{"id":3283,"date":"2010-04-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-31T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010"},"modified":"2018-04-17T14:26:11","modified_gmt":"2018-04-17T08:56:11","slug":"mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                         Central Information Commission\n                   Room No. 5, Club Building, Near Post Office\n                    Old J.N.U. Campus, New Delhi - 110067\n                               Tel No: 26161997\n\n                                                             Case No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000229\n\n        Name\u00a0of\u00a0Appellant                                :       Sh.\u00a0P.\u00a0Suresh\u00a0Babu\n\n        Name\u00a0of\u00a0Respondent                               :       M\/o\u00a0Home\u00a0Affairs\n\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0Sh.\u00a0P.\u00a0Suresh\u00a0Babu,\u00a0General\u00a0Secretary,\u00a0Akhil\u00a0Bhartiya\u00a0Operational\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Staff \u00a0 Association \u00a0 Directorate \u00a0 of \u00a0 Coordination \u00a0 (Police \u00a0 Wireless), \u00a0 had \u00a0 filed \u00a0 an\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>application\u00a0dated\u00a018.09.2008\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act.\u00a0seeking\u00a0information\u00a0on\u00a0various\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>issues \u00a0 concerning \u00a0 Technical \u00a0 staff \u00a0 working \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 Directorate \u00a0 of \u00a0 Coordination\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(Police \u00a0 Wireless), \u00a0 M\/o \u00a0 Home \u00a0 Affairs. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 CPIO\/ \u00a0 Directorate \u00a0 of \u00a0 Coordination\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(Police\u00a0Wireless)\u00a0vide\u00a0his\u00a0letter\u00a0dated\u00a015.10.2008\u00a0provided\u00a0information\u00a0at\u00a0point\u00a0no.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>1,\u00a02,\u00a03,\u00a05(a&amp;b)\u00a0and\u00a06\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application,\u00a0while\u00a0informing\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0that\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>information\u00a0on\u00a0other\u00a0points\u00a0were\u00a0being\u00a0obtained\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0sections\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0Directorate.\u00a0\u00a0Subsequently,\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0point\u00a0no.\u00a010(a\u00a0&amp;\u00a0b),\u00a011\u00a0&amp;\u00a012\u00a0and\u00a0to\u00a0point\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>no. \u00a0 3 \u00a0 were \u00a0 \u00a0 provided. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 thereafter \u00a0 filed \u00a0 a \u00a0 first \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 dated\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>24.10.2008 \u00a0 before \u00a0 the \u00a0 First \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 (FAA)\/Jt. \u00a0 Director \u00a0 Coordination\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(Police\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Wireless),\u00a0submitting\u00a0therein\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0sought\u00a0at\u00a0query\u00a0nos.\u00a04,\u00a07,\u00a08\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>&amp;\u00a09\u00a0had\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0incomplete,\u00a0not\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0point\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>misleading\u00a0replies\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0on\u00a0various\u00a0other\u00a0points.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0FAA\u00a0vide\u00a0his\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>order\u00a0dated\u00a020.11.2008\u00a0replied\u00a0to\u00a0query\u00a0no.\u00a04,\u00a07,\u00a08\u00a0&amp;\u00a09\u00a0and\u00a0also\u00a0clarified\u00a0\u00a0\/\u00a0upheld\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0replies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0on\u00a0various\u00a0other\u00a0points.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0thereafter,\u00a0filed\u00a0<br \/>\n a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0before\u00a0the\u00a0Commission,\u00a0wherein\u00a0he\u00a0submits\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>has\u00a0provided\u00a0misleading\u00a0\/\u00a0false\u00a0\/\u00a0not\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0have\u00a0point\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0query\u00a0no.