{"id":33056,"date":"2010-09-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010"},"modified":"2017-12-17T19:57:00","modified_gmt":"2017-12-17T14:27:00","slug":"mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                             Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n\n                                                                                               CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000824\n                                                                                         Dated:\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a022,\u00a02010\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant                                   :    Shri\u00a0S.M.\u00a0Uge\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority                            :    South\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0\u00a0Raipur\n\n\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.      The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a030.12.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0South\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Raipur\u00a0referring\u00a0to\u00a0one\u00a0year\u00a0extension\u00a0given\u00a0to\u00a0one\u00a0Smt.\u00a0Sarita\u00a0R.\u00a0Kamdi.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        norms\u00a0under\u00a0Estt.\u00a0Rules\u00a0for\u00a0such\u00a0extension\u00a0when\u00a0it\u00a0appears\u00a0to\u00a0affect\u00a0adversely\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0regular\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Senior\u00a0Health\u00a0Inspectors\u00a0who\u00a0are\u00a0already\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0queue\u00a0for\u00a0getting\u00a0transferred\/posted\u00a0or\u00a0promoted.\u00a0He\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        wanted\u00a0 \u00a0 certified\u00a0 copies\u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 relevant\u00a0rules\u00a0along\u00a0 with\u00a0 copies\u00a0of\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 file\u00a0 notings\u00a0 \u00a0 put\u00a0up\u00a0in\u00a0 this\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        connection\u00a0for\u00a0such\u00a0extension.\u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0referred\u00a0to\u00a0 \u00a0transfer\u00a0on\u00a0own\u00a0request\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0Ashish\u00a0Aldok,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Health\u00a0Inspector\u00a0at\u00a0Raigarh\u00a0,\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0criteria\u00a0taken\u00a0into\u00a0consideration\u00a0for\u00a0flouting\u00a0the\u00a0Rules\u00a0&amp;\u00a0regulations\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        as\u00a0detailed\u00a0in\u00a0Estt.\u00a0Serial\u00a0No.114\/07\u00a0and\u00a0152\/08\u00a0dealing\u00a0with\u00a0staff\u00a0transfers,\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0also\u00a0wanted\u00a0details\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        of\u00a0note\u00a0sheet\u00a0etc.\u00a0and\u00a0certified\u00a0copies\u00a0thereof\u00a0put\u00a0up\u00a0in\u00a0connection\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0transfer.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        referred\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0retirement\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0J.S.\u00a0Humane\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a02006\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0post\u00a0still\u00a0lying\u00a0vacant.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0filling\u00a0up\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0post\u00a0and\u00a0sought\u00a0 \u00a0certified\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        relevant\u00a0office\u00a0orders\u00a0and\u00a0note\u00a0sheets\u00a0put\u00a0up\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0connection.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a013.1.10\u00a0stating\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        that\u00a0their\u00a0office\u00a0had\u00a0dealt\u00a0with\u00a0only\u00a0Kr.\u00a0Sarita\u00a0Kamdi.\u00a0Hnce\u00a0the\u00a0requisite\u00a0information\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0collected\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        from\u00a0the\u00a0office\u00a0of\u00a0CPO\/BSP.\u00a0 \u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0this\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0first\u00a0appeal\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        24.2.10\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0the\u00a0PIO&#8217;s\u00a0responsibility\u00a0to\u00a0collect\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0and\u00a0provide\u00a0it\u00a0to\u00a0him.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        also\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0this\u00a0case\u00a0the\u00a0SDPO,\u00a0Raipur\u00a0has\u00a0given\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0official\u00a0capacity\u00a0and\u00a0not\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        the \u00a0 capacity\u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 PIO\u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 Public\u00a0 Authority.\u00a0 \u00a0 On\u00a0 not\u00a0 receiving\u00a0 any\u00a0 reply\u00a0 from\u00a0 the\u00a0 Appellate\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        Authority\u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant\u00a0 filed \u00a0 the\u00a0 second\u00a0 appeal\u00a0 before\u00a0 the\u00a0 Commission\u00a0 on\u00a0 5.4.10\u00a0 for\u00a0 necessary\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        action.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.      The\u00a0Bench\u00a0of\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit,\u00a0Information\u00a0Commissioner,\u00a0scheduled\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0for\u00a0September\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>        22,\u00a02010.\u00a0\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.         Shri\u00a0Prakash\u00a0 \u00a0Kumar,\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority,\u00a0Shri\u00a0G.M.S.\u00a0Naidu,\u00a0PIO,\u00a0Raipur\u00a0 \u00a0&amp;\u00a0Shri\u00a0Manish\u00a0Avasthi,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                PIO,\u00a0Bilaspur\u00a0represented\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0and\u00a0were\u00a0heard\u00a0through\u00a0video\u00a0conferencing.<\/p>\n<p>     4.         The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.<\/p>\n<p>     Decision<\/p>\n<p>     5.         During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0stated\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0transferred\u00a0to\u00a0PIO\u00a0\u00a0Bilaspur\u00a0Division\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>                and\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a01\u00a0&amp;\u00a02\u00a0\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0on\u00a019.4.10.\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>6.              