\n
(supra) Z\ufb02is  iastizftaci it  made dear that whiie the<\/p>\n
Rcfereuca  :*\u00e9\u00a3,*<3\u00a7\u00a7i$ic1a$if*::.%V 4t4;'\u00a7:1\u00a2:% matter, it Shall keep in View<\/p>\n
_ 13:16 eii\ufb01fsisiolz ef t11*f:_V_ FI s3::'\u00a3~le Suyreme Court both in S{\u00a7NDER's<\/p>\n
  (@153 SXNGWS case and ihamafter cansidar the<\/p>\n
p\u00e9ziitiijrn 0:d'i"i::$ ii;1&-,-'t'i."\u00bb:$ and aroma $0 the cencizmian one way or<\/p>\n
V _ the Other atzitoz\ufb01amce with law.\n<\/p>\n
n I \u00ab-3.3, {m that aspect 0f the matter, the contentiaas 6f the<\/p>\n
  aye kept {span in be nrg\u00e9ci before the Reference Ceurt’<\/p>\n
‘”= fi2 th& light of 1:113 abeve, the order dated 26.G:3\u00a32()O4 1% set<\/p>\n
asitie. The pctitien in (ff-ix\ufb01 \u00a7\\’IiSQ\u00a3333.8I}\u20acfO1l$ 1\/ 2693 is restored 1:0<\/p>\n
“‘4<\/p>\n
the \ufb01le of the Civii Judge (Sr. D21) at <\/p>\n
and dispose of the same in acooltiance with law;’ = .1: ‘  .<\/p>\n
14. Since the pazties are I\u20acpI’tE’: fs\u00a2\ufb01:i!3’d.’<\/p>\n
learned counsel, may shall Egef\u00e9fs
\nas the first date Of a\ufb01p\ufb01alanca gar} “Th\u20ac:::eafter the
\nreferernc\u00e9 Court shaii    and dispose of
\nthe petition as crxjp-.c:r1V;.itio13V,-:’;’l3;\u00bb*”..*ez$_*~::  fzot Later than 4
\nmonths from  tii\ufb01  capy of this order<\/p>\n
is produced b\u00e9fc;;%\u00a7– 33\u00a2  <\/p>\n
“;}\u00a7:{itM;i\u00a7x3,:}s$ands dismsed sf. N9 order as
\nto casts. a M ‘
\n  sal-\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
. .  .- ‘ <\/p>\n
ii\u00e9\u00e9  V<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Gunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna :1: THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKKVVV ‘ ‘- ” ‘ cmcurr BENCH AT D\u00a7fA.RW#;i3″ — if ‘ VV mrrsn THIS THE 6*\u00bb DAY 125009 ‘1; ; 353083 V V V V V V THE HOBPBLE MR. Jvs\ufb01\u00e9m g;.s.VVB’aVV1\u00a7A’i\\IH\u00a75. c.1=t.:2″‘raro.\u00a3iVs6\u00a7\\ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31147","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nGunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-09T20:07:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"12 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-09T20:07:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":2173,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Gunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-09T20:07:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-09T20:07:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"12 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-09T20:07:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009"},"wordCount":2173,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009","name":"Gunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-09T20:07:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gunjalli-nagappa-vs-the-land-acquisition-officer-on-6-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gunjalli Nagappa vs The Land Acquisition Officer on 6 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31147","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31147"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31147\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31147"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31147"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31147"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}