{"id":36299,"date":"2010-02-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010"},"modified":"2016-05-29T13:27:45","modified_gmt":"2016-05-29T07:57:45","slug":"shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                 Central Information Commission\n                                                                 CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000070\n                                                                  Dated February 5, 2010\n\n\nName of the Applicant                        :    Shri Yogeshwar Saini\n\nName of the Public Authority                 :    National Board of Examinations\n\nBackground<\/pre>\n<p>1.    The Applicant filed a RTI application dt.8.8.09 with the PIO, NBE requesting for<br \/>\n      information against 6 points with regard to Theory examination in the subject of<br \/>\n      DNB(Orthopaedics) June 2009(Final).Capt.K.Paul James, PIO          replied on 5.10.09<br \/>\n      stating that the RTI application was received on 12.8.09 and involves collating<br \/>\n      information from the Records Section, Confidential Section and Examination Section<br \/>\n      and that he has strived hard to provide the desired information and requested the<br \/>\n      Applicant to appreciate the fact that NBE has been seized with the activities of conduct<br \/>\n      of DNB examinations, evaluation of DNB CET and final examinations, declaration of<br \/>\n      results, conduct of the Forthcoming Foreign Medical Graduates Examinations for which<br \/>\n      there has been an unprecedented increase in the number of applications up to the<br \/>\n      tune of 100%. He further added that besides being the PIO of NBE, he has also been<br \/>\n      entrusted with the duties and responsibilities of Asst. Director (MCQ) Section and<br \/>\n      Vigilance Officer.   The MCQ Section currently has the peak work load during the<br \/>\n      months of June and September 2009 and requested that delay be condoned. He also<br \/>\n      provided point wise information. Not satisfied with the reply, the Applicant filed an<br \/>\n      appeal dt.10.10.09 with the Appellate Authority stating that the reply furnished by the<br \/>\n      PIO is incomplete and unsatisfactory as information sought against points 4, 5 and 6<br \/>\n      has been denied under the pretext that information is not available with NBE.<br \/>\n      Dr.A.K.Sood, Appellate Authority replied on 5.11.09 stating that as for points 4 and 5,<br \/>\n      the Question papers (I to IV) for DNB Final Theory (Orthopaedics) have been set by<br \/>\n      respective Examiners and as per the records available in the office of NBE, information<br \/>\n      on any particular question that appeared in the final theory (Orthopaedics)<br \/>\n      examination of June 2009 is not available with NBE.      He also provided the detailed<br \/>\n      clarification against point 6 of the RTI application.     Dr.A.K.Sood vide his letter<br \/>\n      dt.10.11.09 to the applicant also enclosed an online counseling form which will help<br \/>\n      the subject matter expert in Orthopedics to answer any queries. He also stated that<br \/>\n      in case the Applicant desires a meeting with the subject matter expert for personal<br \/>\n      counseling, the same can also be fixed whereby candidate can seek all the<br \/>\n      clarifications personally and that a       one day CME for DNB candidates on how to<br \/>\n      attempt theory questions in examination is also being held on 14.11.09 at the<br \/>\n      Department of Surgery, Safdarjung Hospital.        Candidates can come to attend the<br \/>\n       same where the subject matter experts would answer the queries related to theory<br \/>\n      examination. The Appellate Authority also enclosed a list of DVDs related to<br \/>\n      orthopedics examination. However, still not satisfied, the Applicant filed a second<br \/>\n      appeal dt.12.11.09 before CIC<\/p>\n<p>2.    The Bench of Mrs. Annapurna Dixit, Information Commissioner, scheduled the hearing<br \/>\n      for February 5, 2010.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.    Capt. K.Paul James, PIO and Dr.Rakesh Gosain, Stdg. Counsel represented the Public<br \/>\n      Authority.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.    The Appellant was heard through audio conferencing, partly while the Respondents<br \/>\n      were present and partly after they left due to faulty lines<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>5.    The Respondent Capt.K.Paul James vide his rejoinder dt.3.2.10 to the Commission<br \/>\n      submitted that the present RTI application is mainly focused on the DNB Final Theory<br \/>\n      Examination Question Paper I and III of June 2009. The Paper I allegedly contained a<br \/>\n      single error i.e. the question No.9 of the paper had wrongly mentioned the word<br \/>\n      &#8216;Focal&#8217; as &#8216;Facial&#8217; , which is a typographical error and in Paper III, question 4, the word<br \/>\n      &#8216;radius&#8217;     was missing inadvertently.     He added that the correction of alleged<br \/>\n      typographical mistakes in question papers are not intentional mistakes and these<br \/>\n      typing mistakes are inadvertent and to appreciate the mistake it has to be appreciated<br \/>\n      that NBE is conducting PG and Post PG level examinations in more than 54 specialties<br \/>\n      besides other examinations and their respective practical examinations.        He further<br \/>\n      added that at the time of drafting of question paper it is the examiners, moderators<br \/>\n      and typists who are aware of the contents and the same is highly confidential activity<br \/>\n      and no unassociated person is permitted to even interact with them during the said<br \/>\n      activity. If the question papers are made to undergo the &#8216;proof reading&#8217; a new layer of<br \/>\n      persons will have to be created and the chances of paper leakage increase. He also<br \/>\n      added that in almost more than 54 x 4 papers(conducted on the same day) only two<br \/>\n      alleged mistakes have been reported.       