{"id":35795,"date":"2009-08-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2"},"modified":"2017-07-13T10:24:16","modified_gmt":"2017-07-13T04:54:16","slug":"smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2","title":{"rendered":"Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<pre>BETWEEN\n\n1.\n\n(BY SRI SHRIKANT T.FA'I*II;; AEiVOjCATE}'~  \n\n(BY\n\n\"SR1  1+ COTKHINOI, HCGP)\n\nIN THE HIGH COUET OF KARNATAKA\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DI-IARWAD\nDATED THIS THE 26\"' DAY OF' AUGUST, 2009\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE HULUVADI G. RAMvES'I\u00abI_D'~V.,V\n\nCRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.2126_  *- \n\nSMT NASEEMA EANDOISAB SIIER=FYzE3E\u00bb._  \nAGE:6'7 YEARS I.    _ \" *\nOCC HOUSEHOLD wORK,__Ie---LO BIJAFUR * ,_  \n\nC' A ..'.'FETITIO_fNER\n\n'I'I--I_E STATE OF,1.KA'RI\\2;iTAxA\n\nI 113\/ B FITS FQFI DHARWAD\n\nI .  TRANSPORT OFFICER\n _ EAv.gNA'SA1?\", HUBLI\n\n...RESPONDENTS\n\n.  ..  CRLZRP NO2126\/2009 is FILED U\/S397 AND 401\n '*\u00ab.CR__F.'C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING\n  THATTHIS HONELE COURT MAY BE FLEASEI) TO KINDLY\n SET\n\nASIDE THE ORDER DATED 3\/3\/2009 PASSED BY THE\n\nW\"\n\n\n\n2\n\nIST ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGES DI-IARWAD SITTING AT\nHUBLI IN CRIMINAL APPEAL 30\/2007'.\n\nTHIS REVISION PETITION IS COMING ON FOR FINAL\nDISPOSAL THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>The petitioner has sought towset  iiordjsr <\/p>\n<p>the IAdd1. Sessions Judge, Hub1i,;&#8221;in <\/p>\n<p>2. According to thi-f:&#8221;&#8212;.Ie-arried cotivriisr\ufb01&#8212;._,,for3 <\/p>\n<p>petitior1er~\u00bbaccused_,&#8217; the accu_s__\u00e9&#8217;d,_ was convicted by the<\/p>\n<p>JMFC 1 Court, Hubii\ufb01n. Ic;ir:i.N&#8217;oLj&#8217;?%i&#8217;9,\/2000 and was<\/p>\n<p>directed.&#8217; to pay   J;&#8211;4\/~&#8217;i1 997 to 3 I -3\u00bb I 998, further<\/p>\n<p>sentencedIV&#8221;h_sr ta pg1;{_  of Rs.},68,000\/-, in default to<\/p>\n<p>.\u00abvw.A_\u00a7indV_-sirgo for&#8221;&#8211;6&#8230;.II10nths. Before the I Add}. Sessions<\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;&#8211;..AJuId&#8217;ge,j  sitting at Hubli, an application under<\/p>\n<p>section 39Ii(i1i.}* to (4) of Cr.P.C. came to be \ufb01led and the<\/p>\n<p>fsamei xzveis; dismissed. Aggrieved by the order passed in the<\/p>\n<p>A&#8217; &#8220;:\u00e9.pvpI\u00e9&#8217;a\u00abI, this revision petition is filed.<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span>\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the<\/p>\n<p>Government Pleader<\/p>\n<p>4. The petitioner had VV.p&#8217;tl\u00bb._l*fi1ed<\/p>\n<p>W.P.No.46139\/2004(MV&#8211;&#8216;l&#8217;AX) before the <\/p>\n<p>at Bangalore challenging them\u00bb 0rd.e&#8217;r&#8221;&#8216;=<\/p>\n<p>Commissioner for Transport regardinganon?\u00bbpayment*&#8212;of&#8217;*tax<\/p>\n<p>in respect of vehicle bearin\u00e9 &#8220;registration <\/p>\n<p>for the period betweenp__1.1.199t3ito_  vsfhich came<\/p>\n<p>to be dismissed. A&#8221;ccor.di&#8211;ng\u00a7fitoilhtihel-learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>petitionelrfthe;petitionlerl&#8221;intends&#8221;to demonstrate that the<br \/>\nvehicle ilWas.. ,:was not road worthy and the<\/p>\n<p>Vehic1e_pWas\u00b0no_t in&#8217;;us&#8217;e_,  such, not liable to pay tax. He<\/p>\n<p> ,.\u00a2f1,trthe&#8217;r i.$1.1l3IIlitS lthatdpefore the Magistrate she could not<\/p>\n<p>epiicidiicdthevildoeuments relevant to prove the non-use of<\/p>\n<p>the therefore was convicted by the Magistrate.<\/p>\n<p>  the application was filed before the Sessions<\/p>\n<p> in the appeals, same came to be rejected.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, according to the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><br \/>\npetitioner, the matter ought to have been remitted back to<\/p>\n<p>the Magistrate for consideration afresh on merits.<\/p>\n<p>5. Per contra, learned Government_~~.Pleader<\/p>\n<p>referring to the dismissal of  <\/p>\n<p>submitted that already the petitioner basil&#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>order of this court which has  <\/p>\n<p>the petitioner has failed to avail.. the ieXen1ptivo_n&#8217;:._as&#8217; &#8216;per the&#8221; i<\/p>\n<p>Government Noti\ufb01cation NAo&#8212;-.