{"id":3251,"date":"2011-01-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011"},"modified":"2018-12-03T19:47:33","modified_gmt":"2018-12-03T14:17:33","slug":"mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                      at\n                                                New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001783\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a024,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a024,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Satish\u00a0M.\u00a0Ghiya\n           #504,\u00a0Honeylisha\u00a0Apartment\n           Behind\u00a0Bhakti\u00a0Vihar\u00a0Complex\n           Chhapru\u00a0Chowk\n           Lakadganj\n           Nagpur\u00a0440\u00a0008\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0represented\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0Y.\u00a0Saraf\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railways\n           O\/o\u00a0EDV(S)\u00a0and\u00a0PIO\u00adV\n           Railway\u00a0Board\n           Rail\u00a0Bhawan\n           New\u00a0Delhi\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Vikas\u00a0Purwar,\u00a0Dir\/Vig.,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Jagdish\u00a0Pandey,\u00a0SO\/Vig.,\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Rajesh\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0\n           II\/Vig.\n\n\n\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                               Decision\u00a0Notice\n\nThe\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0transfer\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0to\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Nagpur\u00a0\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0\n\nthis\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0directing\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0requested\u00a0by\u00a0him,\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a0\n\n24.2.11\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a05.3.11.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0event\u00a0of\u00a0non\u00ad\n\navailability\u00a0of\u00a0records,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Nagpur\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0\n to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0affirming\u00a0the\u00a0non\u00a0availability\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0giving\u00a0 \u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0its\u00a0non\u00adavailability.\u00a0\n\nThe\u00a0Affidavit\u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\/Appellant\u00a0by\u00a05.3.11.\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                          at\n                                                  New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                       File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001783\n                                                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0 Applicant\u00a0 filed\u00a0 an\u00a0 RTI\u00a0 application\u00a0dt.19.6.10\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0action\u00a0taken\u00a0on\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       complaint\u00a0 dt.27.11.96.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0 Raj\u00a0Singh,\u00a0CPIO\u00ad5\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a021.7.10\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0dt.20.7.10\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       furnished \u00a0 by \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 A.K.Singh, \u00a0 SO \u00a0 who \u00a0 stated \u00a0 that \u00a0 as \u00a0 per \u00a0 available \u00a0 record, \u00a0 no \u00a0 such \u00a0 complaint\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       dt.27.11.96\u00a0was\u00a0received\u00a0in\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Directorate\u00a0of\u00a0Railway\u00a0Board.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       dt.25.7.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0received\u00a0by\u00a0him\u00a0till\u00a0date.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Shri\u00a0A.K.Mitra,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a06.9.10\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       officer\u00a0who\u00a0gave\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0as\u00a0follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>       &#8220;In\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0Satish\u00a0M.\u00a0Ghiya,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0informed\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0records \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       pertaining\u00a0to\u00a0his\u00a0complaint\u00a0dt.27.11.1996\u00a0were\u00a0not\u00a0readily\u00a0available.\u00a0\u00a0After\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0his \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       application\u00a0all\u00a0records\u00a0were\u00a0thoroughly\u00a0searched\u00a0and\u00a0after\u00a0a\u00a0lot\u00a0of\u00a0efforts,\u00a0ultimately\u00a0it \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       was\u00a0found\u00a0that\u00a0complaint\u00a0of\u00a0shri\u00a0Satish\u00a0M.\u00a0Ghiya\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0received\u00a0in\u00a0Railway\u00a0Board&#8217;s \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Office\u00a0and\u00a0dealt\u00a0on\u00a0File\u00a0No.1997\/V2\/CR\/G\/4\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0period\u00a0of\u00a014.1.1997\u00a0to\u00a01.9.1997. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       In\u00a0accordance\u00a0with\u00a0extant\u00a0instructions\u00a0regarding\u00a0maintenance\u00a0of\u00a0records,\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0file \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       had\u00a0been\u00a0destroyed&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.1.10.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0pertains\u00a0to\u00a0misuse\u00a0of\u00a0LTC\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0an\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       investigation\u00a0was\u00a0conducted\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0officials\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0and\u00a0since\u00a0this\u00a0involved\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       a\u00a0Group\u00a0A\u00a0officer,\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0came\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Railway\u00a0Board\u00a0Vigilance\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0who\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       with\u00a0the\u00a0remarks\u00a0&#8216;Case\u00a0Closed.