{"id":33995,"date":"2008-09-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008"},"modified":"2016-12-13T23:52:05","modified_gmt":"2016-12-13T18:22:05","slug":"sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Arali Nagaraj<\/div>\n<pre>1\n\nIN THE) HIGH coum OF' KARNATAKA AT  \n\nDATED THIS THE 25TH DAY  2098   V\n\nTHE HONBLE MR.J\ufb01::YfK'.E   \nCRIMINAL REWSIQN \"N.\u00a7).4\"i6\"()F'v\u00a72008\nB N:    L   \n\nSri\ufb01aghavendrgt S @iRaghu    'V\n\nS\/0    .-  \nAged about     \nResiding at~~.Nc;2;50, E._IG,2 \"  \nM.U.D.%A;k, N&lt;::}1r 1%}; %  \n\nHebbal, \u00e9M&#039;ys\u00a3)1*eV   _ \u00e9     ..PETI&quot;I&#039;IONER\n\n(By M; s%%Nupur\u00abAss;\u00a3s., Adv)\n\n V     A. H  ..... .. V\n\n  \n\nBy&quot; N_V.&#039;R\u00a7&#039;i&#039;:&#039;g\ufb02i&#039;iC;; Police\nsta:ion,.Mygom. ...RESPONDEN&#039;I&#039;\n\n(ayisri: A.V.Ramak1&#039;ishna, HCGP)\n\n =  _ .=&#039;I&#039;his Crl.RP is \ufb01led under Section 397 read with\n\na _V --.fj.~4U:1 Cr.F&#039;.C praying to set aside the impugzed judgment\n    order dated 31.01.2008 passed in\n  Cr1.A.No.197\/2006 on the \ufb01le of the 11 Add]. Sessions\n&#039; ~ Judge, Mysore and the judgment; and sentence dated\n\n09.08.2006<\/pre>\n<p> passed in CC No.116\/2004 on the \ufb01le of the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;___f&#8217;*&#8221;-&#8216;*\\.\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2. Though this case is listed for  .<\/p>\n<p>taken up for \ufb01nal disposal with &#8220;the.   V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Counsel for the petitioner-ac:\u00a7iz.\u00a7(-$\u00a71_V_ A.<\/p>\n<p>High Court Government \u00a7:\u00e9;ader amxmeir imkents&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>are heard on   A&#8217; fh&#8217;e &#8220;i mpu@1ed<\/p>\n<p>judgments and also\ufb02&#8217; the &#8221;  placed onj<\/p>\n<p>record.\n<\/p>\n<p>3,%  L  by the Trial Court and<br \/>\nalso   to factum of occurrence of<br \/>\naccideni;k;5u&#8221;&#8216;  as place as stated in the<\/p>\n<p> this petitioner-accused, death<\/p>\n<p>   of .  as a result of the said accident<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;a_t1i&#8221;!__th\u00e9&#8217; ifgztoifg\u00e9\ufb01ment of vehicle are all not disputnd.<\/p>\n<p>1 Learned Counsel for the petitioneraccused<\/p>\n<p>A &#8220;i that of the three eye witnesses namely PWS 3,<\/p>\n<p>   5 and 6 examined for the pr\ufb02\ufb01ecution, PW6 has tunied<\/p>\n<p>  &#8221; f&#8217;1ostj1e and therefore, the conviction is basw on the<\/p>\n<p>evidence of PW3 and 5, which does not disclose that the<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;.&lt;&quot;&quot;&quot;\/\/<\/p>\n<p>accused dmve the said vehicle eithe_1.*&#8211;  <\/p>\n<p>negligently cannot be s11staiI_1_cd__and.&quot;&#039; <\/p>\n<p>impugned judgnlents are liable to; be. set me. f 7 X<\/p>\n<p>5. Per  Z  the<br \/>\nlearned HCGP   eye witnesses<br \/>\nhave deposed   said vehicle at<br \/>\nhigh     deceased and<br \/>\ntherefgrm     as Appellate Court:<\/p>\n<p>were justi\ufb01dd    guilty of the said<br \/>\noffences and   judgments do not<\/p>\n<p>call for   this revision.\n<\/p>\n<p> reading of the evidence of PW3<\/p>\n<p>  5, itais d dddthm; both of them have stated in their<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;the accused drove the vehicle at speed<\/p>\n<p>ddswtsix\u00e9d against tin Idwsed, but they have not<\/p>\n<p>   , _  speed at which the said vehicle was drive:n by<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;tlxi\u00e9dd accused. Learned Counsek far the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>(&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8221;&#8221;\\.a-v..&#8212;n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>referring to this nature of evidence of  3   <\/p>\n<p>placing his reliance on two d\u00e9cisiong {of  &#8220;of 51&#8242; AV<\/p>\n<p>Rajasthan in the case of  L %<\/p>\n<p>Nauratan Mal reportedV1&#8217;n:.?{.702 %(;*r.LL;J.% .3 \u00e9{8VVVand in<\/p>\n<p>the case of State af ed in<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;2oo2 Crl.L.J. 3514  that   itself is not<\/p>\n<p>the criterion:.&#8221;t6&#8217;jAc\u00a3i111\u00a2::&#8217;\u00abto\u20actfixc  that the vehicle<\/p>\n<p>was driven eith\u00a3:-.2;   and therefore,<br \/>\nthe   cams below cannot<br \/>\nbe sustainable  Jaw.-%%  by the High Court<br \/>\nof Rajastjgan in ..  &#8216;inf State of Rcyasthan Vs<br \/>\n in 2002 CrLL.J. 343 at para<\/p>\n<p> 10 and .1;ig..