{"id":37369,"date":"2008-06-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008"},"modified":"2017-07-20T11:21:30","modified_gmt":"2017-07-20T05:51:30","slug":"r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"R Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
R Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.Ramanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH mum op KARNATAKA AT   5  \u00e9 *\n\nDATED mus THE 1013 DAY 03>'    \n\nBEFORE A Q V\nTHE H{)N'BLE MR.JUS'\u00a7'E\u00a7\u00a7E. \n\nCRIMINAL APPEAL N_Qs.37 we  \n\n39   \n\n \n\nR DEENA 4    \n\nS\/0 LATE C   \" ' ._\n\nAGED    * V\n\nR,\/Q NO.237'0,  _  _\n\n'A5 BLOCK, Ii STAGE.  ' -\n\nBANGALORE5\ufb010\u00ab.OI0-   T' ~ ,\u00bb   APPELIANNS)\n *  [COMMON IN ALL\n\nTHE APPEALS!\n\n ray    ,a;M\u00a7.s. s NAGARAJA. ADV. )\n\n' as\/0 SQUNDARMMQE\n\nAGED A\ufb02oat? \u00e9sfmaars,\n\n_  . '_ _w\u00ab:._>s2mNcms mam:\n.x \ufb01;A\ufb01e5Fa&i3A3\u00a3R;\n an:*.~4so:\u00ab:..TowN BRANCH\n'BANGALGRE  RESPONDENII8}\n\n(common IN ALL\nTHE APPEALS)\n\nT  (By '$311'\/Smt : c a mum, ADV. FOR R1--SD,AI)V.)\n\niiiiii\n\nTHESE CRL-.As. ARE FILED U\/S. 378 CR.P.C BY THE\nA\u00a3)VOC.A'I'E FOR THE APPELLANT PRAYING THAT 'l'HiS HONBLE\n\n \n\n \n\n\n\n42:-\n\ncoum' MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE 0129159 13:3':-~._\nACQUITTAL PASSED BY THE xxx ADDL. C.M.M., BANGa..~Lo.RE'__'_:-\u00a7:~ ' \nCC.NO. 31175\/2002 {IN CRL.A.NO.3'?'\/05), ocNo.31':4'fi6\/Voz\u00e9f\u00e9re   4_\nCRL.A.N0.38\/05), oc m.:m77\/02 (IN (;\u00a72L.A.No;39,\u00e9[o_5;\"'~AN:) \"  'V\ncc.No.31178\/02 an CRL.A.NO.40\/053   T_ \nTHE RESPONDEN\"I'--ACCUSED FOR THE OF'FfE\u00a7!(3i\u00a7 P\/'U; s... 13:8\n\nNJ. ACT.\n\nTHESE APPEALS comm  H_EARiNG_  DAY,\n\n  are same in an\nthe four    c  and in older\n\n\u00a7o avoid  and law, the appeals are 1%\n\n   disposed of by a (roman judwmt\n\n  four appeals are \ufb01led by an\n\n \" __;1:3\u00a711cces'.'4\" cm  plainant questlomn' ' g the 1cgal1ty' mid\n\n the order of acquitm} passed by the 19\"'\n\ni'%%i%%'VjLk%Add1;'% \u00a2\u00a7M.M. Bangalore, in C.C.Nos.3lI75\/2002 to\n\nV '   ~  A31L;\u00a73\/2002.\n\n3. The case of the appellant is that the mspondant\nborrmved a sum of Rs.1,55,000\/--~ on 10\/\u00a31\/1999 and\n\n1'; ' \/f\n\n\n \n\n\n\npromised to repay the said hand loan within one yea?\n\nto pay 'mte1r*e-st at 24% p.23. The   \n\nrespondent demanded for    .<\/pre>\n
and since tlm respondent wasV.;:1t:st_ i1:1′ ‘a.  <\/p>\n
the entire loml, he    i.e.,\n\nLML Vespa    and\nYamaha       for\n<\/pre>\n
Rs.6{),0(){t_\/-  of the loan amount of
\nRs.l,55,0t)’t}f-1″  pay the balance of<\/p>\n
_Rs.95,'()_\u00a3’)0\/Ae   months. Again when the<\/p>\n
   for money, reepondent iwued four<\/p>\n
 -. When the said cheques were<\/p>\n
H  bank it was dishonoumd as ‘funds<\/p>\n
  account clomd’. Thexefam, a notice came<\/p>\n
   to the respondent demanding repayment of<\/p>\n
  amount, but inspite of serv1ce’ of notaec,’<\/p>\n
 ‘fespondcnt did not repay the mnotmt. Thcrc\ufb01m, cases<\/p>\n
came to be \ufb01led by the appellant agjnst the respondent<\/p>\n
for the offence punishable under Sectien \u00a338 at’<\/p>\n
Negotiable Instruments Act.<\/p>\n
4. The trial Court after takilg <\/p>\n
