{"id":33619,"date":"2008-03-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008"},"modified":"2017-05-30T11:55:21","modified_gmt":"2017-05-30T06:25:21","slug":"zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Zain S\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Zain S\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: R.B.Naik<\/div>\n
113?! THE HIGH COURT CIF ICSRRNATAIGD; AT BRNGFKLORE \n\nDATED THIS THE RGTH DAY or MARCH 2008 ~f * 3\n\nBEFGRE\nTHE HUN'BbE MR.JU$TICE_R\u00a2E, un1k\"=T\" \"\n\nDRL.R.P.Na.1O38W20Q\u00a7 'A\n\ncxw'f\u00bb\n\nCRL.R.P;\ufb02o.1z\u00a3\u00a732\ufb01Q\u00a7  \nBETWEEN: \" \" ' ''  V'  \nmain, Eiohnbdul_Khadar{\"M\u00e9jn\u00a7Wfz   \n\noccz\ufb01mginesa,g\ufb01r\ufb01pbietyrg==\nEain Entarp:i3as;; ;~v~ =\n\n0gg:Bua5tan\ufb01, K6daqal,\"i},\"._,\nTq an\ufb02 ni\u00a7t.m3ha\ufb01g\u00a2bnagar{A?} _\n*' ;;._$sTI\u00a7inIan*1i duL;n.9.1u3afn5 :\n\"E\u00a3$PBT;.1a_C\ufb01L.\ufb01.P.1226!05\n\n#By'3\ufb01i.H}3L\ufb01\u00a73\ufb01\ufb01a\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9, Advocate?\n\nAND :\n\n'  \ufb01ara\ufb01\ufb01t\u00a7\u00a745fn,fun\u00a7\u00e9W\ufb01athod\n*Majn2,VQ\u00a2c:Lu$ine3s,\n\nRJ\u00a2,LaHmimag3\u00a3,;Gurmitkal\nTg:AYa\ufb02girg~\ufb02ist:Gu1barga.\n, VHm\";alEP0IIIT II C\ufb01L.R.P.103B!05 5\n*A \"\"PETITIONERIl GRL.\ufb02.P.1226f05\nV'\"(Sri.P.3.M3lipati1, Advocate}\nu\ufb02-0-ong-\n\n\ufb02nl.R.P.1D3BfU5 is .filed under Section 397\n\nV *aA\u00bb =\u00e9\ufb01d 431 Cr.P.C. to set aside the judgment and\n'*\"a:der dated 10.6.2605 paasad by the P.0., FTE--I,\n\nYadgir in Crl.A.Hu.1fU2 confirming the judgment\nand ardar dated 6.12.2001 passed by the\n\n\u00a7},j_;.uLcu-U------\n\n\n\nAddl.JHFC., Yadgir in C.C.Na.2T1f0D and acquit\n\nthe petitioner at all the charges lev\u00a7;19\ufb02_\n\nagainat him.\n\ncrl.P..P.1226,~'05 in filad under sac-: ;ion~r.V,3'\u00a7''i% \"\n\nand 4&1 cr.P.c. to madi\ufb01y the judgment an&.arder\n\ndated 10.25.2005 passed by the P'.'O'.\",~.FT.C'I\u00ab-:. Ya;dgi.:i \nin crl.A.Na.1f02 and direct, thal raa9andant~,rf\naccusa\ufb01 ta pay' double the cheque \"amuunt\u00bb_i,a,;,'=\nRs.32.600f\ufb01 and cunfirm Vtha c\u00a2Hviation~\u00a5a\u00a3 the *\n\nreagmn\ufb01ent in respect af the \u00a2ther'a3pagt$,vr,y,\n\nThese petitions apming\"w\ufb01*f\u00a2r h\ufb01ar\ufb01nq this\nday, the \ufb02curt passed=th3_\u00a3pl;awing:\u00a5_\n\nThe p&\u00a3i\ufb01i\u00a7\ufb02&r:#c\u00a2u\ufb01$d WiS; cbnvictad..far an\nc;Efen\u00bb;:1ze .\u00bbgrL:ir::iP:25A={1;g:ab\u00a7VL:ii=;:;\"--ui\u00b0:':;'4e?r' '3ec?;--i\"\u00e9:n 133 of N.I.Act\nand ia \u00e9rntanrmi go \ufb01a\ufb01ergo imprisonment for a\n\npericd ai#\u00b0m\ufb01nt\ufb01$rr\ufb01d.\u00a7\ufb02 pay fine af Rs.5,0DO\/~.\n\n_rFurthg;#'ha is diractad to pay Rs.36,\u00a7O0f-- ta the\n\nrgc\ufb01mgl\u00e9inrhtr a5 compansatinn by an order of\n\n\u00a2\u00a7n\ufb01i\u00a7ric\ufb01y\u00a7n\ufb01*\u00a7entence dated 6.12.2001 passed by\n\n _th-3 ';*a\u00bbud:,1'tm\u00a7i'a1 JMFC., 'fadgir, in C.C.No.2'J'1..'OO.\n\n\" nTha _said \"order at mmnviction and aentence was\n\n\u00b0_ch$1L@nga\ufb02 by tha accuaad in an appeal. The\n\nx '.2r\u00a7siding afficar, Fast Track caurt-1, Yndgir, by\n\nIan or\ufb02ar dated 1\ufb02.6.2005 passed in cr1.A.Na.1fO2\n\ncmnfirme\ufb01 tha order of conviction for an affence\n\nM\u00bbw\u00bbCr\u00bb~--\n\n\n\npunishanln under sac.133 of w.1.Act. However, hp\n\nhas set aside the order imposing \u00a3in&\"n&\u00a3n,\n\nRs.5,\ufb01O0\/-- and ornered tn pay cost of Rs.