{"id":35361,"date":"2010-11-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010"},"modified":"2017-10-18T19:52:44","modified_gmt":"2017-10-18T14:22:44","slug":"dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"Dinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur<\/div>\n
Dinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010<\/div>\n
                                 1\n\n\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN\n                   AT JODHPUR.\n\n                            JUDGMENT\n\n\nDINESH KUMAR ACHARYA vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN                      &\n                    ANR.\n\n             1. S.B.CriminaL Misc. Petition No.186\/2010\n\n             PAWAN ACHARYA & ANR. vs. STATE OF\n                     RAJASTHAN & ANR.\n\n             2. S.B.CriminaL Misc. Petition No.250\/2010\n\n             under section 482 Cr.P.C. For quashing of\n             FIR      No.150\/2009 of Police      Station\n             Nagaur, for offences under section 406 and\n             420 IPC.\n\nDate of Judgment:                        9 November, 2010\n\n\n                             PRESENT\n\n          HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI\n\n\nMr.P.N.Mohnani for the petitioners.\nMr.A.R.Nikub, Public Prosecutor.\nMr.Ashok Chhangani for respondent No.2.\n\nBY THE COURT :<\/pre>\n
        The petitioners Dinesh Kumar Acharya     s\/o Parasram r\/o<\/p>\n
Nakas    Gate,    Behind Traffic Police Station, Nagaur and Pawan<\/p>\n
Acharya s\/o Narayan and Harish Acharya s\/o Parasram           have<\/p>\n
challenged the registration of a criminal case by way of FIR No.<\/p>\n
150\/2009 of Police station Nagaur and       further   investigation<\/p>\n
which is under way, for the offences under section 406 and 420<\/p>\n
IPC,    by       way of quashing the above FIR and         further<\/p>\n
investigation.\n<\/p>\n
       The facts leading to the present petition are as under:
\n                                     2<\/span><\/p>\n
      That the first information report         aforesaid     has been<\/p>\n
registered on a complaint made by the Assistant Engineer,<\/p>\n
Ajmer, Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Ltd., Nagaur (hereinafter referred<\/p>\n
to as ‘the Nigam’) stating that         a contract for      collection of<\/p>\n
electricity bills   was executed on 07.10.2005 in favour of the<\/p>\n
agency     as Jai Maa Electric      Labour     & Contractor      Sahkari<\/p>\n
Samiti, Nagaur (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Samiti’), of which<\/p>\n
the petitioner No.1 Pawan Acharya            being its president     and<\/p>\n
Harish Acharya as being treasurer and Dinesh Acharya as being<\/p>\n
its Secretary,      who had   furnished the     requisite   undertaking<\/p>\n
that in terms of the work order it was incumbent            for the said<\/p>\n
Samiti to have deposited the collected amount of each day in<\/p>\n
the Bank account of the complainant           Nigam on the very day<\/p>\n
and to produce the receipts the next day in the Nigam Office and<\/p>\n
also to furnish the details of the payment received every day.<\/p>\n
      The complainant has alleged that          even while     collecting<\/p>\n
the payments the Samiti started          retaining    the counter foils<\/p>\n
and   stopped furnishing the details of the deposited amount to<\/p>\n
the Nigam according to the complainant by            23.03.09 the said<\/p>\n
collecting agency retained an amount of Rs. 26.77 lacs                as<\/p>\n
received from 2502 consumers . It was submitted by the<\/p>\n
complainant that the contract            with the Samiti has been<\/p>\n
discontinued but proceedings are required to be taken against<\/p>\n
the Samiti for       embezzlement       of money collected from the<\/p>\n
consumers and for cheating.\n<\/p>\n
      On the basis of above first information report, criminal
\n                                   3<\/span><\/p>\n
case No.150\/ 09.04.09 was registered at Police Station Nagaur<\/p>\n
and the investigation is pending.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      The learned counsel for the petitioners contended that as<\/p>\n
a matter of fact the membership of the petitioners in the said<\/p>\n
Samiti had been terminated way back in the months of April and<\/p>\n
May 2007 and       the facts had also been        recorded in the<\/p>\n
concerned register of the      Registered Cooperative Societies to<\/p>\n
the effect that there had been handing over and taking over of<\/p>\n
charges of the newly constituted Samiti          on 20.05.07 and,<\/p>\n
therefore, the present petitioners    have no concern with the said<\/p>\n
collection agency. It is also submitted that the amount referred<\/p>\n