Ordinarily the mistakes are never found in<br \/>\n      question papers but in case the same are found then the Centre Supervisors and<br \/>\n      Appraisers are the key persons to contact NBE control room and corrective measures<br \/>\n      are suggested instantly as has been done in the instant case. He further added that<br \/>\n      NBE came to know of the mistake and the Centre Supervisors and Appraisers at all the<br \/>\n      examination centres had categorically announced and rectified this mistake at all the<br \/>\n      centers at the beginning of the examination.         He also added that not a single<br \/>\n      representation\/grievance\/complaint has been received by the NBE in respect of these<br \/>\n      insignificant typographical errors from any of the candidates. In question 4 of paper<br \/>\n        III, it is alleged that the term &#8216;radius&#8217; was missing. However, the said omission was<br \/>\n       also duly rectified and announced at the centre itself. Without prejudice to aforesaid<br \/>\n       he admitted submitted that even otherwise, the question without the term &#8216;radius&#8217; is<br \/>\n       correct.    He further added that during a sample randomized survey conducted on<br \/>\n       3.2.10 it has been found that in the said question 9 of paper I, the candidates have<br \/>\n       scored 2nd highest average marks and the pass percentage of June 2009 is the third<br \/>\n       best from among the last 8 examinations.\n<\/p>\n<p>6.     The Respondent, Shri Gosain further submitted that prior to 10.7.09 marks were not<br \/>\n       disclosed and after that marks are being disclosed. He stated that separate sheet is<br \/>\n       being maintained for each candidate and there are 59 x 4 mark sheets which need to<br \/>\n       be collated as the marks during that period were not maintained in the format as<br \/>\n       sought by the Appellant.     The Appellant who was heard over the phone stated that<br \/>\n       information against point 6 was not provided and that against 4 and 5 no information<br \/>\n       has been furnished under the pretext that it is not available.         He insisted that<br \/>\n       information against point 6 is of great importance to him. The Respondent submitted<br \/>\n       that even though information sought against 4 and 5 are not as defined under section<br \/>\n       2(f) of the RTI Act, however, the Appellate Authority provided detailed clarification<br \/>\n       vide his order dt.5.11.09.    He further added that the marks obtained         are   not<br \/>\n       available center wise and that any candidate can retrieve his marks now from the<br \/>\n       website after entering his Roll Number.\n<\/p>\n<p>7.     The Commission after hearing the submissions of both sides, holds that information<br \/>\n       sought in points 4 and 5 of the RTI application is not &#8216;information&#8217; as defined in the<br \/>\n       RTI Act as the Appellant is seeking medical details on the subject of Orthopaedics<br \/>\n       which can be obtained from any text book. However, the PIO is directed to provide<br \/>\n       attested copies of the mark sheets of selected candidates in the form in which they<br \/>\n       exist, to the Appellant. With regard to point 6 , the PIO to provide information as<br \/>\n       sought by the Appellant, if available on record. If not, an affidavit may be furnished to<br \/>\n       the Appellant informing him about its non-availability. A copy of the PIO&#8217;s reply dated<br \/>\n       3.2.2010 may also be furnished to the Appellant.\n<\/p>\n<p>8.     The information should reach the Appellant by 5.3.10 and the Appellant is directed to<br \/>\n       submit a compliance report to the Commission by 12.3.10.\n<\/p>\n<p>9.     The appeal is accordingly disposed of.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                            (Annapurna Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                    Information Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated true copy:\n<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy Registrar<br \/>\n Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.    Shri Yogeshwar Saini<br \/>\n      H.No.70-C, Taylor Road<br \/>\n      Amritsar<br \/>\n      Punjab<\/p>\n<p>2.    The PIO<br \/>\n      National Board of Examinations<br \/>\n      PSP Area<br \/>\n      Sector-9<br \/>\n      Dwarka<br \/>\n      New Delhi<\/p>\n<p>3.    The Appellate Authority<br \/>\n      National Board of Examinations<br \/>\n      PSP Area<br \/>\n      Sector-9<br \/>\n      Dwarka<br \/>\n      New Delhi<\/p>\n<p>4.    Officer incharge, NIC<\/p>\n<p>5.    Press E Group, CIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010 Central Information Commission CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/000070 Dated February 5, 2010 Name of the Applicant : Shri Yogeshwar Saini Name of the Public Authority : National Board of Examinations Background 1. The Applicant filed a RTI application dt.8.8.09 with the PIO, NBE requesting [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36299","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-05-29T07:57:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-29T07:57:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1312,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-05-29T07:57:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-05-29T07:57:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-29T07:57:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010"},"wordCount":1312,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010","name":"Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-05-29T07:57:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-yogeshwar-saini-vs-national-board-of-examinations-on-5-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Yogeshwar Saini vs National Board Of Examinations on 5 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36299","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36299"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36299\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36299"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36299"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36299"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}