{"id":33336,"date":"2010-12-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010"},"modified":"2019-01-18T06:44:18","modified_gmt":"2019-01-18T01:14:18","slug":"sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri B R Viswaprakash S\/O Late … vs Smt A Shyla W\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri B R Viswaprakash S\/O Late … vs Smt A Shyla W\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: S.N.Satyanarayana<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 1017* DAY OF DECEMBER 2010\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE s.N.sATYANARAyA1\u00a7A_\n\nR.P.F.C.NO. I 1 OF 2009\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri.B.R.Viswaprakash,\n\nS\/o late Rudrappa,\n\nCivil Engineer,\n\nBhumjka Constructions,\n\nAged about 33 Years,\n\nR\/0 No.\"\/'37\/B, 131 Floor,   .\n1~\"'='1C1'oss, 991 Main, 3m B1ec1;,_' \n\n3\" Phase, Opp: Panacea I*I0spi\"a'1,5\"    \n\nBasaveshwara Nagazf,   -- \nBANGALORE -- '29)'  \n\n(By  \nAND:  0 E  \n\n  .. ..... .. \u00bb\n' V .W\/ 0 B .'P..V\"iswa{2rakas11,\n\nAged about   ars.\nResidiag at .1x:9.5.2Va'\/3,\n\n_   5'-h Niajn, P,J.E;._:t'ension,\n\n0'  _Sri.Jagadeeshgoud Patil 81 Assts,\n\nV.  '~ Sri:-M. G. Contractor,\n\n  E. 0 [SI''i.~R.B.COf1tI'aCtO1',\n0'  :\u00a7Sri.Prakash Salmai, Adv.)\n\nT  L. PETITIONER.\n\n.. RESPONDENT.<\/pre>\n
*_=!=_*_*_=\u00a7=_j=_*<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
This petition is \ufb01led under Section 19(4) of the Family
\nCourts Act, 1984, against the Order dated 1.5.1 1.200′?–passed<\/p>\n
in Criminal .MisCellaneous No.247\/ 2005 on the <\/p>\n
Judge, Family Court, Davangere, partly <\/p>\n
filed under Section 125 of Code of   \u00ab _<\/p>\n
This petition coming on  I_jIela:1’ing.’  0′<\/p>\n
Court made the following:\n<\/p>\n
o 1ziI.ij:_g
\nPetitioner herein  Vanvd..vvVi’respondent is wife in<\/p>\n
Cr1.Miso.No.2\u00e9l7\/20_05 on  Family Court,<\/p>\n
Davangere, lfilediioy   nlajntenanee.\n<\/p>\n
2. Briei” -factsVleadifigglto._this.–~petition are as under:<\/p>\n
The” rna,rriage” of the parties to this proceeding was<\/p>\n
 by their elders on 07.06.2004 at<\/p>\n
Da’vai\u00a7,gere’, bride and her family was residing at<\/p>\n
V that  the marriage, they started living together in<\/p>\n
 * the ‘matrinionial house at Bangalore.<\/p>\n
“”1:’\u00a7;”\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
3. The case of wife is that initially for few  the<\/p>\n
relationship between herself and her husband_I_:w’as’_’<\/p>\n
Thereafter difference arose between them\u00bb. <\/p>\n
performance of marital obligation hy   ‘<\/p>\n
her, marriage was never C()nSLijfI1I_Yiat\u20acd;’- as 11ei4V_hnst1aVr;<i went"<\/p>\n
on postponing the nuptiai cerernorrgr,  the\u00abrnea.n\u00a7wh\ufb02e, due
\nto difference between  ither::n1other~inA~1aw, wife
\nwas thrown out"?  third week of
\nApril, 2005.  ijgriegotiations took place
\nbetween  \u00e9ddgto\ufb02jgsettledtheyidispute. Nothing fruitful
\ncame out 'of V  legal notice was sent by the<\/p>\n
husband -to  calling upon her to join him.<\/p>\n
1';_Iri"coif:p1ia'nce~.of themsarne, she went to the house of her<\/p>\n
   there for two days. Again the pinprix<\/p>\n
 from rnotherain~1aw started to continue, therefore she came<\/p>\n
to Bangalore. Again another notice was sent to her on<\/p>\n
 to which she issued reply notice.\n<\/p>\n
petition was treated as closed with instructions to both the
\nparties to iive together cordially with mutual love and<\/p>\n
affection. However, subsequentiy the case wasxat<\/p>\n
