{"id":3525,"date":"2009-07-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009"},"modified":"2017-04-19T07:23:57","modified_gmt":"2017-04-19T01:53:57","slug":"pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>Regular Second Appeal No. 2213 of 2009                        -1-\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH\n\n\n                                 Regular Second Appeal No. 2213 of 2009\n\n                                 Date of Order: 07.07.2009\n\n\nPawan Kumar\n                                                                    ....Appellant\n\n                                    Versus\n\nSaroj Bansal and another\n                                                              ..Respondents<\/pre>\n<p>CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLA<\/p>\n<p>Present: Mr.Ashish Grover,Advocate<br \/>\n         for the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>\nRAJIVE BHALLA, J (Oral).\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>          The   appellant   challenges    judgments     and   decrees      dated<\/p>\n<p>17.03.2008 and 04.02.2009, passed by the Additional Civil Judge (Senior<\/p>\n<p>Division), Bathinda and the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court,<\/p>\n<p>Bathinda, decreeing the suit filed by respondent no.1 and dismissing the<\/p>\n<p>appeal filed by the appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The plaintiff\/respondent no.1 filed a suit for possession of one<\/p>\n<p>room in House No.1708, Street No.4, Nai Basti, Bathinda on the plea that<\/p>\n<p>she purchased 90 Sq. Yds. out of this property from Kaur Chand vide<\/p>\n<p>registered sale deed No.4377 dated 08.10.1998. The vacant possession<\/p>\n<p>of the house except the room in occupation of the appellant was handed<\/p>\n<p>over to her. It was prayed that as the appellant has no right or interest in<\/p>\n<p>the suit property, a decree for possession be passed.<\/p>\n<p>          In opposition to the averments in the plaint, the appellant raised<\/p>\n<p>various objections but, on merits, pleaded that he is son of Kaur Chand and<\/p>\n<p>along with his brothers and sisters constitute a Hindu Undivided family. The<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Regular Second Appeal No. 2213 of 2009                         -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>room in his possession was constructed out of joint family funds and was<\/p>\n<p>allotted to him pursuant to an oral family settlement.<\/p>\n<p>          On the basis of pleadings of the parties, trial court framed the<\/p>\n<p>following issues and thereafter called upon the parties to lead evidence:-<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;1.     Whether the plaintiff is entitled to the possession of the<\/p>\n<p>                    suit property?OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            2.      Whether the suit is not maintainable in the present<\/p>\n<p>                    form?OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            3.      Whether the plaintiff has no locus standi to file the<\/p>\n<p>                    present suit?OPD<\/p>\n<p>            3(a)    Whether suit is not properly valued for the purpose of<\/p>\n<p>                    court fee and jurisdiction?OPD<\/p>\n<p>            3(b)    Whether defendants have become owners by way of<\/p>\n<p>                    adverse possession as alleged?OPD<\/p>\n<p>            3(c)    Whether suit is bad for non-joinder and mis-joinder of<\/p>\n<p>                    necessary parties?OPD<\/p>\n<p>            3(d)    Whether H.No.1708 is co-parcenary and joint hindu<\/p>\n<p>                    family property of def. no.1 &amp; 2 along with some other<\/p>\n<p>                    persons, as alleged?OPD<\/p>\n<p>            3(e)    Whether     the   sale   deed   is   illegal     and   without<\/p>\n<p>                    consideration, as alleged? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>            4.       Relief.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>          After considering the pleadings, the evidence adduced and<\/p>\n<p>arguments addressed , the trial court held that respondent no.1 was owner<\/p>\n<p>of the entire property, including the room occupied by the appellant. It was<\/p>\n<p>also held that the appellant had failed to prove that the room was<\/p>\n<p>constructed out of joint family funds or that pursuant to a family settlement<\/p>\n<p>the room fell to his share.     Consequently, the suit for possession was<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Regular Second Appeal No. 2213 of 2009                        -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>decreed.\n<\/p>\n<p>           Aggrieved by the aforementioned judgment, the appellant filed an<\/p>\n<p>appeal.    The Additional District Judge, Bathinda, affirmed the findings<\/p>\n<p>recorded by the trial court and dismissed the appeal.<\/p>\n<p>           Counsel for the appellant submits that the courts below were not<\/p>\n<p>justified in rejecting the statements of DW2 Prem Lata and DW3 Pawan<\/p>\n<p>Kumar.     They    have deposed that as the suit property is ancestral<\/p>\n<p>coparcenary property, and the room in dispute fell to the appellant&#8217;s share,<\/p>\n<p>during a family settlement. It is further argued that as these witnesses<\/p>\n<p>have also deposed that the property was constructed out of the Hindu<\/p>\n<p>Undivided Family Funds, the courts below erred in decreeing the suit.<\/p>\n<p>           I have heard counsel for the parties, perused the impugned<\/p>\n<p>judgments and express my inability to accede to the arguments raised by<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the appellant. It would be necessary to mention here that the<\/p>\n<p>courts below are concurrent in their opinion that the suit property was<\/p>\n<p>purchased by Kaur Chand vide registered sale deed No.1259 dated<\/p>\n<p>31.05.1962 and was, therefore, his self acquired property. As regards the<\/p>\n<p>room in the appellant&#8217;s possession, both the trial court            and the first<\/p>\n<p>appellate court have negatived his assertion that this room was constructed<\/p>\n<p>out of the Hindu Undivided Family Funds or fell to his share in an oral<\/p>\n<p>family settlement. I find no error in the impugned judgments as would raise<\/p>\n<p>substantial questions of law sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court<\/p>\n<p>in second appeal. The submission made by counsel for the appellant that<\/p>\n<p>the courts below have failed to consider the depositions of DW2 and DW3<\/p>\n<p>about the family settlement, the use of Hindu Undivided Family funds for<\/p>\n<p>constructing the room etc. is factually incorrect. A perusal of the impugned<\/p>\n<p>judgments discloses that both the trial court and the first appellate court<\/p>\n<p>have considered the depositions of DW2 and DW3 and rejected them. As<\/p>\n<p>the findings of fact returned by the courts below do not suffer from any<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Regular Second Appeal No. 2213 of 2009                      -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>error and as no question of law much less a substantial question of law<\/p>\n<p>arises for consideration, the appeal is dismissed.<\/p>\n<pre>July 07, 2009                                        (RAJIVE BHALLA)\nnt                                                         JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009 Regular Second Appeal No. 2213 of 2009 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Regular Second Appeal No. 2213 of 2009 Date of Order: 07.07.2009 Pawan Kumar &#8230;.Appellant Versus Saroj Bansal and another ..Respondents CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3525","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-19T01:53:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-19T01:53:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":803,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-19T01:53:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-19T01:53:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-19T01:53:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009"},"wordCount":803,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009","name":"Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-19T01:53:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pawan-kumar-vs-saroj-bansal-and-another-on-7-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pawan Kumar vs Saroj Bansal And Another on 7 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3525","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3525"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3525\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3525"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3525"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3525"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}