{"id":36600,"date":"2008-10-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-10-21T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008"},"modified":"2015-02-17T16:05:06","modified_gmt":"2015-02-17T10:35:06","slug":"n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008","title":{"rendered":"N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<pre>E3 THE men COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN(x3AL1.'..T}}{\u00a7'~;.\"A\u00ab K\n\nDated this the 22\" day of\ufb02ctober, 2002: . gj \"\" ' \n\nBefcrrc I\n\n27113 HUMBLE MR JUSTICE g::.m%:4z;; \u00e9' % 1\u00a7;wEs1;%:\" A .  A\n\nRegular Fa-m:Ap;:g;&amp;..V12153'\",'.zc;agT'   \nBgtmeen:   '\n\nN Devadas Pakkala, 50 yrs\n\nSic late Mahabaia Pakkala   r x\nif 1821, ICmss, Smlpatxgrmna Nagar...  _  '\nBangaiore 560 027 _   \n\n(By Sri M .1 Alva, A\u00a2.:;; ~  51  \"  j   \nAnd:  \"\"    \n\n1 Smt B \u00a7.,1~.4;1g.::-ati7ni'az:\u00a7m:a,~ 'A % 5\nW\/9 late Subbarnxa,  89 ._ \"   \u00e9 \"\nSouth End 3 Cross,  \n\n 69 ~ V '\n\nV \"  sm\u00a3}.Ashn%smghi. 48  %%%%% \u00ab \"\n V' we Sanjajz xmm Singmi\n'  18:\"1_._ };'F10t:s15,\"!nCr:)ss\n\"'  Hagar, Bangakrrc 27 mpondenm\n\nT} -V: (By Sri K  sutsaa  Adv.)\n\n,  \" .. }3irs{Appea1 is filed under s.95 &amp; Order 41, Rule Lcpc praying\n  \"-.to\"a:et'a_sia*.:io_ the judgnent and decree of dismissal dated 25.7.2007 by the XI\n= . .. 3661-. Ci-igy Civil Judge, Bmmlore in as 4449:1995.\n\nT \"  u  First Appeal coming cm for Haaring this day, \ufb01ze Court delivered\n\n1 L' j  ii-'65 . foilowi:ng:\n\nDR\"\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>This appeai is by the p1ainti\ufb01&#8217; seeking for setting   <\/p>\n<p>and decree pamed by the XI Addl. City Civi1&#8217;J\ufb01dge, Bimggiziiw\u00e9iivaii isizdey V J<\/p>\n<p>in 03 4144051995 dismissing the suit for specific  -.<\/p>\n<p>The plainti\ufb01 is said to be in miiupg\ufb01on iif\ufb02ic   of  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>the premises bearing No.18\/1 situate ,::l&#8217;5_Cros;s;, \u00ab. <\/p>\n<p>Bangalore which is dmzcribedv   _The plainti\ufb02&#8221; was said<\/p>\n<p>to be 2  ii&#8217;  on a monthly rent of<br \/>\nRs.800\/-.    obtaining iicense from the<br \/>\ncompetenfvv.Aatn3:ori\u00a7_ir,iV a&#8217; Service Station. 1: is also further<\/p>\n<p>avmred   moi\ufb01\ufb01  1995, defendant started dsemanding the<\/p>\n<p> plaixzti\ufb01li  &#8220;vacate   over vacant possession of the ssshedule A<\/p>\n<p>in     that he intensis ta dispose of the entire building, The<\/p>\n<p> as B Schedule consisting of gonad floor which is<\/p>\n<p> _ the A&#8221;acherii1ie;.i:&#8221;The ground floor is measuring east-wmt 18 feet and north-<\/p>\n<p> 33 iesi: According to the plaint\ufb01&#8217;; he refused to vacate the same and<\/p>\n<p>   purchase the building fem&#8221; a peasmmble consideration. It is his case<\/p>\n<p>    the 1&#8243; afcndzmt had agecd to sci} the B schedule propelty and in this<\/p>\n<p>Liiregard, taiks were held on 12.2.1995 in the presence of various persons<\/p>\n<p>including some Advocate and a Chartered Accotmtzm. At \ufb02nat time, the 1&#8243;<\/p>\n<p>AV<\/p>\n<p>speculative [one and accordingly, resisted the suit. Based on the ___above<\/p>\n<p>pleadings, the trial court framed me following issues:<\/p>\n<p>1 Whether the plaintiff preves that the 1&#8243; defendant aga-ea-ugi :ojV;~.ejiL\u00a3:\u00a7\u00a2\ufb01_f A&#8221; * .._V<\/p>\n<p>Schedule propcny for a consideration of 33.4 lacs? &#8221;  = &#8212; .: &#8216;  b<\/p>\n<p>2 Whether the piainti\ufb01&#8217; proves that as a  af  .\u00ab<\/p>\n<p>paid a mm: of Rs.l,06l!- advnncg to tlxaff dafendan &#8216;E&#8217;  &#8216;~ . \u00ab.<\/p>\n<p>3 Whefner the plainti\ufb01&#8217; proves a&#8217;v.1Lat:fieM\u00bbis   to &#8221; V<\/p>\n<p>perform his part of conmmt? V V _ &amp; &#8216;<br \/>\n4 Whether the plaintiff m;%a.\u00a2   ,\u00a31&#8217;\u00a7tf0uI of 25&#8243; \u00abMegan: by<br \/>\nthe 1&#8243;&#8216; defendant is null ax1c&#8217;n_roid?__v   &#8216; T.&#8221; .. %  _<\/p>\n<p>5 Whether the 4g:il3\u00a7nti\ufb01:&#8221;j5t\u00e9v\u00e9\u00a7;: eistiuea for speci\ufb01c<br \/>\nperfonnarxcc\ufb01rf fig;-agaa\u00e9umnt -sf   V.\n<\/p>\n<p>6 Wh\ufb0111er_ ::\u00a75&#8217;g;sa;n;;:r%pn\u00ab\u00a7esMna.a: he is entitled for the declaration in<br \/>\nrespect cm: sale   of 2\u00b0&#8221; defendant?