{"id":31675,"date":"2010-09-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010"},"modified":"2018-10-23T07:37:47","modified_gmt":"2018-10-23T02:07:47","slug":"sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 13\"' DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2071s:.i,T:\"'\u00bbE.\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA,'V_C3'QW\u00a7'A.4_ T\n\nWRIT PETITION No.26274;f;20:tQ' (;G\"M-cypc;\":)'-   ' \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri V.Krishna Reddy,\nS\/o. late G.Veni<ataswa\nAged 62 years, _ ._ _ _  V. \nR\/at Mul\u00a5angichetiapalEi,'* *  '--  L V '\nBagepall\ufb02afuk,  I A\nKoiar District. \n\ny Rep1.d.y,' " V . ' -~\n\n     PETITIONER\n(By Sri S.K.:VenE\u00a7a'ta;;RedT\u00a7i'y,'A_d\\:;)\u00bbfVv \n\n1. Sri K'..Krishna,  T'\nS\/0. Kaplnalah... " j _ \nAged about 48 y._ea'rs,'~v'\nR,-fat No.4, :'\u00bb'E,G;Road,\n,_R\u00e9em:a\ufb01nagaran'1",'vv- ---------- \n\n ._Bangafiofe,Rural District.\n\nI -2." .,Smtv..:v'M..n\u00a3VIafr2ggiia,\n\n" A We\/0. Ve-Tfaekaita Reddy,\nAged 53. V yea rs.\n\n Sri .VveT\u00a7kata Reddy,\n\n'S\/no. G.Venkataswamy Reddy,\n\n  -Aged 62 years.\n\n No.2 and 3 are R\/at\n\n\n\nIx.)\n\n"Vaibhavi Nilaya", No.268,\n\n4" Main, 3"' 'B' Cross, 3'" Stage,\n11 Block, Basaveshwaranagar,\nBangaiore - 560 079.\n\n4. Sri B.Ramaiah,\nS\/o. Bettaiah,  \nAged 44 years,  _ '  *\nR\/at No.78, Sri Manjunatha Nila'=,I'a,1_'\u00b0*~'l\n3"' Main, Sanjevini Nagar, _ = \nMoodalapalya, ' ' \nBangalore --- 560 072.   \n\n V _  RESAPQSIDENTS\n\n(By Sri K.Somasekhar F{'ed'dy,'-Adam foVr}?.2'~& R3;\n\nSmt. M.R.Shaiamala, for M.\/s. Ke'svy_.&'C_o..V, Advs. for R1;\n\nService of notice. to R4.idi\u00abray.ing to call for records and\nquash the oi.rd'er1'.;_:dat.ed= t26.07_'_.20ji0 vide Annexure ~-- 3\npassed'io'n\"I;'A.c.:No.6\"\u00a7in o'.\u00abs;'No.31'7'4\/2006 on the file of the\nAddf. City Ci-vii '8';Sessionis\"3vi.i_d'ge, Bangalore City.\n\nThis._p'etition_lco'n1i:n'g__':ori'Jfor preliminary hearing in 'B'\ngroup, this d.ayvithe-Co:;rtr'tade the following:\n\n'*\u00bbti\u00bb _____ QRDER\n\n '  ..VRes'po'ndjent No.1\/plaintiff filed suit on 21.04.2006 for\n\ntherellietotcjspt\u00e9cific performance of the agreement of sale\n\njdated 02i0$.\"2003 in respect of the suit schedule property\n\n ':j_*agali2n.st respondents 2 to 4. Defendants 1 & 2 filed written<\/pre>\n
‘  statement dated 11.07.2006 and contested the suit ctaim.<\/p>\n
H4″ defendant\/petitioner purchased the sit property on<\/p>\n
\/,x’<\/p>\n
\/u<\/p>\n
09.03.2006 and hence he was impieaded as additionai
\ndefendant. The petitioner\/4″‘ defendant filed written<\/p>\n
statement on 04.07.2008. Issues were fra-q*i’edf”-\u00ab.:}onu<\/p>\n
02.02.2010. The suit was posted for piaintiff’s..Ae;vid4eric.e’*i0i’ri”it to<\/p>\n
18.03.2010. Plaintiff fiied LA No.6. on..o1s.07?.02’0i’.0\u00bb’ \u00a7eeiig:_ng, 0″<\/p>\n
permission of the court to a’me%i’d’~ the <\/p>\n
incorporation of additional piea”d.i.ng a’r’.d_ avdd2it,i’0’n._:a’i'”prayer ” 0′<\/p>\n
i.e., to direct the 13′ and 4f5_….d:eferidant.’t0–rexeisute the
\nregistered saie deed ..t:o’\u00bb\u00bbdeiiver physicai
\nvacant possession of  Despite the
\nobjections fi~ied_  triai court \/’has
\naiiowec:i.,_’I.i1\\’ the said order, the 4″‘
\ndefendanthas filed: t\u00e9hiig ‘petition.<\/p>\n
4:3,  .2 iS.A.i\u00a7;\\’leri”i<ata Reddy, iearned advocate<\/p>\n
\u00e9"'apVpea.riii'g  thevumpietitioner wouid contend that, the<\/p>\n
 LA No.6 has not been considered and<\/p>\n
