{"id":35762,"date":"2009-03-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009"},"modified":"2016-10-02T21:59:53","modified_gmt":"2016-10-02T16:29:53","slug":"rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Rohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Rohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009<\/div>\n
Review Application No.355 of 2004 in C.W.P.No.15127 of 2001                1\n\n\n        IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                        CHANDIGARH.\n\n                                                    Date of Decision:-3.3.2009\n\nRohit Sharma & others\n                                                               ---Applicants\n                                             Versus\n\nState of Punjab & others\n                                                               ---Respondents<\/pre>\n
CORAM:- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE J.S.KHEHAR
\n        HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE NAWAB SINGH<\/p>\n
Present:-    Mr.Sudhir Mittal, Advocate for the applicants.<\/p>\n
             Mr.A.K.Chopra, Senior Advocate with Ms.Shaibya Sood,
\n             Advocate for the non-applicant-petitioners.\n<\/p>\n
             Mr.Sandeep Khunger, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 & 3.<\/p>\n
J.S.KHEHAR, J.(ORAL)<\/p>\n
             The Improvement Trust, Jalandhar offered two plots bearing<\/p>\n
Nos.291 and 292 in its 73.5 Acres Scheme known as Lajpat Rai Nagar to<\/p>\n
one Raghbir Singh. The ownership right in the aforesaid plots was subject<\/p>\n
matter of dispute between the class -I heirs of Raghbir Singh, namely, Har<\/p>\n
Kaur (mother of Raghbir Singh) on the one side, and Neera and Mannu<\/p>\n
(widow and daughter of Raghbir Singh) on the other. The aforesaid dispute<\/p>\n
eventually attained finality when the Supreme Court finally determined the<\/p>\n
share of Har Kaur as 1\/3rd, and the shares of Neera and Mannu as 2\/3rd (in<\/p>\n
respect of the aforestated plot Nos.291 and 292).\n<\/p>\n
             This matter came up for consideration before this Court on the<\/p>\n
writ side, wherein, the writ petition filed by the vendors of Neera and<\/p>\n
Mannu was allowed. While disposing of the said Civil Writ Petition<\/p>\n
No.15127 of 2001on 30.4.2002, this Court directed as under:-
\n Review Application No.355 of 2004 in C.W.P.No.15127 of 2001                   2<\/p>\n
          “In view of the facts fully detailed above as also the statement<\/p>\n
          of learned counsel representing petitioners, it is ordered that<\/p>\n
          respondent authorities would transfer 2\/3rd share of the plots<\/p>\n
          291 and 292 in favour of petitioners subject to that petitioners<\/p>\n
          will file their affidavits stating therein that in case the<\/p>\n
          vendors, namely, Smt.Neera and Miss Mannu deny having<\/p>\n
          transferred the same to the petitioners, they would surrender<\/p>\n
          the plots to the original owners. The petitioners shall also<\/p>\n
          abandon the nurseries that have since been opened in the<\/p>\n
          plots in question. Rights of petitioners to seek partition of the<\/p>\n
          property and raise construction is left open at this stage. All<\/p>\n
          that needs to be mentioned on that account is that petitioners<\/p>\n
          may apply for partition of the land and thereafter for<\/p>\n
          construction. Their applications for partition and construction<\/p>\n
          shall be decided in accordance with law, rules and regulations<\/p>\n
          that may govern the field.”\n<\/p>\n
             Subsequent to the disposal of the said writ petition, contempt<\/p>\n
proceedings were initiated under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act,<\/p>\n
1971 by the petitioners in C.W.P.No.15127 of 2001. During the course of<\/p>\n
the aforesaid proceedings in COCP No.1177 of 2002, this Court passed the<\/p>\n
following order on 17.5.2005:-\n<\/p>\n
           Present:     Mr.Adarsh Jain,Advocate.\n\n                        Mr.N.S.Gill, AAG, Pb.\n\n                        Mr.S.C.Khunger, Advocate.\n\n<\/pre>\n
                        Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that it<\/p>\n
           is implicit in the order dated 30.4.2002 directing that there
\n Review Application No.355 of 2004 in C.W.P.No.15127 of 2001                     3<\/p>\n
           would be transfer of 2\/3rd share of plots 291 and 292 by the<\/p>\n