the instance of wife and notice was again issued’ tojjf’n1isb’and,’ <\/p>\n
who appeared before the Court l)elovv\u00bbVand..vfi1_ed’   L<\/p>\n
of objections contending when .0_:ace there was-‘:re}conci1iat.ion<\/p>\n
and Crl.Misc.Case is closed,  of reeopenirig the same
\ndoes not arise. He furtlierr-..cor_iten’ded_  hisuvwife agreed
\nto come and live with  of the case<\/p>\n
at first instance,  reinsetidd to” coIn’e—-~hacik to mat\ufb01moniai<\/p>\n
h\ufb02m\ufb01  “vvasheid with the well Wishers in
\nthe housetof her ‘sister.>tat~.LYelaha11ka on 12.01.2006. In the<\/p>\n
said meeting  stated that she is not interested in living<\/p>\n
 her husband,  intend to take divorce as she is<\/p>\n
 Viilage Industries Board and getting<\/p>\n
 hands”o.me.__”saia;ry, she does not require to go back and live<\/p>\n
 it Husband suggested they can separate seeking<\/p>\n
 mutual consent. She did not come fonvard to do<\/p>\n
RH<\/p>\n
so, instead \ufb01led application for reopening of proceedings for<\/p>\n
maintenance by swearing to false affidavit.<\/p>\n
6. He denied the allegations that he   <\/p>\n
consummate marriage. According to]: <\/p>\n
again called upon his wife to’ .c_ome”L_bar.:k 1’n:atriIi1o”I1iair~,<\/p>\n
house, she is avoiding the  she    at
\nDavangere as stated in   with
\nher brother-ir1–laW,.~Xfirup,alt;sha  at Silk Board
\nQuarters, at   working in Khadi
\nand Villag_e._   Secretary drawing
\n that there is documentary<\/p>\n
evidence to show her  Suppressing the same she<\/p>\n
V    _c-he at her. husband.\n<\/p>\n
 proceedings, petitioner ~ wife adduced<\/p>\n
 evidence as  and marked two documents, Exs.P-1 and<\/p>\n
  ‘behalf of respondent, he examined himself as R.W.i<\/p>\n
l_’_a__nd.lproduced Exs.Rwl to R4, out of that three documents are<\/p>\n
T  marked as Exs.R-i to R–3, two of them are photos and<\/p>\n
Vv?\n<\/p>\n
7<\/span>
\nanother is (3.1). Since the respondent w husband d.id not
\nappear on the date fixed for cross examination, tht;–._Court<\/p>\n
below proceeded to close the evidence of “the<\/p>\n
petition filed by Wife for maintenance,  <\/p>\n
evidence of respondent and procehedeldl’tojallovlf   <\/p>\n
petition granting rnaintenance: in al’stin1 of Liperp<\/p>\n
month from 02.12.2005  aWarde’d 2:’%.1,000\/\u00bb~
\ntowards litigation eXpense_s;t.  0 0 .0 H H<\/p>\n
8. Being aggrieved by  has come up in
\nthis petition    ground that the
\nCourt bellow ‘haslignoredylttieevidence available on record and<\/p>\n
believed thellfalsev  by Wife, wherein she has<\/p>\n
 the  fact that she is qualified engineer<\/p>\n
and proj~ected herself that she has studied upto SSLC and<\/p>\n
   alsogiven  statement that she does not have any income<\/p>\n
 of her that the Court below has also ignored the<\/p>\n
  produced by him, Exs.R-I to R3 more<\/p>\n
 .___’particularly, Ex.R~3, C.D., which clearly disclose that in the<\/p>\n
mgtvti<\/p>\n
videograph made by Ice Cable Network T .V., of Bangalore<\/p>\n
under the name and style of “Nimma Aike”,  of<\/p>\n
company, where the wife is working has givensn <\/p>\n
wherein his wife is introduced as a1’1~ern 30 sent the;s’a_idx2. <\/p>\n
organisation. The Court below iiasnipre-eeeded <\/p>\n
said petition without looking   th:e”‘contents V<\/p>\n
therein.\n<\/p>\n
9. It is also his ‘case thatiiiijs  that
\nhe is not  with her, though
\nhe has expresse.ci:”th_.e_  is his wife who has not
\nshown interest intercourse with him, she<\/p>\n
has no iritention of._ her husband and she is only<\/p>\n
“iI1tere.stedE  ool1ee’tin.g__tas much money as she can from him<\/p>\n