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0No\u00a0action\u00a0taken&#8217;.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0added\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0file\u00a0\u00a0however,\u00a0was\u00a0destroyed\u00a0by\u00a0<br \/>\n          the\u00a0vigilance\u00a0section\u00a0on\u00a05.7.05.\u00a0\u00a0When\u00a0queried\u00a0whether\u00a0the\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0complaint\u00a0and\u00a0investigation\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         report\u00a0\u00a0are\u00a0\u00a0available\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0were\u00a0unable\u00a0to\u00a0give\u00a0a\u00a0proper\u00a0reply.<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0of\u00a0both\u00a0sides\u00a0 \u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0transfer\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         application\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Nagpur\u00a0\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0directing\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         PIO\u00a0to\u00a0 \u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0requested\u00a0by\u00a0him,\u00a0 \u00a0by\u00a024.2.11\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         submit\u00a0a\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a05.3.11.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0event\u00a0of\u00a0non\u00adavailability\u00a0of\u00a0records,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         the \u00a0 PIO,\u00a0 Central\u00a0 Railway,\u00a0 Nagpur\u00a0 to\u00a0 provide\u00a0 an\u00a0 affidavit\u00a0 to\u00a0 the\u00a0 Commission\u00a0 with\u00a0 a\u00a0 copy\u00a0 to\u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         Appellant\u00a0affirming\u00a0the\u00a0non\u00a0availability\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0giving\u00a0\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0its\u00a0non\u00adavailability.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         The\u00a0Affidavit\u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\/Appellant\u00a0by\u00a05.3.11.<\/p>\n<p>4.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                  \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                          Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0Satish\u00a0M.\u00a0Ghiya<br \/>\n         #504,\u00a0Honeylisha\u00a0Apartment<br \/>\n         Behind\u00a0Bhakti\u00a0Vihar\u00a0Complex<br \/>\n         Chhapru\u00a0Chowk<br \/>\n         Lakadganj<br \/>\n         Nagpur\u00a0440\u00a0008<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n         Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railways<br \/>\n         O\/o\u00a0EDV(S)\u00a0and\u00a0PIO\u00adV<br \/>\n         Railway\u00a0Board<br \/>\n         Rail\u00a0Bhawan<br \/>\n         New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n         Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railways<br \/>\n      O\/o\u00a0Advisor\u00a0(Vig.)\u00a0and\u00a0AA\u00adV<br \/>\n     Railway\u00a0Board<br \/>\n     Rail\u00a0Bhawan<br \/>\n     New\u00a0Delhi<\/p>\n<p>4.   Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001783 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a024,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a024,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Satish\u00a0M.\u00a0Ghiya #504,\u00a0Honeylisha\u00a0Apartment Behind\u00a0Bhakti\u00a0Vihar\u00a0Complex Chhapru\u00a0Chowk Lakadganj Nagpur\u00a0440\u00a0008 The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0represented\u00a0by\u00a0Shri\u00a0Y.\u00a0Saraf\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Respondents Ministry\u00a0of\u00a0Railways O\/o\u00a0EDV(S)\u00a0and\u00a0PIO\u00adV Railway\u00a0Board Rail\u00a0Bhawan New\u00a0Delhi Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Vikas\u00a0Purwar,\u00a0Dir\/Vig.,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Jagdish\u00a0Pandey,\u00a0SO\/Vig.,\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0Rajesh\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0 II\/Vig. Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice The\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0transfer\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0to\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Nagpur\u00a0\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0 this\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0directing\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0requested\u00a0by\u00a0him,\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a0 24.2.11\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a05.3.11.\u00a0\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0event\u00a0of\u00a0non\u00ad availability\u00a0of\u00a0records,\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0Nagpur\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0an\u00a0affidavit\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0with\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0 to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0affirming\u00a0the\u00a0non\u00a0availability\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0giving\u00a0 \u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0its\u00a0non\u00adavailability.\u00a0 The\u00a0Affidavit\u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\/Appellant\u00a0by\u00a05.3.11. In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001783 ORDER [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3251","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-12-03T14:17:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-03T14:17:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":501,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-12-03T14:17:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-12-03T14:17:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-03T14:17:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011"},"wordCount":501,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011","name":"Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-12-03T14:17:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-satish-m-ghiya-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-24-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Satish M Ghiya vs Ministry Of Railways on 24 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3251"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3251\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}