{"id":33841,"date":"2009-01-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009"},"modified":"2017-05-12T12:01:16","modified_gmt":"2017-05-12T06:31:16","slug":"sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala<\/div>\n<pre>\" WPNo.9494i20G%\n\nL   A ~  Ms Buiming,\n\nin THE man Coum' 013* KARNATAKA AT BANGAL0R$_T~~%.%\n\nDATED THIS THE 29TH DAY 09 JANUARY   ; j--i    .\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE normm on. Jusncn  \u00e9 ; 7\n\nvmrr PETITION N0.949\u00a7\/20Ci$'(GM-CP C\u00a7:  'T; V\n\nBETWEEN:      '\n\nSribishivakumar,   A      \n\nS10 S:-ES Na1ayauhSw\u00e9m*'.-,V V      ' '\n\nA2e=44yw-rs,   \" A . \n\nNo.4, 1\" F1o&lt;_)z&#039;,--..}.&#039;f*  * V\n\nHebhal,  *  .4  .\n\nBangalore-560 0&#039;24. .  *   -. &#039; &#039; Petitioner\n\n(By Sri A  for petitioner)\nAND:   &#039; V&#039; V %\n\nS\/oi Sr&#039;-i Ab::u1Ra:wo9s%%%\n &#039;~._,  at No.34-Q, A &#039;\n Near  O\ufb01oe,\n_ _HCi?I_)a1,  Road,\n&quot; &quot;   ga&quot; m. xe-559 024.\n _  The State of Karnataka,\n&#039; -.R_ep*. by its Secmtary to Govecmmcnt,\n&quot; Revenue Dcparmcnt,\n\n\n\n&#039;H  \u00bb \n\nW P N0.9494\/2008\n\n3. The Special Deputy Commissiozmr,\nBangalore Urban Ilistrict,\n\n4. The Assistant Commissioner,\nBangalore North Tank,\n\nPodium Block,\n\nV V Towers,\n\nBanga\u00a3orc--56O 00 1.\n\n5. The Tahsildar, _ J _ _V\n\nBangalore North Taluk,    \n\nKids Kemp Building, V   &#039;\n\nKGRoad,   5  _  -  &#039;\n\n O09.      &quot;    Respondents\n\n(By Amafmd c        \n(R-253 and S   un\u00e9mpmscntcd)\n[Govt Adm, Ext R4&#039;(ahsent}]  .\n\n--I - Rn \n\nThis Writ Petition  \ufb01led &quot;under Articles 226 it 227 of the\nCons13&#039;tutioa;1_{of Endia,  to praying to quash the impugned\no1de7r&#039;{Anm&#039;x1}rc-\u00abM}VvAciated 1353:2006 passed by the IX Add}. City Civil\nJudg\ufb01. B1&#039;-.&#039;1;ga::k)&#039;1E;, .oz\ufb01._vI.A-III in O S 910.2076\/2004 and 83%! the\nPetition.    = _ \n\nThis }&quot;etit1T;t$x&#039;1-;\u00a7:i51A11ing on for hearing mm day, the Court mme\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p> &#8216;  &#8221; petitioncrlimpleeading applicant is before this Court for<\/p>\n<p> the oI&#8217;dt::r dated 13.3.2006 passed on LA\u00bb-EH \ufb01xed in 0 s<\/p>\n<p>[L_\u00a5[%<\/p>\n<p>w P No.9eay2oos<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>No.20&#8217;76[2004 on the tile of xx Add]. cityeivig mgg <\/p>\n<p>City at Am1e;xure~M.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. Learned Counsel for the   that the<br \/>\nrespondent No.1 has filed   NO6.2 to<br \/>\n5\/ Government O\ufb02ieezs Aiabr &#8221; other reliefs<br \/>\nwith reference to M  at Hebbal,<br \/>\nBangalore-Bellary    :s1vi&#8217;bmits that in w P<br \/>\nNo.47599\/200$    present petitioner was<br \/>\narrayed as ms\ufb01ggde\ufb01t ra\u00a7}&#8217;%j;a\u00a7de~ writ Petition was disposed of<br \/>\non 10.2.200{l   respondent No.1 to approach the<br \/>\nappitipria\ufb01j rogum&#8221; i&#8217;or&#8221;&#8216;appmp\ufb02am relief as the relief cannot be<\/p>\n<p>   of its powers under Articles 226 &amp; 227 of the<\/p>\n<p> e zgpnstim\ufb01m&#8217;  the petitioner herein should have been made<\/p>\n<p>_  gt   15etitioner was not made as a patqty to the suit \ufb01nd<\/p>\n<p>  A&#8217;  No.1, the petitioner made an impiwding<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01nder Order 1 Rule 10(2) of cm seeking permission to<\/p>\n<p>   .oome:oi:&#8221;zecord as co&#8211;defcndant, but the trial Court erred in 1e3ect1&#8242; &#8216;ng<\/p>\n<p>W P N034-94\/2903<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>3. I have paused the order dated 10.2.2004 at <\/p>\n<p>That Writ Petition was \ufb01ked by the respondent No.1 <\/p>\n<p>o\ufb01cers of the Government\/respondent Noel ta 4_ _ <\/p>\n<p>Jagmeesh, Keshavakuma}? Mane  ..e:\u00a2y-L    <\/p>\n<p>as respondent Noe.5,6 and 7. The  Wes&#8217;;  <\/p>\n<p>respondent No.1 herein to restzraijziv.  