that'iitheV.__'ciai0rnmade in LA No.6 is ex–facie barred by time,<\/p>\n
 as  as, the piaintiff is making ciaim on the basis of<\/p>\n
_Aag'reerneht dated 02.08.2003, which was canceiied\/<\/p>\n
\u00a5\/<\/p>\n
fw-\n<\/p>\n
terminated on expiry of 31.10.2003 and that the suit<\/p>\n
property was sold. in favour of the 4*” defendant\/petigtioner<\/p>\n
as per the registered sale deed dated <\/p>\n
pursuant to an agreement of sale dated  ”<\/p>\n
the safe deed having been execu’t\u00e9’d’*mA_u*,;h  tio-Ctiheg<\/p>\n
fiiing of the-suit and since there is<\/p>\n
Sreenidhi Souharda Sahakara’–vE\u00a7:a’~nk Niva..rr1itf’,3’a* t\u00a7–a4n’g’aE’ore, ”<\/p>\n
the prayer is untenab!-exboth””‘on,_:’faVct,s.’ and”in iaw. He
\nfurther contended  of issues on
\n02.02.2010, thejgvadetigg,igi,j1,ae\u00a2~m,,imrave commenced
\nand hence  Rufe 17 CPC is
\nattracted.–.  for the suit and the
\nproposed  and a new case is being<\/p>\n
intrmduced, inV’v’ierr of\u00e9iwhich, the impugned order which is<\/p>\n
 not considered, and reasoned order, is perverse and illegaf.<\/p>\n
1″Lea.rn\u00abed’ contended that, the trial court has acted<\/p>\n
irrati’onaiiy’and illegaily in passing the impugned order.<\/p>\n
3;=–~ ” Smt.M.R.Shaiamaia, fearned advocate<\/p>\n
2._”‘a_ppearing for the respondent No.1, on the other hand<\/p>\n
k<\/p>\n
\/.\n<\/p>\n
as<\/p>\n
would contend that, the trial court has kept in its View the<\/p>\n
settled principles of law with regard to grant-._ of<\/p>\n
amendments. Learned counsel submits <\/p>\n
amendment being necessary to determine” the,V”‘ree.l’_f <\/p>\n
questions in controversy between,’th”e”parti.es.;anVd.inVo*rder’:<\/p>\n
to avoid multiplicity of proceAed_ingVs, <\/p>\n
Learned counsel submits that,’~i.frrnay  for it<\/p>\n
trial and in the facts  circu’msjtan’ces ofithe ‘case, the<\/p>\n
order passed on LA No.6 ;_is not :i’rr_a_tiofr_iaVl” and illegal and<\/p>\n
hence, no interference  cal’i’ed._VVfoi?’ in exercise of<\/p>\n
supervisorysjiu   of Constitution of<\/p>\n
India.\n<\/p>\n
4.  j’povAver”…’-to allow an application for<\/p>\n
 of “p’lavi.ri.t.\u00abis neither in doubt nor in dispute.<\/p>\n
 The –vwAidie:”pow\u00a3\u00e9r_on the part of the court is circumscribed<\/p>\n
by the racti\u00e9;rsV:l.i1 it<\/p>\n
(12) .. the application must be bonafide<\/p>\n
 ”  the same should not cause any injustice to the<\/p>\n
other side, and X
\n\/\/4<\/p>\n
pa<\/p>\n
(3) it should not affect the right aiready accrued to
\nthe defendants ‘ <\/p>\n
The trial court to akiow LA No.6 has <\/p>\n
following reasons:\n<\/p>\n
“The defendant No.4 having :been”niade_ta <\/p>\n
the suit. an opportunityhas to”‘o_e”givenuVto7  iaiaiintiff <\/p>\n
to plead the facts relatinglto, the cief_e11d_a_nt”1NoQV4; By 00<\/p>\n
that only it cannot beggis-atdv~t}1’a.t theteigs “change of
\nsubject matter of”‘su;1t_ got   made out. The
\nmerits of the contenti_ons_VVbean’no.t’A–\u00bbbe__’Considered and
\nconseqttentiy-_ the  2 iixiatitation cannot be
\nconstdeted stage ofthe  Hence rejecting<\/p>\n
the Co11t\u00e9ntions  d_e’fe7nda\u00a7_nts, LA No.6 is allowed”.<\/p>\n
 ._   plaintiff, the 15′ defendant
\nbeing    suit property executed an<\/p>\n
agrejement Vofnstavlte in his favour on 02.08.2003 and<\/p>\n
 rreceix\/e’d.tAth4e*advance sale consideration amount. The time<\/p>\n
 iirrt1’_i__tV.tfi>tet;.,,tVyva’sV’three months from the date of agreement.<\/p>\n
The 2″5″‘d-etendant is the husband of 15’ defendant and<\/p>\n
 allegediys received Rs.S0,000\/- from the 3″ defendant for<\/p>\n
