{"id":35681,"date":"2009-05-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009"},"modified":"2017-10-27T05:17:38","modified_gmt":"2017-10-26T23:47:38","slug":"mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n
gs: mg: HIGH CQURT <3? mRz\\:A*rAm AT BANGALORE\n33113121 the 12833 day sf may 2\u00a3js\u20ac}9\n:BEFQRE:\nTHE HfZ2N'BLE3 MRJUSTICE : V.JAGANNAT}i\u00a7J?\u00a77\nCZIXEIL Rgvisiaisz PE'I'Z'1'EE;}N N0. 323 1 Qmsj\n\nBEZTW EE N :\n\n1. \u00a7\\?i:s:'s. Dinah Saldanha,   \nW] \u00ab:3 late Felix Saldanha, '\nAged about 64 yeiars,\n\n2* Jayalith Smdanha, _ _V\n' 8\/ 0 late Felix Saitianha, "\nAgad about 29 fgeaxs. \n\n3. Smt. Meera, V  _   .\nD\/--. 5' \nAged abcmt 37 y\u20acar$._  '\n\n4.  NV\u20acr::1.\u00a3i, i  V' \n\nD \/  F \n_ _Age.t:i \"\u00e9:1:fa_t:::3JI_ ($4 f:2'.t':aiS.\n\nV  \u00a7.}''\u00a7'E1fEii?31\"'yea1i3. _:   VV\n\nRevafhi,\nDIG Krishxxamma Hangs};\nAged about 28 years. '\n\nLaxtnanan, A .  _ _\nSfo K\ufb01ahnamma ['--\u00a7.eI1g's;11,_ V  -.\n\nAged about 35 yea:*s.--. '\n\nSmtf Krishni\u00e9mm\u00e9  ezugsu,\n\n \/ 0 '1a.1:e  1P'0o_i:--:ry,\nAged abogt  . y&;:a;\"s;. ' \n\nV _ 511  Iffa p;m&2%;3*:,\n fs\u00ab'ieramaja.112 V\ufb01lage, Bamrwaia Taluk,\n Qak\ufb01hma Kamxa\u00e9a --= 574 187.\n\nAdvocate for Rd :0 R-3. }\n\nThis petrltion coming on for hearing this day, the <::. 1\/2993 on the \ufb01le of the\nPr}. Civi} Ju\u00e9ge {d1:Dn.}, Baniwala, Dakshina Kanna\u00e9a,\n\ndismissmg the suit for pas-semian.\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
This revision petition is by the p1ai11t_if\u00a7:\u00a7  <\/p>\n
trial calm: in E\u00a7.<;':.No. 1\/2603 arid. it is; <\/p>\n
the judgment of the ma: Ceurt  w'hi<::1 'say<\/p>\n
the piainti\ufb01s fez: passessieiz. u\u00e9f-…t1r1e Suit pr\u00e9;;2is\u00a2's'V{::a3in\u00a2 ta\u00bb '<\/p>\n
be dismissed. L<\/p>\n
2. The fliai\ufb02tiffg   \ufb02\u00e9i\u00a7g;”\u00a7\u00a7.te:f~m-law, gand
\nchildren and $\u00a7\u00a7:1__ ‘sf   it was their
\ncase   ::.’,f\u00a21.f1g;\u00a5;””H!;he saicl Jmachim
\nSaideii\ufb01aaa premises on menthiy rent
\nbasis ts:V5L… (:;:”3..t=: ‘  Pc::o\u00a7ary and tha tenazit\ufb01y<\/p>\n
co51ri:;3:if:f:;s\u00a2d f13om.____\u00e9.~1.8. 1974. The said Joachrini<\/p>\n
‘  S:5ldar\u00a7ha:’\u00abV%Vi{f:itiated smail causa suit against Narayaxaa<\/p>\n
 ‘jr\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01ect caf giaint-A scheduie gmperty and the<\/p>\n
 saj\u00e9 ..s\u00a31:}t was \u00e9ismissed as ma tanancy questian was<\/p>\n
%% ~  pe:mg b\ufb01fem the Land Tribunal, aaateeal,<\/p>\n
VA  V.  This said Narayana Paejagry had flied I%’0m1\u00bb–‘?’<\/p>\n
application befart?-2 the Lan\u00e9 Tribzma} and the said<\/p>\n
agpiica\ufb01an was dismissed by the Lan\u00e9 ‘I’ri__b:_:na} an<\/p>\n
‘9.\n<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
4<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
26.E>.19′?9 and an the Very same day, tbs wife Gf<\/p>\n
Narayaxla P{)0\u00a78I’j\u00a7:” 1.6., d:3fe12da11t~3 in the pr\ufb01se\ufb01t suii,
\n\ufb01led F1″‘ti this C4()1EFfE._?1:’1E. ‘\u00a77\u00a5fV1’it<\/p>\n
