{"id":35658,"date":"2011-05-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-05-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011"},"modified":"2017-08-04T20:05:21","modified_gmt":"2017-08-04T14:35:21","slug":"ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011","title":{"rendered":"M\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
M\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011<\/div>\n
CWP No. 7233 of 2011                                           -1-\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH\n\n\n                                            CWP No. 7233 of 2011\n\n                                            Date of Decision: 2.5.2011\n\nM\/s N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd.\n                                                        ....Petitioner.\n\n                  Versus\n\nState of Haryana and others\n                                                        ...Respondents.<\/pre>\n
CORAM:-     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADARSH KUMAR GOEL,\n            ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE.\n\n            HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL.\n\n\n<\/pre>\n
PRESENT: Mr. Ashok Aggarwal, Senior Advocate with
\n         Mr. Piyush Bansal, Advocate for the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
\nADARSH KUMAR GOEL, ACJ.\n<\/p>\n
1.          This petition seeks quashing of order dated 21.2.2011<\/p>\n
(Annexure P-10) passed by the Chief Engineer (NH), Haryana<\/p>\n
debarring the petitioner from further tendering in the department for two<\/p>\n
years i.e. upto 21.2.2013.\n<\/p>\n
2.          Case of the petitioner is that work of construction of ROB<\/p>\n
(Railway Over Bridges) in Sirsa Town was allotted to it vide agreement<\/p>\n
dated 19.12.2008 at a contract price of about Rs.22 crores.               On<\/p>\n
19.5.2010, show cause notice was issued to the petitioner alleging that<\/p>\n
the petitioner failed to submit method statement of construction for<\/p>\n
approval as stipulated, it failed to supervise pre-stressing operations as<\/p>\n
per the contract, it failed to transport precast girders in the prescribed<\/p>\n
manner and also failed to deploy sufficient key personnel.           These
\n CWP No. 7233 of 2011                                            -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
lapses resulted into falling of girders during construction on 15.12.2009<\/p>\n
at 7.00 P.M. This negligence could have resulted in loss of human lives<\/p>\n
also if persons were working at the site beneath the fallen portion, at the<\/p>\n
time of incident. It was proposed that the petitioner may be debarred for<\/p>\n
two years from further tendering in Haryana PWD.           The petitioner<\/p>\n
submitted reply stating that the occurrence took place due to sudden<\/p>\n
mechanical fault in the machinery and there was no negligence on its<\/p>\n
part. The reason for the falling of girder was an accidental push from<\/p>\n
hydra due to insufficient spacing between girders. On receiving the<\/p>\n
reply followed by further representation of the petitioner dated<\/p>\n
15.10.2010, a committee was constituted to give personal hearing. The<\/p>\n
committee conducted proceedings from time to time and concluded the<\/p>\n
same on 6.12.2010. It concluded that there was nothing in the reply of<\/p>\n
the petitioner to warrant alteration in the proposal for debarring for two<\/p>\n
years. After consideration of the reply and the report of the committee,<\/p>\n
the impugned order has been passed concluding that the petitioner<\/p>\n
violated the provisions of the contract agreement in the manner stated<\/p>\n
in the show cause notice resulting in mishap on 15.12.2009 when the<\/p>\n
girder fell during construction which could have resulted in loss of<\/p>\n
human lives. Accordingly, the petitioner was debarred for two years for<\/p>\n
further tendering in the department.\n<\/p>\n
3.          Aggrieved by the above, this petition has been filed.<\/p>\n
4.          We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length.<\/p>\n
5.          The main contention raised on behalf of the petitioner is<\/p>\n
that the petitioner was working as per designs prepared by the<\/p>\n
department which has defect of leaving less space between the girders.
