{"id":36622,"date":"2010-01-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010"},"modified":"2016-12-29T10:53:57","modified_gmt":"2016-12-29T05:23:57","slug":"ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Ramaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Ramaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: B.S.Patil<\/div>\n
I\n\nW P 351346\/ 2809\n\nIN 'E'I\"IIC I\"-IIGI---1 COUR'F OF KARNATAKA AT I'31\\NGAl..ORI.Z\n\nDATEI) T HIS THE E 1\"\" DAY OF JANUARY. 2010\n\nB FIFO R E\n\n'1'1\u00bbH\u00ab: E----ION'BLI\u00a3 MR..;Us'1f1Ct\u00ab.:\u00a33.s.1I>A'rI1-   .\"\n\nWRIT PETITION No.35346\/2009      \"\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nRAMASVVAMY ANGAIDE.\n\nS\/O VEERAPPA.\n\nAGED ABOU\"E' 52.\n\nADYAKSHA.\n\nGONDIHALLI GRAM PANCI--{AYA'I'.\nMAD HUGIRI TAL U K.\n\n'\u00a7\"U1\\\/IKU R DISTRICT.\n\n(BY SR: B.K.MANJUNA'I'}I, ADV.)-I AV  \n\nAND:  ****  ._ \n\n1. 'I'H.}3 Ass:sjI'.w*I\"-(:93\/1M1S\u00a3s;A\u20ac;+zxsf_ER.C\n\nMADI*~IU'GIRI._S{EB I';\u00bbI.\\7'I\u00a7sIN;=. \n\nMADmJ<;:R1'1#A1,L:K.  _  '\nTUMKUR D1L:3irm(:*1'.._ V '\n\n2. TIMI  \u00a7:;1%:c::L\u00a7z\u00a3\u00ab:'I'AR::  V\n - \/. (.;<:)._1\\I1;311g1x_;\\LL,1 GRAM '1'?-A-'N'CI"E.AYA'I'.\n\nV "MA:3:~\u00ab1u"C,;1 RI " r:<_xI.1.21e<,\n\n_ "2::;':\u00bb:.;A.\n~ . _ \" \/xvm-::3{. ABOUT' \u00a330 YEARS:\n\n S:aAR();JAMMA.\n\nW?\/ D I-'{Ai\\3GAS'vVA.E\\\/IY.\n\n V' \"':'\\;C}I%I}f) A130 UT 40 Y'I%3AI-ZS:\n\n\n\n'NE? 35346 \/ 2(){}9\n\n'. T. RAMANNA.\nS\/O E31\"-IIMANNA.\nAGED A130 UT 50 YEARS;\n\nG'\n\n7 . S H I VAM U R'I.'IvfY.\nS \/ O C H I Ki{A.I\"IAN U MA.i\\:\"I\"I\"1AP PA.\nAG ED ABC) UT' 50 YEARS.'\n\n8. N.RAJAKU.I\\\/IAR.\nS\/O NARASI---I IMAPPA.\nA(}E*LD ABOUT 45 YEARSE.\n\n9. SCHIKANNA.\nS \/ O SANNAPPA,\nAGED ABOUT 45 YEARS:\n\nI. O. R . VEN KATAC I\"-IAI..A.IAI-\"i . \n8\/ O RANGAPPA. A  '2.\nAGED ABOUT 50 YEARS: ' '\n\nrm To 10 ARE 'I'HI:tVMEMi3'1\u00a3R$\"Qf?'  A\nGONDl}:I.AI.LI (,;:<A;:x\/V: '_\u00a3~'-ANc2_:IA--I.AY\u00a3\\"I',  'V . --\n1u;'gz\\*.\u00bb  30:2 C: \/R4\nSR1 R.D1::VA::;A:s, AC;'A_. mp  '\nma, :3. 5 '10 :'o.__Am:: sz;r2\\r.rg:1;.ggziL.INR1a:1:>Rr::s1\u00ab:N'r1a:1:>]\n\nviij3r~1s;_.,;?\u00a32';f1'I'1()N\" IS\"\"F1VI..i%ZI ) UNDER AR\"1'1<::a,1+:s 1226 av 2:2? OP'\n\n1'til';-if;6:0\u00a3~.Is'r':f1'U_';*;c)N OF INDIA PRAYING '10 QUASH "I'\u00a7~IE MEI\u00a3\u00a3'1"ING\n\nN.O'I'ECE=D\u00a33fIff*3{)_".1.7j1----_I.2009 ISSUED BY 'i'E*iI:'\u00a7 25*' RESPONSE}-NT VIDE\nAENNEX-URE: ENG A VVRJTOF CECR'.1*IORAI~ZI.\n\n'1jI~1Is 1%'L%:'_1'I4{'5--'1At.)N C.?(')MiN(.} ON IA~'(\ufb02)R PRI\u20acI,Iz\\\/HNARY I-4IEAR1\u00a7\\?(3 'I3'\n\n(13 I'{C)[JP.'TIAAI I);A'r'. 'I'I"{I*3 (IOL.?R'I.' MADE3 "1'I'~!E I'()I.,I.,(I)\\'VINC}:\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
