{"id":31602,"date":"2010-01-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010"},"modified":"2015-02-25T11:04:34","modified_gmt":"2015-02-25T05:34:34","slug":"the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: K.L.Manjunath And Kumar<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE }~I1GH COURT OF }\u00a7ARNA'l'AKA, CERCUIT BENCH __ T\n\nDHARWAD.\n\namen THIS THE) 127'?\" DAY OF JANUARY :20_m :A.\nPRESENT 1  V12\n\nTHE HONBLE M'\u00a3e.JUsT1c\u00a3:: xv;LA\u00a7'M'AN\u00a5Ji3_NArfi3Y' \nAND:  i  \u00bb\u00bb  L\nTHE \u00a7~{ON'BLE MR.  \n\nMiscellaneous Fircsi VAppea'}\"E'Je .'  of\n\nBetween :\n\nThe Oriental I.n.:;u1\"~a_ncc\u00a7:_' Co.' \u00a3311.',  \nBellary, Rep. {by 'Bic; V .    4'   \nBranch Maf1'a'gi,e 1'=a:'f1_Vr\u00a7'11(m=_* =.._   \u00bb\nThrough Tize 1-\".'{_eV{;_ic)r325i'='{)ff1~Ce,'_  \n\nNO. 44,\/---4:\u00bb-5,_L'eo Ceiimple-&gt;5,  ' '\n\nResidency Rodd,  , \n\nBangalore.' \"  .  \n\nRep. bykthe' Assista.t1t. Mzz\ufb01exgjer,\nSri.K. Jajfe.IT\u20ac5U\"f1. ' A ~ . \n\n..Appe11ant\n\n\" V'   Jai1'\u00a3\u00e91Vf';\"'i{;}{. Vasatdth Adv.)\n\nAnd  \n\n'b';ii;'VVMoheiiI\u00a7J_r:T:ed Rafiq,\n\nS \/ Peeranf Sab,\n\n Agedabctut 30 years,\n\nDriver of Lorry\n\n No}a&lt;:A~34\/2772\n\n&#039;._Re:sident of Bandimote,\nBellary.\n\n\n\nLJ\n\n2. G. G-opaia Krishna\nS \/ 0. Venkataramappa,\nAged about 45 years,\nOwner of Lorry bearing,\nN0. KA-34-2772.\n\nC\/0. Baiaji Kerosene Agency,\nNear APMC Yard,\nBellary.   _\n\n3. Sri. Govinda.\nS\/0. Late Kondappa,\nAged about 30 years.\n\n4. Smt. Huiigemma\nD\/0. Late Kondappa,\nAged about 29 years.\n\nThe resp01&#039;1dents=NQ. 3 a:n&lt;&#039;:&#039;i*4::&quot; V\nare residents Qf&#039;;&#039;3.apuji2&lt;sf;1gar,.I&#039;\nBellary.  V ~ 3 \n\n...Respondents\n(By sixi.&#039;v1.wgae\u00a3sax}a1---a;;&#039;2ia~,}&#039;.&#039;&lt;:?g\u00a7i+&#039; as 85 R4, R} a, R2 - Sd)\n\nThis.VIvIvisee11aneoL1&#039;sFirst Appea\u00e9 is fifed u\/s. 173(1) of MV Act\nagainst tit}: judgment&quot;&#039;;:n_d___avvard dated. 07\/03\/2006 passed in\n1&#039;t&#039;!VC&#039;.=i\\}0V&#039;.&#039;*E3}?2OCf5&#039;on the file of the Pr}. Civil Judge (S1&quot;.Dn.} and\nMember,&#039;--\u00bb _V M.AC.&#039;1&quot;~?._1I;v __ Beilary, awarding a Compensation of\nRs.3,sQ3,Q.OG,&#039;_{&#039;witfii ii&#039;-1_&#039;1t&#039;:t3,&#039;I&#039;CS{ {gl(&#039;j. 6% }:).a. from the date of petition till\n\n realisation&#039;\n\nThis appea\u00e9iicomiiig on for orders this day, Manjunath, J.,\n\n-@&#039;_fd.e.1iV&#039;e{ed the foilowing: -\n\n\n\n&#039;.1 J\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Though the matter is listed for orders, by consent o_f&#8221;p_a&#8217;r.ti&#8217;e.s,<\/p>\n<p>the appeal is heard on merits.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Beinc a rieved by the &#8220;a,1d&lt;T1ne1&#039;1t and award. _a&#039;sVsedV&#039;b\u00ab_ the<br \/>\n2: E&#039;. &#039;5 3 tr: _ l3._. , A <\/p>\n<p>MACT, Bellary, dtd. O7\/03\/2006 passed\ufb02in  1*-:_o.*&#039;A1&#039;3.\/&#039;2~\u00a3:o$&#039;jthe:&#039;<\/p>\n<p>present appeal is filed by the 1nsurar_1ce Company ehailengin\u00e9; the <\/p>\n<p>liabilities saddled on it. The resptuiideiiaets\u00e9Clairnants&#039; a claim<br \/>\npetition claiming eompensatiorg&lt;)117aeeAo&#8211;ii11t&#039;of the death of one<\/p>\n<p>Kondappa, who died in a road Ijraiffic _.-.aleoiden_.t occurred on<\/p>\n<p>30\/ 11\/2004 while  VVKalif&#039;hataka Warehouse<\/p>\n<p>near Mundatgi cross his work. On account of<br \/>\nthe rash and negljlgenvt   driver of the truck bearing No.