Pazition No. 2090?\/2:302 and 31:3 eo:;rt,M%%ti\u00e9\u00a7}M%%:#:;\u00a71%%;aai~\u00a7s\u00a74<\/p>\n
dated 1.7.2902, accaptad the (:_a$::.__::f;f  <\/p>\n
the order 0? the Land Tribunal \u00a7\u00a7ia\u00abs\u00a7:._ sfei  <\/p>\n
arder of 11113 Gaul’: had att\u00e9i\ufb01\u00e9ai \ufb01\ufb01z\u00e9iity a$1\u00a71_t:> W333′ V L’<\/p>\n
prefezi\ufb01d against it \u00a5:1}2j the pr\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9zzt.’\ufb01$fe1ic:ia173.i:$,,’i<\/p>\n
4, :'”I’ii7\u20ac ”  ‘~f\u00a7i'(:r\u20ac:af’\u00a3\u00e9:’; issuad notice? to the
\nd@’f\u20acr1{ia1\u00e9ts va$}i:i;:i\u00a7giI?.n::fi1:. t::: quit the mid pI’\u20ac\u00a71TiiS\u20acS and<\/p>\n
11a11d._vo2:$1;”%_re;{:3::{\u00a3 pQs\u00e9;\u00e9ssiGn thersof :0 them. Though<\/p>\n
 ”  _ i\u00a5i%.”‘:’d..i.?:\/81 situated in 3.2%. 41\/34 of<\/p>\n
 M\u00e9fanaajaiu vmage of Bazitwai Taiink. The defendarlts<\/p>\n
  ___\u00a3iid not contest the mattar either by \ufb01iing the written<\/p>\n
statenzent 01′? {tress-\ufb01xaxnining the plamtiffs’ witnesses,<\/p>\n
Despite this, tha txial caurt \u00e9ismissed {ha suit cf the<\/p>\n
j\u00bb-\n<\/p>\n
5<\/span>
\npiaintiffs. As such, the p\u00a3a_i:1t\u00a7\ufb01’s are bafars this c::ouri: in<\/p>\n
this revision petitian.\n<\/p>\n
S. The learnatii Counsd for the p{:ttiti0I1\u20ac1’$M\ufb01ib\ufb01ii\u00e9ftad<\/p>\n
that the judgznfsmz of 1:113 trial <:urt cam r1()tF b_re   <\/p>\n
ifi law for l’_{1C\u00a5I'<'3i than 0116 reas-:\u00e9riA.m *'1*'h\ufb02e'–.f"3r$t_ Gi*I:.c <\/p>\n
the trial cum East sigh': of me fact we the ;:1a;m:ia*s'A11aa%%V<\/p>\n
annexaci this power of &EtOITi\u00a7_\u00a7"dOC\ufb01I11\u20ac\u00a7\ufb02\u00a3.  i:h\u00ab.: <\/p>\n
pi:-3111:. But, the  s::_0L1.1*t;'VIi\u00e9aL:sVL.:'c;;!j$crved fiV1"at" thc3ra was
\n:10 power af af.t<;:r:1ey5  :t:l'rL3V<:\u00a3:1iti1c::1::i:' .AA_'.:pi_'Q:iuC\u20acd by the<\/p>\n
p1ai\u00a31?;iffS; –  I-V <\/p>\n
6. T\ufb01zs ‘– S\u00a2<3r.'3;::'1':;":_j   is that the ma} <:0urt. had<\/p>\n
absrzrved    had failad to Show that there<\/p>\n
 – is” Fzimse-A prenii\u00e9\u00e9 situated in the above said S”Li1″V\u20ac}r’<\/p>\n
   “the pleading and the 6Vidf:I1(3:\u20ac piaced by<\/p>\n
Ehs;  unem\ufb01xigly poim: 3113.? t0 the existence af a<\/p>\n
 xhQu\u00e9ev…;A3re111ise 313:1, as suizh, the Said fmding is alse<\/p>\n
‘  ierrafaeous.\n<\/p>\n
 ”  The thirti reasen is that ‘$116 ma} (301311; has<\/p>\n
ebserva\u00e9 that there is no Ea11d1ord–t\u20ac:nani I’\u20aci8J.ZiQ1″\u00a3$hip<\/p>\n
jy<\/p>\n
L1<\/p>\n
batsmen \u00a3116 parties and, as such, {he Su\ufb01; of the
\npiaintiffs cannet be deemed arid this reas0ni:1gV-is aisca
\naga:i11*3t. ma pixszadixigs and the evidence 2i;’it’:xe
\npiaintiffs. A u  <\/p>\n
8. Th\ufb01 f{}11::’t}:1 reason is <\/p>\n
observed. that :19 notice was issziegi\u00e9ngz <\/p>\n
but. my the rum ;:o}a3′:1ti\ufb01’ i.\u00e9’;’;V..\u00a73″{::; 01′ J9za:\u00e91;fn1′:$a\u00a3da1\ufb021a,
\nhad issued natice “::E”:e .\u00a79iat{cr::\u00ab.\u00a7\u00a3#1;$\u00ab.als0  sexveci on
\nall the ciefe31dap.i:s. I1;._i.:s Qn -these reasaning,<\/p>\n