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>8(a),\u00a08(b),\u00a09,\u00a010(a),\u00a011\u00a0and\u00a012\u00a0and\u00a0denied\u00a0information\u00a0to\u00a0query\u00a0at\u00a0point\u00a0no.\u00a0\u00a07(a\u00a0&amp;\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>b)\u00a0and\u00a013\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>   2.      The\u00a0matter\u00a0was\u00a0heard\u00a0on\u00a020.01.2010\n<\/p>\n<p>   3.      Sh.\u00a0P.\u00a0Suresh\u00a0Babu,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present.\n<\/p>\n<p>   4.      Sh.\u00a0P.\u00a0K.\u00a0Singh,\u00a0Director,\u00a0Sh.\u00a0M.S.N.\u00a0Swamy,\u00a0Dy.\u00a0Director,\u00a0Sh.\u00a0C.\u00a0P.S.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>           Nagra,\u00a0A.D.(M)\u00a0and\u00a0Sh.\u00a0Phool\u00a0Kumar,\u00a0A.D.\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0<br \/>\n           Public\u00a0Authority.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nThe\u00a0points\u00a0raised\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0para\u00adwise\u00a0comments\u00a0provided\u00a0by\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0are\u00a0as\u00a0follows:\u00ad\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Query\u00a0No.\u00a07(a):\u00ad\u00a0&#8220;Is\u00a0it\u00a0true\u00a0that\u00a0discrimination\u00a0is\u00a0offence\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0Indian\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Constitution?\n<\/p>\n<p>Query\u00a0No.\u00a07(b):\u00ad\u00a0Is\u00a0it\u00a0true\u00a0that\u00a0equal\u00a0wages\u00a0for\u00a0equal\u00a0works\u00a0are\u00a0natural\u00a0justice?<\/p>\n<p>Comments\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent:\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>        The\u00a0 Respondent\u00a0 have\u00a0 held\u00a0 that\u00a0 &#8220;the \u00a0 information\u00a0 sought\u00a0 does\u00a0 not\u00a0 come\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>under\u00a0the\u00a0purview\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Act,\u00a02005.\u00a0\u00a0Hence,\u00a0no\u00a0comments.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Query \u00a0 No. \u00a0 13:\u00ad\u00a0 \u00a0 &#8220;As \u00a0 per \u00a0 Recruitment \u00a0 Rules \u00a0 of \u00a0 Senior \u00a0 Technical \u00a0 Assistant,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Wireless\u00a0Supervisor\u00a0and\u00a0Technical\u00a0Assistance\u00a0are\u00a0also\u00a0eligible\u00a0for\u00a0promotion\u00a0if\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>they\u00a0 have\u00a0 passed\u00a0 Grad\u00adI\u00a0 Radio\u00a0Technician\u00a0Test.\u00a0 \u00a0 Similarly\u00a0as\u00a0 per\u00a0 the\u00a0 R.R.\u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Senior\u00a0Supervising\u00a0Officer,\u00a0TA\u00a0(M)\u00a0and\u00a0TA\u00a0are\u00a0also\u00a0eligible\u00a0for\u00a0promotion\u00a0if\u00a0they\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>have\u00a0passed\u00a0Grad\u00adI\u00a0Wireless\u00a0Operator\u00a0test.\u00a0\u00a0But\u00a0Wireless\u00a0Operators\u00a0and\u00a0T.A.\u00a0from\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Operational\u00a0Side\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0being\u00a0provided\u00a0the\u00a0Grad\u00adI\u00a0Radio\u00a0Technician\u00a0Course\u00a0and\u00a0<br \/>\n vice\u00a0versa.\u00a0 \u00a0Kindly\u00a0intimate\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0Wireless\u00a0Supervisors\u00a0and\u00a0TA\u00a0who\u00a0have\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>passed\u00a0Grad\u00adI\u00a0Operational\u00a0Test\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0being\u00a0called\u00a0for\u00a0Grad\u00adI\u00a0Radio\u00a0Technician\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Course\u00a0and\u00a0vice\u00a0versa.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Comments\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent:\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>As\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act,\u00a02005,\u00a0the\u00a0applicant\u00a0is\u00a0required\u00a0to\u00a0explore\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>channel \u00a0 of \u00a0 first \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 for \u00a0 providing \u00a0 the \u00a0 desired \u00a0 information \u00a0 if \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>applicant\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0CPIO.