\u00a7 <\/p>\n<p>V  u   In my opinion, the \ufb01ndings<br \/>\n * r qr lama Magistrate on the point that<br \/>\nV&#8217;  the vehicle was not being drivcjn rashly<\/p>\n<p>or negligently are liable to be con\ufb01rmed<\/p>\n<p>r&#8217;___S&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&gt;*&#8211;w&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>one as they are based on    H<\/p>\n<p>appreciating of evidence. <\/p>\n<p>11. No doubt;\n<\/p>\n<p>La} and PW4 &#8212;  \ufb01ai\ufb01istated<br \/>\nthat the vehicle     lmt<br \/>\nspeed      for<br \/>\n of the<br \/>\n&#8216;V ._ ..a11\u20aci until it is proved by<br \/>\n&#8216;A    that the vehicle was<\/p>\n<p>being.  rashly or negligently.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>  the case of State of Rajasthan Vs<\/p>\n<p>  &#8211;VVJoit;i  in 2002 CrI.L.J. 3514 at para 9 and 10<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V V&#8217;   as under:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;9. PW6 &#8212;- Ooka has not been<br \/>\ncross examined, still, his testimony<br \/>\nfalls much short of proving the guilt of<\/p>\n<p>(__r\u00bb._.\/<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the accused. He simpiy states    <\/p>\n<p>tractor was going $\u00a7rith&#8221;fa.$t*&#8217;_.spg3&#8217;\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7i:\u00bb <\/p>\n<p>Tariya fell down.\n<\/p>\n<p>about the jerk;  vlhtfas. &#8216;by<\/p>\n<p>the tractoxf as    the. _  Fl}q &#8221; ;. . _,}\u00a7,&#8217;x;\u00a7P5.\n<\/p>\n<pre>Fmm h\u00a7S'*\u00bb     fgzctum of\naeeifjent   it does\n    or rashness\non the part of the    _ \nspeed of the :::~acto};    \n\ndisclosed.\n\n10. If ' is' e  ~ the four\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>eye wi\u00e9nesses  tt&#8217;ave\u00a7}jI;ig in the<\/p>\n<p>tmney   of the real<\/p>\n<p> V.  The prosecution<\/p>\n<p>usot\ufb01igatzion to prove that<\/p>\n<p>the e&#8217;4j:&#8217;ea;.e{;n for the accident was<br \/>\nthe raslf&#8217;  negligent driving on the<\/p>\n<p>&lt;&#039;&#8212;&#8211;(&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#8211;&#039;*&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;&#039;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">9<\/span><\/p>\n<p>conviction and sentence dated 09.08.2006   <\/p>\n<p>No.116\/2004 on the file of thqleamedh&#8221;i&#8217;\u00a7\u00a5:V&#8217;._(:&#8217;gi\u00e9il.&#8217;_&#8217;_:Cit*ii <\/p>\n<p>Judge (Sr.Dn.) and CJM,  <\/p>\n<p>dated 31.01.2008 oil <\/p>\n<p>\ufb01le of the learned II \ufb01ddl.  are<br \/>\nheraby set aside.    acquitted<br \/>\nof the   304A of IPC.\n<\/p>\n<p>However,    for the<br \/>\n  section 196 of mxv<br \/>\nAct gmA\u00a2he \ufb01ne, if any, paid by the<br \/>\npetitionei9\u00a5a\u00a7:cu${}:c\u00a7.&#8221;\u00e9i&#8217;1;:aif&#8230;&#8221;i&#8217;)e returned to him.<\/p>\n<p>Sdf<br \/>\nJudge<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008 Author: Arali Nagaraj 1 IN THE) HIGH coum OF&#8217; KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY 2098 V THE HONBLE MR.J\ufb01::YfK&#8217;.E CRIMINAL REWSIQN &#8220;N.\u00a7).4&#8243;i6&#8243;()F&#8217;v\u00a72008 B N: L Sri\ufb01aghavendrgt S @iRaghu &#8216;V S\/0 .- Aged about Residing at~~.Nc;2;50, E._IG,2 &#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-33995","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-13T18:22:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-13T18:22:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":630,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-13T18:22:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-13T18:22:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-13T18:22:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008"},"wordCount":630,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008","name":"Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-13T18:22:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-raghavendra-s-raghu-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-25-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Raghavendra S @ Raghu vs State Of Karnataka on 25 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33995","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=33995"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/33995\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=33995"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=33995"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=33995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}