in the first information report relates to the months of December<\/p>\n
2008 to March 2009 i.e. which is of after the termination of the<\/p>\n
membership of the petitioners with the said Samiti and hence<\/p>\n
the investigation in the above criminal case cannot be continued<\/p>\n
and is liable to be quashed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents<\/p>\n
contended that the investigation in the above matter is pending<\/p>\n
and the necessary documents are required to be produced by<\/p>\n
the petitioners.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
       During the course of arguments           it has also been<\/p>\n
contended by the learned counsel for the petitioners that later on<\/p>\n
Assistant Engineer of the Nigam filed a civil suit for the recovery<\/p>\n
of the said amount in the competent court, that further weakens<\/p>\n
the investigation process in the criminal case. A copy of the
\n                                  4<\/span><\/p>\n
plaint has been submitted for perusal.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
        The learned counsel for the petitioners, while arguing his<\/p>\n
case, relied on the following decisions :-\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
    1. B.Suresh Yadav vs. Sharifa Bee<\/a> [2005 Cr.L.J. 431]<\/p>\n
    2. Vir Prakash Sharma vs. Anil Kumar Agarwal<\/a> [( 2007) 7
\n       SCC 373] and<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
    3. All Cargo Movers (I) Pvt.Ltd. vs. Dhanesh Badarmal Jain &
\n       Anr.<\/a>[2007 AIR SCW 6667]<\/p>\n
        Learned counsel for the respondent        on the other hand ,<\/p>\n
while      advancing   his   argument    relied    on   the   following<\/p>\n
judgments :-\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
<\/blockquote>\n
    1. Mohd. Ibrahim vs. State of Bihar [(2009)8 SCC 751]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
    2. Jimmy Sudarshan Purohit vs. Sudarshan Sharad Purohit
\n       [(2005) 13 SCC 410]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
    3. Sunita Jain vs. Pawan Kumar Jain<\/a> [(2008) 2 SCC 705]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
    4. State of Maharashtra vs. Sayed Mohammed Masood<\/a>
\n      [(2009) 8 SCC 787]<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
    5. Central Bureau of Investigation vs. K.M. Sharan<\/a> [ (2008)
\n      4 SCC 471] and<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
    6. Pratibha vs. Rameshwari Devi<\/a> [( 2007) 12 SCC 369]<\/p>\n
        I have gone through the judgments cited by the learned<\/p>\n
counsel for    both the parties and also perused the copy of the<\/p>\n
plaint filed by the learned counsel for the petitioners.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n
\n<\/blockquote>\n
        The contours of the power under section 482 Cr.P.C. have<\/p>\n
been explained in a series of decisions by the Hon’ble Supreme<\/p>\n
Court. In State of Haryana        vs. Bhajan Lal<\/a> [1992 Supp (1)
\n                                 5<\/span><\/p>\n
SCC 335]     a question came up for consideration as to whether<\/p>\n
the quashing of the FIR filed against the respondent Bhajan Lal<\/p>\n
for the offence under section 161 and 165 IPC and section 5 (2)<\/p>\n
of the Prevention of Corruption Act was       proper and legal ?<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
Reversing the     order passed by the High Court the Hon’ble<\/p>\n
Supreme Court explained the circumstances under which such<\/p>\n
power     could be exercised. Apart from    reiterating the earlier<\/p>\n
norms laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, it was further<\/p>\n
explained that such power could be exercised where allegation<\/p>\n
made in the FIR or complaint are        so absurd and      innocently<\/p>\n
improbable, on the basis of which no prudent person can ever<\/p>\n
reach a just conclusion that there is sufficient ground for<\/p>\n
proceeding against      the accused. No doubt at the state of<\/p>\n
quashing the FIR or complaint the High Court is not justified in<\/p>\n
embarking upon an enquiry as to the probability, reliability or<\/p>\n
genuineness of the allegation made therein.<\/p>\n
      It is not unusual \/ unbecoming that an incident may give<\/p>\n
rise to   a cause of action   for the   civil as well as     criminal<\/p>\n
proceedings at a time. Institution of civil proceedings in such a<\/p>\n
case does not    distract or take away remedy of criminal       side.<\/p>\n
The fact that accused     petitioners were authorised to collect<\/p>\n
payment against the bills only up to certain period, cannot be<\/p>\n
disbelieved at this stage. Even if it is assumed that there was<\/p>\n
some express or implied consent for      extension of the term of<\/p>\n
contract, still withholding the collection for unduly long period<\/p>\n