‘*sai’e’\u00abof the suit scheduie property and hence they were<\/p>\n
….–.\ufb01ade parties to the proceedings. The oiaint\u00e9ff having<\/p>\n
\\\u00ab>\/\u00ab<\/p>\n
,- 1<\/p>\n
come to know that the 2″” defendant is attempting to set!<\/p>\n
the suit property in favour of one B.Ramaiah, got _issued<\/p>\n
15!’.\n<\/p>\n
iegal notice dated 13.10.2003 calling upon<\/p>\n
defendant to executed the registered sale deed,  ‘<\/p>\n
the 13′ defendant sent a repiy dated  Piatintiff in<\/p>\n
aiieges that 15’ defendant did not iagctililn ‘rterhi.sgf’o.fthe:r”.i-eiiigrig<\/p>\n
and did not perform the coriftract. Hen__ce,_avno’t.he*r~\u00bbVri’otice’=3′<\/p>\n
dated 12.11.2005 \/ 22,11.2005VVVwvas”caus.ed’,~~forVgwhich the
\n15′ defendant repiied  defauit on the
\npart of the piai\u00e9ntiff.  ihstiftuted for the reiief
\nof specific, the cause of
\nactioni\ufb01g   and continued upto
\n23.11.2oo5_3   V 3 1 A <\/p>\n
 The-I15′ :& 2″” defendants filed written<\/p>\n
.’sta,tem_ent aiidpcontended that, the time agreed to under<\/p>\n
10’th’e.._afgree_nd_en.t”dated 02.08.2003 was the essence of the<\/p>\n
contractiandt expired on 02.11.2003. The other averments<\/p>\n
‘.,i:rna.;j_e in the plaint were denied. The readiness and<\/p>\n
it  ‘wViiiin’gness on the part of the plaintiff was disputed. It was<\/p>\n
‘\u00bb\/<\/p>\n
1..\n<\/p>\n
stated that, having waited for about 1 ‘\/2 years and…_since<\/p>\n
they were in dire need of funds, they mortga’g’e:d,*f._t’iie<\/p>\n
property and borrowed ioan from Sreenidhi <\/p>\n
Sahakara Bank Niyamitha, Bangalore…and.’_4’for’4″ti\u00a7e4  it<\/p>\n
of discharging the mortgage,<\/p>\n
agreement of sale in fav’eu:r”-\u00bb..of one__ 0′ 0<\/p>\n
W\/o.V,Krishna Reddy on 22,AO.9,i2,O_0’:’3..and “thereafter sold
\nthe property in favour'”‘(3f\u00e9’ 09.03.2006
\nand delivered 4_:po.sses~s’io’ri* iitiofj’   It was
\nsubmitted  also transferred
\nto the   hence the plaintiffs have
\nno rightoveritthe.  The saie deed executed in
\nfavour of  specificaliy pieaded in para<\/p>\n
10 of the nwrittten statement. The 4″‘ defendant was<\/p>\n
 VsobseqLi’e:nt!y”injpieaded. Thereafter, LA No.6 was filed<\/p>\n
se_e’i\u00e9i_ng”‘a’inei’idi\ufb01ent of the piaint i.e., to incorporate<\/p>\n
 _ additionai. ‘pleadings and an additional prayer to the<\/p>\n
if if if  .,fofiiotwing”‘effect:\n<\/p>\n
  “’11(A) It is submitted that the 1*” defendant despite
\nE giving the paper publications on 29.10.2005<\/p>\n
‘ix<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
intimating the public at large that they shall not<\/p>\n
transact with the 13’ defendant in respect 0fvl:1;11.:_3ESlllt<\/p>\n
schedule property, the 1st defendant has<\/p>\n
registered sale deed in favour of the 4″‘   V’<\/p>\n
9″‘ March, 2006. The said factmeame.’t’o”be:lfnowleVdge <\/p>\n
of the plaintiff only when the l\u00e9fdjefendant <\/p>\n
written statement. In viewlx_of*_the  <\/p>\n
defendant was  as” _av   the ” V<\/p>\n
proceedings.\n<\/p>\n
l1{B} It is submittedjthalt tl:–i_eel4’i-*.\u00a5jdelfetftdant is also fully
\naware of the fact that a.~n.:fva\u00a7r_een1ent subsisting
\nbetweenuthe   ‘defendant and the
\nsaid   intinilated  .thewp–ublic at large on\n<\/p>\n
29.  v5’a1ne,l’lthe 41:2 defendant has<\/p>\n
yeht’ui-g\u00a71i:,to  thlelsuilt schedule property and<\/p>\n
therefoie -Iltllll dlefendarit is not a bona\ufb01de purchaser .<\/p>\n
of thestuit ‘sch’edt1le—— property. In View of this, the 4″<\/p>\n
_ defendant is.also’.re\u20acjuired to join as a party alongwith<\/p>\n