On\u00a0perusal\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0submissions\u00a0on\u00a0record\u00a0and\u00a0after\u00a0hearing\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0noted\u00a0that\u00a0 \u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     Appellant \u00a0 had \u00a0 received \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 after \u00a0 he \u00a0 filed \u00a0 the \u00a0 second \u00a0 appeal \u00a0 and \u00a0 since \u00a0 there \u00a0 is \u00a0 no \u00a0 further\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     communication\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0after\u00a0receiving\u00a0the\u00a0information,\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0assumed\u00a0that\u00a0he\u00a0is\u00a0satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     same.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>7.              \u00a0The\u00a0\u00a0PIO\u00a0Bilaspur\u00a0Division\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0showcause\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0why\u00a0a\u00a0penalty\u00a0should\u00a0not\u00a0be\u00a0imposed\u00a0upon\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     him\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0furnishing\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0mandatory\u00a0period.\u00a0The\u00a0response\u00a0to\u00a0this\u00a0notice\u00a0to\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     Commission\u00a0by\u00a025\u00a0October,\u00a02010.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>8.              The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0accordingly\u00a0disposed\u00a0of.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                                  \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                          Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\n     Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>     (G.Subramanian)<br \/>\n     Deputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>     Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>     1.         Shri\u00a0S.M.\u00a0Uge<br \/>\n                Chief\u00a0Health\u00a0Inspector<br \/>\n                Railway\u00a0Quarter\u00a0No.74\/2<br \/>\n                South\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway\u00a0Colony<br \/>\n                Durg\u00a0(C.G.)<\/p>\n<p>     2.         The\u00a0PIO<br \/>\n                South\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n      Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n     Personnel\u00a0Division<br \/>\n     Raipur<\/p>\n<p>3.   The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n     South\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n     Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n     Personnel\u00a0Division<br \/>\n     Raipur<\/p>\n<p>4.   The\u00a0PIO<br \/>\n     South\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n     O\/o\u00a0the\u00a0Divisional\u00a0Security\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\n     Bilaspur\u00a0Division<br \/>\n     Bilaspur<\/p>\n<p>5.   Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000824 Dated:\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a022,\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant : Shri\u00a0S.M.\u00a0Uge Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority : South\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0\u00a0Raipur Background 1. The\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0was\u00a0filed\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0on\u00a030.12.09\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0South\u00a0East\u00a0Central\u00a0Railway,\u00a0 Raipur\u00a0referring\u00a0to\u00a0one\u00a0year\u00a0extension\u00a0given\u00a0to\u00a0one\u00a0Smt.\u00a0Sarita\u00a0R.\u00a0Kamdi.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0the\u00a0 norms\u00a0under\u00a0Estt.\u00a0Rules\u00a0for\u00a0such\u00a0extension\u00a0when\u00a0it\u00a0appears\u00a0to\u00a0affect\u00a0adversely\u00a0the\u00a0interest\u00a0of\u00a0regular\u00a0 Senior\u00a0Health\u00a0Inspectors\u00a0who\u00a0are\u00a0already\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0queue\u00a0for\u00a0getting\u00a0transferred\/posted\u00a0or\u00a0promoted.\u00a0He\u00a0 wanted\u00a0 \u00a0 certified\u00a0 copies\u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0 relevant\u00a0rules\u00a0along\u00a0 with\u00a0 copies\u00a0of\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 file\u00a0 notings\u00a0 \u00a0 put\u00a0up\u00a0in\u00a0 this\u00a0 connection\u00a0for\u00a0such\u00a0extension.\u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0referred\u00a0to\u00a0 \u00a0transfer\u00a0on\u00a0own\u00a0request\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0Ashish\u00a0Aldok,\u00a0 Health\u00a0Inspector\u00a0at\u00a0Raigarh\u00a0,\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0criteria\u00a0taken\u00a0into\u00a0consideration\u00a0for\u00a0flouting\u00a0the\u00a0Rules\u00a0&amp;\u00a0regulations\u00a0 as\u00a0detailed\u00a0in\u00a0Estt.\u00a0Serial\u00a0No.114\/07\u00a0and\u00a0152\/08\u00a0dealing\u00a0with\u00a0staff\u00a0transfers,\u00a0and\u00a0\u00a0also\u00a0wanted\u00a0details\u00a0 of\u00a0note\u00a0sheet\u00a0etc.\u00a0and\u00a0certified\u00a0copies\u00a0thereof\u00a0put\u00a0up\u00a0in\u00a0connection\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0transfer.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0also\u00a0 referred\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0retirement\u00a0of\u00a0Shri\u00a0J.S.\u00a0Humane\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0year\u00a02006\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0post\u00a0still\u00a0lying\u00a0vacant.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0 wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0the\u00a0reasons\u00a0for\u00a0not\u00a0filling\u00a0up\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0post\u00a0and\u00a0sought\u00a0 \u00a0certified\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33056","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-12-17T14:27:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-17T14:27:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":577,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-12-17T14:27:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-12-17T14:27:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-17T14:27:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010"},"wordCount":577,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010","name":"Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-12-17T14:27:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-s-m-uge-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-22-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.S M Uge vs Ministry Of Railways on 22 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33056","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33056"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33056\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33056"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33056"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33056"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}