the 51;1it:”:;\u00a7*  p1i\u00a7;i3T:zti1″\u00a7’s”caIzi\u00a7’S”t:>’Vb<3 dismissed.<\/p>\n
9. “;-\u00a7_’i\u00a7i7c”\u00a3’\u00a71”:e:1i; of $1.6 trial C{)U1’i1, {ha<\/p>\n
I\u20aca3\u00a7T16d.CQ1:1\u00a71SfCf:ffiGf ‘Q33. pnetiti0ner$~piair1ti\ufb01’s argued that,<\/p>\n
 \ufb01r\u00e9i  ‘theta was no Writtexz atatement \ufb02ied. by any of<\/p>\n
   and neimer the dafendants tack any<\/p>\n
p\u00e9\u00e9ns V-15:5 :::foss\u00ab<-rxaxxxiixe tha piamti\ufb01s' Wiizneases and 1316<\/p>\n
  '\ufb01\ufb01gul\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01t\ufb01 pro\u00e9ucad by aha piaiziti\ufb01fs. Thai: apart, the<\/p>\n
 defendant was imaged 3:-bparia iaafore the trial<\/p>\n
" V'  "\u00a7:9ur1': and {ha other defendants, thaugh appearaci<\/p>\n
'thmugh a Counsei, did :10: contest the case of the<\/p>\n
piaintiffs either by filing any written s\u00a39.f:<=;:11e:1'\u00a3 or<\/p>\n
i\/'5'<\/p>\n
leading any evidexzce. Tilug, \u00a3116 material p1ace\u00a7t'T'i:i\u00a7y.t11e<\/p>\n
pl:-3i:*1t%iffs csught; to have been accepted by <\/p>\n
and their suit might 'Em have been decret:_:ii\u00bb  Iifqi'  <\/p>\n
10, As far as th@ suit filed far  bj;*'<:VA:\u00e9e._Qf:<\/p>\n
c:w13ers is cancerned, int"-: sa;_\u00a711;issid:1__ :1;:,\u00a2;d\u00a2 i\ufb01\ufb01xai' it is"<\/p>\n
ms: in dispute that '?3*\u00a7I" <i:~_t_.zl'i\u20ac '::\ufb02c'~""".vn%rs of 316
\nsuit premises and   1316 $011 of
\nJoachim    cwoumers, is
\n\ufb01xltitleci   an his bahalf and as
\nan     gfherefsre, no defazmam;\n<\/p>\n
\u00a3331′: b \u00e9\u00abf\u00ab\u00a71-\ufb01nti  by the gylain\ufb01\ufb01s and fai\u00e9ure<\/p>\n
an the  $1536 A\u00e9;\u00a7,(\u00a7ff3i;ld8_I1f.S in eexittesting the suit :3?<\/p>\n
  C}f)}\u00a3:’:\u00a7\ufb02\u00a7i\u00a7\u00a7fS ‘\u00a31f:”‘f:Ei:ig written Statemant <31' .I.e3.ding any<\/p>\n
  'E3;:ide:ji(::\u00a7  cmsswexamiriing the piazza" 'ifs' wimasses<\/p>\n
affsfa  Eb hav\u00e9 ied {ha txtiaji ceurt ta pronamice the:<\/p>\n
 Aj11{igi1:;\u00a7%i*;t} in favaur Sf the plainiziffs in accaydanee wit}:<\/p>\n
   pmvisiens camtaine\u00e9 in Order 8 E1115 10 9f th\ufb01<\/p>\n
 In support of the above $LI\u00a7iI311"iiSSiQI1S, the<\/p>\n
ieazned eaxmsel far the pet:itiar1r;=:::rs giaced raiiance on<\/p>\n
,5<\/p>\n
,..w<\/p>\n
8<\/span><\/p>\n
the d&ci$im1s reported in 2834(1) Suprexxxa 33:0 and<\/p>\n
2004??) KQCR 2313.\n<\/p>\n
11, E-Zfeiying 01′}; {ha afaresaid dasisions and the I\ufb01\u00e9aztaxial<\/p>\n
place\ufb01 ‘b<:f0re the trial Court: and the rea301f1\u00a7 by<\/p>\n
the trial court being unacceptable either  f:a;;::t::SL' '<:'\u00a7:* jja  <\/p>\n
Eaw, the Eeaxfnsd celmsei fer t\u00a7:iJemMp"e'i:iti<3I1e:'s p:fa\u00a7;5:*:3 my<\/p>\n
ailowitig this I'\ufb01ViSi{}I"l petitian  s\u20act"f;ii1;'g 'aS:id\u20ac: "'*\u20ac19ii\u20ac\u00a2–..<\/p>\n
judgr:1en'\u00a3 G? the trig} <:e:::1,1r}'f;"L\u00ab\u00e9i1ri \ufb01ecr\u00e9\u00e9igg \u00e9\ufb01ait as'<\/p>\n
prayed for.\n<\/p>\n
12, i_{}}’1_  ‘}E1;Blf%\u00a7L_ ‘\u00a3236 13313161} czounsel far ‘E\u00a7’1r:~:
\nrasgiorldsafii\ufb01, ‘&ir\u00a7i6L:.’$;;*<f:\ufb01~:_':Lli1\u00e9fa:1<:\u00a3a:{1ts–1 {\u00a33 3 and Si: befare<\/p>\n