<br \/>\n 34\/2?7f?.&#039;2lV, &#039;which&#039;  eoming from the opposite direction,<br \/>\n  Koudappa, which resulted in his<\/p>\n<p>death&quot; &#039;.l.f&amp;ee&lt;)rding to the claimants they are the son<\/p>\n<p> and daughter g\u00a7f.Lh&#039;\u00e9 deceased and that the deceased was getting an<\/p>\n<p> of Rs&#039;;4.,0OO\/~. The insurance Company admitting the<\/p>\n<p> &quot;pol;.:f_\\f2eont..eI1ded that since the drive.1&#039; had no valid license the<\/p>\n<p>Viisilbility-r_elcai1n()t be fixed on it. In order to prove their respective<\/p>\n<p>Contentions the 13&#039; Ciaimahi go: himself examined as P.W.1, one<\/p>\n<p>Qevendrappa was examineci as P.W.;2. Ci;-iimants I&quot;f3i1&#039;.EE{Zi&quot;.&#039;Ll&quot;[)i_()l&#039;1<\/p>\n<p>E)x.P&#8211;1 to 9. On behalf of {he iI]S\u00a5.11&quot;&#039;ciI]{;&#039;.C Ciimpany  _<\/p>\n<p>the policy as Ex.R&#8211;1, no c:vid&lt;~3nCc: was 10% in. The.TriaifCO&#039;urt\u00ab.aft\u00a2f <\/p>\n<p>considering the eviciencrc lcgrt in by thy pa.rtij\u00bb3S&#8211;i_he_Id-. tha-t_ <\/p>\n<p>Ciairnants are entitled for 2: C(.)IB}}CIj:\u00a7Eiii6\u00a71 :i()&#039;f  iby<br \/>\nfixing the liability on the liisuramce  iii&quot;;eihg:V&#039;iag.igi&quot;ieved by<br \/>\nthe giidgrrient and award of  .iii\u00a7t&#039;e.sentiieiii5pii2aI is \ufb01led<br \/>\nbythe Insurance Company.  &#039;L V&#039; L A i<\/p>\n<p>3. We have&#8221;  bi\u00e9ai&#8212;;3&#8217;\u00e9dV._ i;;&gt;1.i;1se1i for the parties. The<\/p>\n<p>main conten\ufb01iion 0f&#8217;t&#8217;:Iie ap&#8217;\u00a7;7ei1arii:.?_s cou-nsei are &#8211;<br \/>\nIf The drii2\u00e91*..ijVd.id&#8217;*~z1ib&#8217;f. possess authority license<\/p>\n<p>ther\u00e9jbre t.h\u00e9&#8217;Eihb.iiity Cannot be saddled.\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;:&#8217;2;,._&#8221;*,Sif~&#8217;!,AC\u20ac U&#8217;l\u20ac&#8217;HCl1Ciii?71ClI1IS were dependants of the<br \/>\nid\u00e9c\u00e9idsed fhe respondentsclaimants are not<\/p>\n<p> .\u00e9ntizie&#8217;d&#8217;:for&#8221; cz cornpensatiori.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. St) faifi\u00e9s.  13&#8242; point.  (3(&#8216;&gt;2.1CCI'{1Cd, admittedly on behalf<\/p>\n<p> .InLsura&#8217;nCe Company though {&#8220;116 said issue was on the<\/p>\n<p>i&#8221;,V&#8221;.&#8221;i}&#8217;1S&#8217;i,].i&#8221;i&amp;z;}&#8217;1VCt3..C()fI&#8217;1p\u00a3i1&#8217;J},?&#8217;, no c-rvicir3hc&#8217;:c has bemi adduced. In the<\/p>\n<p>absence of the eviclence &lt;3? ii&#039;isL.iram&#039;c= C(.I)I&#039;l&quot;:\u00a7,)i-1l&#039;l,\\&#039;, the Trial Court: has<\/p>\n<p>rightly held that the li2;2l&#039;3i}it\\_-&#039; lid:-S to be :;;,.ic.lcll&lt;:cl on the lnsL:.r\u00a7}&#039;r.i&#039;ee_<\/p>\n<p>Company. Be that as it me-iy, the l(.&#039;\u00a3.iI&quot;1&#039;1L.&#039;f;&#039;l I;,&#039;([)LiI&quot;l.&#039;3f;&#039;:&#039;l for the<\/p>\n<p>has produced the xerox r:i&#8217;\u00a7.g w_i&#8217;t.hA.:&#8217;th&#8217;e.il&#8217;\\fliein6:l&#8221;&#8216;-.\u00a7)I:;rr<\/p>\n<p>perusal of this d0&lt;:um&lt;:m., it is ciea;-ir&#039;&lt;i.o&#039;.._iis 1liz.:if- the dr.ri&#039;veVi~.V\u00a7,_nitiai:;ll3\/A<\/p>\n<p>had obtained the li&#8221;liglliu   on<br \/>\n26\/09\/1996 the Same its  t.1&#8243;t:)l{)i-ilk?&#8221;\/.2036.  &#8220;lBut on<br \/>\n22\/01\/1998 the Licem3i1_ig.{ \/\\iith_x)1fi_r\u00a7.j, il:3t:i,g;-1t.i&#8217;inlh.\u00e9\u00a7vv&#8217;e&#8217;permitted to<br \/>\ndrive heavy transp0rt.3__.:irieili:i&#8217;irele &#8216;9-v1.::E.