\u00a7@0f\u00a7n\u00a3n\ufb02*nn\n\ntha complainant~PH1 for having fmmnn\u00a7.n=\u00a7nV,\n\na\ufb01\ufb01liantinn naeking reference ,afj*En[\ufb021 \"\ufb01\u00e9  \u00a7E\ufb01'if\n\nHandwriting Expert. In adaitian},ne has gitgrndv\n\nthe direatinn nf payment nf4nnmgannatinn nnssed\nby the trial Caurtjn\ufb01n\ufb017dunn\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7#V,;hatHH\u00a7nt qr\nFm.86,v500;'---, any at  shall be\npaid to the {\u00a2\u00e9nn;nnnt+?;i{iiwnndnnnha remaining\nammunt nf \ufb01n \u00e9\ufb01gnbnz; 5nnnli-nn'forfaitad to the\n\nStatn.\n\nE. \"\ufb02ning'% n\u00a7gnia\u00a7n\u00a7 by the afnrasaid\n\njudgmgnt _and \u00abn:dnr,n nha complainant has fila\ufb01\n\n=n_\u00a2rl,\ufb01;?.\ufb01\u00a2.i236f0\u00a7HHnhallenging \"\" the adequacy qr\n\nti':-\u00e9k._nv~nI;i\ufb01:6e-nVf:\u00e9uf~i:in;:-u-aed and th accused has filed\n\nCrl;E;P.HmH1\u00a73n\/05 challenging the crdar uf\n\n\"\u00bb;_\u00a3nnvintinn and sentence.\n\n 'R\"tn\u00e9 cnnplainnnt and tha accused.\n\nV \"3} I have heard the learned counsel for\n\n\/QQ!~V\\Cb:V'---\n\n\n\n4. It is net in dispute that the accusgd\n\nhaa flhatan a scheme of giving a Hare Hhnda Mbthtl,\n\nCycleh on depasit Of certain man\u00e9ysi\ufb01 in *=t\n\ninstallments and under the \"gain a\u00a2h\u00e9m&;n\"t\u00a7g =\n\ncnmplainant want an depasitinq,mnna\u00a7\u00a73nn\ufb02\"thh\u00a3,wg\n\nin all dnpnsitad a sum of H;.4l;3\ufb010f-;l\"}BQhthaV\n\naccushd did nat pravida than Hgro \"Hhn\ufb01a l\ufb01otar\nCytle ah Eromi3od'Lhhndhtiintht\ufb01l\u00bbEx.P1'zi\u00a7\" the' Chhque. Ex.E3 is the banker's\n\n\":gnddr\u00a7amnnt;,\"h_ Ex.F.2 is another banker's\n\nnn\ufb02ntaahhnfnihtlmating the complainant that the\n\n--theqn& it \"hcuncad. The complainant issued a\n\nHuhh\"3tatutht\ufb01t legal notica on B.9.2UUD as at. Ex.Pd\n\nhtnallih\ufb01 upon the accused to make good the payment\n\nl h*:n\ufb01nrnd undar tha cheque. The said notice was\n\ntsant thraugh registered post acknowledgment due.\n\nIt wan aarvnd upnn tha accused. The postal\n\n\ufb01\u00a3bLUlL\"a\n\n\n\nacknswladgmsnt is prcducad and marked as Ex.P\ufb01 in\n\ngrant sf the sams. On 12.9.2000, the acsuss\ufb01ip\n\nrsglisd to the said notica contending ttha\u00a7tfbs:*ts\n\n31.7.EQGO the accused had gone ts_the;stsmisss*\u00a7EV=\n\nths cnmplsinant and had made s has sh\ufb02hcty 6str'rj\n\nthara and under that cir\u00e9umstahca; Vths\"'\u00a7c\u00a2ps4d i\n\nwas tmmpallad ta issue a bisntizhaqsugtshish was\nissued as a security \ufb01nqfkngths fury nsst day,\nthe cmmplainant spprssthsa tbs atstssss collected\na sum of Hs.35;G\ufb01\ufb02{~ thith wsh she std as on that\n\nday, since ihei hssh n\ufb01tjiBrsu\u00a7ht* the cheque for\n\n\u00aba\n\nraturn t' \u00a2x1i\u00a7'ths\" i%s\ufb01mnFi\"\" he issued an\nacknswls\ufb02gsmentftsssi@t'; stating that he had\n\nrsseivsd ail smnsys ate from the accused and that\n\npm\ufb01& ha&,ns'c1aim*inW:sspsst of any transaction as\n\nVign i;3.2pB\ufb02 std the said racaipt was also signed\n\ns\u00a7=\ufb01im in ths presence sf two witnesses. Ex.n1\n\n-is t\ufb01s 'tsssipt produced by the accused. The\n\nwtitcsmglsihsht in his evidence has depossd that the\n\niststsigt, Ex.