\n CWP No. 7233 of 2011                                             -3-<\/span><\/p>\n
The incident of falling of girders led to revising of the plan and thereafter<\/p>\n
the work was successfully completed.       The girder also fell on account<\/p>\n
of accidental push to one of the girders.        There was no breach of<\/p>\n
agreement as the method statement was duly signed, pre-stressing<\/p>\n
material was supplied by the authorized vendors and pre-stressing work<\/p>\n
was done by training executions. Entire payment has been made to the<\/p>\n
petitioner and work completed. These facts were pointed out in the<\/p>\n
reply.   The committee failed to give personal hearing though such a<\/p>\n
hearing was necessary and was proposed.\n<\/p>\n
6.           Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the<\/p>\n
impugned order was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural<\/p>\n
justice. He has also placed reliance on the following judgments:-<\/p>\n
             I.     M\/s. Erusian Equipment & Chemicals Ltd. v. State<\/p>\n
                    of West Bengal and<\/a> another, (1975) 1 Supreme<\/p>\n
                    Court Cases 70;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
             II.    M\/s. Travancore Rayon Ltd. v. Union of India,<\/a><\/p>\n
                    1969 (3) SCC 868; and<\/p>\n
             III.   Bhim Sain v. Union of India and<\/a> another, AIR 1981<\/p>\n
                    Delhi 260.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
7.           We are unable to accept the submission. There is no doubt<\/p>\n
that blacklisting is a serious matter which has effect preventing a person<\/p>\n
from entering into lawful relationship with the Government for gains and<\/p>\n
principles of fairness apply to any decision of the State for passing an<\/p>\n
order which may affect the reputation and civil rights of a person.<\/p>\n
Principles of fairness require due consideration of representation of the<\/p>\n
affected party, as laid down in the judgments relied upon. Whether or
\n CWP No. 7233 of 2011                                           -4-<\/span><\/p>\n
not principles of fairness have been followed depends upon facts and<\/p>\n
circumstances of each case.      In the present case, admittedly show<\/p>\n
cause notice was given to the petitioner indicating the grounds on which<\/p>\n
nature of action was proposed. The show cause notice stated violation<\/p>\n
of terms and conditions of contract and also the fact that girders fell<\/p>\n
down due to negligence of the petitioner which had the potential of<\/p>\n
resulting in loss of human lives. The committee was also constituted to<\/p>\n
look into the stand of the petitioner and the committee did not find any<\/p>\n
merit in the stand taken. Thereafter, the impugned order has been<\/p>\n
passed. It cannot, thus, be held that there is violation of principles of<\/p>\n
natural justice. No doubt, the impugned order does not discuss in detail<\/p>\n
each and every plea which the petitioner may have taken in the reply<\/p>\n
but it clearly mentions that it is failure of the petitioner on account of<\/p>\n
which the girders fell down during construction which had the potential<\/p>\n
of causing loss of human lives. Whether the action of falling girders<\/p>\n
was on account of any defect in the designs or on account of<\/p>\n
negligence or was accidental is not a matter on which this Court can<\/p>\n
substitute its opinion for the opinion    formed by the administrative<\/p>\n
authority. It is not a case where any malafides have been alleged. This<\/p>\n
Court does not sit in appeal over the decision of an administrative<\/p>\n
authority. Mere fact that the design was revised does not necessarily<\/p>\n
mean that there was a defect in the design which resulted in falling the<\/p>\n
girder. A bonafide opinion has been formed that there was negligence<\/p>\n
on the part of the petitioner in executing the contract and the negligence<\/p>\n
was of serious nature. As stated by learned counsel for the petitioner,<\/p>\n
entire payment for construction has been duly made. This shows that
\n CWP No. 7233 of 2011                                           -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
there is no malafide on the part of the respondent. As regards the<\/p>\n
period of debarring for two years from the date of issue of the letter, it<\/p>\n
cannot be held that the same is shocking proportionate to the lapse<\/p>\n
found on the part of the petitioner.     It is not possible to hold that<\/p>\n
debarring of two years has to be from the date of alleged lapse and not<\/p>\n
from the date of passing of the impugned order. Thus, we do not find<\/p>\n
any ground to interfere.\n<\/p>\n
8.          The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n\n                                            (ADARSH KUMAR GOEL)\n                                            ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE\n\n\n\nMay 2, 2011                                  (AJAY KUMAR MITTAL)\ngbs                                                 JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court M\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011 CWP No. 7233 of 2011 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No. 7233 of 2011 Date of Decision: 2.5.2011 M\/s N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd. ….Petitioner. Versus State of Haryana and others …Respondents. CORAM:- […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35658","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-05-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-08-04T14:35:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-04T14:35:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1121,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-05-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-08-04T14:35:21+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-05-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-08-04T14:35:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011","datePublished":"2011-05-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-04T14:35:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011"},"wordCount":1121,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011","name":"M\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-05-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-08-04T14:35:21+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-n-k-g-infrastructure-ltd-vs-state-of-haryana-and-others-on-2-may-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S N.K.G. Infrastructure Ltd vs State Of Haryana And Others on 2 May, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35658","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35658"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35658\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35658"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35658"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}