\n<\/p>\n<p>7  V &#8220;p:*(\u00a7=ires that he is entitled for permanent<br \/>\nigujunqtion  &#8221; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>  AV  <\/p>\n<p> \u00a7&gt; f  four vvimassw were examined and about thirteen<\/p>\n<p>   marked and on behaif of the respondent, two witnesses<\/p>\n<p>  me! got marked about in all, eighteen documents. After<\/p>\n<p>  while answering the relevant issues in favour cf the defendants,<\/p>\n<p>VT  &#8220;ihv2-.&#8221;t:1&#8217;ial court dismissed \ufb01le suit. Hence, this appeal.<\/p>\n<p>ya,<\/p>\n<p>Advocate depicts that Rs. 5 hes has been mentioned as such, there is no<\/p>\n<p>consensus adidem between \ufb02xe panics. When there is no such unity ofmind<\/p>\n<p>as to me sefling of me propeny in favour of the plaiza\ufb01if by the ~ u<\/p>\n<p>when there is no centres! or agreement, it cannot be  <\/p>\n<p>a\ufb01er thought by the plasma&#8221; to knock oif  me  &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>resisted the appeai.\n<\/p>\n<p>In the light efthe angurnents  woul\u00e9i arise for<br \/>\nconsideration is whether there exist.$fa.va\u00a5i\u00a7i  the parties to<\/p>\n<p>execute the propeny by .1.'&#8221;vdefe;::Ie:gt.i:\ufb01  whether the<\/p>\n<p>trial court ig.*&#8217;_;:;&#8217;\u00a7ni2e;&amp;V:es;: fee  of the plaintiff and then<br \/>\nc\ufb01satnissing  sixit bf \ufb01zhe\ufb01ler the trial court is justified in<\/p>\n<p>holding that  was &#8216;  and willing to perform his pen of<\/p>\n<p>  E  wheidier&#8230;\ufb02:e.&#8217;u~ial com! is justi\ufb01ed in holding that the<\/p>\n<p> have so  the saie made in favour of the 2&#8243;&#8216; defendant is null and<\/p>\n<p>V  is mtitled for a decree of specific performance and<\/p>\n<p> ferapemxane .\n<\/p>\n<p> AA  theuoilt set it is seen, as rightly argued by the teamed counsel for<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab   nothing has been mentioned about the token advance paid by<\/p>\n<p>  to the 1&#8243; defendant in a sum ef Rs.1001f- and also existence of<\/p>\n<p>\\,\/<\/p>\n<p>aiso regarding justification of sale in favour of 2&#8243; defendant: <\/p>\n<p>defendant, the same cannot be interfered with at this stage as <\/p>\n<p>on the part of the plaintiff to demonstrate t11,a.t..a._\\_{ziid  mfg.&#8217; V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>existence bctwecn the plaintiff and I&#8221;   T ~ <\/p>\n<p>In the circumstances, the appeal   it  dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>Parties :6 beat their own costs; v &#8221; &#8216; L<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh E3 THE men COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BAN(x3AL1.&#8217;..T}}{\u00a7&#8217;~;.&#8221;A\u00ab K Dated this the 22&#8243; day of\ufb02ctober, 2002: . gj &#8220;&#8221; &#8216; Befcrrc I 27113 HUMBLE MR JUSTICE g::.m%:4z;; \u00e9&#8217; % 1\u00a7;wEs1;%:&#8221; A . A Regular Fa-m:Ap;:g;&amp;..V12153&#8242;&#8221;,&#8217;.zc;agT&#8217; Bgtmeen: &#8216; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36600","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-02-17T10:35:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-17T10:35:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008\"},\"wordCount\":686,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008\",\"name\":\"N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-02-17T10:35:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-02-17T10:35:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008","datePublished":"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-17T10:35:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008"},"wordCount":686,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008","name":"N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-10-21T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-02-17T10:35:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-devadas-pakkala-vs-smt-b-s-munirathnamma-on-22-october-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"N Devadas Pakkala vs Smt B S Munirathnamma on 22 October, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36600","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36600"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36600\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36600"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36600"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36600"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}