{"id":34268,"date":"2010-11-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010"},"modified":"2017-02-14T03:01:55","modified_gmt":"2017-02-13T21:31:55","slug":"manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n<pre>V. 7.   ygzars \"\"\" \"\nW.\/OfMOh\u00a7im\ufb011,\u00e9d__Kha1ee1\n\n gubrani I-zIO'bV1i,CChannagiriTa1uk\n  -- ._ Dayanagere' Dist:rict--5'77 213 .. RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>  5&#8242;;ri.\u00abfP.M.Siddappa, Advocate. for Mylaraiah Associates)<\/p>\n<p>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGA.LQR.E<br \/>\nDATED THIS THE 29&#8243;&#8221; DAY OF NOVEMBER :20%fOm<br \/>\nBEFORE     % % %<br \/>\nTHE HON&#8217;B&#8217;LE MR. JUSTICE ANANOEEYRAE EDDY<br \/>\nREGULAR SECOND APPEZXLTNO. 1803. OE \ufb01:069;%M  <\/p>\n<p>BETWEEN: s  V&#8217; K L A<br \/>\nManjuI1ath,44 years,   &#8216;\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>S\/O.Mahadevappa:..    I     <\/p>\n<p>Agricuiturist,     ..     V &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Residing at Ta&#8217;.Iare_i\u20ace_:\u00e9&#8217; V.i11agr::j- _ A    &#8221; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Ubrani HOh1Ei_.CVCha1i;13\u00e9\u00a7i17i T.,a1a1k- &#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>Davanagevfe Dist1*icvt&#8211;577&#8242;  _  &#8230;APPEL&#8217;LANT<\/p>\n<p>(By Shyi&#8217;; B.C.VC FE\u00e9t9;h;&#8221;.A;%_:d\\fOcate)<br \/>\nAND. , . . .\n<\/p>\n<p>_&#8230;&#8230;.__._&#8230;.T.\n<\/p>\n<p>AgriCultu1*1s&#8217;f;_&#8217;v_\u00bb. . __ =1; &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Residing at. Ta&#8217;v_areke.re Village<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>This appeal is filed under section 100 of Code of<\/p>\n<p>Procedure, 1908 against the judgment and decree  &#8221;<br \/>\nl3.l0.2009 passed in R.A.No.l69\/2006 on the file&#8217; of_:&#8221;th&#8217;e&#8217;*~  *<br \/>\nAdditional Civil 5udge(S1&#8242;.Dn), Davanagere, allowti&#8211;ng:&#8221;the&#8217;=.appeal'&#8221; ._<br \/>\nand setting aside the judgment and decreeidated l&#8217;_3.6_..200f3 pas_s&#8217;ed7.,<br \/>\nin O.S.No.76\/O3 on the file of the AdditionalCivil..}t1dge{&#8216;}r&#8217;;Dn\u00bb)\u00a7e I<\/p>\n<p>Channagiri.\n<\/p>\n<p>This appeal coming on for A&#8217;drni\u00bbssion Court<br \/>\ndelivered the following: &#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p> A  <\/p>\n<p>Heard the le.a1&#8242;.ned_cou_&#8217;slnel&#8217;\n<\/p>\n<p>2. H piheipappeiiaht ewesiictheppiainhff before the trial Court.<br \/>\nIt is the plaint_iff&#8217;s&#8217;c&#8217;a3e_that&#8221;theprcperty described in schedule &#8220;A&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>was his absolatel pvrolpertyl anildp-.the property described in schedule<\/p>\n<p>   of &#8220;schedpu&#8221;;e &#8220;A&#8221; property. Hence, sought for<\/p>\n<p>hreicoyeryp &#8220;&lt;)4fi&#039;ip_espse&#8211;ssion insofar as schedule &quot;B&quot; property was<\/p>\n<p>concerned. .  suit was contested whereby the defendant claimed<\/p>\n<p> &lt;.___&#039;that schedule &quot;B&quot; property was gornal land and the defendant had<\/p>\n<p> _ibee&#039;n,_in.&#8211;&#039; unauthorised occupation of the same since the year I992<\/p>\n<p> on an application seeking regularisation of unauthorised<\/p>\n<p>A &quot; occupation, an Hakku Patra had been granted by the competent<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>authority. Therefore, her possession and title to the said <\/p>\n<p>been regularised. The trial Court however, on the issues  =<\/p>\n<p>decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff&#8217;.&#8217;Ai&#8221;T&#8217;i:e sa_me_, bieen\ufb02. it<\/p>\n<p>challenged in appeal by the respondent, the lower  <\/p>\n<p>has found that the appellant wasiiitlaimingp Vuade\ufb01axreygistered<br \/>\npartition deed executed on xhibipijmi\u00e9whereas<br \/>\nthe Hakkupatra under\u00bb \\whic.h&#8230;:t_lie  claiming was<br \/>\nissued on   found that the<br \/>\ndefendantv,,w.asv_Ainfpois:sessiori&#8211;ii,oi  property since the<br \/>\nyear l99\ufb01;._p   thus held that the burden<\/p>\n<p>was on the plaintiff  .establish that schedule &#8220;B&#8221; property formed<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Jlpart ofschedule &#8220;tit&#8221; property and that it was the family property<\/p>\n<p> the&#8221;appe_llarit,,_which was available for partition under Exhibit<\/p>\n<p>  Pluarid u_nlesis*,.