in violation of the conditions of the contract and further without<\/p>\n
satisfactory explanation may lead to an inference of dishonesty
\n                                  6<\/span><\/p>\n
and the result of the investigation    only will establish the true<\/p>\n
nature of the dispute i.e. whether it is pure civil dispute or some<\/p>\n
criminal intent was there behind it.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      Quashing of first information report at investigation stage<\/p>\n
is possible only in a rarest of the rare cases where it suffers from<\/p>\n
some inherent improbability or even if      accepted    on its face<\/p>\n
value , will not constitute any offence or whether investigation<\/p>\n
itself is patently barred by law. The case in hand is not of such a<\/p>\n
nature so as to call for interference at this stage, in view of the<\/p>\n
provisions enunciated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case<\/p>\n
of State   Haryana    vs. Bhajan Lal<\/a> (supra).\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      In   B.Suresh Yadav ‘s case (supra) the Hon’ble apex court<\/p>\n
found no dishonest concealment of facts and two contrary and<\/p>\n
inconsistent stand were taken by the complainant.<\/p>\n
      In    Vir Prakash Sharma’s case (supra) the Hon’ble<\/p>\n
Supreme Court held that     non payment or unpayment of price<\/p>\n
of goods by itself does not amount to cheating or breach of trust<\/p>\n
and it had to be essentially a civil dispute.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      In   All Cargo Movers (I) Pvt. Ltd.’s case (supra)        the<\/p>\n
Hon’ble Supreme Court held that breach of contract simplicitor<\/p>\n
does not constitute an offence and the criminal complaint was<\/p>\n
filed after one year of filing the civil suit. The Hon’ble Supreme<\/p>\n
Court quashed the criminal proceedings.\n<\/p>\n
                                      7<\/span><\/p>\n
           The facts of the present case are different. In the present<\/p>\n
case, the amount was collected by the Samiti on behalf of the<\/p>\n
Nigam from the consumers and they were not entitled to retain<\/p>\n
or keep the amount           collected   on behalf of the Nigam with<\/p>\n
them for such a long period. Therefore,in view of the principles<\/p>\n
enunciated by the Supreme Court in           State of Haryana’s case<\/p>\n
(supra) the present case is not of such a nature so as to call<\/p>\n
for interference at this stage under section 482       Cr.P.C.<\/p>\n
           SB Cri.Misc. Petition No.186\/2010 filed by Dinesh Kumar<\/p>\n
Acharya and         SB Cri.Misc. Petition No.250\/2010 filed by Pawan<\/p>\n
Acharya and Harish Acharya are           devoid of any force and are<\/p>\n
liable to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
           Accordingly, both the petitions are hereby dismissed.<\/p>\n
                            (KAILASH CHANDRA JOSHI),J.\n<\/p>\n
L.george\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Rajasthan High Court – Jodhpur Dinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR. JUDGMENT DINESH KUMAR ACHARYA vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. 1. S.B.CriminaL Misc. Petition No.186\/2010 PAWAN ACHARYA & ANR. vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ANR. 2. S.B.CriminaL Misc. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,19],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35361","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-rajasthan-high-court-jodhpur"],"yoast_head":"\nDinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-18T14:22:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-18T14:22:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1418,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010\",\"name\":\"Dinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-18T14:22:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-18T14:22:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-18T14:22:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010"},"wordCount":1418,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010","name":"Dinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-18T14:22:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dinesh-kumar-acharya-vs-state-anr-on-9-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dinesh Kumar Acharya vs State & Anr on 9 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35361","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35361"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35361\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35361"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35361"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35361"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}