f;i1:~.;'!.:;"'i:~3.1 e{;\u00a7\u00a5:”;’1″1:..’t’~:a:;i the judginent 0f the {rial \u20ac91.11″:<\/p>\n
   jfzhat  \u00a3116: etisgafects which have been poiuied<\/p>\n
A miif: Abyvv\u00e9th\u00e9 lc\u00e9afrzeci caunssi for the prstitieners are -net ‘(:16<\/p>\n
ci\u00e9feciig’ ’33i:\ufb01}i(:’E1}f in the eye {Bf 13%: \u00a31: 15, therc\u00e9fm\ufb01,<\/p>\n
   ..c(;;1te::-\u00e9ed that the defendants wera not S\u20ac;{‘V\u20acd with th\ufb01<\/p>\n
 notice in accerdance wit}1 tha previsions <:a11tai1:*mt:i<\/p>\n
 "  –in. Section :85 of the Trazmfaz' sf Praperty Act, Tha Suit<\/p>\n
pramiges is an ag1"'i(:11I3;m*a1 iazizd and, thersfsre, the<\/p>\n
te\ufb02allcy will have to be viawsci as a tenancy fmizl year it';<\/p>\n
}<\/p>\n
9"\n<\/p>\n
yczai’ and, as. such, six memhs’ nudes ought ta h\u00a3’:1V\u20ac<\/p>\n
been given, which was not done in the instant ca:r.TI\u00e9;-_<\/p>\n
18. it is than subI11:ittec\u00a5. by the learned CG_;;\ufb013\u00e9i\u00a3’_~ <\/p>\n
respond\ufb01nts that HG 11131::-‘:ria1 is 1)1at:\u20acd b\u00a7.5 ., <\/p>\n
before the t:rial cmir\u00e9: it) show that th\u00e9gr\u00e9a }\u00a7.);\u00a7<i;_':1\ufb01e;"ic\u00a2:{  :3.<\/p>\n
1;~\u00bb1'eI11is6 61" 11:31:58 in '($16 suit$L::V\u20ac\u00a7j;%V_I\u00a7u:1:bxir' S;-'S_}1as:\u00a7 b\u00e9(::i1 " ;<\/p>\n
observed by $116 trial Cuurt. is t1':r3;:;i.\u00e9ireg::;e*,d iiiilat t';'1<i:re
\nis no materiai piacecisln\u00e9w _I~1..}\u00a7i_<ayaIza Poejary was<\/p>\n
a menthly tenaxlt; a?:_Rs2.f2;'\u00bb'   and there is no<\/p>\n
p1c:ad:ii'1g"t.::.;\u00e9\ufb01'f:<\u00a71:.a:1d, 'fiier\u00e9fore, {I16 trial ceurt has
\n :(:;bse;r\u00a7?ei\u00a7'tV3:1\u00e9re is I10 ia11d1ore:i–tenaI:t<\/p>\n
re1atiQI'1s1\u00a7i'g': bet}x3–.e\u00a3:11\u00bb  parties, In the abs\ufb01nca ef the:<\/p>\n
   bcingV'"pia::"d to ShOW that the quit nmtice was<\/p>\n
  –f<:1\u20acfe:1daI1ts, the suit cf the plaintiffs couid<\/p>\n
1157;? hav1\u00e9ii\u00a7:3i1 decreed.\n<\/p>\n
 n1;4_..  far as the pewer Qf attorney is colzcemad, 111$<\/p>\n
 ‘ 1\u00a5.:\u00e9a;f1c<:\u00a7. Counsel for the r\ufb01span\u00e9tsms argued that \ufb01rm<\/p>\n
" " * "view taken by I116 trial ccsurt <:ta:'1I1i be fz\u00e9rmed as<\/p>\n
erroneous. Thus, :31} essence, supperting the reasons<\/p>\n
amigltt\u00e9cl =%3y the trial caurt, the I\ufb01mn\ufb01d 0911:1861<\/p>\n
\ufb01r;\/,<\/p>\n
#-\n<\/p>\n
:0
\nsubmitted that the dismisaai ef the suit by the trial<\/p>\n
courf, cannot Em imerfared witil in this 1′<EiViSiOi1 petitiorz.<\/p>\n
15. Having mug hsa1’c:i both Si(ii\ufb01S, {Jim 0111}; pciizi fer<\/p>\n
cansideratiorz is whether the judglnent. Qt’ <\/p>\n
can be Said to E36 sustainable in iaw,_.i1i”‘*.zie=.%;f”~\u00a3f t’m\u00e9_A <\/p>\n
masons assigzed by it having] regard ‘E9 *t3t’1\u20ac_;:  <\/p>\n
I’EtViSi0I”1.\n<\/p>\n
16\u00bb Tim \ufb01trst point. ta 1:;e…VVi{:’o:1;\u00a7icierhed* –i:_sA 3:3 t0 the<\/p>\n
Genera} Fewer of At\u20ac5o1\u00e9:c\u00a7}” ti\ufb01i\u00e9\u00e9it\u00e9i\ufb01d in favgur of<\/p>\n
\u00a3h&: \ufb01fth   . \u00a7>tb\u20ac_’:r plaintiffs. The ‘\u20acr:ia,\u00a7 ceurt.