 “‘_ I’I:”:I”\u00a7’}iS writ. poi.i1.i.<}z'2. pc1.it.1'.o1'1ctr is r,:h21iEe1'1gi11g the 1'"z01.i<:re<\/p>\n
':'_'{Ii'a-{Vc~d _17.I1.2009 issuecf by 1'esp0s';d\u20ac121. no.1 _ 1'-\\SSiS1",\u00a3,1i'1I.<\/p>\n
WP ;35:345 \/ 2009
\n4<\/span><\/p>\n
Acihyakslm emd Upac\ufb02lyalislm 0!” Gramzl I5’ar1(.sl121y2\u00e91t,!’1] Rules,
\n1994 (11e1″ei11afi.\u20ac1′ 1’efe1*red to as ‘the Rules’. for sh01T1i}___. {he<\/p>\n
A$sis1a1’1E. Co1’1’1n1issi1’1cr xvas reqL1i1’\u20acci 20 give E(‘:_ a1l_ i=. 1’h.c’.<\/p>\n
1’11\u20ac1′}’]bO1’S. I10t1′(‘fe of no? less than 15 clear daitys (J1″ S’r.1cI1_\u00a7m.c.{,ii’ig V’<\/p>\n
as per Rule 3(2) of the RL1Ic-s. x’\\<.:(_:ordi_r'1g '\u00a7; o p(:' 1V.'iE'i._()[1t\u00a5'1j.<\/p>\n
excluding the day on \\-vhich the I1<)T.iz'?e \\.ve':_'sT ~ciispz~1EC'l1..\u00e9(1&2mLi;fi1vic5<\/p>\n
day on which the 1'1c)t.2cre xxrais ""1-ic(:ei\\ri3ic! by 'i,l"1e"\u00ab,_'p=ev:itibner.*<\/p>\n
p\u20act.i1,i.o1'1e1' had only \u00a34 ("I\u20ac21}" days 1H1"(:V)'1'\u00a7..Qt3'~K_\u00a7\\-'*I1i(Th' \u00a7':T*_!VlV_s-?.1'1v(.*5:'t. by one
\nday and E.hc?:*e1'(')re. t'I1er"\u00ab-_fi1:\u00e9e1–i11_g;_' vvI'i'x–\u00e9fc1  'by {he Assist\u00e9-mt.
\nCommissioner' on O5.12.2009_ivas= A1'l=l_eg:\u00bb.1'Iv_ a"r'1.:,i"'cL)m.1*21ry 2.0 the<\/p>\n
p1'0visI01'1s.\n<\/p>\n
3. This ‘.Cdt,;r1′. a_1{~i’.h.r: ‘i;i11Vi{~:.’\\5x~.he11 the IIIEIUG1’ was posted for<\/p>\n
preliminary li\u00e9\u00e9z-1{i1[1.gd\u00a7, d;i_dA11<5tAg~fe111t any interim 01'ci(–:1* sE,aying the<\/p>\n
_~inc?t%f4in\u00bbg-\ufb02t.<')V 15\u00a2 heldxO;'1_Q_5.vi2.20O9. IL has. howcrver. passed z::.r1<\/p>\n
 0rc!e:rV';rr1;1E{i;T1'g;\u00a31.._(%'i<i_z11' that: 'the 1'\u20acfSL\u00a711 of the nieeting to be held<\/p>\n
on  to halve bertm 05.12.2009) is s'u13_\u00a7t3Ct, to izht'<\/p>\n
1"-esrxlt. iii \u00a3.1'1'i55 v.vfi.I pci'.it':1'01'1'. It  not in (.f1'.5ap11I'.('~r Ehat. the 111ect':i1T1g<\/p>\n
K  'r\u00a7'z.:1xr.-zci VG.5.l2".2()O9 hi-:13 in I'2;ut1. izzaken plave zmci {he m.ernbr31's of<\/p>\n
.E'\u00a7"._.r;r 7f}faf1"121 P211T1('11ayz"1i11 have expre:-3sscrcI tlieir no c0r1fiClence in<\/p>\n
–. _f:.V}’1c’%’pc:’\u00a3.i1..io1’1<;\u00e91* :"esL.:11.i11g_\u00a7; in his 1'c::m<)vz2:l ftfom the post-;L. IL  alsso<\/p>\n
'\\7\\\u00ab"P 3 51346)'\/i2()O9<\/p>\n
not in d1'sp:..:1e 1.112111" 21 new Ac.i.1'1y21IisI1z;1 11:18 b\u20ac(';'1'1 e1cCIcd"\u00a73.y 1"h(:*<\/p>\n
me111be1's of \u00a5}IE.'. (,}1'3.1[1'1a Pz111(:I1z':_\\;at'.11 who is fu1'1('?t:i()1'1\u00a71&1.g' –:1_.'.\u00a7':~{'1':T(*.h~<\/p>\n
