{"id":3665,"date":"2010-08-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010"},"modified":"2018-02-22T12:42:19","modified_gmt":"2018-02-22T07:12:19","slug":"mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                   CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n               Appeal No. CIC\/PA\/A\/2009\/000011 dated 31-12-2009\n                 Right to Information Act 2005 - Section 19\n\nAppellant:            Shri Onkar Sharma\nRespondent:           High Court of Allahabad\n                                                      Appeal heard on 9.8.'10\n                                                Decision announced 11.8.'10\nFACTS<\/pre>\n<p>        By an application of 12-3-09 Shri Onkar Sharma of Dilshad Garden,<br \/>\nDelhi   applied to the CPIO, High Court of Allahabad seeking the following<br \/>\ninformation:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>        &#8220;I have lodged complaint against the Civil Judge\/ ASJ Smt.<br \/>\n        Veena Chaudhry vide my complaint dated 22.1.2009, a copy of<br \/>\n        which is enclosed. What the action has been taken so far may<br \/>\n        kindly be informed. Please also permit to give it to media.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>        To this he received a response from CPIO, Shri S. Farid Raza, Jt.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Registrar (E) High Court of Allahabad informing him as follows:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>        &#8220;Your application dated 14.3.2009, in which you have sought<br \/>\n        certain information under Right to Information Act, 2005, is not<br \/>\n        found in accordance with the Rule 20(a)(v) of Allahabad High<br \/>\n        Court (Right to Information) Rules, 2006 consequently it is<br \/>\n        rejected under the said Rule.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>        However, the Rule 20 (a) (v) of the Allahabad High Court (Right<br \/>\n        to Information) Rules, 2006 is stated as under:_<br \/>\n        Rule 20: Notwithstanding anything contained anywhere in these<br \/>\n                Rules, the applicant will be furnished with the information<br \/>\n                requested for if and only if\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                (a)   The furnishing of such information is:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                (v)   Not otherwise against any law or practice<br \/>\n                      prevailing in the material regard.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>        Aggrieved Shri Onkar Sharma moved an appeal before Registrar<br \/>\nGeneral, High Court of Allahabad , with the following plea:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>        &#8220;I have to say that I have applied under RTI Act, 2005 and not<br \/>\n        under any rule framed by any agencies. Act supersedes all the<br \/>\n        rules under constitutional framework.&#8221;\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>        Upon this Shri Dinesh Gupta, Registrar General ordered as follows:<br \/>\n          &#8220;It is clear that Hon&#8217;ble The Chief Justice has full power to<br \/>\n        frame rules under Right to Information Act and, therefore, it is<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        1<\/span><br \/>\n       wrong to say that the Act supersedes all the rules under the<br \/>\n      Constitutional frame work. The appellant has sought information<br \/>\n      about action taken against Smt. Beena Chaudhary, Civil Judge<br \/>\n      (ADJ Ghaziabad on the basis of his complaint dated 22.1.2008.<br \/>\n      It is against the provision of Rule 20 of the Allahabad High Court<br \/>\n      (Right to Information) Rules, 2006 to provide such information.<br \/>\n      Thus, the appeal carries no merit and therefore, Stands<br \/>\n      dismissed.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       This has brought Shri Sharma in his second appeal before us with the<br \/>\nfollowing prayer:\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;I request before you to pass an order directing the<br \/>\n       concerned Registrar General to supply the information<br \/>\n       about action taken on my complaint immediately. It will be<br \/>\n       in the interest of justice, mine and public. I am ready to<br \/>\n       appear in person also.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>      The appeal was heard through videoconference on 9-8-2010. The<br \/>\nfollowing are present.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Appellant<br \/>\n      Shri Onkar Sharma<br \/>\n      Respondent at NIC Studio Allahabad<br \/>\n      Shri G. K. Srivastava, Deputy Registrar, High Court Allahabad<\/p>\n<p>      Respondent CPIO Shri Girish Kumar Srivastava, Dy. Registrar<br \/>\nsubmitted that as per proviso to Section 8 (1) (f) information, which can be<br \/>\ndenied to Parliament or State Legislature, could be denied to any other<br \/>\nperson. In this context he cited Article 235 of the Constitution of India which<br \/>\nvests in the High Court control over subordinate courts. He then submitted<br \/>\nthat Rule 20 (5) has been made in exercise of the power of Chief Justice<br \/>\nunder the Constitution. As such disclosure could be in violation of Article 235.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Shri Onkar Sharma on the other hand submitted that if the information<br \/>\nhad to be refused as per the Constitution he should have been told as much.