{"id":31661,"date":"2008-11-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008"},"modified":"2018-09-09T11:17:17","modified_gmt":"2018-09-09T05:47:17","slug":"syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Syed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Syed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda<\/div>\n
'gm SI:i  sxeexiiizasajn, Adv.)\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA A'If--\u00a7;\u00a7.'}\u00a7~3C }}\u00a3?:1;{\ufb01?}I?\u20acTE.b\n\nDATED THIS THE aw DAY _QF.NOVE\u00a7IVI\"LB;'?:?\u00a32;'2CiO8 ' '\n\nBEFOREQ'\n\nTHE HC)N'8LE MR. JUs*biC:B:% B.'SREENl3{%5;SE\"wGf\u00a7WDA\u00bb '\n\nM.F.A._.No. 263~'?f'\u00a2\u00a3 2003 \u00a2:mr\u00ab::1 \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSyed T&$}I1\u20ac\ufb01I1 KQuS{3I',  _  ~ \nwe Syed   \nAged 17 \u00a7z\u00e9a3_$,'3~n\u00a7\u00ab:1oVr-,_V'--\u00ab.__  '4  \nR\/p by its, g%m;;~c1ia:: \u00abz1atur\u00e9\u00a7i'7fat;hcr\n3y*ed.iVibr*a11iw\u00bb   \nRfo3Aza_d.1ia'gaz:*_a';,\u00ab.% =   . _\n\nNear raiiway tra\u00e9\ufb01k,    V' \" \n\nMazldya, . '   \n\n APPELLANT\n\nSQ'-0 S-._'idd\ufb01ah,\nR\/0 Ni}. 133, , Mailanaikana Katte,\n\n AA Gancialu Post, Mandya Tq.\n\n'. \"I'h\u00e9 Branch Manager,\n The Grienta} hlsurance ()0. Ltd.,\n\" M.(Li. Road, Mandya,\n\nNew tf..ra._I1sfaI'rc:d to I\ufb01ivisioznai Managua\",\nOpp. Fire Brigade,\n\nSarswathipuram,\n\nMysore 2(1).\n\nW\n\n\n\n REsPo;m E.1\u00a7rs_\n(33; Sri  Suresh, Adv. for R 2) V   \n\nTHIS MFA FILED U\/'S 173(1) 0? Mv ACT AGAINST T;,~1~E,..1t;:m :\u00bb_:1_;+3m'.__\nAND AWARD DATED 31.12.2007 PASSEL} IN MVC Nc:2..2_335;2Q05 on 'rm: \nFELE 05* THE PRESIDING OFFICER, FAS'\u00a3'~TRACK_' COAIJRf'i'~E ANI) MAfC'F,. V\nMANDYA PARTLY ALLow11m:; THE GL2'-XI?-.vi PE'I'1'i'iO1*I F\u20acjR.CQ1_.*wiI?ENSATEON*._\n\nAND SEEKERS ENHANCEMENT OF COM'fENS13tT,ION':\u00bb. \n\nTHIS APPEAL COMING Q?-I.4_\u00a5%'ORV;5sD\u00a7'4'\u00a7ESSIC?r\u20ac;A ATEQIIS. 1:93;=s.?; 'fH\u00a7;\nCi'3UR'i',Il}ELiVERE\ufb01 THE 1\"4'c::1..I..<:;w~'.*.\u00a7_:~1<;":\u00ab:.;V " V V.   " \n\n~1~+~_...I? *3 .1*--  \u00e9igcident and\nno appeal is filed eim\u00e9yv byf  \u20ac):sz;1 Ae\"i-.(;r the\" I\ufb01surcr of the\n\noiTe1:\u00a7:i1ii\u00a3ig\" fc1\":i:e:}.}:\u00a7;\u00e9;1gi'131 g\"\"'tiie fuming ef the Tribuna;\nthat  4- a\u20ac:t3ic:ik*:.v3i;:t._>Tix*:\u00a7\u00a7:S'\u00bb.j\ufb01sctztirred chm 1:0 U113 rash and\n\nrmg1igcn'\u00a5;L 0f\".tkV1E {::\ufb01'eI1d.i11g vehicie and the iiability\n\n  '\u20ac}i;\"~\ufb011\u20acf \"\u00a7I1S1,1IaI1;3E'{:dH1paDy, the only issue Itaquired to be\n\n    111:: is Whether the compensation awarded\n\n\"Aby:  is just and proper or calls fer\n\n xt:nhaiI1\u00a2::'eI:11c11t.\n\n After hearing the learned Counsei for the parties,\n\npemsmg the judgnani: and award I am of the apinien that\nthe compensation award\ufb01d by the Tribunal is nut just an\u00e9\n\nW\n\n\n\nproper and is an the iewer side and} tilerefezfe \n\ntebeenhanced.  \n\n4. As evidenced from    6, the\n\nappellant has eustajneci the\"fui]\u00a7t\u00a79ii3g \n\n1) fall of one    _. . ._ _ \n2) ene. tooth\"We$'Vb1'0A1ien;   '\n3} \u00a7ne.._j3'_;':e\ufb01;;_wes.,  _ Vf '\n\nPW 3  whe treated the\n\nappe\ufb02ant. has:    ' \u00bb \n3) one  is   \n\n2) one ttieth  w\"it};1 the upper portion\nelightly visibde; _\n\nA V ' V _ 3';  \" \u00bb en-e  wee totally loosened;\n\n '--  be-me en the upper maxilla which\n-..eove;:s_toof11 was broken.\n\n B35  local anesthesia removed the intruded\n\nZ    teeth. Thereafter met canal treaixnent was\n\n'V de;ie\u00bbef\ufb01er cleaning the sockets he removed intruded teeth\n\n the ieesened tooth replaced with respective eeekets.\n\nThe wiring was dene to aii the from: anterior teeth together\n\n .\n<\/pre>\n