4. I.em’11ed Counsel appeaxing for {Thea }3ef.i1i(>m’:1-‘._$\u00a7ubmi1.s1:h_;u”V<\/p>\n
as the p1′()(‘.\u20ac’,C1L11′(‘.’ p1’es(:1’ibcd ii11(it’Ii: R.{:1.}.t? f3{i2_) Qf”-1.116’*-.R:,:.E;e\u00e9s<\/p>\n
reqL1iring 15 days clear notice t,() b\u00a2 g1’\\*’\u20ac’ I”1._1,(‘}”T.h(‘, r;a’e :n;be1*s  <\/p>\n
convening the 111ee1i11g for  cm   Qo111’ide11(:c%
\nmotion is marldamry.   iA.v\u20acSpOm}\u20acm-\n<\/p>\n
no.1 an\u00e9i the Subsequent  ‘\u00a3;\u00ab’1i1_’\u00a2b\u00bb_”f:’1en1bers of the
\nGamma P2111chay21j\u00a3i’1′:i@:VZ’:%Iec:;\ufb01_,ing  are iliegai and<\/p>\n
are liable I10 130 sf’:V\u00e9ivhsfcfti.4″~ff}’r:1A”sV::},s;.3()’rt”of his (j?om,\u20ac1’11i1’o1’1 1113}.<\/p>\n
1’eqL1i1’en1en”f'”0i7 Cie\u00e9igf’da1y:3″11oI.i\u00a2\u00e9”‘iS I11a1’1daL0ry, Counsel for<\/p>\n
tiller 1:)e1it:i()i1_e1″has pIVe1<.\u00a7e:i 'I"e_1i'ew;1'c:g}.: on the F11}! I'3cn(?h d<:Cjsi01'1 of<\/p>\n
this Court in 1[hg=r (rasc*'Q1"C.P'e:ttaswamy 8: Ors. vs. Smt. Prema 8:<\/p>\n
..–o;-s. A.f1\u20ac'.,19\u00a72  558… ….. <4 \u00ab<\/p>\n
S.A V ._f-,e2i1"n \u20acd.'VGiWc?rz1n1e111 Advocate res1's1.1'ng Ult'? (:0m.em:io11<\/p>\n
 canvass_ed  t:}je Counsel for the pei.it1'one1' has piaced 1'e}1'ancE:<\/p>\n
f "O'f1"I.}1\u20ac? dc:c}ivs_j{')r1s in the case ()i'Muni1-athnamma vs. The Assistant<\/p>\n
 4-Cbzxzzmis\ufb01ioner, Koiar Sub–Division and another, {LR 2007 KAR<\/p>\n
  Pi-111d M.Muniyappa vs. State of Karnataka,<\/a> 1999(4) KLJ 42.\n<\/p>\n
,_}’j\u00a211’f,\u00e9c:1.11a1*1y 1:0 e1Tnp11asi7,e the {’21cE’. that wI’1e1’1 the petif:2o1’1.er has<\/p>\n
lost. 1″1’1e c(mi’1’dC:’1Ce of I’m\u00bb. :1’1(?1nbe1’s 01′ the (31’a1’11z;1 PaI”1cI”1ay21I”.h<\/p>\n
WP 351346\/2()O9<\/p>\n
amd has been L.1:1sez~.1’\u00a3ed and new ;’\\cll’1yal:sha.1 in l’11’s5 }:3.’1’a.,ee is
\nelec1.eci. at his l’I'”1S\u00a5.E\u00a5.1’1(?C. this C0:,z.rt should not i1’1te;fl}:1*e”!;.(.>. .<'3el.<\/p>\n
aside the whole pl'O(T\u00a3'.SS z1lready clone.\n<\/p>\n
6. Upon hea.1’1’1’1g the leamed C0url_sel:i701f:I.l’1epa’1’1:*ieS”V2:-:1d”_11 1’ee0_rd’, i11e;il;1\u20ac;A.Vl”_ac:1s(\u00a7 and <\/p>\n
ci1’eu11’1st21nces of this case. I do    \u00a7)’1;\u00a7)pe’1′ to go
\ninto this legal (:ont.e:1l.i0r1’iligecl :.p\u00e9'(;i'(;iQn\u20ac,1.  regard 10
\nthe nlemdatiory m11.L:.1’e of   of the Rules
\nproviding for .15 {;:}.ee;1j:(Z’r.*f2zy:;.:A__ 11c:1l;i:ee “{T.()\u00a5l\\’\u20acI1if1.g the meeting
\nfor discussion?   The Full Bench
\nde(~.is:’011   ill{*3′<r()1'1li.'e\u00a7\u00e9(Vel Se('%1i()I1 47(3) el' the
\nK.\u00a31I'I1E?iT.E1li\u00e91:zZlllkl  l5$EIEI1('h\u00a31yE1l',l'1 Sam1i1.l1is. l\\\/l211'1d2.1l<\/p>\n
