{"id":37011,"date":"2010-06-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010"},"modified":"2019-01-11T11:11:55","modified_gmt":"2019-01-11T05:41:55","slug":"k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010","title":{"rendered":"K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nCrl.Rev.Pet.No. 1185 of 2002()\n\n\n1. K. KOYA, S\/O. V.K. CHEKKUTTY,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. ABOOBACKER, S\/O. POOLATTAPARAMBIL\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.P.MUJEEB\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :16\/06\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n            M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,J.\n          ===========================\n            CRL.R.P.No.1185 &amp; 1186\n                      OF 2002\n          ===========================\n\n     Dated this the 16th day of June,2010\n\n\n                    ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>    Petitioner was convicted and sentenced for<\/p>\n<p>the offence under section 138 of Negotiable<\/p>\n<p>Instruments   Act     in    C.C.410\/1993    and<\/p>\n<p>C.C.70\/1994   by     Judicial    First    Class<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate&#8217;s Court, Parapanangadi.   Petitioner<\/p>\n<p>challenged the conviction and sentence before<\/p>\n<p>Sessions Court, Manjeri in Crl.A.4\/1996 and<\/p>\n<p>9\/1996.       Learned   Sessions    Judge    on<\/p>\n<p>reappreciation  of   evidence   confirmed   the<\/p>\n<p>conviction  and  sentence  and   dismissed  the<\/p>\n<p>appeals.  The revisions are filed challenging<\/p>\n<p>the conviction and sentence.  Crl.R.P.1185\/2002<\/p>\n<p>is  filed   challenging  the   conviction   and<\/p>\n<p>sentence  in  C.C.410\/1993   as  confirmed   in<\/p>\n<p>Crl.A.4\/1996.     Crl.R.P.1186\/2002  is   filed<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.1185 &amp; 1186 of 2002       2<\/p>\n<p>challenging           the    conviction  and   sentence   in<\/p>\n<p>C.C.70\/1994 as confirmed in Crl.A.9\/1996. First<\/p>\n<p>respondent contended that promising visa petitioner<\/p>\n<p>obtained        Rs.10,000\/-     and  towards  its  repayment<\/p>\n<p>issued       Ext.P1      and  P5  cheques  respectively  for<\/p>\n<p>Rs.6000\/-        and      Rs.4000\/-  drawn  in  his  account<\/p>\n<p>maintained in Pallikkal Service Co-operative Bank.<\/p>\n<p>When the cheques were presented for encashment,<\/p>\n<p>they were dishonoured under Exts.P2 and P6 memos<\/p>\n<p>for insufficient funds.            By Ext.P3  and P7 notices<\/p>\n<p>first respondent demanded the amount covered by the<\/p>\n<p>dishonoured          cheques.      Both  the  notices   were<\/p>\n<p>returned unclaimed and petitioner did not pay the<\/p>\n<p>amount.        Petitioner pleaded not guilty.        Learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate tried both the cases together and on the<\/p>\n<p>evidence of Pws1 and 2 and Exts.P1 to P8 found the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner guilty.            He was convicted and sentenced<\/p>\n<p>to simple imprisonment for one month each and a<\/p>\n<p>compensation             of    Rs.6000\/-    and    Rs.4000\/-<\/p>\n<p>respectively and in default simple imprisonment for<\/p>\n<p>one month each. The contention of the revision<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.1185 &amp; 1186 of 2002       3<\/p>\n<p>petitioner is that the courts below failed to take<\/p>\n<p>note of the fact that the notices demanding the<\/p>\n<p>amount covered by the dishonoured              cheques were<\/p>\n<p>returned unclaimed and the complaints were filed<\/p>\n<p>before the expiry of 15 days from the date of<\/p>\n<p>respective dates of intimation and therefore they<\/p>\n<p>are     premature         and on   that  sole  ground,   the<\/p>\n<p>conviction        is     to  be set  aside.     It  is  also<\/p>\n<p>contended that petitioner has not been properly<\/p>\n<p>questioned under section 313 of Code of Criminal<\/p>\n<p>Procedure.\n<\/p>\n<p>      2.     Ext.P4 is the original notice sent to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner and returned unclaimed.             Ext.P4 shows<\/p>\n<p>that the intimation was given to the petitioner on<\/p>\n<p>9.10.1993 and it was received on return by the<\/p>\n<p>first      respondent       on 15.10.1993.     Even  in  the<\/p>\n<p>revision, petitioner contended that the date of<\/p>\n<p>intimation namely 9.10.1993 is to be taken as the<\/p>\n<p>date of receipt of notice by the petitioner.             The<\/p>\n<p>case is that           if that be so, petitioner has 15 days<\/p>\n<p>time to pay that amount and excluding 9.10.1993 the<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.1185 &amp; 1186 of 2002        4<\/p>\n<p>15 days would expire on 24.10.1993.                But the<\/p>\n<p>complaint was filed on 22.10.1993 and therefore the<\/p>\n<p>complaint is premature. Learned Sessions Judge has<\/p>\n<p>considered this aspect in the proper perspective.<\/p>\n<p>Relying on the decision of the Apex Court in<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/doc\/504910\/\">Narsingh Das Tapadia v. Goverdhan Das Partani<\/a>          2000<\/p>\n<p>(3) KLT 605) it was held that the relevant date is<\/p>\n<p>the date of taking cognizance and not the date of<\/p>\n<p>filing       of   the      complaint.  If that be  so,  the<\/p>\n<p>cognizance was taken after the expiry of 15 days<\/p>\n<p>from the date of receipt of notice and therefore<\/p>\n<p>the      conviction         is      legal.    Similarly  in<\/p>\n<p>C.C.70\/1994.           Ext.P8 the original notice which was<\/p>\n<p>sent by the first respondent and returned back<\/p>\n<p>unclaimed         by     the   petitioner.  It  shows  that<\/p>\n<p>intimation          was     given   to  the  petitioner  on<\/p>\n<p>16.11.1993. Excluding that day, the fifteen            days<\/p>\n<p>would expire on 1.12.1993. The complaint was filed<\/p>\n<p>only on 2.12.1993. Though petitioner contended that<\/p>\n<p>the complaints are premature and therefore the<\/p>\n<p>conviction         is     illegal,  in   the light  of  the<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.1185 &amp; 1186 of 2002     5<\/p>\n<p>declaration of law by the Apex Court in Narsingh<\/p>\n<p>Das Tapadia&#8217;s case (supra) the submission can only<\/p>\n<p>be rejected.