           trust, that the trust will remove any encroachment on the said<\/p>\n
           plots and failure of the trust to remove such encroachment on<\/p>\n
           an implied direction amounts to contempt. Contempt is not a<\/p>\n
           remedy unless an order expressly on this point exists. Learned<\/p>\n
           counsel for the petitioner seeks time to get necessary<\/p>\n
           clarification. Adjourned to 29.8.2003.\n<\/p>\n
           17.5.2005                                          Sd\/- A.K.Goel\n\n                                                                     Judge\"\n\n<\/pre>\n
Consequent upon the passing of the aforesaid order, another Civil<\/p>\n
Miscellaneous application bearing No.13298 of 2003 was filed in the said<\/p>\n
writ petition, so as to seek a clarification of the order passed by this Court<\/p>\n
on 30.4.2002 (while disposing of C.W.P.No.15127 of 2001). The aforesaid<\/p>\n
Civil Miscellaneous No.13298 of 2003 was dismissed on 11.7.2003, by<\/p>\n
observing that no occasion had arisen for any clarification of the order dated<\/p>\n
30.4.2002. Be that as it may, while disposing of C.M.No.13298 of 2003, a<\/p>\n
Division Bench of this Court granted liberty to the petitioners in<\/p>\n
C.W.P.No.15127 of 2001 to seek partition of the property before they could<\/p>\n
claim a right to assume possession thereof.\n<\/p>\n
             In the background of the order passed on 11.7.2003 disposing<\/p>\n
of Civil Miscellaneous No.13298 of 2003, a civil suit, which was pending<\/p>\n
consideration between the parties for partition of plot Nos.291 and 292 in<\/p>\n
Lajpat Rai Nagar, came to be disposed of on the basis of the compromise<\/p>\n
inter se between the parties. Paragraph 3 of the order dated 14.8.2003<\/p>\n
disposing of the aforesaid civil suit is being extracted hereunder:-<\/p>\n
          “3. This petition pertains to passing of final decree of partition,
\n Review Application No.355 of 2004 in C.W.P.No.15127 of 2001                    4<\/p>\n
          petitioners No.1 and 2 have transferred their share in favour of<\/p>\n
          petitioners No.3 to 6 to the extent of their 2\/3rd share. Although<\/p>\n
          the compromise Ex.C4, the parties have placed on file a site<\/p>\n
          plan showing separate shares falling to their share. As such,<\/p>\n
          final decree is ordered to be drawn up and the parties are<\/p>\n
          directed to furnish the requisite stamp papers within 15 days<\/p>\n
          and thereafter file be consigned to the record room.”<\/p>\n
             When the proceedings initiated in COCP No.1177 of 2002<\/p>\n
came up for consideration at the hands of this Court on 29.8.2003, the<\/p>\n
following order was passed:-\n<\/p>\n
           “Civil Misc. application is allowed.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
           Learned counsel for the petitioner has sought clarification of<\/p>\n
           the order dated 30.4.2002 passed by the Division Bench of<\/p>\n
           this Court in CWP No.15127 of 2001. The application for<\/p>\n
           clarification has been disposed on 11.7.2002 vide Annexure<\/p>\n
           A\/1. Thereafter, even the partition to the extent of 2\/3rd share<\/p>\n
           of plot Nos.291 and 292 have taken place between the parties<\/p>\n
           and a final decree has already been passed by the Civil Judge<\/p>\n
           on 14.8.2003. In view of these subsequent facts, the<\/p>\n
           respondents are bound to deliver the possession of the<\/p>\n
           property to the petitioner.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
It is not a matter of dispute that consequent upon the passing of the<\/p>\n
aforesaid order, possession was delivered to the petitioners in CWP<\/p>\n
No.15127 of 2001.\n<\/p>\n
             It is in the background of the factual position noticed here-in-<\/p>\n
above, that the instant review application has been filed at the hands of
\n Review Application No.355 of 2004 in C.W.P.No.15127 of 2001                5<\/p>\n
Gajinder Singh Bhatia, claiming possession over plot No.292, Lajpat Nagar,<\/p>\n
Jalandhar, in his capacity as a tenant. It is the vehement contention of<\/p>\n
applicant-Gajinder Singh Bhatia that the order dated 30.4.2002 passed by<\/p>\n
this Court disposing of CWP No.15127 of 2001 had adversely affected his<\/p>\n
rights. It is pointed out by Gajinder Singh Bhatia in the review application<\/p>\n
that he had not been impleaded as a party-respondent in CWP No.15127 of<\/p>\n