&#8211;the title to the land was proved, Exhibit P10 would<\/p>\n<p>not eonfett any title on the appellant since there was a serious<\/p>\n<p>  about the identity of the land and availability of the same<\/p>\n<p>i  for partition in favour of the appellant. The appellant had not<\/p>\n<p>produced documents to establish title to the said schedule <\/p>\n<p>%<\/p>\n<p>V the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>property to show that it was the family property of the ap_&#8217;pe:l_lant_<\/p>\n<p>and therefore available for partition under Exhibit   *<\/p>\n<p>that primary premise that the lower appefIate\u00ab Court i;&#8217;ey&#8217;erjSCtd&#8217;i&#8217;v.,<\/p>\n<p>the findings of the trial. Court and helds__against thep&#8217;appellar1&#8211;.r,C&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Hence, the present appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The appellant ha:s__&#8217;fil&#8217;e.d.7an before this<br \/>\nCourt under Order    Civil Procedure,<br \/>\n1908 seeking tode&#8211;ed&#8221;:fdalt.ed.-5.5.1965 and copies of<br \/>\nR.T.C.    &#8220;B&#8221; property was indeed<\/p>\n<p>part of schedule  it belonged to the family of<\/p>\n<p>C   the learned counsel for the respondent would<\/p>\n<p>  subnjit4Vthat.&#8217;th:ere is no foundation laid to produce the said<\/p>\n<p>U&#8221;i\u00a7&#8221;.&#8217;A&#8221;&#8211;._doeuments__at this belated stage before. this Court and he would<\/p>\n<p> e.f&#8217;urjther&#8211;.contend that even if such documents are accepted on face<\/p>\n<p>i  yaltie, without testing the veracity therein, it cannot be established<\/p>\n<p>3 that schedule &#8220;B&#8221; property is part of schedule &#8220;A&#8221; property, in the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>face of which, the appeal would have to fail at the <\/p>\n<p>Therefore, the question of considering the applicatior-ri\ufb01lecii ~<\/p>\n<p>Order XLI Rule 27 of the Code of Civil&#8217;ii&gt;reeiee1:ireQ.ijaos .Vwo_1ji,1di&#8217;, he<\/p>\n<p>not arise for consideration as the conditions prescribed\u00ab. <\/p>\n<p>Order XLI Rule 27 are not met  appe&#8217;lla_ntei&#8217;n  to<br \/>\nproduce the said documents\n<\/p>\n<p>5. In the z\u00abjh:Q&#8217;_v.e biiekgre;rriri;&#8217;\u00ab~es-..it the burden on the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff~appeliiaiitijtoiesia.b:li&#8217;shj&#8217;.&#8211;tit&#8217;le_sehedule &#8220;B&#8221; property and<br \/>\nthe appe1:Vlaiitiha*=ii\u00bbngdoesomand in the absence of any<\/p>\n<p>material pleadings that &#8220;de&#8221;ed in respect of the property was<\/p>\n<p>V lost orgjwas misplaced  the pendency of the proceedings<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;r.4_eitherl&#8221;&#8216;bef2ore the trial Court or the lower appellate Court, the<\/p>\n<p>appellhlaiitiv&#8217;seeking&#8217;to produce the alleged sale deed pertaining to<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;,schedule  property at this stage of the proceedings does not<\/p>\n<p>r~:arisei&#8217;for consideration. Even if this document is taken on record,<\/p>\n<p>  question of appellant finding a case for himself on the material<\/p>\n<p> on record is dim and the reasoning of the lower appellate Court<\/p>\n<p>7:.\n<\/p>\n<p>cannot be fauited. Therefore, no substantial question of law arises  _i <\/p>\n<p>for consideration. The findings are \ufb01ndings of fact.<\/p>\n<p>6. Hence, the appeal is rejected.\n<\/p>\n<p>*a1b\/\u00bb&#8211;.\n<\/p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010 Author: Anand Byrareddy V. 7. ygzars &#8220;&#8221;&#8221; &#8221; W.\/OfMOh\u00a7im\ufb011,\u00e9d__Kha1ee1 gubrani I-zIO&#8217;bV1i,CChannagiriTa1uk &#8212; ._ Dayanagere&#8217; Dist:rict&#8211;5&#8217;77 213 .. RESPONDENT 5&#8242;;ri.\u00abfP.M.Siddappa, Advocate. for Mylaraiah Associates) IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGA.LQR.E DATED THIS THE 29&#8243;&#8221; DAY OF NOVEMBER :20%fOm BEFORE % % % THE [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-34268","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-13T21:31:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-13T21:31:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":870,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-13T21:31:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-13T21:31:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-13T21:31:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010"},"wordCount":870,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010","name":"Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-13T21:31:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manjunath-vs-shahida-jan-on-29-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Manjunath vs Shahida Jan on 29 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34268","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34268"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/34268\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34268"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=34268"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=34268"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}