{"id":37385,"date":"2009-09-09T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-09-08T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009"},"modified":"2016-03-04T09:16:16","modified_gmt":"2016-03-04T03:46:16","slug":"the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009","title":{"rendered":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD\n\nDATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE.JA.,S_.BO?ANNRL  A\n\nMFA No.261.7\/2OOS\"~T_\nMFA CROB No.73\n\n\"\/2oo9.C*Cf  \n\nIN MFA NO2617\/2008\n\nBETWEEN\n\nTHE DEVESIONAL\u00ab.._M*ANAG1\u00a3-R,'-~_V  \nDIVISIONAL O.F'f\u00a5'I.C;E, \"   .f  ..  \nNORTH VIESTTTKTAARNATAKA.ROAEv--T'RANSPORT\nCORPORATION;AEVE,LOALIM.p1v:S1ON,\nBELOAUM,  ' ' A   \"\nOWNER AND INSURER OENWKRTC BUS\nNO.KA--2_3\/F~253',V A A ' \"\n\n  THRO#L;jG1L1A,THE 'CHIEF LAW OFFICER.\n\n**** ~ . . . APPELLANT\n\nV.'(BY.:.VS'r'21.1K,_'I\\IAC\u00a7}xRAJA, ADVOCATE.)\n\n'SVR1.1RANNA RCUDRAPPA BAGEWADI\n\n\" \" ':4fA(3-ED ABOUT 27 YEARS,\n A OCC; POWER LOOM BUSINESS,\nRESTEINC AT H.NO.81, MARGAMBA GALLI,\n\n  _.__\"\"i{H\u00a3:SE3AG~BELGAUM.\n\n RESPONDENT\n\n   \"(BY SRLSANJAY S. KATAGERI, ADVOCATE.)\n\n$\n\nI'\nQ'\n\n\n\nTHIS MFA IS FILED U\/S 173(1) OF MV ACT\nAGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD \n22\/O2\/2007 PASSED IN MVC NO2506\/2004 ON.'\n\nFILE OF I ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR,HDN'.')---Oj'&amp;:v..\nADDITIONAL NIACT, BELGAUM, AWAR}_Z\u00e9_ING..'_'V*-----._\nCOMPENSATION OF RS.1,84,324\/-- WITH INTEREST @  \n6% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TI'L;L\"PI'\\.SI'~M'E.NT_.  \n\nIN MFA CROB N0.'733\/2009 _\nBETWEEN\nIRANNA RUDRAPPA EAGEwA_D'I \" I\nAGED ABOUT 28 YEARS'-,-- AI   \nOCC: POWER LOOM BUSINESS,' I _\nR\/O. H.NO.81, MAR__GA1\\,=i\"BA- GALL_I,__ I\nKHASBAG--BELsGA\u00a7IIM.     \"\n\n..   I ' . ...PETI'I'IONER.\n\n(BY SEI.SIoINIJAy\"' IS:O;1'1}\u00a7A\"f-A.GER1; --ADVIOCATE.)\n\nAND\n\nTHE D;1'v'ISIONAI, MANAGER,\n\n \" '~D_IVIS_I'\u20ac)NALA  .\n NORTH WEST.KARNATAKA ROAD TRANSPORT\n'COAI:2I\u00bb'ORAI'ION,' IBELGAUM DIVISION,\n\n  '(BY SRl';fI.'R.BENTUR, ADVOCATE.)\n\n]3EL'G_A.U\"MZ\"_..V_ \n\n RESPONDENT\n\n MFA CROB IS FILED U\/O 41 RULE 22 OF\n\nI  R\/W SEC.173(1) OF MV ACT 1988 AGAINST THE\n KJUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 22\/O2\/2007 PASSED\n IN 1\\\/IVC NO.2SOe\/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE I\n\nADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN.) 85 ADDITIONAL\n\nI\n\n'1'\n\n\n\n4_ . Vawardeicd. \n\nMACT, BELGAUM, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF\nRS.1,84,324\/-- AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF\nCOMPENSATION. '\n\nTHESE MFA AND CROSS OBJECTIONS ARE\nCOMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT\nDELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:\n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>The appellant corporation  .in&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>question the judgment and awatd I<\/p>\n<p>passed in NEVC N02506 \/ 200\/\u00a5_in_V so lfarllas tlie&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>of compensation awarded by th4e&#8221;&#8216;-Tribunal&#8217;.  cross<\/p>\n<p>objections fi&#8211;ledVlbj?.&#8217;the ol&#8217;aiiumant\u00a7, the claimant is seeking<\/p>\n<p>further enhianclementl &#8216;amount as against the sum<\/p>\n<p>  as  the question of quantum arises, both in<\/p>\n<p>  the  the cross objections the contentions<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8216;ti.-Ti.&#8221;V&#8221;\u00ab.urged in  appeal are to be considered at the outset.<\/p>\n<p> The learned counsel for appeliant contended<\/p>\n<p> the Tribune} was not justified in awarding the<\/p>\n<p>medical expenses as done by it in the absence of<\/p>\n<p>J<\/p>\n<p>4&#8217;:\n<\/p>\n<p>claimant was in&#8211;patient for a period of 39 days. in<\/p>\n<p>respect of the expenses incurred towards the said<\/p>\n<p>treatment the medical bills have been produced <\/p>\n<p>same are marked as Ex.P.10. Consolidated <\/p>\n<p>bills indicates of the total expenses.i\u00bbneurre.d  <\/p>\n<p>of Rs.~&#8217;~ll,692=44. Therefore when.&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>undergone treatment as an  for  a<br \/>\nmonth and the bills  been<br \/>\nproduced, the arnouflt   the actual<br \/>\nbills cannot be     <\/p>\n<p>6)  as reckoned by<br \/>\nthe Tribu&#8221;nal,:_ injuries and the disability<\/p>\n<p>thereafter isllirxdicated Afrorniwhat has been noticed above.