{"id":36724,"date":"2009-08-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009"},"modified":"2018-04-06T03:25:00","modified_gmt":"2018-04-05T21:55:00","slug":"ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents &#8230; vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents &#8230; vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>C.W.P. No.19707 of 2006                                          -1-\n\n     IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                     CHANDIGARH\n\n                                               C.W.P. No.19707 of 2006\n                                            Date of decision:19.08.2009.\n\nM\/s Paramdeep Commission Agents and others                     ...Petitioners\n\n                                       Versus\n\nState of Punjab and others                                 ...Respondents\n\n\nCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASBIR SINGH\n\nPresent:     Mr. Arun Jain, Senior Advocate, with\n             Mr. Vishal Goel, Advocate, for the petitioners.\n\n             Mr. Anil Sharma, Additional Advocate General, Punjab,\n             for respondent Nos.1 and 2.\n\n             Mr. H.S.Riar, Senior Advocate, with\n             Mr. R.S.Cheema, Advocate, for respondent Nos.3 and 4.\n\n             Mr. Dharam Vir Sharma, Senior Advocate, with\n             Mr. Anupam Bhardwaj, Advocate,\n             Mr. Kanwaljit Singh, Senior Advocate, with\n             Mr. M.S.Kahlon, Advocate, and\n             Mr. B.R.Mahajan, Advocate,\n             for respondent Nos.5 to 205.\n                                   *****\n<\/pre>\n<p>JASBIR SINGH, J. (ORAL).\n<\/p>\n<p>             This writ petition has been filed with a prayer that action of<\/p>\n<p>the respondent authorities, in making allotment of plots to the<\/p>\n<p>selected\/chosen few, ignoring right of the petitioners and other similarly<\/p>\n<p>situated license holders, who were running their commission agent&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>shop at Bhagtanwala Mandi, District Amritsar, be set aside.            It was<\/p>\n<p>further prayed that auction of plots in            New Grain Market at<\/p>\n<p>Bhagtanwala Mandi, District Amritsar, conducted on 23\/24.11.2006 be<\/p>\n<p>quashed, being arbitrary, mala fide and in violation of Articles 14 and 19<\/p>\n<p>(i)(g) of the Constitution of India.\n<\/p>\n<p>             It is case of the petitioners that they are doing the business<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.W.P. No.19707 of 2006                                       -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of Commission Agents and are trading in agriculture produce in<\/p>\n<p>Bhagtanwala Mandi, District Amritsar. All the petitioners are license<\/p>\n<p>holders, issued to them under the provisions of the Punjab Agricultural<\/p>\n<p>Produce Markets Act, 1961, by the Market Committee, Amritsar. Plots<\/p>\n<p>in New Grain Market at Bhagtanwala Mandi, District Amritsar, which<\/p>\n<p>were put to auction, were not reserved for old licencees, rather those<\/p>\n<p>were to be allotted to the general public, as per norms.<\/p>\n<p>             It is an admitted fact that after the advertisement, plots<\/p>\n<p>were auctioned on 23\/24.11.2006 and, thereafter, on 14\/15.12.2006. It<\/p>\n<p>is primary grievance of the petitioners that the auction held on<\/p>\n<p>23\/24.11.2006 was not an open auction. In a very mala fide manner,<\/p>\n<p>selected\/chosen few persons were called inside the room, in batches,<\/p>\n<p>and, thereafter, plots were allotted to them, as per convenience of the<\/p>\n<p>authorities. Averments in this behalf have been made in paragraph<\/p>\n<p>No.12 of the writ petition, which reads thus: &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;12. That to the utter surprise of the petitioners no auction<\/p>\n<p>            was held on 23.11.2006 and a secret process continued on<\/p>\n<p>            23.11.2006 by calling chosen few in small groups.        The<\/p>\n<p>            respondent authorities may be directed to produce the<\/p>\n<p>            record relating to the allotments made on 23.11.2006 and<\/p>\n<p>            24.11.2006 as well.      Most of the persons including the<\/p>\n<p>            petitioners who were present in the auction were not even<\/p>\n<p>            called inside and, thus, they could not get chance to bid for<\/p>\n<p>            any site. As per information obtained by the petitioners as<\/p>\n<p>            many as 110 plots have been shown to have been<\/p>\n<p>            auctioned\/allotted on 23.11.2006.     In these 110 allottees<\/p>\n<p>            there are only 50 old licencees. Rest are outsiders. Even<\/p>\n<p>            the authorities have shown to have made licences on<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.W.P. No.19707 of 2006                                           -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>            23.11.2006 and 24.11.2006.         Thus, there is no rational<\/p>\n<p>            criteria.   The respondent authorities have again made a<\/p>\n<p>            complete go-by to the rules and regulations in the matter of<\/p>\n<p>            allotment\/auction of the plots.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            In their written statement, respondent Nos.3 and 4, in<\/p>\n<p>paragraph No.7 of the preliminary objections, have averred as under; &#8211;<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;7.   That the instant petitioners fully participated in the<\/p>\n<p>            auction conducted by respondents &#8211; Punjab Mandi Board.