with Alveolar bone with mettlebar. The deeter  the<\/p>\n
appeliantihceme after six weeks for \ufb01xing  <\/p>\n
Accordingly the appellant was b;jeught_by’v-   <\/p>\n
20.10.2005 and underwent   f<\/p>\n
the suppert of one nature? teeth  the ‘ 4 teeth<\/p>\n
by adapting the abotfe $aidV_pi’eeec13;re. Eevfurther deposed
\nthat the said fear  -not have the same<\/p>\n
strength as   “teeth. The doctor<\/p>\n
   twe teeth and other
\n on the natural teeth and this<\/p>\n
Wouki   time damage the ether natural<\/p>\n
    teeth is noticeable by others<\/p>\n
   of \ufb01xa\ufb01en of artzitieial teeth there is slight<\/p>\n
the external appearance of the appellant. He<\/p>\n
 _asseS’:~1e\u00a7\u00e9 the permanent disahi\ufb01ty to the extent [if 20 to<\/p>\n
‘ <\/p>\n
5. Leazned Counsel for the appellant submits that on<\/p>\n
account of the f1’aetu:re and removal ef teeth the appeiiant
\n@<\/p>\n
casmet chew food and there is dis\ufb01gI1re;3:1’2;:(f._;;t1t:i$\u00a7V’ ‘\u00a7iei”_”‘1’a\u00a5:e_V<\/p>\n
and has a\ufb01c-xzted her ma1′;”i\u00e9i gt’:” .  _p1″-vg::sp’-‘s:AtV::\ufb01\u00e9~;_ ‘Lam %%%m-3  <\/p>\n
educational career and _ prafks :”f(z)I’  \u00abpf<\/p>\n
comprelisatimtl.\n<\/p>\n
6. Per contra, Sri  Counasel for the
\nInsurance  ‘ti-1a.1_; :7t1’1vere was only cane
\nfracture    iiccn removed. She was
\n  There is no inmgmvenienca
\ncause\ufb01   (:a1*<::e:* and the injury has not<\/p>\n
a\ufb01izctasd  A  Themfore the cempeilsation of<\/p>\n
A  .RV.S.{37';{3GG;f awgia\u00e9d by the Tribunal is just and proper<\/p>\n
A  'V12gOft, for enhancement.\n<\/p>\n
  ” lhavc noticed from the ju\u00e9gnesnt of the Txibunal<\/p>\n
A’   apart from remmva\u00e9 of some teeth the other teeth are<\/p>\n
 ”  ioosenad, due ta which she could not. chew food<\/p>\n
which she was doing prim’ to the accident. It has also<\/p>\n
came in evicience cf the doctor that there is slight change<\/p>\n
in her appearance. Admittedly the appc11\u00a7iV*1t” ‘. -Tt\ufb02d<\/p>\n
gr} studying in 93* standard a:r1d~~i!:.  E11; <\/p>\n
acc\u00e9unt of removal of teeth her  ff5T, :_19t  3<\/p>\n
Changed and it has not  af’ft~:z;tcdA”i1e2r’  car\u00e9\u00e9r<\/p>\n
and her marriage presgpects-.–**  <\/p>\n
8. Considering ti2.\u00a2”::1at~in’\u00a7:. (Sf sustained, pain<\/p>\n
and suifexings u:1d\u00a2:;fgr\u00a7r1:2;=:   undertaken by<\/p>\n
the ap;3e}l:\u00a7a i:.:t’,   of R$.3(),O0O\/- awarded
\nby   “pain and suifeling, loss of<\/p>\n
amcnit.ie?.3″”~.   fAEA!3’_’: “~=;\u00bb1}nhappi11ess, pleasure, marriage<\/p>\n
   etfi  Rs.6,000\/- awardeci towards nimdicai<\/p>\n
   tI’cat1neI1t as against the medical Iiaills<\/p>\n
 Rs.6{}-30\/– and Rs.1,00G\/- awarded towards<\/p>\n
 atterirj\u00e9int charges are mat only just and proper they am<\/p>\n
  much an the lower side and irzadequate.<\/p>\n
 .\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
9. After careful consi\u00e9cration of the;   the<\/p>\n
appellant: I deem it 31.131: and prapgr 1:0  <\/p>\n
compcnsaticm as tmdtzr: 1     ”\n<\/p>\n
1) Pain, sufferings and m$:r1ta\u00a7.__ag(;\u00abny   ‘1?_5.5\u00a3)4,’\u20ac.!{){)~,(V~<\/p>\n