\ufb021, which was shswn ts him, is\n\ni Etcsnsattad. Tha signatura on the said receipt is\n\nA\"\"hat that nf his and just to defeat the claim. a\n\nreceipt has been created and produced in the\n\n\/Q QLxA\u00a2U\u00a71#-\n\n\n\ncmurt. The trial Caurt ha\ufb01 held that Ex.Dl\u00a7\n\nreceipt is a created document and D.Ws.2 a\ufb01d 3f;\n\nwhn are known to tha accused have supportad him * '\n\nand their aral evidence belies thei: e\u00a7idi\ufb01\u00a7a:*EsV=\n\nsuch, the trial caurt has held the s\u00e9cusad \u00a7uiitg'i'\n\ncf tha offence punishable  ugdar H\ufb01\u00e9ctia\ufb01 }iEB_ \u00e9f  \n\nM.I.Act and santencad him as \ufb01tgtad \u00e9bc\ufb01\u00a7; f\n\n5.. The la.arnad    accused\nambmits that thdpgh Q\u00e9W\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7g\u00a7t\ufb02\ufb01\u00a7\u00a5VaTE\u00a7\u00a3erance of\nE:-:.D1. to a:.  Courts below\nre\u00a3u3ad_tm_$\u00e9nH \ufb01@\u00a7_#\u00a7m%;' \ufb01@W\ufb01\ufb01rther argued that\ntha aig\ufb01;turE %h\u00a7q@d h#\u00a7w_h\u00e9en compared by taking\n\nthe \ufb01ignatuta cf \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 a\u00e9e\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01d in Caurt.\n\n[fa 4 Tne \u00a3ria1_\u00abcourt. as well as the First\n\n Vgpg\u00a71Lata aCe\ufb01bt_ have done auch an exercise and\n\nh$v\u00e9 uf\u00e9\ufb01\ufb02dQ.t$\u00a7t in the receipt the signature\n\n--affi$%d.7qnf\"\u00a3he stamp 13 only Haren\ufb01ra and not\n\nuu \ufb02\u00a7ran\ufb01r$\"Rathad and as such the signature is not\n\n:\u00a7t\ufb01a\u00a3'wf the complainant. The cther contantiqn of\n\nVT  accusead that only a sum or R.s.35,aD0i- was\n\n\"dun and mat a sum of Rs.d1,300f~ runs cantrary to\n\nthe dmcumantary evidence. In the notice, Ex.P6,\n\n\\\n\nA\u00a3LJ\ufb02LMH#\n\n\n\nit is clearly' indicated that the sum due was\n\nas.41,3oo;-. The said averment has not {b$\u00a2a\"_\n\nagecifically traversed. But, however. in7E#;\u00a75~\ufb02*= \n\ntha xepxy notice, it is indi;ate\u00a7MWt$\u00a7t *\u00a7nV.\n\n15.11.1993<\/pre>\n
, lumpsum amount.’wa$; pgidg \u00a7n\ufb01”~\ufb01at[ &nfrf<\/p>\n
inatallmants. The tntal uf the \u00e9ai\ufb01 ama@ht\u00bbwpp1dV%<\/p>\n
revaal, the sum due was  h$\u20ac\u00e91f3\ufb01\ufb01f\u00e9_ an\ufb01\u00a7 not
\nRa.3s,$eo;– an cont\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01nd \ufb02\ufb01y: \u00a7h# aqcus\u00a7H;  As
\nsuch, the con\u00a2un;ent \ufb01in\ufb01in\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01r \ufb01\ufb01\u00e9f\ufb01\ufb01urts below
\ndn nut raquib\u00a7f in\u00a7ar\u00a3afa\ufb01d\u00a7 7i\ufb01\ufb01 the present
\nraviaian paf%t@\u00a7\ufb02 \u00e9in\u00a2\u00a73\u00a2\u00a7j\u00a7\u00a3\ufb01\ufb01\u00a7\ufb01 is made out for
\nintarfag\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9 \ufb01g g\u00e9 f\u00a7r as \ufb01\ufb01\u00e9 canviction af the
\nacgu3g\ufb02 f\u00a7h_a\ufb01:%f\ufb01\u00a7\ufb02##1@\ufb01ni5h\ufb01hlB under Sec.138<\/p>\n
of N.1,Act;*.%-\n<\/p>\n
,w,A \ufb01a;i7fH\u00a7w\u00a7var}%m\ufb01s regards the sentence, the<\/p>\n
ia$rn#d\u00bb\u00a7D\ufb02h$$1 far the accused submitted that in<\/p>\n
View pf tn: cbntroveraial claim, the amount cauld<\/p>\n
T”\u00bba_Lat ‘ba”_@Erangad for. The businass that he was<\/p>\n
 “._\u00a2hg\u00e9\u00a7&\ufb01 in since went into losses, he cauhd not<\/p>\n
V*. “maEa arrangement far paymant af the cheque amaunt<\/p>\n
‘ fwithin time and even nuw, he is in financial<\/p>\n
distraaa. Therefore, submits that the sentence<\/p>\n
