{"id":35117,"date":"2007-09-25T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2007-09-24T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007"},"modified":"2016-11-27T03:57:07","modified_gmt":"2016-11-26T22:27:07","slug":"mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007","title":{"rendered":"Mangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Mangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWA No. 2229 of 2007()\n\n\n1. MANGALY TIMBERS, PALAKKAD.\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. MANGALY INDUSTRIES,\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE ADDITIONAL SALES TAX OFFICER,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR),\n\n3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE,\n\n4. THE MANAGER,\n\n5. M\/S.HILL WOOD INDUSTRIES,\n\n6. M\/S HILL WOOD IMPORTS AND EXPORTS PVT\n\n7. M\/S.NATIONAL TIMBER TRADERS,\n\n8. P.AHAMMEDKUTTY AND COMPANY,\n\n9. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),\n\n10. THE SALES TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,\n\n11. THE DIRECTOR, VIGILANCE AND ANTI\n\n12. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES,\n\n13. P.MOIDEEN, PROPRIETOR,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.I.MAYANKUTTY MATHER\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN\n\n Dated :25\/09\/2007\n\n O R D E R\n                       H.L. DATTU, C.J. & K.T. SANKARAN, J.\n             ...................................................................................\n                                   W.A. No. 2229 OF 2007\n              ...................................................................................\n                         Dated this the 25th September , 2007\n\n\n                                          J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
H.L. Dattu, C.J.:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
        Respondent Nos. 6 and 7 in the Writ Petition (C)No. 33646 of 2005 are<\/p>\n
the appellants in this appeal.\n<\/p>\n
        2. The appellants only question a portion of the order passed by the<\/p>\n
learned single Judge while disposing of the Writ Petition, by order dated<\/p>\n
06.06.2007. The offending portion, that is pointed out by the learned counsel<\/p>\n
for the appellants, is extracted below:\n<\/p>\n
        “Petitioner’s specific case is that respondents 5 to 10 accounted<\/p>\n
        their unaccounted purchases as made from petitioner by using<\/p>\n
        Form 18        issued in the name of the petitioner                              without his<\/p>\n
        knowledge.         Pursuant           to enquiry            on these            allegations<\/p>\n
        under orders of this Court,                              petitioner’s claim was<\/p>\n
        substantially found to be correct.” (emphasis is supplied.)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
        3. Thereafter, the learned single Judge has directed the Commissioner<\/p>\n
of Commercial Taxes to nominate a person as the appellate authority                                  for<\/p>\n
disposal of the appeals pending against the assessment orders for the<\/p>\n
assessment years 2001-02, 2002-03 and 2003-04.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
        4. We have heard Shri V.V. Asokan, learned counsel appearing for the<\/p>\n
appellants, Shri K.B. Pradeep, learned Government Pleader for the Revenue<\/p>\n
W.A. No. 2229 OF 2007<\/p>\n
                                       2<\/span><\/p>\n
and Shri V.P. Sukumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in the Writ<\/p>\n
Petition\/13th respondent herein.\n<\/p>\n
       5.   Shri V.V. Asokan, learned counsel appearing for the appellants<\/p>\n
would submit that while relegating the parties to the appellate authority, there<\/p>\n
was no reason for the learned single Judge to have expressed an opinion on<\/p>\n
the merits of the case pleaded by the petitioner as well as the respondents in<\/p>\n
the Writ Petition. Therefore, the learned counsel requests us to expunge the<\/p>\n
aforesaid observation made by the learned single Judge in the course of the<\/p>\n
impugned order.\n<\/p>\n
       6. In the instant case, the petitioner\/13th respondent herein was before<\/p>\n
this court inter alia questioning   the recovery proceedings initiated by the<\/p>\n
assessing authority for realisation of the arrears of tax for the assessment<\/p>\n
years 2001-02, 2002-03 and 2003-04. It was the case of the petitioner\/13th<\/p>\n
respondent herein before this court that respondents Nos. 5 to 10 in the Writ<\/p>\n
Petition had misused his name and also Form 18 and therefore, he is in no<\/p>\n
way liable for payment of arrears of tax for the aforesaid assessment years.<\/p>\n
       7. The learned single Judge has not gone into the merits of the case.<\/p>\n
But,    has directed the appellate authority to be nominated by the<\/p>\n
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes to dispose of the appeals filed by the<\/p>\n
petitioner and others against the assessment orders.        In our opinion, while<\/p>\n
doing so, there was no reason for the learned single Judge to have expressed<\/p>\n
any opinion on the merits of the contentions canvassed by the petitioner in the<\/p>\n
Writ Petition. Therefore, that portion of the order passed by the learned single<\/p>\n
W.A. No. 2229 OF 2007<\/p>\n
                                        3<\/span><\/p>\n
Judge , which would come in the way of respondents 6 and 7 in the Writ<\/p>\n
Petition\/appellants before us , requires to be expunged from the order passed<\/p>\n
by the learned single Judge. Therefore, the following:<\/p>\n
                                 O R D E R<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
       i)      The Writ Appeal is disposed of.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
       ii)     The offending portion in the order passed by the learned single<\/p>\n
Judge is expunged.\n<\/p>\n
       iii)    Now the appellate authority,         to be nominated by the<\/p>\n
Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, is directed to decide the appeals filed<\/p>\n
by the petitioner in the Writ Petition\/13th respondent herein, as well as others ,<\/p>\n
on merits without reference to any one of the observations made by the<\/p>\n
learned single Judge .\n<\/p>\n
       Ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                      H.L. DATTU,
\n                                                    CHIEF JUSTICE.\n<\/p>\n
                                                    K.T. SANKARAN,
\n                                                         JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n
lk<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Mangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WA No. 2229 of 2007() 1. MANGALY TIMBERS, PALAKKAD. … Petitioner 2. MANGALY INDUSTRIES, Vs 1. THE ADDITIONAL SALES TAX OFFICER, … Respondent 2. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35117","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2007-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-26T22:27:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007\",\"datePublished\":\"2007-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-26T22:27:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007\"},\"wordCount\":599,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007\",\"name\":\"Mangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2007-09-24T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-26T22:27:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2007-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-26T22:27:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007","datePublished":"2007-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-26T22:27:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007"},"wordCount":599,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007","name":"Mangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2007-09-24T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-26T22:27:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mangaly-timbers-vs-the-additional-sales-tax-officer-on-25-september-2007#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mangaly Timbers vs The Additional Sales Tax Officer on 25 September, 2007"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35117","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35117"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35117\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35117"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35117"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35117"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}