{"id":35373,"date":"2010-09-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010"},"modified":"2018-08-14T11:00:59","modified_gmt":"2018-08-14T05:30:59","slug":"m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nOP(C).No. 95 of 2010(O)\n\n\n1. M.KRISHNAMMAL, AGED 87 YEARS,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, RENT CONTROL COURT,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. K.LEELAMMAL, AGED 62 YEARS,\n\n3. S.S.ANITHAKUMARI, D\/O.K.LEELAMMAL,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.G.VENUGOPAL\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOMAS P.JOSEPH\n\n Dated :29\/09\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                              THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J.\n                            --------------------------------------\n                               O.P.(C) No.95 of 2010\n                            --------------------------------------\n                   Dated this the 29th day of September, 2010.\n\n                                      JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>       This petition is in challenge of Exts.P4 and P5, orders refusing to send<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P1, letter to the expert for opinion as to the handwriting and signature and to<\/p>\n<p>reopen the case for the said purpose. Plaintiff in O.S.No.104 of 2009 of the<\/p>\n<p>court of learned Additional Munsiff (Rent Control Court), Thiruvananthapuram is<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner before me. She claimed that the suit property which is the self<\/p>\n<p>acquired property of her husband, Arumughan Pillai belonged to her as per<\/p>\n<p>registered Will No.66 of 1978 executed by him and on the testator dying on<\/p>\n<p>05.04.1998. On petitioner learning that respondent No.1, her daughter as if she<\/p>\n<p>is a co-owner of the undivided property has executed settlement deed No.1393<\/p>\n<p>of 2001 purporting to transfer her 1\/9th share in the property, she filed the suit<\/p>\n<p>for cancellation of that settlement deed and to enforce her right under Will No.66<\/p>\n<p>of 1978. Respondents ofcourse disputed genuineness of the Will. Parties went<\/p>\n<p>into evidence. When petitioner was in the box she wanted to prove a letter dated<\/p>\n<p>18.10.1999 allegedly sent by respondent No.1 to her which according to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner made reference to the disputed Will. The purpose was to show that<\/p>\n<p>even as in the year, 1999 respondent No.1 was aware of the existence of Will<\/p>\n<p>No.66 of 1978. But that letter was not allowed to be marked in evidence since it<\/p>\n<p>was objected by respondents. When respondent No.1 was in the box and was<\/p>\n<p>being examined as DW1, she was confronted with the letter but she denied it. It<\/p>\n<p>is thereon that petitioner wanted the letter to be sent to the expert for opinion and<\/p>\n<p>OP(C) No.95\/2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                          2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>reopen the case for the said purpose.          Learned Munsiff dismissed those<\/p>\n<p>applications. It is contended by learned counsel that proof of letter was relevant<\/p>\n<p>and necessary for a decision of the controversy involved and to show that<\/p>\n<p>version of respondent No.1 that she was unaware of existence of the Will is<\/p>\n<p>untrue.   It is pointed out by learned counsel that learned Munsiff has even<\/p>\n<p>made an observation in Ext.P4, oder that &#8220;further the genuinity of the Will is not<\/p>\n<p>proved by the plaintiff herein&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       2.       I have gone through Ext.P1, letter allegedly sent by respondent<\/p>\n<p>No.1 to petitioner. There, reference is to a Will allegedly executed by the father<\/p>\n<p>(as told by the mother) bequeathing property in favour of the daughter and the<\/p>\n<p>sender of      the letter wanted the original Will to be given to her for her<\/p>\n<p>understanding. I must bear in mind that as per Will No.66 of 1978 claim of<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is that entire property is bequeathed to her.   In this proceeding I am<\/p>\n<p>not at the question whether learned Munsiff was correct in disallowing marking of<\/p>\n<p>the letter when petitioner was in the box. I leave that question there.    What is<\/p>\n<p>relevant is not whether respondent No.1 was aware of existence of Will No.66 of<\/p>\n<p>1978 during the time Ext.P1, letter is allegedly written but whether Will No.66 of<\/p>\n<p>1978 is the last Will and testament of the deceased Arumughan Pillai. That is a<\/p>\n<p>matter which petitioner has to prove by appropriate evidence as provided under<\/p>\n<p>the Evidence Act and the Succession Act. In that view I am not inclined to think<\/p>\n<p>that Ext.P1 should be sent to the expert for opinion which would only delay<\/p>\n<p>OP(C) No.95\/2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                          3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>further proceedings in the suit. But any observation made by the learned Munsiff<\/p>\n<p>as to genuineness of the Will or sufficiency of evidence let in by the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>in Ext.P4 was     unwarranted for disposal of Ext.P2, application and, learned<\/p>\n<p>Munsiff shall decide the suit untrammelled by any such observation. I also make<\/p>\n<p>it clear that if necessary it will be open to the petitioner to challenge the<\/p>\n<p>correctness of the impugned orders or refusal of learned Munsiff to mark the<\/p>\n<p>letter when petitioner was in the box in the appeal if any arising from the<\/p>\n<p>judgment and decree of the learned Munsiff if petitioner is otherwise entitled to<\/p>\n<p>that course, notwithstanding any observation made herein or the dismissal of this<\/p>\n<p>petition.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       3.     In the light of what I have stated I do not find reason to interfere<\/p>\n<p>with Exts.P4 and P5, orders.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>       Resultantly this Original Petition is dismissed with the observations made<\/p>\n<p>above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                THOMAS P.JOSEPH,<br \/>\n                                                        Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>cks<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM OP(C).No. 95 of 2010(O) 1. M.KRISHNAMMAL, AGED 87 YEARS, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, RENT CONTROL COURT, &#8230; Respondent 2. K.LEELAMMAL, AGED 62 YEARS, 3. S.S.ANITHAKUMARI, D\/O.K.LEELAMMAL, For Petitioner :SRI.G.VENUGOPAL For Respondent : No Appearance [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35373","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-14T05:30:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-14T05:30:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":730,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010\",\"name\":\"M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-14T05:30:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-14T05:30:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-14T05:30:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010"},"wordCount":730,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010","name":"M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-14T05:30:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-krishnammal-vs-additional-munsiff-on-29-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M.Krishnammal vs Additional Munsiff on 29 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35373","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35373"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35373\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35373"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35373"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35373"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}