_  stated that the Court below has not<\/p>\n
  Considered.”whether he is an employee of Bhumika<\/p>\n
Copnstructiori or he is its owner as aileged by her wife. He<\/p>\n
 .._Cor;teri(i_ed that subsequent to marriage he is unemployed and<\/p>\n
  not have any income of his own and that his wife having<\/p>\n
‘w’:=’\\.\u00bbi<\/p>\n
9<\/span>
\nstayed away from him without there being any valid reasons,
\nshe is not entitled to any m_air1tenanee for the reason that she
\nis having income of her own. Therefozre, the order passed by<\/p>\n
the Court below is required to be set aside.<\/p>\n
10. Initially this matter was disposed of for   <\/p>\n
of petitioner’s counsel. Subsequently when the was 7<\/p>\n
restored and it was taken upsfor fl4r1–al”‘diSpO:S\u20acJ..T ” <\/p>\n
through the grounds in the  l”–‘etitio’1’r-Zarnld also the
\n\ufb01ndings of the Court below:  following
\npoints for consideration:   A<\/p>\n
1.  below was justi\ufb02ed in
\n = l petitioner ~\u00ab\u00bb wife is not
\n‘ ” properly ‘q’Lrali’fied and not employed and also<\/p>\n
 i-(“not .eapa’i)l”eof maintaining herself?<\/p>\n
 ._   the maintenance awarded. at
\nV_’\u00bbRs;.3,l000\/w per month is just and proper or<\/p>\n
” _ does it call for interference of this Court’?<\/p>\n
E0
\nHeard the counsel for petitioner and respondent.
\nPerused the pieadings and evidence available on record. On<\/p>\n
appreciation of the same, in the light of the the<\/p>\n
Court below, this Court answer the aforesaid  “ford <\/p>\n
Consideration, in the negative. for the    ”   it
\nREAsoNs”\n<\/p>\n
11. Admittedly marriage’ tietweeri the has taken<\/p>\n
place on 07.06.2004. The  card produced<\/p>\n
by the parties  Cdldlrtd  discloses that the<\/p>\n
respondent a\u00bb.quaiiiiedV”:AEIeeti’onie Engineer and the<\/p>\n
petitioner’-,– husband-~ipst a  E\ufb02ngmeer. From the records, it<\/p>\n
is clearly  . petitioner admits there is no<\/p>\n
-veonsuvmmation of” \u00abmarriage, her allegation is that her<\/p>\n
dliusbagid   interested in discharging his marital<\/p>\n
  obligation arid it is also her case that he is an impotent.<\/p>\n
he-.,.g__When the\ufb01riuptial ceremony is not conducted and when the<\/p>\n
 .A._e’apahiu1i’ty or otherwise of the husband to have successful<\/p>\n
 —-.’i’nter?course with the respondent \u00ab~ wife not being established,<\/p>\n
‘*1<\/p>\n
E<\/p>\n
11<\/span>
\nthere is no basis for the respondent — wife to come to a<\/p>\n
conclusion that the petitioner herein is impotent. itppisttzlyeariy<\/p>\n
seen that after the marriage, respondent has n;ot”stayed.VA4i’or<\/p>\n
long time with the petitioner  it   <\/p>\n
immediately after she left the matriinonisi  l’<\/p>\n
week of April, 2005, notices a\u00e9–e’i.gentV”to’Vlier hor_VVhLishandir<\/p>\n
on 03.08.2005 and 2\u00e93.O8.2()_()_l5=V:_to_\u00bb_p he; ‘\u00bbhroth7er–in–1aw’s
\naddress, where she has”‘–rece’iye3d’ j.  notices, which
\nclearly discloses tliatV_.aitei””shc:’ieVf.t fnatrinionial house, she
\nwas residing
\n12_ It ;;$’:._a1go 3\u00a2\u00a7\u00a7V11′:’:tiigiat_’fl-ie””photos which was produced at<\/p>\n
EXs.R–l andVV”R–_p2   in EX.R–3, which was played by<\/p>\n
-this  __i’11 thelpiesence of counsel appearing for petitioner<\/p>\n
.and.V.respovndent;”‘it is seen that the respondent — wife is seen<\/p>\n
  in tiie”‘isaid’wfidaeo in an office, where it appears she is<\/p>\n
V7.p_.uenj1pp1oye<i  the said office. Conversation in the said C.D.,<\/p>\n
  indicates to a pointed question by an interviewer<\/p>\n
 …,regarding the personal matters of the said Wife, she tries to<\/p>\n