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;The who hadv-been examined as PW.2 before the<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;haslvistated the physical disability alnounting to<\/p>\n<p>&#8212;  mlilaeeeee&#8211;;lef the left lower limb and 15% to the left<\/p>\n<p> doubt the disability with regard to the whole<\/p>\n<p>   been indicated. However taking into<\/p>\n<p>  .consideration the injuries suffered and the avocation of<\/p>\n<p> the claimant, the disability assessed by the Tribunal at<\/p>\n<p>J<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;0<\/p>\n<p>17% cannot be considered as excessive. Therefore even<br \/>\non that ground the same does not call for interference<br \/>\nand the compensation in any event does not call for<\/p>\n<p>reduction.\n<\/p>\n<p>7&#8242;) In this background the enhancemeagt..soi;ig:}1;t:V&#8221; <\/p>\n<p>by filing the cross objection requires to be c_onysidered,i&#8217;4_lnii <\/p>\n<p>so far as the other heads as already no_ticed&#8217;,__<\/p>\n<p>appropriate. The only question iivvhich  <\/p>\n<p>consideration is with regard to theiiiloss oi;-future income<br \/>\nin relation to the dis.aL\u00a7ilit;v.  &#8221; _ regard While<\/p>\n<p>calc&#8217;ula\u00a5;ingi&#8211;th &#8216;  ath&#8211;e..Tri&#8217;ounal has reckoned<br \/>\nthe dailyiincome:o1;:&#8221;thie\u00bbVinjur*ed&#8217;at Rs.80\/&#8211; per day. The<\/p>\n<p>claimant contended -that\u00bb. heiwas a loorn operator and the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;ac_cid=3:n&#8217;t occu&#8217;r1*e.d\u00ab\u00abon 11-10-2004 and as such the<\/p>\n<p>iisaiirn  day reckoned is on the lower side.<\/p>\n<p>    made by the claimant that he was<\/p>\n<p>i&#8221;~..\u00ab.._ea,rnirzg&#8221;Rs.6,000\/&#8211; cannot be accepted, however a<\/p>\n<p>  of 123.100\/&#8211; per day is to be reckoned and if<\/p>\n<p>H &#8216;iii&#8221;&#8216;-i.the__5monthly income is taken at Rs.3,000\/&#8211; and if the<\/p>\n<p> parameter with regard to the disability and<\/p>\n<p>J<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;E<\/p>\n<p>multiplier as reckoned by the Tribunal is taken into<br \/>\nconsideration, the compensation towards 17% disability<\/p>\n<p>would be in a sum of Rs.1,04,040\/&#8211; since the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>has already awarded a sum of Rs.83,232\/&#8211;, the clai:n.ai1t<\/p>\n<p>would be entitled to the difference. The enhanced&#8221;&#8216;po.rm&#8217;.,or1:_.V  H<\/p>\n<p>of the amount is payable with interest at the&#8217; it <\/p>\n<p>as awarded by the Tribunal. The e:n4ha;r1eeid <\/p>\n<p>interest shall be deposited  the Corporation a<\/p>\n<p>period of six Weeks from the date_reoeipt&#8217; of.the_E:opy of<\/p>\n<p>this order.\n<\/p>\n<p>8) &#8216;&#8211;.abl0&#8217;ve,&#8230;.the appeal and the<\/p>\n<p>cross ob}eot_ions of. No order as to costs.<\/p>\n<p>9)  ~ T he listatutory.ll&#8217;arnount deposited in this Court<\/p>\n<p> pfaii sin&#8217;ittetd._to thellllribunal.<br \/>\nIUDGE<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, BEFORE THE HON&#8217; BLE MR. JUSTICE.JA.,S_.BO?ANNRL A MFA No.261.7\/2OOS&#8221;~T_ MFA CROB No.73 &#8220;\/2oo9.C*Cf IN MFA NO2617\/2008 BETWEEN THE DEVESIONAL\u00ab.._M*ANAG1\u00a3-R,&#8217;-~_V DIVISIONAL O.F&#8217;f\u00a5&#8217;I.C;E, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37385","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-03-04T03:46:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-04T03:46:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009\"},\"wordCount\":570,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009\",\"name\":\"The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-03-04T03:46:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-03-04T03:46:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009","datePublished":"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-04T03:46:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009"},"wordCount":570,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009","name":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-09-08T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-03-04T03:46:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-divisional-controller-vs-sri-iranna-rudrappa-bagewadi-on-9-september-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Divisional Controller vs Sri Iranna Rudrappa Bagewadi on 9 September, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37385","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37385"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37385\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37385"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37385"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37385"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}