impasrad by the trial Court is harsh and aaxcasxsi.-’em<\/p>\n
am’. as lenient View may be taken. Taking <\/p>\n
~wnsi.c$-aration, the arguments addressed<\/p>\n
lezarnad cmunsal for the accu:-4:;i.,~.._I’ do  <\/p>\n
tha sentence imp-used ia harem  T afxc\u00e9ssiffe <\/p>\n
the sama requires intarferahca,\n<\/p>\n
3. Hanna, I paaa the fai1a\ufb01ing:– ‘<\/p>\n
.iii_c;,n2$:f::\n<\/p>\n
via)    is
\ndiami\u00e9$&dia\ufb01q>\ufb02:;,R,F,H\u00e9,103Bf05 is<\/p>\n
‘ab: V  vctanviction vi’
\nttiei ;pa’ti.tVi’\u00a7$na4\u00a3”–..,r3\u00a7i:>.r: an offence
\n.~ 5>uni\u00a7m_i>l=a ..’~uri’t1ei”‘.Sec. 138 cu? N. I .Ac:t<\/p>\n
  Ina sentence at<\/p>\n
it  cut’ the accused for a
\n1%-__aa*riI;:#i’\u00a3. cf six munths is set aside.<\/p>\n
“:|;tfa;1~ lieu, he is sentenced to pay a<\/p>\n
x  firm or R5.65,UUU.e’– within a period.
\n‘ of tire months, in default to
\nundergo 3.1. for a period at six<\/p>\n
mxmtrw. gum”; ,_<\/p>\n
(:1) Out: of the fine amount, a
\nsum cuf Rs.6tJ,,UDU\/- shall be paid tn:
\nthe complainant<\/p>\n
*a1l::f-.  J’u0{g\u00bbef’A.: * ‘<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Zain S\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008 Author: R.B.Naik 113?! THE HIGH COURT CIF ICSRRNATAIGD; AT BRNGFKLORE DATED THIS THE RGTH DAY or MARCH 2008 ~f * 3 BEFGRE THE HUN’BbE MR.JU$TICE_R\u00a2E, un1k”=T” ” DRL.R.P.Na.1O38W20Q\u00a7 ‘A cxw’f\u00bb CRL.R.P;\ufb02o.1z\u00a3\u00a732\ufb01Q\u00a7 BETWEEN: ” ” ‘ ” V’ main, Eiohnbdul_Khadar{“M\u00e9jn\u00a7Wfz […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33619","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nZain S\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Zain S\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-30T06:25:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Zain S\\\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\\\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-30T06:25:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":384,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Zain S\\\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\\\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-30T06:25:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Zain S\\\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\\\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Zain S\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Zain S\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-30T06:25:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Zain S\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-30T06:25:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008"},"wordCount":384,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008","name":"Zain S\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-30T06:25:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/zain-so-abdul-khader-vs-narendra-so-punya-rathod-on-20-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Zain S\/O Abdul Khader vs Narendra S\/O Punya Rathod on 20 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33619","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33619"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33619\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33619"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33619"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33619"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}