<\/p>\n<p>            In fact, prior to the filing of the instant writ petition, most of<\/p>\n<p>            the petitioners who were the successful bidders, and had<\/p>\n<p>            already purchased the plots in the auction have already<\/p>\n<p>            been issued letter of allotments qua their plots. The details<\/p>\n<p>            of the petitioners who have successfully purchased plots in<\/p>\n<p>            the auction conducted on 23.11.2006, i.e. prior to filing of<\/p>\n<p>            the instant writ petition is annexed as Annexure R-3, 4\/4.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            In reply on merits of paragraph No.12 of the writ petition, it<\/p>\n<p>was further stated as under: &#8211;\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>            &#8220;12. That the contents of Para No.12 are wrong and denied.<\/p>\n<p>            The auction process was conducted in a free, fair and<\/p>\n<p>            transparent manner. Most of the petitioners participated in<\/p>\n<p>            the auction and have even purchased plots and have also<\/p>\n<p>            been issued Allotment Letters qua their plots, even prior to<\/p>\n<p>            filing of this Writ Petition. The averments being made are<\/p>\n<p>            factually incorrect to prejudice the minds of this Hon&#8217;ble<\/p>\n<p>            Court.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>            On 26.11.2008, respondent Nos.3 and 4 took a specific<\/p>\n<p>stand that auction was open and the proceedings were video-graphed,<\/p>\n<p>on all the four occasions. Counsel for the respondents were directed to<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> C.W.P. No.19707 of 2006                                          -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>produce, in Court, recorded version of the auction proceedings, as<\/p>\n<p>stated by respondent Nos.3 and 4.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Today, in Court, Video Compact Disk (VCD), of the<\/p>\n<p>recorded version of the auction conducted on 23\/24.11.2006, has been<\/p>\n<p>produced and it was displayed on a laptop. It appears that the auction<\/p>\n<p>was conducted in a huge room, in which many officers and large<\/p>\n<p>number of the participants, may be more than 100, were present.<\/p>\n<p>             It is contention of the petitioners that they were not allowed<\/p>\n<p>to enter the room.\n<\/p>\n<p>             This contention has been specifically denied by the<\/p>\n<p>respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Such like disputed facts cannot be gone into by this Court<\/p>\n<p>while exercising jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the<\/p>\n<p>Constitution of India. From the facts available on file and after viewing<\/p>\n<p>at the recorded version of the auction, this Court is of the opinion that<\/p>\n<p>auction was conducted in an open manner and it was not in batches<\/p>\n<p>and in a closed room, as projected by the petitioners. So far as the<\/p>\n<p>price difference in the plots allotted is concerned, it is specifically noted<\/p>\n<p>in the proceedings of auction that the plots, which fetched less value on<\/p>\n<p>23.11.2006, are near to the garbage dump and are situated in the<\/p>\n<p>periphery of the Grain Market.      There is no allegation of mala fide,<\/p>\n<p>against any of the official respondents, in making the allotment.<\/p>\n<p>             In view of above, no case is made out for interference.<\/p>\n<p>Otherwise also, it has come on record that in the auction in dispute,<\/p>\n<p>plots were also allotted in favour of many of the petitioners.<\/p>\n<p>             Dismissed.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n\nAugust 19, 2009.                                       ( JASBIR SINGH )\nvinod *                                                        JUDGE\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court M\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents &#8230; vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009 C.W.P. No.19707 of 2006 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH C.W.P. No.19707 of 2006 Date of decision:19.08.2009. M\/s Paramdeep Commission Agents and others &#8230;Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others &#8230;Respondents CORAM: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-36724","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents ... vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents ... vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-05T21:55:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents &#8230; vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-05T21:55:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":933,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents ... vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-05T21:55:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents &#8230; vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents ... vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents ... vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-05T21:55:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents &#8230; vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-05T21:55:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009"},"wordCount":933,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009","name":"M\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents ... vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-05T21:55:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-paramdeep-commission-agents-vs-state-of-punjab-and-others-on-19-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Paramdeep Commission Agents &#8230; vs State Of Punjab And Others on 19 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36724","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=36724"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/36724\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=36724"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=36724"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=36724"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}