<br \/>\nHe agreed that the Constitution has overriding effect. However, in his view,<br \/>\nSection 20 (5) of the Allahabad High Court (Right to Information) Rules 2006<br \/>\ncannot override the law itself under which information can only be refused as<br \/>\nper Section 8 (1). Shri Onkar Sharma also submitted that this argument of the<br \/>\nConstitution has not been raised in refusing the information, he should now be<br \/>\ngiven an opportunity to contest the argument allowing him two days for the<br \/>\npurpose. We have accordingly received on 11.8.10 a fax letter from appellant<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                       2<\/span><br \/>\n dated 12.8.10.Shri Sharma has argued that should respondent now place<br \/>\nreliance on Art 235 it is &#8220;CPIO and others who should approach the<br \/>\nConstitution Bench, not I&#8221; Pleading that the CIC is not a forum to discuss<br \/>\nconstitutional issue citation of Art 235 was &#8220;irrelevant,&#8221; and information should<br \/>\nbe supplied to him.\n<\/p>\n<p>                               DECISION NOTICE<\/p>\n<p>       Article 235 of the Constitution of India states as follows:<br \/>\n       &#8220;235. Control over subordinate courts The control over district<br \/>\n       courts and courts subordinate thereto including the posting and<br \/>\n       promotion of, and the grant of leave to, persons belonging to the<br \/>\n       judicial service of a State and holding any post inferior to the post of<br \/>\n       district judge shall be vested in the High Court, but nothing in this<br \/>\n       article shall be construed as taking away from any such person any<br \/>\n       right of appeal which he may under the law regulating the<br \/>\n       conditions of his service or as authorising the High Court to deal<br \/>\n       with him otherwise than in accordance with the conditions of his<br \/>\n       service prescribed under such law.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>       There is nothing in this Article that would militate against disclosure of<br \/>\naction taken, if any, by the High Court. The Article allows only the High Court<br \/>\nto deal with District Courts and courts subordinate thereto in accordance with<br \/>\nthe conditions of service prescribed under the law. The question then arises<br \/>\nthat, is the information sought disclosable also under the RTI Act simply<br \/>\nbecause the authority to exercise the power of the Constitution of India is<br \/>\nvested in the High Court? Respondent Shri Srivastava has quoted from DO<br \/>\nNo CV 1295\/84 of 20.89.1984 addressed by the Vigilance Bureau to Govt of<br \/>\nUP asserting the exclusive authority of the Court under Article 235 &#8220;to look<br \/>\ninto such complaints and take action as deemed proper by it.&#8221; This stand<br \/>\ncannot be disputed. A copy of the letter received by e-mail has been placed<br \/>\non file. However, it does not follow that information regarding any action taken<br \/>\nin this regard is exempt from disclosure before Parliament or indeed to a<br \/>\ncitizen under the RTI Act. The RTI Act makes mandatory access to any<br \/>\ninformation which is held by or under the control of a public authority [Sec<br \/>\n2(j)], of which a High Court is one, save those public authorities outside the<br \/>\npale of the Act as per Sec 24(1), and with the exception of that information<br \/>\nthat is exempted from disclosure u\/s 8(1) and 9 of the Act. In this case, no<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                        3<\/span><br \/>\n such exemption has been cited which will apply, except the Proviso which is<br \/>\ninapplicable.\n<\/p>\n<p>       If on the other hand the High Court has established a practice of<br \/>\nrefusing such information which would justify recourse to Rule 20 (v), this<br \/>\npractice is clearly in violation of the law and the CPIO is hereby directed u\/s<br \/>\n19 (8) (a) (iv) to ensure necessary changes in this practice to bring the<br \/>\nmanagement of such records into compliance with the RTI Act 2005. CPIO<br \/>\nwill now provide the information sought to appellant Shri Omkar Sharma<br \/>\nwithin ten working days of the date of receipt of this Decision Notice, even if<br \/>\nno action has in fact been taken on his complaint. The appeal is therefore<br \/>\nallowed. However because we are satisfied that the information was refused<br \/>\nin good faith as per CPO&#8217;s understanding of the law, there will no costs<\/p>\n<p>       Reserved in the hearing, this Decision is announced in open chamber<br \/>\non this eleventh day of July 2010. Notice of this Decision be given free of cost<br \/>\nto the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Wajahat Habibullah)<br \/>\nChief Information Commissioner<br \/>\n11-8-2010<\/p>\n<p>Authenticated true copy. Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against<br \/>\napplication and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO<br \/>\nof this Commission.\n<\/p>\n<p>(Pankaj K.P. Shreyaskar)<br \/>\nJoint Registrar<br \/>\n11-8-2010<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                       4<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Appeal No. CIC\/PA\/A\/2009\/000011 dated 31-12-2009 Right to Information Act 2005 &#8211; Section 19 Appellant: Shri Onkar Sharma Respondent: High Court of Allahabad Appeal heard on 9.8.&#8217;10 Decision announced 11.8.&#8217;10 FACTS By an application of 12-3-09 Shri Onkar Sharma of [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-22T07:12:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-22T07:12:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1256,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-22T07:12:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-22T07:12:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-22T07:12:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010"},"wordCount":1256,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010","name":"Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-22T07:12:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-onkar-sharma-vs-high-court-on-11-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. Onkar Sharma vs High Court on 11 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3665"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3665\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}