to V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>3\/Governmmt O\ufb01cers from &#8220;&#8216;demo}iehi1t,\u00a5g&#8217;j&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>without deciding the or  ..  That Writ<br \/>\nPetition, as   Qf liberty appromh<br \/>\nthe competentV..Givi1  the petitioner was made<br \/>\nas xespondent7N&#8217;o.&#8217;7&#8221; not e good \ufb01ound to contend that<br \/>\nthe petitioner  ua._&#8217;_&#8217;pmpVer_   party for the purpose of<br \/>\nadj_u{licatiom}l:.&#8217; 51*\u00bb the  %%%%% f\u00e9dmincexy, the petitioner is not an<\/p>\n<p>  contention of the petitioner that he is one<\/p>\n<p>  respondent N0. 1 has enczeached upon the<\/p>\n<p>  =  up a eonetzmetion and thexeibre he wants to<\/p>\n<p>t  the suitsin the interest of general public, holds no water.<\/p>\n<p>  $153011 has no locus stxandi and if he is not a pmper and<\/p>\n<p>    party for the purpose of adjudication, he cannot be made<\/p>\n<p>  \ufb01\ufb01alty to the suit. It is not a public interest litigation, where the<\/p>\n<p>W P <\/p>\n<p>doctrine of locus standi can be relaxed    &#8220;f:\u00bb.t_=:A<br \/>\npermitted to participate in the  Th:  h\u00e9zs  *<br \/>\nrightly rejected the app\ufb01cation. I see     Tty in the<\/p>\n<p>impugned order.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. In the result,  Writ  samcis hcmcby<br \/>\ndismissed. 1  &#8221;     C &#8216; &#8216;<br \/>\n . . &#8216; .  &#8216;I       <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009 Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala &#8221; WPNo.9494i20G% L A ~ Ms Buiming, in THE man Coum&#8217; 013* KARNATAKA AT BANGAL0R$_T~~%.% DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY 09 JANUARY ; j&#8211;i . BEFORE THE normm on. Jusncn \u00e9 ; 7 vmrr PETITION N0.949\u00a7\/20Ci$'(GM-CP C\u00a7: &#8216;T; V [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33841","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-12T06:31:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-12T06:31:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":408,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-12T06:31:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-12T06:31:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-12T06:31:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009"},"wordCount":408,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009","name":"Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-12T06:31:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-n-shivakumar-vs-sri-mumtaz-ahmed-on-29-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri N Shivakumar vs Sri Mumtaz Ahmed on 29 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33841","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33841"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33841\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33841"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33841"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33841"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}