 1%} deferida.nt’so as to executed the registered sale<\/p>\n
., , ,  d-\ufb01led inlfavour of the plaintiff.<\/p>\n
 direct the 1″ defendant and the 4″‘<\/p>\n
A  defendant to execute the registered sale deed in favour<\/p>\n
ofvthe plaintiff and consequently direct both of them to<\/p>\n
if ‘T deliver physical vacant possession of the suit schedule<\/p>\n
“property in favour of the plaintiff’.<\/p>\n
\\<\/p>\n
\/J’?\n<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
7. The only reason stated in the affidayit in<\/p>\n
support of the prayer for amendment is that,.vj”t.hfen4_’f”<\/p>\n
defendant has ventured to purchase the set-t <\/p>\n
property on 09.03.2006 during _t.h.e._’subsist’en’ceV’.”of_’_the<\/p>\n
agreement between the plaintiff and <\/p>\n
he having been impleaded sulrseduently,  no’~ 1′<\/p>\n
pleadings against him,__ it is necess_aiy_y to see–ks_Aanti3endment
\nof the plaint, which will not ‘ccha,nj.ge”-triflenature of case or<\/p>\n
cause of actio’.n’.–_ In=”‘t’r’ie:”:obj.ectio.rss.,:”filled by the 4″‘<\/p>\n
defendant,__ ..i.t\u00a7’–..  _\u00ab;_alle_g_ed_ th.at,j .  purchased the
\npropertyy__pri’o{‘:”td1.;the   suit, the application is
\nbelated and wo?-.iid_y”change—tlm nature of suit and also the<\/p>\n
cause of action.\n<\/p>\n
 VFrom–\u00bbitvh_e\u00abtvrecord it is clear that, 1″ & 2″”<\/p>\n
 id;efeVnda_nts’ifiled_the written statement on 11.07.2006 and<\/p>\n
“s’tat’ed   sale of suit property in favour of the 4″‘<\/p>\n
; defeiidant “aha have furnished the full particuiars of the<\/p>\n
 “f.,registerved sale deed. I.A No.6 was filed on 16.07.2010<\/p>\n
—   more than three years after the written statement was<\/p>\n
 Wfiled by the 15″ & 2″” defendants. There {inc explanation<\/p>\n
\/’<\/p>\n
{V<\/p>\n
of whatsoever for the long delay. The negligent<\/p>\n
complacency on the part of the plaintiff would noteperrnyit<\/p>\n
them to amend the plaint, more particu|arly3V..i..w’hen*~-..tr:e_T’\u00bb<\/p>\n
claim has, apparently, become barredby ti_:’he.”~~:’.’; .  ‘<\/p>\n
9. It is true that, amen:dme1nt”‘wals~. <\/p>\n
certain cases even when the .claims were\u00bb bVar,re”d_:’byr~ time. ” ‘<\/p>\n
However, for that there had to..befa_v’a,l,Aid lziasisrnade out in
\nthe application and  the part of
\nthe plaintiffs.   particularly
\nwhen an  h,aVV;;’ey.”fvne’__Veffect of defeating
\nthe righ__tsVcreaitedglinll  by the lapse of time,
\nthe prayer-  be readily allowed. The<\/p>\n
facts of th’e._,case”doVe.s_  show any such attempt having<\/p>\n
 bee.n.{\u00a5rna~de “the_._’plaintiff in support of LA No.6. As<\/p>\n
 \u00bbafVready._’noticed__, the trial court has not considered the<\/p>\n
}’e~bj’ec.tio’n:=\u00a7”.’1f{:led”to LA No.6. It has not kept in its view the<\/p>\n
V -V attra’ctio’-ridofproviso under Rule 17 of Order 6 CPC, since<\/p>\n
 have been framed and there is deemed<\/p>\n
.  commencement of trial. The plaintiff has not shown due<\/p>\n
T  “diligence. The defendants 1 & 2 in the written statement<\/p>\n
\/,4<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
stated about the sale of suit property under a registered<\/p>\n
sale deed dated 09.03.2006 and having given.:’~t_he.’_2full<\/p>\n
particuiars thereof, the plaintiff was bound tioi.<\/p>\n
plaint, if he wanted to challenge…th_e said”s’a.l’.e.’Vd’eedV or<\/p>\n
obtaining any relief against the :’p,urc’haser\/4″‘ .:defen’da’ntg<\/p>\n
The Second Part of Arti_cle”l5\u00a7V4–..of the iLim_it2a.t’iAo\u00a7n~~Act~igets”..2′<\/p>\n
attracted atleast with the  reph,r..,n0t,iice dated