&#8217;~&#8217;p\u20aci&#8221;:.I&#8217;i&#8217; and the said<br \/>\nheavy tranSP\u00a3&gt;rt    renewed from time<br \/>\nto time and    From the perusal<br \/>\nof this doc1.:me&#8217;14\u00a7i &#8216;itis&#8217;  driver had a valid license.<br \/>\nEven thoughtvhe  xi-9:-isii&#8217;;rilif&#8217;li\u00a7&lt;&#039; e.ippe!!z;.im&#039;., the said burden has<br \/>\n &quot;cl-i by the tllliz-il1&quot;1&quot;f1Z-.ill&#039;}lS iliotzgli ihirjy were not required to<\/p>\n<p>pI&#039;OCl1&#039;l;if_I_\u20ac:l!:V&#039;\u00bb1_.ElC3ll*3 VdQeurli&#039;1{:1it:.. In the rsirctinieste.-mc(*s, lg&#039; point argued by<\/p>\n<p> &quot;&#039;tl*&#039;i\u00bbe counsell for _Fi.1;)i\u00a7&#039;J&#039;\u20ac&#039;1ll&#039;e&#039;i11i liais to be I&#039;(&#039;_l(.?(&quot;l.(.&#039;(Iil.<\/p>\n<p>  far as the 2&quot;&quot; point&#039; is {..&#039;(.)l\u00a7(&#039;.(&#039;l&quot;I&#039;1C:&#039;d, admittedly the<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;ei21_irhaIii:s are son ari(:l (l&amp;iL.1gl]l(&#8220;.I&#8217; of 1.126 (.&#8217;l{&#8216;(.'(&#8220;&#8216;Lif-?i(:(l. No taviderzce is<\/p>\n<p>(3<\/p>\n<p>produced before the COL&#8221;z1&#8217;t {(1) Sh(&#8216;)W aha: the dE&#8217;C\u20acE1Sf3d was r2&lt;:)_1;.__1iv\u00e9ng<\/p>\n<p>with the appe\ufb01ants and that {I30 appc3\u00a7\u00a7:;1m.s were not :i:\u00e9p\u00a7.3_\u00e91gf,.1&#039;ir;g<\/p>\n<p>upon the income of the dCC&#039;.\u20ac3E1SC&quot;.&#039;d. $11 the c\u00a7rc:z1ms\u00a3a11r;&#039;\u00e9:a, x\u00e9q-f\u00e9&#039; &#039;d&#039;G~ {if}: V&#039;<\/p>\n<p>see any reason to reverse the fi1&quot;1di13gs of L__.?1.r;: Tribujfzal: &quot; 2&#039;\\.V:g\u00bb::oVt&quot;:1_ix%1;g1&#039;y_V,<\/p>\n<p>appeai is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>Parties to bear their ovm cos.;\u00a3&#8217;.\n<\/p>\n<p>Amount if any, in depmsii, is Q1-&#8220;&#8216;i~C&#8217;.IA-&#8216;nC&#8221;\u20aci  [VO_bt3 tfaravsferfed to the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010 Author: K.L.Manjunath And Kumar IN THE }~I1GH COURT OF }\u00a7ARNA&#8217;l&#8217;AKA, CERCUIT BENCH __ T DHARWAD. amen THIS THE) 127&#8242;?&#8221; DAY OF JANUARY :20_m :A. PRESENT 1 V12 THE HONBLE M&#8217;\u00a3e.JUsT1c\u00a3:: xv;LA\u00a7&#8217;M&#8217;AN\u00a5Ji3_NArfi3Y&#8217; AND: i \u00bb\u00bb L THE \u00a7~{ON&#8217;BLE MR. Miscellaneous Fircsi [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31602","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-25T05:34:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-25T05:34:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":870,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010\",\"name\":\"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-25T05:34:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-25T05:34:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-25T05:34:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010"},"wordCount":870,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010","name":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-25T05:34:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-mohammed-rafiq-on-27-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd vs Mohammed Rafiq on 27 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31602","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31602"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31602\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31602"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31602"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31602"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}