\n“had ebssfv\ufb01d’ aif  ef the judgmtznt that me<\/p>\n
sigcjii ‘1=z:\u00a7;SV”;);\ufb01-:\u00a31\u00a5c6d by the fifth e:1\u20acf\u20ac11da1:11:. This<\/p>\n
VA :>b$cr%%2zL1:i9fx…_ 13 quita \u20ac3C)]f1′{ZI’aiI’}_E in the 136152′ clacmnsants<\/p>\n
 .pi*QgiAt:i;t4\u00a7\u20ac\u20ac\u00a7.,\u00bbV__bj\u00a7::”$16 p\u00e9aiji\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 aiarzg with the pxazmu\ufb01. The<\/p>\n
V\u20ac ff! \ufb01~3fSt,’\u00a7\u00a7\u20acum@nt pmduced is th\ufb01 G..PJ\u00a7. axecuted by<\/p>\n
3   ~ti1\u00a7_  and the fourth pla\u00e9ntiffa in favour 3f the \ufb01fth<\/p>\n
‘AAV-ijiai\ufb01tiff and the St\ufb01corld d<:sctm1ent is the G.?.A. \u20ac;xr:c:1'1f:&d<\/p>\n
VV "  \u00a53y the sectmd and f9u:'th piaiintiffg in faxmur 0f the fifth<\/p>\n
gglaizxtiff. The trial ceurt, therefare, &r1*\u20ac\u00a7 in ebseiving ta:<\/p>\n
the {:on'a*a:\u00b0\u00a7; in {aha CO'LlI'S\ufb01 of its j1;iC\u00a7\u00a7}I}\u20ac}'3.t.<\/p>\n
Q'?\n<\/p>\n
Ii<\/p>\n
NotWit1’1st2111ding the executioxi of the: power at’ ai.tm*r1e3;
\nby 1.11:3: ether piaintiffs in favaur of the fifth piaint\u00e9ff, the<\/p>\n
piaintiffs have also stated that the \ufb01\ufb01h, \u00a7\u00ablaiI1\u00a7iff ~i $;~;t11e<\/p>\n
$011 of deceased Jaachim Saldanha and, 3.3  <\/p>\n
the scar: of the co-mwner of th\ufb01 ..sI.,1_it p;*\u00e9i7r1’i\u00e9t:,. ‘Vth\u00e9 .f1fi;h”‘<\/p>\n
piaimiif is erititirsd in that capa\u00e9jsty  A:s”:\u00a7ee3:s.f_f<:;;'*:"e*\u00e9i'C\u00a7iE;i:);'*1T1,Qf<\/p>\n
the defandamts and in i:11iS'i:'\u00a2\u00a7.a:'d, \u00e9; dc3cisi\u20ac) f:"t13~e–';Ape_x.  L'<\/p>\n
Ci\u00a2:)u1't can but: p1*es$,ed i:':t,c:..}\u00e9';x<::}:1r\u00a7\u00a2:e ii1'*f;;1\u00a7iQ3:ir of ih\u00e9<\/p>\n
I'\u20acViSi()11 petiticn\ufb01rs.\n<\/p>\n
17. ~3″:1″‘t}s\u00a7i\u00a7’is;:a\u00e9%Lft.;:’r:ps:2\u00a7’1:a\u00a7d i1’1″‘2–i\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a3)<%{1) S:_1p1'eme 350, the
\nApex V\ufb01giart. E*49\u00a7S"t?\u00a7'z\u00e9.t where 0116: C0–O'\u00a7?\u00a3?I"l{iI' \ufb01l\ufb01s a<\/p>\n
Siliif\ufb01l' e\ufb01iatian z1gai11's:.-ffthe tenant, E13 63.068 it St: an his<\/p>\n
 "  _ sa\u00e9\u00e9iii bgszhalf iI1A}f*ii$5*—-f3'afJI} right and as an agant cf the ether<\/p>\n
 _ *z:r\u00a7~\u00e9't::'_a?r:\u00a2:';:\u00a7"A'  the ccnseni: 91' ether cc\u00bb-mxzners is<\/p>\n
?asf$\u20ac.m1<_:':;ci' Eaken uniess it is Shawn *::h&': the athzsrr <:Q-<\/p>\n
 0wnt:1f$':.wc::\u00b0e not ageeabie ta: eject fh\ufb01 tenant ans} the<\/p>\n
 VSf1\u00a7i'i;\u00ab was \ufb01iad in spifaa af thsir disagczement. in the<\/p>\n
" instant ease, $1.0 such factors are prss\ufb01mz Ea tak\ufb01 the<\/p>\n
View that ms ether <;:o-Gwmirs di\ufb01 not censent ta \u00a31322<\/p>\n
evictieza \u00absf the defsudant\ufb01 f1*:::m the suit pramiws. (2311<\/p>\n
%\/<\/p>\n
ya'<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
ihsi: Qthar handy ‘\u00a3313 poxssezr 01’ attarntiy <i@<:::,;111e:1:$.<\/p>\n
p'1:'Q<:1u<::ed aiorzg with the piaint co11\ufb01:rm tbs L3;I}8.11iIi'1GUS
\nameement. by all the CC}-G?y'T.'i\u20aciI'S far seeking avic\ufb01\u00e9zjiz Qf<\/p>\n
t._'c1::': defeil\u00e9azztg.\n<\/p>\n
18, iimnirig E3 the <_;_L:es\u00a5:is::z-:1 <3? hesuse bei3*\u00a3'gVVs:ti_;1aied' -23*: <\/p>\n
the S1131 pren\ufb01aes, in the  '\u00a7}Ia_i:1it  th\u00e9<\/p>\n
d\u20acS81'if\u00a7)\u00a7if31'1 <3? the 5112*: pf{}p\u20ac'3_I"\u00a7L\u00a7f f1:-"3.;s"be\u20ac11 gi2;<f:fi'1 311:?" it i;z~iz<\/p>\n
aim extract\ufb01d by the i;r\u00b0ia;t' 'L'<;:;'i1;;I,'t  Ehfe  ;f:01i:jse cf its<\/p>\n
judgmeni: 313$ the S:-35,:1"x:i\u20ac$2.irip\ufb01QI3_ .1f\u00e9ie:1ds as 1.1\u00a7icie'1" :<\/p>\n
 _’ 1 ”    PI'{13ii}\u20ac1″\u00a7Z”?\n<\/p>\n
 r\u20acsid\u00e9:;f.i\u00a3\u00a7}  b\u00e9aritzg D091′ Na.2–81
\n_ ‘sf \u00a7\u00ab}’EGY\u00a7\ufb011Z71\u00abE;jvShi._P\u00e93’\u00a7}:1CI’18_j!a’E}T: situate\ufb01 if}. SE0.