32<\/span><\/p>\n
avoid the same with the support of her superior officer in the<\/p>\n
said office. The photographs at EXs.R–l and R–2  the<\/p>\n
C.D., clearly give credence to the contention<\/p>\n
petitioner herein to the effect that hiswife, wliojiis <\/p>\n
1.7′<\/p>\n
Electronic Engineer is gainfully ‘\u00bb\u00a73I1’1:*’-_,'”1’l-C).j;’\u20ac(‘I\u00a7;..’i’ITlV'”a'”V:\u00a3<\/p>\n
1I’II4:1; in l<\/p>\n
Bangalore and as such. she i2(as~.._been’-._resirdi1ig” inv…IE3ariga1or.e’<\/p>\n
since the day she left the  . l_  <\/p>\n
13. Now coming to the  e’vi,dence of the wife,
\nthough she has stated tii’ai3tiispstitisnef “herein is having a
\ncompany of   –.1f1oi_”}\u00a7rod_uced any documents to
\nshow thatihe ‘is.  the company. Per contra, she<\/p>\n
has produceii.._4the \u00a7:ero:;”copy of income tax return to show<\/p>\n
_.–that tile. iricorne .of–Rs_,__l.,~O6,81r7\/~ as on that day. Therefore<\/p>\n
V’l1e’r’;cor1teritior1_\ufb01th.a.t her husband is drawing Rs.30,0G0\/– is<\/p>\n
  nothiriglbut which is obviously stated to in\ufb02uence the<\/p>\n
ll”~.\u00bb_.uCourt  to fix a fat and handsome maintenance to her.<\/p>\n
 ._’i”h’1″oVughout her evidence, it is seen that the same is<\/p>\n
 ,.._i1:icoi;’1sisterit regarding her qualificatioti and her employment.<\/p>\n
aw’,-\u00b0\\<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
When her wedding invitat:ion itself shows that she is a<\/p>\n
qualified Electronics Engineer, her contention  has<\/p>\n
completed only SSLC and that she is unemp_loj}ed<\/p>\n
capable of getting any employment _is>utter_. Court. <\/p>\n
below has not looked into the coI1dt1Ct;’oI7. .<\/p>\n
\ufb01rst. instance, both the partieshad agreed_  live’<\/p>\n
together and thereafter it is gorle back on
\nthe undertaking given    that she would go
\nand join the mat7tirrionial::’  that time and
\nagain she was    to join the
\nmat\ufb02monjialllvhoittsellgil  to stay away from the
\nsame  Jtryl =”her legal right for seeking<\/p>\n
maintenance from her husband.\n<\/p>\n
“14-…  eonduct  discloses that she has absolutely no<\/p>\n
int_ere_st’  her marital obligation as a wife. The<\/p>\n
  Court\u00bb…belowh:as. ignored all this and in its haste refused to<\/p>\n
”  suf\ufb01fcvieht time to permit the petitioner we husband, who is<\/p>\n
 in the Court below to subject himself for cross<\/p>\n
W:\n<\/p>\n
‘n}1%,<igIT.k5*:.1t:s\u00a7i'<\/p>\n
14<\/span>
\nexamination and has proceeded to dispose of the petition for
\nmaintenance Without looking into the evidence,  is<\/p>\n
available on record and thereby committed an \u20acI_’.i'”o’1″.”   .;. it <\/p>\n
15. The counsel appearing for respondent  that. <\/p>\n
there is nothing on record to showitliateti’1e’vs}ife'”is'”gatnially .<\/p>\n
employed and that she is   <\/p>\n
assuming that she is en1ploye(i:f,the_V Cou”1*t__l)eloW should
\nconsider whether it 1% or a stray
\nemployment for or :_tn?o’   salne cannot be<\/p>\n
the Co11rVt?..Al:)elowl “denied. In support of that,<\/p>\n
counsel for  has relied upon the following<\/p>\n
ltd)’ .199vG.i:E$upreme Court 383 -~ in the matter of Ashok<\/p>\n
   V1 Addl. Sessions Judge, Varanasi and<\/p>\n
lhV._others.’  has relied upon this decision to sate that the<\/p>\n
  being impotent, is not able to perform his marital<\/p>\n
Ml<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
Obligation and therefore the order passed by the Court below
\nis just and proper.\n<\/p>\n
(b) He has further reiied upon the in<\/p>\n
1991 CRI.L.J. 2357 in the matter of  <\/p>\n
Singh Vs. Vi Additional Sessions  <\/p>\n