P2111el1aya'1.l1s anal l'\u20acya_\u00a7;\u00bb<_a l~',a1i'el\u00a72-1yat.l'1s Act, 1993 and Se(:i,i0n 49<\/p>\n
 [1':.eV_"}')'33%fL _(_;l1l'R\/\\()1."xi;t;\\..i….KE1I'I1E1ll&1lr(\u00a3-1 l~'anel1aya1".I*1 Raj Act, 1993.<\/p>\n
'('lQ\u20acS_l'1'(3.l'_ 1'\u00a23e1V1'~.:::t.'1\u00a3.(.\\'fv'ln_211t 11218 been stated in Section 47(3) requi3'ir1g<\/p>\n
the 'Ass~iSt'21rj.t–V7C0jei11'1'1issioner to give 15 c:lear clays notice for<\/p>\n
(:*on_sicie14a,(,id21 <3\u00a7'1.l'1e 11'1ee[.ir1g of no (.:0z:1l'id<-\u00e9nc.e motion. E—Iowever,<\/p>\n
 F"<ul.ie_$ l'1*2m1ed in exerdsc: of 1110 (leis.-;a__\u00a7a1t:e(:l power by the Slate<\/p>\n
 G({)ve–F_f.1"l11'ier1i. do Inake it elem' Lmder Rule 3(2) of the Rules that<\/p>\n
"l5'"d\u00e9ety'S rzolliee shall be glverl for ('r01'1sic.le1'a[ion of the l'1.1(JE'IlOI'"J of<\/p>\n
no Cc)r1lic.{eI'1(j:e._ The ei"l'e(:1 arld }'J:.:1'p01'l, of this Rule is reqL.;.:'red to<\/p>\n
Q"\n<\/p>\n
we 35345’\/:2.009
\n7<\/span><\/p>\n
be examined in an E-l]’)p1′()})I’i\u00a31t(‘;’. CTEISE’. VVh\u20ac’U’1C1′ the Rule
\np1’esc1’ii3es 1h1′:a11c.tIz=1t(.)ry 1’eqt.1i1’eme1’1I artd. w}1et’l’1e1′ vt11~’-of the<\/p>\n
same 1*esL1It.s in tmcE()i1’1g the erltire \u20acXC’I'(“?\u00a7SC’ u.1’1cie1’t2’1i~%._ei”1-.t’s3_th\u20ac<\/p>\n
111211.161′. which in my Cortsictereci view. requires to-fb’e. t~:t:3[‘)”t-‘i);3t?I”a’t <\/p>\n
to be decided in an ap}..)1’op1’iat,e (.?&1SC\u00bb.1!’1′ t’1’1\u00a7s ea’.\u20ac3’eV;?. V\u00e9’:ilI1:”. 115.1<\/p>\n
inclined to enter into the said it-zgal (T()f’1.’U'(:J’\\’:”(:3.1″(Sy as the nh1e:r_i’1bc\u00a71′-s.<\/p>\n
of the Gmma i~’anehayat”h 1″12,-we E-x;5t:(;ssc:d’their ho,CGzj’I’E.de11’ee in”<\/p>\n
the pe;t.1’tior1e.r and what’  more___\u00a7_1i’tf)_t)1″‘t.;111t is”‘th_;3t.V_Vt31’1ey have
\nelected at new Adhyztksha “tn.7h_is7._p}a\u00e9ee has taken over and
\nhas been t’ur1et.i01’1i1:g as s.m:*1v=..,:*N\u20ac:i.ther t:lj1:;j”1″te\\tr Adhyaksha is<\/p>\n
tttade pztrty to t’:_I’\ufb01_;3 ;);t(3(:\u00a3rcdi.:1g,. 11<)r_…;1Ei VtI'1e"t5t.VI1e1' members of the<\/p>\n
Gmtlta Pai..I1c%1h1_r.1.ya1t'Vh".;12Te"a1':*z1yed ~pa.1't,y-1'esp(mdent.s in the writ,<\/p>\n
petiticm.\n<\/p>\n
7. Itgjihs” the CO1VTt’,–{-‘,._IV1V11′()l1 of the Cotmsel for t.he pet.iti.0ner that<\/p>\n
  passed an order on 02.12.2009 making it”\n<\/p>\n
\u00a331623′ tha\ufb01  the z’11eeti1’1g to be held an 05. \u00a322009 will<\/p>\n
0′ he st.1I5je.(:t:,.__t’O -the resuitz of the w1″i’t pe.t,it’;i0I1. 1’ega:”d]ess of the<\/p>\n
“:7.E11,:\u00a53seqt;e1′;.’t.— .0 deveI0}:)me1’tt55. the ;:)eteit0i.o1’1er is e1’1t.it.1ed for<\/p>\n