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3. Section 142 of Negotiable Instruments Act<\/p>\n<p>provides that notwithstanding anything contained in<\/p>\n<p>the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (a)no court<\/p>\n<p>shall take cognizance of any offence punishable<\/p>\n<p>under section 138 except upon a complaint, in<\/p>\n<p>writing, made by the payee or, as the case may be,<\/p>\n<p>the holder in due course of the cheque. (b) such<\/p>\n<p>complaint is made within one         month of the date on<\/p>\n<p>which the cause of action arises.           Clause (c) of<\/p>\n<p>the proviso to Section 138             provides that the<\/p>\n<p>drawer of such cheque         has to fail to make payment<\/p>\n<p>of the said amount of money to the payee or as the<\/p>\n<p>case may be, to the holder in due course of the<\/p>\n<p>cheque, within fifteen days of the receipt of the<\/p>\n<p>said notice. True, on receipt of the notice under<\/p>\n<p>section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act the<\/p>\n<p>drawer has 15 days time to pay that amount.        As far<\/p>\n<p>as the complaint is concerned, he has to file the<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.1185 &amp; 1186 of 2002      6<\/p>\n<p>complaint before the expiry of thirty days from the<\/p>\n<p>date of receipt of the notice.         As declared by the<\/p>\n<p>Apex      Court      filing  of  a  complaint and   taking<\/p>\n<p>cognizance are two different and distinct aspects.<\/p>\n<p>In C.C. 410\/1993 though the complaint was filed on<\/p>\n<p>22.10.1993 and fifteen            days from the date of<\/p>\n<p>receipt of notice would expire only on 24.10.1993,<\/p>\n<p>learned Magistrate has taken cognizance only on<\/p>\n<p>2.12.1993.              So  also  in C.C.70\/1994   learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate has taken cognizance of the offence only<\/p>\n<p>on 7.2.1994 though the complaint was filed on<\/p>\n<p>2.12.1993. In both the cases         cognizance were taken<\/p>\n<p>much after the expiry of 15 days in both the cases.<\/p>\n<p>In such circumstances, conviction of the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>for the offence under section 138 of Negotiable<\/p>\n<p>Instruments Act in both the cases is perfectly<\/p>\n<p>legal.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4. Then        the only question is regarding the<\/p>\n<p>sentence.          The amount covered by Ext.P1 and P5<\/p>\n<p>cheques together is Rs.10,000\/-. Learned Magistrate<\/p>\n<p>awarded a compensation of Rs.6000\/- and Rs.4000\/-<\/p>\n<p>Crl.R.P.1185 &amp; 1186 of 2002       7<\/p>\n<p>respectively with a default sentence of simple<\/p>\n<p>imprisonment for one month.           The calendar judgment<\/p>\n<p>in C.C.410\/1993 shows that petitioner was arrested<\/p>\n<p>on     21.9.1995          and was  released  on   bail   on<\/p>\n<p>23.9.1995.Records also shows that subsequent to the<\/p>\n<p>conviction also petitioner was in custody.          In such<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, interest of justice will be met, if<\/p>\n<p>the substantive sentence is modified to the period<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has already in undergone          in these cases<\/p>\n<p>and confirming the compensation with the            default<\/p>\n<p>sentence.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Revisions are allowed in part. While confirming<\/p>\n<p>the conviction as well as the compensation and the<\/p>\n<p>default       sentence,      the  substantive sentence   is<\/p>\n<p>modified        to     the  period petitioner  has  already<\/p>\n<p>undergone.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                       M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR<br \/>\n                                                JUDGE<br \/>\ntpl\/-\n<\/p>\n<p>M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>     &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>  Crl.R.P.NOs.1185 &amp; 1186<br \/>\n           of 2002\n<\/p>\n<p>     &#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>           ORDER<\/p>\n<p>       16th June,2010<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 1185 of 2002() 1. K. KOYA, S\/O. V.K. CHEKKUTTY, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. ABOOBACKER, S\/O. POOLATTAPARAMBIL &#8230; Respondent 2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY For Petitioner :SRI.K.P.MUJEEB For Respondent :SRI.S.V.BALAKRISHNA IYER (SR.) The Hon&#8217;ble MR. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37011","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-11T05:41:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-11T05:41:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1078,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010\",\"name\":\"K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-11T05:41:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-11T05:41:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-11T05:41:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010"},"wordCount":1078,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010","name":"K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-11T05:41:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-koya-vs-aboobacker-on-16-june-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K. Koya vs Aboobacker on 16 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37011","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37011"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37011\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37011"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37011"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37011"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}