\u00a0In\u00a0this\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0applicant\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>explore\u00a0the\u00a0channel\u00a0&amp;\u00a0scope\u00a0for\u00a0obtaining\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0first\u00a0Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Authority.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>        The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0also\u00a0expressed\u00a0his\u00a0dissatisfaction\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>provided\u00a0to\u00a0query\u00a0no\u00a08(a),\u00a08(b),\u00a010(a),\u00a011\u00a0&amp;\u00a012\u00a0of\u00a0his\u00a0RTI\u00a0application.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Query\u00a0No.\u00a08(a\u00a0&amp;\u00a0b):\u00ad\u00a0\u00a0&#8220;Kindly\u00a0intimate\u00a0the\u00a0reason\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0a\u00a0Wireless\u00a0Operator\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>getting\u00a0promotion\u00a0years\u00a0later\u00a0than\u00a0a\u00a0Radio\u00a0Technician\u00a0when\u00a0both\u00a0are\u00a0having\u00a0equal\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>wages\u00a0in\u00a0lieu\u00a0of\u00a0equal\u00a0works\u00a0and\u00a0when\u00a0both\u00a0Operational\u00a0and\u00a0Maintenance\u00a0Wings\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>are\u00a0identical\u00a0limps\u00a0of\u00a0Technical\u00a0Cadre?\n<\/p>\n<p>8(b): Kindly \u00a0 intimate \u00a0 the \u00a0 reasons \u00a0 as \u00a0 to \u00a0 why \u00a0 Operational \u00a0 Staff \u00a0 are \u00a0 being\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>discriminated\u00a0in\u00a0promotional\u00a0avenues\u00a0in\u00a0DCPW?&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Information \u00a0 Provided:\u00adThe \u00a0 Wireless \u00a0 Operators \u00a0 and \u00a0 Radio \u00a0 Technicians \u00a0 are\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>promoted\u00a0to\u00a0their\u00a0next\u00a0higher\u00a0grade\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0Recruitment\u00a0Rules\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0post\u00a0as\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>when\u00a0vacancy(s)\u00a0arise.\n<\/p>\n<p>8(b):\u00ad As\u00a0such\u00a0no\u00a0discrimination.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>\nQuery\u00a0No.\u00a010(a):\u00ad\u00a0 \u00a0&#8220;As\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0Guidelines\u00a0of\u00a0DOP&amp;T,\u00a0Cadre\u00a0Review\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>carried \u00a0 out \u00a0 in \u00a0 all \u00a0 Departments \u00a0 in \u00a0 every\u00a0 five \u00a0 years. \u00a0 \u00a0 If \u00a0 the \u00a0 guidelines\/orders\u00a0 of\u00a0<br \/>\n DOP&amp;T\u00a0 are \u00a0 applicable\u00a0 to \u00a0 all \u00a0 departments,\u00a0 kindly\u00a0 intimate\u00a0 as\u00a0 to \u00a0 why\u00a0 no \u00a0 Cadre\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Review\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0taken\u00a0place\u00a0in\u00a0DCPW\u00a0ever\u00a0since\u00a0its\u00a0inception\u00a0as\u00a0stated\u00a0by\u00a0Sh.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Sher\u00a0Singh,\u00a0the\u00a0then\u00a0J.D.(Admn.)\u00a0in\u00a0one\u00a0his\u00a0file\u00a0noting.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Information\u00a0Provided:\u00ad\u00a0 &#8220;Although\u00a0efforts\u00a0were\u00a0made\u00a0earlier,\u00a0but\u00a0because\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>complexities\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0work\u00a0force\u00a0of\u00a0DCPW\u00a0could\u00a0not\u00a0materialize.\u00a0 \u00a0However,\u00a0an\u00a0in\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>house\u00a0committee\u00a0has\u00a0recently\u00a0been\u00a0set\u00a0up\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0regard.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Query\u00a0No.\u00a011:\u00ad\u00a0\u00a0&#8220;A\u00a0Departmental\u00a0Committee\u00a0comprising\u00a0of\u00a0eight\u00a0members\u00a0was\u00a0set\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>up\u00a0for\u00a0examining\u00a0the\u00a0feasibility\u00a0of\u00a0merger\u00a0of\u00a0Operational,\u00a0Maintenance\u00a0and\u00a0Cipher\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Wing\u00a0in\u00a0DCPW.\u00a0As\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0minutes\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0meeting,\u00a0the\u00a0view\u00a0of\u00a0six\u00a0members\u00a0were\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>in \u00a0 supportive \u00a0 to \u00a0 the \u00a0 merger \u00a0 of \u00a0 three \u00a0 wings. \u00a0 \u00a0 Only \u00a0 two \u00a0 members \u00a0 (General\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Secretaries\u00a0of\u00a0Maintenance\u00a0and\u00a0cipher\u00a0Associations)\u00a0have\u00a0opposed\u00a0the\u00a0merger.