\n  31% \u00a33? . ,E\u00a7@ e\u20acra1n:giaiu Viilage af BaI:1’\u00a3x=\u00bb;a\u00a7<\/p>\n
” .\\\u00a7$’, :hErefg\u00a7%e\u00a7’% \u00a331631′ that 3N9, 41,\/34 aim CQIE1\u00a7f3}f’iS\u20acSe af<\/p>\n
a :3\u20ac:\u00a7:i%.i\u00bb;*:::i5\u20acial \ufb01f\ufb01il\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01s Apgri from izhig, the evidenca<\/p>\n
 V. np5i1:e:\u00a7;fad ” mfere the trig} Court by the fifth piaizztiff else<\/p>\n
 \u00a71e”:*1ti<}ns exisiieuca sf the suit premiseg and the suit<\/p>\n
M {3}i'\u20aciI;iS{\u00a7S b\u00e9irzg \ufb01ver; it) iate Narayama Pgsjaw 9:1 3<\/p>\n
monthiy rent. The E\ufb02\ufb01f\ufb01 evidsnce Sf the \ufb01fth pia\u00e9iit\ufb01ff<\/p>\n
}\u00bb<\/p>\n
5-'<\/p>\n
$3<\/p>\n
placeai by "s;x321\u00a7' eff 3:1: a\ufb01idavit, has ;'&:1::a\u00e9;*1&d tmSi'1a_ken
\neven {:3 me siighttzst t:\u00a7<;,'\u00a3,\u20ac:'\u00a7i b\u20acCa"L1se, the ti\ufb01f\ufb01\ufb01daili\ufb01
\nhangs 129$. b0ti'1e:*\ufb01<:1 \u00a313 C"\u00a3'(}SS-\u20ac\u00a7<i{:1II{1\u00a7I"i\u20ac the fifth piaizmff in<\/p>\n
1'&:\u00a7;)e4::t. {}f the af\ufb01\u00e9lavit avid\ufb01nce \ufb01l\ufb01d by hiltcu <\/p>\n
wards, thr: evicierace placed by tile \ufb01fth p'i\u00e9Vai13\u00a3ii'\u00a7f"i–s <\/p>\n
cenforzlzitg with the stand taken in..i_:.h\u20ac: ..;;a;:"1{:1, _\u00a7'_t;3%1ri'if_<Vi' <\/p>\n
being no evidenca to the c0nt1"\u00e93*y,  fj;i\u00e9\\i \u20ac;f)':TlI'3: _{:t)\ufb01;K\u00a7<\/p>\n
ram; hava brtzshed aside said '\u20ac;1:_ici\u20ac.;1\u00e9::v$  \ufb01f\u00b01;h- V<\/p>\n
plzairatiff.\n<\/p>\n
I9. V*A\u00a7i:21rt;f:f011\u00a7::f3:ft16’a\u00a7t:2v\u20ac,A\ufb011:;;:)’:11eI* ‘E’\u00a3%8.S0\ufb02 far act;-ept.i:2g
\nthe afg;13in\u20ac:1’t. fafitifz\u00e9’ v:J \u20ac:T’i=.i:c}i\u00a73\u00ab1′:er%s’ swings} is ‘that: the fifth<\/p>\n
dc:f::_1t;<:1a11\u00a7i;~Vb\u20aci31gV–_t\u00a71tf:\u00bbw=if\u20ac: 0f Narayana. Foojary, 3139 filed<\/p>\n
 V'  _ &\u00e911$3*=\u00a7?';it:;a?J.ti\u20ac}{1"i:1"\u00a73':&i1:1–?;A bafem '\u00a3116 Land Triburnal and<\/p>\n
    fQ}:j;1}., slim Irzad spttzcificaiiy smted that it was<\/p>\n
\ufb013._::\u00e9\ufb01 in :*\u00e9:\u00a7}:\u00e9’re, tata\ufb02y<\/p>\n
f.?\u20ac}’V6:’S\u20ac am: f\ufb01\ufb01iltf\ufb01fjf to t\ufb01\u00e9 avide:’1<:<i': mi: record,<\/p>\n
}<\/p>\n
I
\nx<\/p>\n
14<\/span>\n<\/p>\n
20. As far as the qE1i'{.E1tZ3tiC\u20ac is C:{3I”1CEI’1″16C1, arise again,<\/p>\n
‘t:}1<:': affidavit. evidarl\u00e9m of the \ufb01fth piai\ufb02tiff cleariy rmreals
\nthat quit nmjce was issued 0:1 22.8.1980 and again it<\/p>\n
was issued on }.1.11,2{)\u20acL)2 Calling upon the <\/p>\n
1:0 szuwender the suit premisea by 13.1   <\/p>\n
110\u00a7iC\u20ac was replied by d@f\u20ac3I1Ci3I1'\u00a3S'"i -'!:o    " Su\ufb01'. i;;E':s.\u00a7 <\/p>\n
fourth dafandant refused ta raf::a:ix%c:T the 'i1Qi;;s:_g _a':f\u00a7i;i..,,. "\u00a7:i:_<\/p>\n
this regazd, the  am A -,V\u00a7\ufb01I*\u00a7}{\u00a7\u00a72~;\ufb01':%':d  the-%<\/p>\n
achlewie\u00e9gement 31539. al0:1Vg"%%i:\ufb01iV"'\u00a7h\u20ac   fat' as<\/p>\n
the fourth d\ufb01fentiagitC0i;\u00a5:;iE:1fn&%i';v:%. v?g}f1\u00a3::–.\u00a7vas piacred ex\u00bb-<\/p>\n
\u00a7:nart\u20ac}__ be_f4:;r:*;:V 'i:~:,*-*: and it is 91113: the mihei’