summons to the respondent <\/p>\n
summons, the respondent appeafed   ‘V  *’<\/p>\n
in an the four cases    of the
\ncomplaint 1:;  Q; .  the appellant
\nexamined   the docummats
\nE’:xs.P.l    the argmnents and after<\/p>\n
perusal of   ma’ 1 Court cnterta1ned’ a<\/p>\n
_doubt ” gaLbu:1t   of the cheque for lcw\ufb02y<\/p>\n
 and dismissed the complaint and<\/p>\n
    for an o\ufb02imoe<\/p>\n
   Sectistm 138 of the Negotiable<\/p>\n
 Act. A@’i\u20acved by the said ouzlcr, the<\/p>\n
  filed these four appeals praying’ to set made’ the<\/p>\n
 ‘  “e$ifd\u00e9i’cfaoquittai mssed by the trial Court.<\/p>\n
5. Heard the arguments of the learnad counsel for<\/p>\n
theappellant.Evcnthoughnotioehasbeense1vedcnthe<\/p>\n
 %    were not issued to the<\/p>\n
V k 2   and no documentary evidence 1%
\n.4 .  j,   ‘(Sn record that thaw cheques were issued an
\n V ‘ r:;mj’:  Mere \ufb01ling of a\ufb01dav\ufb01 by way of an cadence’<\/p>\n
 sumcient to hold that the respondent has rcbutted<\/p>\n
respondent in all the appeals, he <\/p>\n
5. It is argued by the  1″\u00ab:ih:ii:$ejj:”f:\u00a7iV:i”t!;\u00e9\u00bb1..jA<\/p>\n
appe- Kant that the trial Court nit’  -vi %<\/p>\n
the evidence in mcondjng its
\nR.W.l himself has admitted \ufb01e
\nwhich were  given to
\nthe appellant  -\u00a39  itself is an
\nadmission.  L   to have mkcn this
\naspact into   to have comr1cted’ the
\nappengnt bugraaed ;:o”d\u00a7_:@o  thereby wrongly anaxymd<\/p>\n
  is argued that the burden sf pmof<\/p>\n
the prvwump\ufb01on avaiiable  favour of the appelimn.<\/p>\n
! \/”E<\/p>\n
Therefore, the bmtlen lies on the  re’   \u00bb <\/p>\n
prove that he has not borrowed  <\/p>\n
appellant and the cheques were  to    u<\/p>\n
been misused by the appellant %eet\u00a7e1\u00a2 a
\nTherefore, the trial     ‘ng the
\nevidence and has Acome t:.\\..:e::wpervex’s:c.   in holding
\nthat the cneqggg   but not to this
\nappellant’ “””  2     <\/p>\n
7.  arguments of the learned
\ncounsel    J\ufb01all these cases and a\ufb01er<\/p>\n
gar  evidence we on ed, the<\/p>\n
   egg-gse-3.’: , _ for my considcrattbn and decision is<\/p>\n
 and order of acquittal pawed by the<\/p>\n
 ma:  pw  arse, Incorrect’ and illegal?<\/p>\n
 ”  T\ufb01c defence taken by the respondent during’ the<\/p>\n
 tit?   he had a l1I’$lSaCtIO1]’ with’ one Kamaraj Wm is<\/p>\n
  eier and brother of the appellant, that he walled’<\/p>\n
  of Rs.95,ooo\/– from the sax!’ Icamamj and issued’<\/p>\n
cheques in question in favour ofthe said Kamrag during<\/p>\n
5%<\/p>\n
,.\u00bb~’<\/p>\n
amount that the two vehicles 3  <\/p>\n
bearing Regn.No.KA 03     <\/span><\/p>\n
beating Regn.No.KA 04 W  to the
\nsaid Kamaraj towards  \u00abaim   the
\nappellant \ufb01led the falqgg.   course, a
\ns%tion wag’     V’  jlant that he Ind
\nissued 4   and the<\/p>\n
same  next question aw. 1 has<\/p>\n
  it    that the 4 chques wane<\/p>\n
  __  the  ‘ on that Kamaraj<\/p>\n
   \u00a7 b1m1′ 1: cbequm apart mu: 2 winches’ , R ‘m for
\n  to mine his own bmther whc\ufb02xcr<\/p>\n
  the respondent and the mid Kmaraj. The
\n Qi-cspoudent cammt be called to mine Kamaraj. Since<\/p>\n
thesa1dKamaraj1mppcnstohethebmthc1’oi’thc<\/p>\n
appallant, he may not support the respondent.   <\/p>\n