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Kindly\u00a0intimate\u00a0whether\u00a0the\u00a0decision\u00a0of\u00a0a\u00a0Departmental\u00a0Committee\u00a0is\u00a0as\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>views\u00a0of\u00a0majority\u00a0members\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0committee\u00a0or\u00a0the\u00a0committee\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0dissolved\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>want \u00a0 of \u00a0 a \u00a0 unanimous \u00a0 decision, \u00a0 which \u00a0 may \u00a0 result \u00a0 into \u00a0 the \u00a0 interest \u00a0 of \u00a0 minority\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>member?\u00a0Kindly\u00a0intimate\u00a0the\u00a0guidelines\/procedures\u00a0of\u00a0a\u00a0Departmental\u00a0Committee\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>in\u00a0arriving\u00a0a\u00a0decision.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nInformation\u00a0provided:\u00a0&#8220;The\u00a0Committee\u00a0have\u00a0recommended\u00a0for\u00a0dissolution\u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>non\u00a0arrival\u00a0of\u00a0unanimous\u00a0decision.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>\nQuery \u00a0 No.\u00a0 12:\u00ad\u00a0 \u00a0 &#8220;The\u00a0total\u00a0numbers\u00a0of\u00a0posts\u00a0of\u00a0 Senior\u00a0 Technical\u00a0Assistant\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>DCPW\u00a0is\u00a045\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0total\u00a0number\u00a0of\u00a0posts\u00a0of\u00a0Technical\u00a0Assistant\u00a0(Maintenance),\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>which \u00a0 is \u00a0 the \u00a0 feeder \u00a0 post \u00a0 of \u00a0 Senior \u00a0 Technical \u00a0 Assistant, \u00a0 is \u00a0 49. \u00a0 \u00a0 A \u00a0 proposal\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>demanding\u00a015\u00a0more\u00a0posts\u00a0of\u00a0STA\u00a0for\u00a0Disaster\u00a0Management\u00a0is\u00a0also\u00a0under\u00a0process.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>At \u00a0 present, \u00a0 the \u00a0 ratio \u00a0 of \u00a0 number\u00a0 of \u00a0 post \u00a0 of \u00a0 STA\u00a0 is \u00a0 to \u00a0 number\u00a0 of \u00a0 TA(M)\u00a0 is \u00a0 1:1\u00a0<br \/>\n approximately.\u00a0\u00a0If\u00a015\u00a0more\u00a0posts\u00a0of\u00a0STA\u00a0will\u00a0be\u00a0sanctioned,\u00a0the\u00a0ratio\u00a0will\u00a0become\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>60:49\u00a0(the\u00a0Pyramid\u00a0will\u00a0become\u00a0inverted).\u00a0\u00a0As\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0guidelines\u00a0of\u00a0Department\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Personnel\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Training,\u00a0Para\u00a03.12.2\u00a0of\u00a0OM\u00a0No.\u00a0AB\u00ad14017\/12\/87\u00adEstt\u00ae\u00a0Dated\u00a018th\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>March, \u00a0 1988, \u00a0 &#8220;feeder \u00a0 grade \u00a0 should \u00a0 range \u00a0 from \u00a0 3 \u00a0 to \u00a0 5 \u00a0 times \u00a0 the \u00a0 number \u00a0 of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>sanctioned\u00a0posts\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0higher\u00a0grade&#8221;.\u00a0As\u00a0per\u00a0the\u00a0norms\u00a0of\u00a0UPSC\/SSC\/DOPT,\u00a0if\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>sufficient\u00a0numbers\u00a0of\u00a0feeder\u00a0posts\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0available\u00a0for\u00a0promotion\u00a0to\u00a0a\u00a0higher\u00a0post,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>i.e.\u00a0if\u00a0the\u00a0ratio,\u00a0some\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0posts\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0earmarked\u00a0for\u00a0Direct\u00a0Recruitment\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>thought\u00a0U.P.S.C.\u00a0or\u00a0Staff\u00a0Selection\u00a0Commission,\u00a0kindly\u00a0intimate\u00a0the\u00a0reason\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>why\u00a050%\u00a0or\u00a0sufficient\u00a0percentage\u00a0posts\u00a0of\u00a0Senior\u00a0Technical\u00a0Assistant\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>earmarked\u00a0for\u00a0Direct\u00a0Recruitment\u00a0thorough\u00a0UPSC\u00a0or\u00a0Staff\u00a0Selection\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>when\u00a0there\u00a0are\u00a0crores\u00a0of\u00a0qualified\u00a0persons\u00a0seeking\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0job\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0country.