40′(T_Qi’t’Std\u00bb\u20ac’1.i&t1.it)ft of the eo1’1t.e1’1ti0z1 mised by him artd vi0]at,io1’1 of<\/p>\n
‘”:v13(_j___\ufb0112mda.tn1’y pmeedttre p1’eseriI:2ecE has to be de<.:Ia1*etI as<\/p>\n
"–.i}E.e,ga] 1'esuIt.i:'1g in the requi1"en1e:1'\u00a3' of redoing; the same in<\/p>\n
\\VT' .'3:"534b' \/ 2003-}
\n9<\/span><\/p>\n
More (.)\\”t.’1′ 1E’1{).:1.. ‘FL’ <\/p>\n
lizwe been &1(‘,C()1’I1\u00a7)1i’:3\u00a7’1Cd in E5″? dz-Iv …….\n<\/p>\n
8. In t1’1\u20acs<: Ci1*C1,m"1s'Lar1(':<:'s. I am 11c:\u00bb'i: i11'C:'i'i.*1A_e.(-1' to;'i1.1f(:ri%3I'\u00e9'with<\/p>\n
the IIIE-1.1.161" at this stzlge as the no c:()I1i3d\u00e9::1<:e rnoE_-.\u00a7,of1~\u00e9:: c\u00e9a1':~=ieci*,<\/p>\n
t1'11'01.1gI"1 algainst t.l'1c1=. pe1,i':i:.)1'1er z11id_E\u00e9.1.ne\\.v Ad11y2-1}\u00a7:s11.\u00e9\u00a7:; i::\u00a7 \u00e91(%(_\u00e9Le(l<\/p>\n
in hiss place. 'I'he1'ef01'C. fa-%1'141]c)u,1V"\u00e9egxgljm\u00e9sixlg a.r.1y'*0pi11i01'1 wiih<\/p>\n
1"CgE1}"d to the legal c0':'1\u00a74e11t:iOi'1_[ {1'1'ger:?1' by .{'1":..\u20ac:"p\u00e91–it'i():1er. this writ'.
\npt':t.iti(.)n is disr1T1issc_c:1V\u00a7 <\/p>\n
%%%% 'V SUN 1
\nJudge<\/p>\n
'is<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Ramaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010 Author: B.S.Patil I W P 351346\/ 2809 IN ‘E’I”IIC I”-IIGI—1 COUR’F OF KARNATAKA AT I’31\\NGAl..ORI.Z DATEI) T HIS THE E 1″” DAY OF JANUARY. 2010 B FIFO R E ‘1’1\u00bbH\u00ab: E—-ION’BLI\u00a3 MR..;Us’1f1Ct\u00ab.:\u00a33.s.1I>A’rI1- .” WRIT PETITION No.35346\/2009 ” BETWEEN: RAMASVVAMY ANGAIDE. S\/O VEERAPPA. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nRamaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-29T05:23:57+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-29T05:23:57+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1660,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Ramaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-29T05:23:57+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-29T05:23:57+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-29T05:23:57+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010"},"wordCount":1660,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010","name":"Ramaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-29T05:23:57+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramaswamy-angadi-vs-the-assistant-commissioner-on-11-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramaswamy Angadi vs The Assistant Commissioner on 11 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36622"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36622\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}