wherein the Allahabad High CO’:.;fL hasheld t1i’a;t.,i:ex\u00e9}eriT;i\u00a7i%i1ef;t’<\/p>\n
the wife is an educated  she.  uiaemployed,
\nmaintenance cannot be.._.’V:ref1j_VsedV  because she is<\/p>\n
educated and capable of <\/p>\n
(0) He   thewdecision reported in 1981<\/p>\n
CRI.L.J.  in the Virnal Vs. Sukumar Anna Patil<\/p>\n
and another arid..,e(‘:hvterid that when there \ufb01nding of fact that<\/p>\n
 i’ti’adV”neg1ecte’dand refused to raaintain wife, she is<\/p>\n
entitled to<\/p>\n
  (d) in  judgment of this Court in the matter of<\/p>\n
 Vs. Aravinda Tejas Chandra reported in<\/p>\n
KCCR 2245, wherein it is clarified. that maintain<\/p>\n
WM]<\/p>\n
16<\/span>
\ncannot be equated to capable of earning for herself and where<\/p>\n
the capacity to earn and unable to maintain is distinguished.<\/p>\n
Counsel appearing for respondent — wife relied qion __tE.tese<\/p>\n
judgments and stated that in the iighi of  \u00a7 <\/p>\n
maintenance awarded by the   ‘i1_tto<\/p>\n
consideration that the ht1sband”‘is :iInpotent  not<\/p>\n
completed his maritai obligation___ai1d also not–r1iairitair1ed his
\nwife is rightly appreciated loelow and awarded
\nmaintenance, which Cannot’ <\/p>\n
16. Per cont.ra;*vcoiirise}:_a._1\u00a7’11ea:fi1ig\u00bb ioruiietitioner M husband
\nhas relied  of this Court reported in<\/p>\n
2007(4)   matter of Abbaiah Vs. Byrappa<\/p>\n
  Rwherein ____ this Court has dealt the aspect of<\/p>\n
“supp:~esgmg~i ilniaterial information and the right of the<\/p>\n
  partiesto see’1{_e\u20ac1uital)le relief under such circumstances. in<\/p>\n
 mattevrpfy Sri.Jagadish Patii Vs. The State of Karnataka<\/p>\n
  reported in 2007(4) KCCR SN 307, wherein this<\/p>\n
‘   has dealt with the rights of the parties who approached<\/p>\n
Li $1<\/p>\n
17<\/span><\/p>\n
the Court, must approach the Court with clean hands and<\/p>\n
state the true facts before the Court.<\/p>\n
17. On appreciation of pleadings and contentions.:rais’ed_””oy. 4_<\/p>\n
both the parties and also the docuInen’ts\u00a2aVfajlah1e’.on  j <\/p>\n
it is clearly seen that the respon(ienf1?\u00a71er_eir1,
\nin the Court below is a qualified::Electron.ic  has no
\ninterest in living with her”  mat\ufb01n’1onial house,
\nhaving deserted on her   failed to the
\nseries of request  and join him,<\/p>\n
has proceeded to-“‘\ufb01le””the’7\ufb01jresent’petition for maintenance.<\/p>\n
The Legislators \u00e9wiisddorii while enacting the Hindu<\/p>\n
Marriage Act;vena.cted  provision ernpowering the wife<\/p>\n
,.-to seek~3’.maintenan’ce,…_wl1en she is ignored by her husband,<\/p>\n
the same -as a matter of right by the petitioner herein<\/p>\n
    to ful\ufb01l the marital obligation towards<\/p>\n
  she is trying to make use of the marriage as a<\/p>\n
 of additional income for her. Though she is gainfully<\/p>\n
.  –..ernpioyed, she has suppressed the same, sworn to false<\/p>\n
“””\\<\/p>\n
18<\/span>
\naffidavit to the Court below and tried to project herself as a
\nhelpiess wornan to extract maintenance by the Vypetitioner<\/p>\n
herein, which conduct of the “respondent is ljiighly”de_pl.or:abIe.<\/p>\n
Therefore, this Court hold that with\ufb01mthe  <\/p>\n
respondent herein has not established tliat she “is”n.o’i,:capa_ble <\/p>\n
of maintaining herself.\n<\/p>\n
18. It is also seen that i. not given
\nsufficient opportunity to  Court below, who
\nis petitioner herein; __to   to substantiate
\nhis case.   the matter back
\nto the    to the Trial Court to give<\/p>\n
permission to._bicthV”partiesto produce additional documents,<\/p>\n