\u00a7i.IL&#8217;&#8211;,\/95\/TIl\\\/l&#8221;l&#8217;\/&#8211;7T(&#8216;l) dated<\/p>\n<p>11.9.1980 which has  of the owner<\/p>\n<p>to decl.f-the&#8221;itl1eiiinon:3\u00a7i;i&#8217;se&#8217;of &#8216;the &#8216;lifehiicle in Form No.30 with<br \/>\nnecessarjr lees  documents of the vehicle to<\/p>\n<p>obtain. exem&#8221;pti_Von_c-\u00abf  Therefore, he submits that the<\/p>\n<p> V&#8217; &#8220;c.assi:r,di&#8217; the petitionefshould not be entertained.<\/p>\n<p>V &#8211;   v- petition what is being noticed is that<\/p>\n<p>the Viorayerisicilthe petitioner is that the matter may be<\/p>\n<p>Vi\u00b0~.,,_&#8221;remanded. by allowing her to produce the documents<\/p>\n<p> the learned Magistrate to demonstrate that the<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>vehicle was not in use. The requirement as per the<br \/>\nNotification is that the non&#8211;use of the vehicle ought to<br \/>\nhave been intimated immediately just prior to the non~use<\/p>\n<p>of the vehicle by paying the required fee. Admittved&#8217;ly,i*-the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has not made any such appliicatioifnil <\/p>\n<p>exemption.   _<\/p>\n<p>7. Hence, in order io_V&#8221;gi.Ve  Voppo1=tu&#8217;nityVVVt&#8217;o them<\/p>\n<p>petitioner to contest the maittei\ufb01u since the..Hrnatter has<\/p>\n<p>already been dismissedl&#8221;in_r and based on<\/p>\n<p>the grieVan&#8217;ce tliel&#8221;petitioner, it is inevitable<br \/>\nfor the pietitioneritoi&#8217;:_diepo:sit.:ithe tax Within six months and<\/p>\n<p>if such arno11ntt\u00bb_i,s deposited, the petitioner shall be<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;entitled to p&#8211;rxoduce&#8221;the documents before Magistrate and<\/p>\n<p>iiiconteist &#8221; Or else, the order of the Sessions<\/p>\n<p>Judge  the application shall stand confirmed.<\/p>\n<p>8: Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to pay<\/p>\n<p>A  p:.taX&#8217;&#8211;W_ithin six months, in View of the order of this Court<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><br \/>\nfor the period between 1.4.1997 and 31.3.1998 and on<\/p>\n<p>such deposit, the petitioner is entitled to produce the<br \/>\ndocuments and contest the matter before the learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate.\n<\/p>\n<p>9. With the above observations\u00ab,~&#8211;~tii:e..:&#8221;feVisiofi&#8217;~. <\/p>\n<p>petition stands disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p>IUDGE<\/p>\n<p>vrp\/&#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh BETWEEN 1. (BY SRI SHRIKANT T.FA&#8217;I*II;; AEiVOjCATE}&#8217;~ (BY &#8220;SR1 1+ COTKHINOI, HCGP) IN THE HIGH COUET OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DI-IARWAD DATED THIS THE 26&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF&#8217; AUGUST, 2009 BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MRJUSTICE HULUVADI G. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-35795","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-13T04:54:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-13T04:54:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2\"},\"wordCount\":643,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2\",\"name\":\"Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-13T04:54:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-13T04:54:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-13T04:54:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2"},"wordCount":643,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2","name":"Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-13T04:54:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/smt-naseema-bandgisab-sherpyade-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-26-august-2009-2#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Smt Naseema Bandgisab Sherpyade vs The State Of Karnataka on 26 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=35795"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/35795\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=35795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=35795"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=35795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}