2) Medical expenses, ti\ufb01a\ufb01\ufb01i\u00e9tnt .  V
\nand incidental charge$.___s}’u.;:h.._\u00bb .
\nas I10urishmeIit~,..,_at.t<:nda11t' charges '<\/p>\n
and cenveyanc\ufb02 \u00bb _ –. Rs. 15,000] —<\/p>\n
3) Loss of mngrmiti\u00e9s’  \ufb01fe: Rs.15,0G0\/-<\/p>\n
4) 193055;’ Cf .\u00a7I;ospi\u00e9ctus I Rs.25,GO(),\/-<\/p>\n
4) 1{}\u00a7i’iS_C\u00a7f
\n. .. cause’; tolierfzdl\ufb01lcational career Rs. 13,000]-<\/p>\n
Tota} Rs. 1 , 18,000] ~<\/p>\n
   ‘   appellant is entitled for tcxtai cempsnsatian<\/p>\n
\u00e9f..__Rs,_v1;\u00a7,8~=,tf\u00a700\/~ iI”1C1\u00a5.L1diE1g the compensation awarded by<\/p>\n
 n the  with interest at 6% 13.31. from the date of<\/p>\n
A’ pe\u00e9i\ufb01on till the \u00e9atc of actual payment.
\ngm. Accorriingly the appeal is allcrswed. Tbs judgnmt 3116<\/p>\n
‘ award of the ‘I’ribuna} is medi\ufb01\ufb01d to the: above extent. The<\/p>\n
respendent II1SLiI”‘aI’1C\u20ac Company is directeciAv.\u00a3i:;,’thc<\/p>\n
compensation amczunt. with iiritcrcst  ‘411’1\u00a5:3s<:#1:1f1\u00a75\u00bb_._<\/p>\n
from the date 01' receipt of a   , <\/p>\n
N0 order as 1:0 costsf,   ' . . V V n  '<\/p>\n
Sri  Surtrsh,   to Sit
\nvakaiath wtitirxin twa   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Syed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008 Author: B.Sreenivase Gowda ‘gm SI:i sxeexiiizasajn, Adv.) IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA A’If–\u00a7;\u00a7.’}\u00a7~3C }}\u00a3?:1;{\ufb01?}I?\u20acTE.b DATED THIS THE aw DAY _QF.NOVE\u00a7IVI”LB;’?:?\u00a32;’2CiO8 ‘ ‘ BEFOREQ’ THE HC)N’8LE MR. JUs*biC:B:% B.’SREENl3{%5;SE”wGf\u00a7WDA\u00bb ‘ M.F.A._.No. 263~’?f’\u00a2\u00a3 2003 \u00a2:mr\u00ab::1 BETWEEN: Syed T&$}I1\u20ac\ufb01I1 KQuS{3I’, _ ~ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31661","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSyed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Syed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-09-09T05:47:17+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Syed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-09T05:47:17+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":611,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Syed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-09-09T05:47:17+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Syed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Syed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Syed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-09-09T05:47:17+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Syed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-09T05:47:17+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008"},"wordCount":611,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008","name":"Syed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-09-09T05:47:17+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/syed-tasmeen-kousar-vs-m-s-vijaya-kumar-on-3-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Syed Tasmeen Kousar vs M S Vijaya Kumar on 3 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31661","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31661"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31661\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31661"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31661"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31661"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}