 also to leadevidence in support of their case. After<\/p>\n
 .suf\u00a3iC~isent”vopportunity to both the parties, the Trial<\/p>\n
  Courf of the petition \ufb01led by the wife,<\/p>\n
 _ respondent under Section 125 of Cr.P.C., on its merits.<\/p>\n
   avoid any further delay in this matter in reissue of<\/p>\n
 ..__riotiee to parties in the remanded proceedings, the counsel<\/p>\n
\u00a34,\/VI’<\/p>\n
iiCi\\#XeVe C   <\/p>\n
I9
\nappearing for “both par\ufb01es are directed to appear before Trial
\nCourt on 17.01.2011. On that day, ihe Presiding…C\ufb01icer of<\/p>\n
F amily Court, Davangere, shali \ufb01x the date e0n\\_re:rii’eiitvj’to’ boti\ufb01l<\/p>\n
parties to file additional pleadings  \u00a7oc1i–.the11\u00a3$:,.   <\/p>\n
also to iead further evidence, if
\nand thereafter dispose of  ‘V<\/p>\n
Registry is directed ‘to  of Trial
\nCourt; to Family Courti  ‘4i:ti\u00e9’:ae(1i_ate1y to see that<\/p>\n
the records are a\\*.ailvabie_’ \ufb01avangere, to call<\/p>\n
the same   ifi *    <\/p>\n
Sd\/-1
\nIudgg<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri B R Viswaprakash S\/O Late … vs Smt A Shyla W\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010 Author: S.N.Satyanarayana IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 1017* DAY OF DECEMBER 2010 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE s.N.sATYANARAyA1\u00a7A_ R.P.F.C.NO. I 1 OF 2009 BETWEEN: Sri.B.R.Viswaprakash, S\/o late Rudrappa, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33336","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri B R Viswaprakash S\/O Late ... vs Smt A Shyla W\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri B R Viswaprakash S\/O Late ... vs Smt A Shyla W\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-18T01:14:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"13 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri B R Viswaprakash S\\\/O Late … vs Smt A Shyla W\\\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-18T01:14:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":2596,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri B R Viswaprakash S\\\/O Late ... vs Smt A Shyla W\\\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-18T01:14:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri B R Viswaprakash S\\\/O Late … vs Smt A Shyla W\\\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri B R Viswaprakash S\/O Late ... vs Smt A Shyla W\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri B R Viswaprakash S\/O Late ... vs Smt A Shyla W\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-18T01:14:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"13 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri B R Viswaprakash S\/O Late … vs Smt A Shyla W\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-18T01:14:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010"},"wordCount":2596,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010","name":"Sri B R Viswaprakash S\/O Late ... vs Smt A Shyla W\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-18T01:14:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-b-r-viswaprakash-so-late-vs-smt-a-shyla-wo-b-r-viswaprakash-on-10-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri B R Viswaprakash S\/O Late … vs Smt A Shyla W\/O B.R. Viswaprakash on 10 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33336","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33336"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33336\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}