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Information\u00a0provided:\u00ad\u00a0&#8220;The\u00a0\u00a0posts\u00a0of\u00a0STAs\u00a0are\u00a0created\u00a0by\u00a0concerned\u00a0authority\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>as\u00a0per\u00a0job\u00a0requirement\u00a0and\u00a0filled\u00a0adhering\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Recruitment\u00a0Rules\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0post\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>DCPW.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> Decision<\/p>\n<p>        In\u00a0reply\u00a0to\u00a0this\u00a0query\u00a0No.\u00a013\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent\u00a0have\u00a0only\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0explored\u00a0the\u00a0channel\u00a0for\u00a0obtaining\u00a0the\u00a0desired\u00a0information\u00a0from\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0First\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0find\u00a0merit\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0plea\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Respondent. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 had \u00a0 in \u00a0 fact \u00a0 filed \u00a0 a \u00a0 first \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 before \u00a0 the \u00a0 First\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0(FAA)\u00a0who\u00a0should\u00a0have\u00a0ensured\u00a0that\u00a0an\u00a0appropriate\u00a0reply\u00a0was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>provided.\u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 FAA\u00a0 is\u00a0 therefore,\u00a0 directed\u00a0 to \u00a0 provide\u00a0 the \u00a0 requisite \u00a0 reply\u00a0 to \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Appellant\u00a0within\u00a015\u00a0days\u00a0of\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission.<\/p>\n<p>        However,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0does\u00a0not\u00a0find\u00a0any\u00a0reason\u00a0to\u00a0 \u00a0interfere\u00a0in\u00a0any\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the \u00a0 other \u00a0 replies \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondent. \u00a0 With \u00a0 these \u00a0 observations\/ \u00a0 directions, \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>matter\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                    \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0(Sushma\u00a0Singh)\u00a0<br \/>\n            \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner\u00a0<br \/>\n                                                                                                   1.04.2010\u00a0\u00a0\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010 Central Information Commission Room No. 5, Club Building, Near Post Office Old J.N.U. Campus, New Delhi &#8211; 110067 Tel No: 26161997 Case No. CIC\/WB\/A\/2009\/000229 Name\u00a0of\u00a0Appellant : Sh.\u00a0P.\u00a0Suresh\u00a0Babu Name\u00a0of\u00a0Respondent : M\/o\u00a0Home\u00a0Affairs Background The\u00a0Appellant,\u00a0Sh.\u00a0P.\u00a0Suresh\u00a0Babu,\u00a0General\u00a0Secretary,\u00a0Akhil\u00a0Bhartiya\u00a0Operational\u00a0 Staff \u00a0 Association \u00a0 Directorate \u00a0 of \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3283","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-31T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-17T08:56:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-17T08:56:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1254,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-31T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-17T08:56:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-31T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-17T08:56:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-17T08:56:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010"},"wordCount":1254,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010","name":"Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-31T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-17T08:56:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-p-suresh-babu-vs-ministry-of-home-affairs-on-1-april-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.P Suresh Babu vs Ministry Of Home Affairs on 1 April, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3283","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3283"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3283\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3283"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3283"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3283"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}