2001, the order passed in the said Writ Petition at his back and which<\/p>\n
adversely affected his rights, were liable to be set aside.<\/p>\n
              The claim of Gajinder Singh Bhatia in his review application<\/p>\n
No.355 of 2004 is based on the fact that he enjoys tenancy rights over plot<\/p>\n
No.292, Lajpat Nagar, Jalandhar. This assertion at the hands of Gajinder<\/p>\n
Singh Bhatia has been vehemently opposed by the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
petitioners before us. In fact the claim of tenancy rights at the hands of<\/p>\n
Gajinder Singh Bhatia, before this Court, is not supported by any<\/p>\n
documentary authentication. Gajinder Singh Bhatia has inter-alia assailed<\/p>\n
the judgment and decree dated 14.8.2003, whereby partition was effected<\/p>\n
between the petitioners in CWP No.15127 of 2001 (who were vendees of<\/p>\n
Neera and Mannu) and between Har Kaur. A few other issues have also<\/p>\n
been raised at the hands of Gajinder Singh Bhatia.\n<\/p>\n
             The order dated 30.4.2002 in respect of which review has been<\/p>\n
sought was an order passed on the writ side. Now the assertions made on<\/p>\n
behalf of the applicant, namely, Gajinder Singh Bhatia raise disputed<\/p>\n
questions of fact. These questions cannot be adjudicated upon by this Court,<\/p>\n
in exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.<\/p>\n
In the facts and circumstances of this case, we consider it just and<\/p>\n
appropriate to grant liberty to the review applicant Gajinder Singh Bhatia to
\n Review Application No.355 of 2004 in C.W.P.No.15127 of 2001                   6<\/p>\n
raise all or any of the claims raised by him through the instant Review<\/p>\n
Application before a civil Court of competent jurisdiction, if he is so<\/p>\n
advised, in accordance with law. The instant review application is<\/p>\n
accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms. Needless to mention that in<\/p>\n
case the review applicant avails of any such remedy, any observation made<\/p>\n
in the instant order, shall not be taken into consideration by the Civil Court,<\/p>\n
as an expression of opinion, on any of the issues canvassed.<\/p>\n
\n\n\n                                                              (J.S.Khehar)\n                                                                   Judge\n\n\n\n                                                              (Nawab Singh)\n3.3.2009                                                          Judge\nAS\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Rohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009 Review Application No.355 of 2004 in C.W.P.No.15127 of 2001 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Date of Decision:-3.3.2009 Rohit Sharma & others —Applicants Versus State of Punjab & others —Respondents CORAM:- HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35762","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Rohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-02T16:29:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Rohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-02T16:29:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1369,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Rohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-02T16:29:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Rohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Rohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Rohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-02T16:29:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Rohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-02T16:29:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009"},"wordCount":1369,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009","name":"Rohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-02T16:29:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/rohit-sharma-others-vs-state-of-punjab-others-on-3-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Rohit Sharma & Others vs State Of Punjab & Others on 3 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35762","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35762"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35762\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35762"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35762"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35762"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}