mspomdent was due in a sum of Rs.$}5;,OI30_(  <\/p>\n
balance amount of hand loan,   <\/p>\n
taken cheques for Rs.95,000\/~
\ni.c., Rs.50,000\/~. ‘I’tn:x’e
\nby the appellant as to  for the
\nlesser amount     due in a
\nsum of  dispute with read
\nto the    The respondent
\nhas not  to  by the appelhnt and<\/p>\n
 is ngtgjagm. mg.’    the cheques mm by an<\/p>\n
xaespmk   %  at the appellant but not in favour<\/p>\n
  is none oma imn the bmmcr ofthe<\/p>\n
   d’ the rwpondent haein clearly<\/p>\n
 A .*.c___s  he himself has clawed all the installmzta<\/p>\n
J  mmpaamm If really the xmmm: had borrowed<\/p>\n
oomsion fertlierespolxderxttohsndcsrerhistwovelliclcs<\/p>\n
  139 of the Act is available for
\n  i when MMMMM & the respondent] accused ms<\/p>\n
  to prove his case. Non<\/p>\n
   of the bmthcr of me appellant and non
\n  of my document for lending amount no the<\/p>\n
_ V   and non o\ufb01ering any xwnahde explanation’
\n respondent to hand over his two vehizlm to the<\/p>\n
to me another ofthc accused, in part   &
\namount. The fact that   AV
\nvehicles to the brother of
\nadmitted by the appellant.  –a%%m ‘km; ,3; the
\nprestmlption ava\ufb02gbic    but the
\nappellant has    to prove his<\/p>\n
case.    analyzed and
\napprecxm  record. In a case
\nunder  mmmcm Act,<\/p>\n
brothszr of the appellant and further mm o\ufb01ering any<\/p>\n
M M\u00bb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court R Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008 Author: K.Ramanna IN THE HIGH mum op KARNATAKA AT 5 \u00e9 * DATED mus THE 1013 DAY 03>’ BEFORE A Q V THE H{)N’BLE MR.JUS’\u00a7’E\u00a7\u00a7E. CRIMINAL APPEAL N_Qs.37 we 39 R DEENA 4 S\/0 LATE C ” ‘ ._ AGED * V […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37369","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nR Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-07-20T05:51:30+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"R Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-20T05:51:30+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":797,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008\",\"name\":\"R Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-07-20T05:51:30+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"R Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-07-20T05:51:30+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"R Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-20T05:51:30+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008"},"wordCount":797,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008","name":"R Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-07-20T05:51:30+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-deena-vs-c-s-kumar-on-10-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R Deena vs C S Kumar on 10 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37369","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37369"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37369\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37369"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37369"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37369"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}