\ndr:fe:”a(iai'”;:fi,$”‘;?e%}”; \u20aci:  ajgigarsrarance through 3 <::0uI3.s\u20aci_,<\/p>\n
{f\u00a7':1<\u00a7\u00a7.6i' Lizhs aI\u00a7o%.:e circxzinstances, :10 defect can be faund<\/p>\n
\u00bb ii}. {hay p3ai:":ti\u00a7Tfs' 02136 as mrgards iS81.131"}\u20ac36 Of ncfice ':9 {ha<\/p>\n
'\u20aci \u00e9:f<*:I1da2;?\u00ab1"="\u00a7\u20ac:;"?;:;-ii'hand CW6}? the Vaczalzt pomessiorz zizf tha<\/p>\n
gtliii pivgxizsas.\n<\/p>\n
“ii  The East ::;f the paints ‘:9 be taken mate of is that<\/p>\n
  gm aritire pie:-adings mm are backed up by 1:119, afii\u00e9avit<\/p>\n
\u20ac’\u00a33’i{}\u20acI1C\u20ac: 0f the \ufb01fth gjiaizztiif art: tha czsl\ufb02jg mat\ufb01riai b\ufb01fore<\/p>\n
the trial satzrt. and them wars I10 ether \u00ab::<:21"m'a pi\ufb01\u00e9adi\ufb02gs<\/p>\n
.3\u00bb<\/p>\n
r'<\/p>\n
E5<\/p>\n
er evidemte piace\u00e9 by the t:iefen<:1aI1i:s. Ho s,=:;.:"itte1"2
\nsiat\u00e9zm\ufb01rxt was f\ufb01ed by 311}; 0f the eziefandaj\u00e9ts svhe
\nappearad bafere {E16 tiriali (":{}U;1"?; 11131' $11635; ahose its __{::mss–<\/p>\n
\ufb01xaizxme the fif\u00e9h plaiiltiff W116 gave evi\u00e9ience an V of<\/p>\n
\u00a3135 athax" p\u00a7a:im;ifsYS as well and it iS 116edies;\u00a7—'to:  <\/p>\n
the dafandants did :10: Choose _t@~ \u00e9ead I '\u00e9\ufb01yi\ufb02\u00e9\ufb01cg  <\/p>\n
their desferaca' In Gfh\ufb01tl' W0;'ds;'gi'i::._\u00a7\ufb01\u00e9a1ii  iE.T::js_;<\/p>\n
thair awn conducii, th\u00e9 -_V_V"i\u00a7s:fe:1d'a:";:&:  VE1._a~i2's\u00a7:"""vii\u00a3\u00e9ra\u00a7i\u00a7,%' <\/p>\n
C\u00e9\ufb02c\ufb01d\ufb01d the \u20ac":8.S\u20ac\u00a7  of  .\/1111 5:22:31:\n<\/p>\n
<:ircu111s':ia11<::\u20acs, {ha tri\u00e9i _\u00a73O1'i37i,:V1'\u20ac?$}L1\u00a7.(E:1???' have ciesiinaii to<\/p>\n
decr\u00e9a \u00a3:?;'u':  _'ii\u00a3'1\u00a7'~f"3.Ez1ii"1ii\u00a7I"Se. in {hi3 3'6garCi, the
\ne:i\u20acc:isi01A3"'-(}f'*t;E1EVS.{\u00a7\u00a3}Vi411*\ufb01 \u00a7s\u00e9;t\u00a70r:6:\u00a31 ii": 2OG4(4} 2<;<::\u00ab:::R 2.31:3<\/p>\n
 \u00e9:<;;sm\u20ac:s \u00a30 $1:-:: i"f:SC1IC Qf tilt-: petitioners and in me<\/p>\n
\u00bbA \u00a7::'01._:1'3\u00e9 'A\u20ac}'\u00a7,%i\u00a7\u00a7(i_' ardar, this, cau\ufb02; uitiixtaately opined that<\/p>\n
 ~x\u00a7?E.:::r\u00e9 t;E;i@-__(i<l:{i\u00e9;1:1da11ts di\u00e9 not \ufb01l\ufb01 the w\ufb01tten $ta..teme;I1t,<\/p>\n
"{1@. f}Ti.iI'};\u00a3,'{\u00a7,; xiz\u00e9s ieft is aha {rial C(}!_31"f1 \ufb01xifi\ufb01i\ufb01i :0 faiiaw the<\/p>\n
 "pI'9jfgi$ i\u00a5jI1s ef Grder 8 REES 10 Sf tha {3.I73".,{.':.' and ':6<\/p>\n
7\u00a7:::r0::'1Qu1zc\u20ac the }u{\u00e9@31\u20ac:1t.\n<\/p>\n
22. In iihifi i11$ta11*\u00a3 case, not only there was :10 ‘\u00a7~\u00a5’I’i3;Tt6I1<\/p>\n
siatatement and \u00a316 E’f\u00a7%”iCi\u20ac”3}I’3.C\u20ac glgsced by the defandazlts,<\/p>\n
}\u00ab<\/p>\n
, I<\/p>\n
Eff}<\/p>\n
but tbs \u20acViC1s2f’V_’4\u00a7f:3:;:=f:gCE iVl**:a@_ “+.?\u00e9:f,i  <\/p>\n
fact that the tenancy mattsr \u20ac:r:1\u00a7iec\u00a7_AAiii?iiiI1\u00a3i:i\u00a2’}};*_ <\/p>\n
0:’ this plain1:.if’fs, by virtue (sf .’;_I”1\u20ac ojixd\u00e9z” {3a”sTf3:\u00a7ciV.i\u00a7f1  ,<\/p>\n
26390?\/2{;}\u00a33*2 and the _ 0r~:i\u20act1′    ;1’\u20ac:111ai1″1\u00ab3\u00a2:i