\n23.11.2005 or from Vtheiidate was sold on
\n09.03.2006 in fa-\\\/your er”the’;4’\ufb01” The said sale
\ndeed has    years period,
\n statement was filed on
\n11.07},200e.A2″0:..e.rfr~upfnvahiese. to understand as to why the
\nplaintiff   atleast from 11.07.2006.\n<\/p>\n
Thegapplicatio’n~,._V_,as already noticed, is silent with regard to<\/p>\n
the inV’te.rven–i.ng period and no explanation much less<\/p>\n
ho’2n_a\u00abfid’e\u00a7_~v_..V_are””forthcoming in support of the affidavit in<\/p>\n
I.A’;’No.v6.’ ‘7Having not challenged the sale deed dated<\/p>\n
2.   09.._,03.Z’006 by the 4*” defendant atleast within three years<\/p>\n
‘”‘fVVro’rn” the date the 15’ & 2″” defendant filed the written<\/p>\n
  “statement on 11.07.2006, it is not open to the plaintiff to<\/p>\n
\/”\n<\/p>\n
E3<\/p>\n
seek amendment of pleading and prayer ‘noticed supra.<\/p>\n
Trial court has not noticed any of the material aspeCVts.._ya~nd<\/p>\n
has mechanically allowed LA No.6. In the circ-un*s’sta;’n.c:es,_”‘ .<\/p>\n
it is not permissibie to permit the__p.l.aintiff_–‘t’o'”int_roduc’eV an ”<\/p>\n
apparently, time barredclaim. T-hereis irrrationallity.\/..an:-jA<\/p>\n
iilegality on the part of ti’ie”-\u00abtrial ‘court iny’passiVng..’3 the.u*<\/p>\n
impugned order.\n<\/p>\n
For the foregoing’  t\u00e9hlelvviwritpetition stands
\nallowed and tne.:irnpug;nVed’ ivgualshed.
\nrlowc\u00e9x\u00e9g\/’edict    ,that the finding and
\nobserylati’onsg:’:lhad’e he’i’rgi’i\u00a7imited for consideration
\nof  the grounds raised as against<\/p>\n
the orderlialilovwing Ai.yA’\u00ab…l\u00a5io.6, shall not be construed as<\/p>\n
 ex.p_’r:’ession,,y_of op’in.i.o.n\u00abon the merits of the case, which is<\/p>\n
 l.iable_  disposed of in accordance with iaw, un~<\/p>\n
ihfluencedv~V’iii}y.i1the observations made herein.<\/p>\n
2 ..(v)1’rdered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
Sad\/ti
\nItaga<\/p>\n
M ”  Ksj\/~<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13″‘ DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2071s:.i,T:”‘\u00bbE. BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE A.N. VENUGOPALA,’V_C3’QW\u00a7’A.4_ T WRIT PETITION No.26274;f;20:tQ’ (;G”M-cypc;”:)’- ‘ BETWEEN: Sri V.Krishna Reddy, S\/o. late G.Veni<ataswa Aged […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-31675","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-23T02:07:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-23T02:07:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1996,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-23T02:07:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-23T02:07:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-23T02:07:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010"},"wordCount":1996,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010","name":"Sri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-23T02:07:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-v-krishna-reddy-vs-sri-k-krishna-on-13-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri V Krishna Reddy vs Sri K Krishna on 13 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31675","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31675"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31675\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31675"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31675"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31675"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}