\nuzlcha\ufb02emgtad aim}  -‘_;da\u00a7V,.i:, ‘t;’;?;_\u00ab;:. C{}1_\u00a3FtA 00113:} 11:31:<\/p>\n
have ciismissec;1_ the s13.i_t r.”2f  As such, the<\/p>\n
ardsx’ ‘paSs.&i_\u00a314     “P–\u00a3ai”3.:10t b6 sustained<\/p>\n
\u20aciL’f1\u00a7i”__GIT:_ s’;’aT(;\u00a7:SV .311 \u00a313 _iax;-*” .’ ~~ ._ ‘<\/p>\n
23. In i:i*–:\u00a7% I’\ufb01S’:i_1-};31,A’\u00a7h\u00a3?…!\u00a7\ufb01’f:iVT\u00a7Si\u20ac)I} petition is aii\ufb01wed, The<\/p>\n
   <)r_f..ti1\u20ac ‘\u00a3:ria1 03111″: is set aside. The suit<\/p>\n
‘  the’ is <:l\u20ac\u00bb::re\u20acd' The resgmndents are gra\ufb01ted<\/p>\n
.i~;i:v;}"'%A1"n<oi1"i:h;:~: .7'?\u00e9:iI::1\u20ac ts hand over vacant p\u00a3'\u20acI11iS\u20acS ta the<\/p>\n
 1*&:Vis~3'oi';_ patitiezzers and in View caf the giainiiiffs having<\/p>\n
A V _ '  up the prayer for m\ufb01sne pm\ufb01ts as cauld be S6631<\/p>\n
 :;?\u00b0r'0m tfze meme \ufb02ied brefam the ma] caurt, fh\ufb01 que$t;i::s:1<\/p>\n
of Ill\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02\ufb01 pm\ufb01ts being payabia to them will :10: a1'is<~::'<\/p>\n
&<\/p>\n
,1<\/p>\n
Tha d\u20ac\u00a7f{iI"1d\u00a7:'iI"H".S Shall f\ufb01\u00e9 an affidavit: befew: thig
\nCGLEFE wi.'\u00a7hi:"1 four VWEBKS sf this Qrder I'\u20acgar<:\u00a3i21g\n<\/p>\n
– I-24\u00bb)<\/p>\n
cozzlpiiarim of Elm tin”; to them ta band ever va\ufb01argt
\nA <\/p>\n
pssa\ufb01asioil to the petiiiorzers Eliid t.i1\u20ac:}; SE18}; I10t;.ci1’ia{5\u00a7*;~.:3″;\u20ac:<\/p>\n
p\ufb01titialzers ti: 33:13:’ ftV:;{“f;h<=:1' pi'0(:<i',\u20ac:di:1gs in t\u00a71_i.!:?\u00a7__  <\/p>\n
fu1'the1*, in '(ha event of the res1J:;<:;I1_}e::::;> 11.10<\/p>\n
take zaecessary action as is; _<::'\u00a7:a\u00a2n ts' -:11-5:31: iii E\u00e9wg,  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009 Author: V.Jagannathan gs: mg: HIGH CQURT <3? mRz\\:A*rAm AT BANGALORE 33113121 the 12833 day sf may 2\u00a3js\u20ac}9 :BEFQRE: THE HfZ2N'BLE3 MRJUSTICE : V.JAGANNAT}i\u00a7J?\u00a77 CZIXEIL Rgvisiaisz PE'I'Z'1'EE;}N N0. 323 1 Qmsj BEZTW EE N : 1. \u00a7\\?i:s:'s. Dinah Saldanha, W] \u00ab:3 late Felix Saldanha, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-26T23:47:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"18 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-26T23:47:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":3278,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009\",\"name\":\"Mrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-26T23:47:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-26T23:47:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"18 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-26T23:47:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009"},"wordCount":3278,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009","name":"Mrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-26T23:47:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-dinah-saldanha-vs-yashodha-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mrs Dinah Saldanha vs Yashodha on 28 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35681"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35681\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}