{"id":376,"date":"2008-06-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008"},"modified":"2015-05-12T02:11:25","modified_gmt":"2015-05-11T20:41:25","slug":"sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: R.B.Naik<\/div>\n<pre>m mm HIGH sound' or KARNATAKA, BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 26?\" DAY 09 JUNE zoeajj\nBEFORE   \n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE    \nCRIMINAL REVISION P_\u00a3_3'FfP;QN NQ;\u00ab2*L*5\u00a7f.(\u00a7F:'2_Q{36 ' \u00bb \n\nBETWEEN\n\nSri.Gopa1akrishna '\n\nAged about 51 years, _\n\nS\/o I{.N.Kamath,  \" _\nVajra Sccuritim 8: Inv\u00a2snncm'~.a,.A  \"_\nMangalom-575 001. ' V \"       : Petitioner\n\n(By sn. Ptmdikai \n\nsmt.ch1t:~a1&lt;a1a&#039; A  . P\u00a7a%hhs\u00a7:\u00a7A%;%% \nAged _about~53&#039;vy\u00a2ars,;~--._ V &quot;\nW\/o;&#039;M.A.Prabh1;,&#039;\n\n &#039;~    ..... .. N\n \n\n: Respondcnt\n\n  Advocate)\n\n   Criminal Revision Petition is \ufb01lm under Section\n V&#039;39&#039;?&#039;..4_Cr.P.C praying to set aside the Judment and order of\n\n  fill Additional Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada\n  M-&#039;.a\ufb02\u00e9a1o1&#039;e in Cr1.A.No.3l9\/2004 Dated 2&#039;2-9-2006 and\n _MJ_11dg1I1ent and order of the JMFCA? Court, Mangalore in\n&quot; C.C.No. 196\/ 2003 Dated 9-9-2004.\n\nX \u00a2LK\\A\u00a3!.,;-\u00abPL-M\n\n\n\nThis petitionmmlngosnforhmnim. thisdaythccourt,\nmade the following: &#039; \nO 3 __B_ E Q\n\nThe pc1:itioncr\/ accused is convicted __ if\n\npunishable under Section 138Mof  \n\nsentenced to undergo S.I for    5\n\ndirected to pay compensat\u00a7f\u00a7n..  \nmonths in default to _   an order of\nconviction and   &quot; passed by the\n\nJMFC, Mangalgrg in   said order of\n\nconvictian  &quot;is\u00ab~mi\u00a3.1fn&#039;mcd by judment dated\n22-9-2005    11: Additional smions Judge,\n in Cr1.A.No.3 19\/2004.\n\n  \u00ab   was  Managing Direachor\n\n    &amp; Investments Pvt.Ltd., and for the\n\n &#039; he borrowed a sum of Rs.3,50,000\/-s\n\nmam &#039;respondent complainant. Towards thcdischaree or<\/pre>\n<p>%    he imuod mm cheques; ctmue bearing No.<br \/>\n ..9\u00a7O138 for a sum of Rs.1,00,000\/-; cheque bwring No.<br \/>\n &#8221;  930139 for a sum of Rs. 1,50,000\/- and cheque bearing No.<\/p>\n<p>\\<\/p>\n<p>)&#8217;L,Qmo.&gt;~U~&#8212;-\n<\/p>\n<p>A &#8221; if  H &#8221; respondent] ooxI1pIaJI1an&#8217; 1:.<\/p>\n<p>930140 for a sum of Rs.1,G0,000\/-. Exs.P.1 to R3 are the<br \/>\nchequw issued by the petitioner\/aecusw. The <\/p>\n<p>on presentation were returned with   <\/p>\n<p>bankers as &#8220;stop Daylllent&#8221;. Exs.P.4 to  <\/p>\n<p>memo. On return of the   <\/p>\n<p>issued a legal notice as p\u20ac:1&#8243;-  %tma\u00a7\u00a7ke<br \/>\ngood the money covered  the  For having<br \/>\nserved notice Ex.P.8 Eg,P.3(a) is the sigxature<br \/>\nof the peti\ufb01oner\/aecueeti mag reply has<br \/>\nbeen   In the reply he has<br \/>\ncontetiticd   &#8221; were forcibly taken for beixm<\/p>\n<p>retained  net for presentation to get them<\/p>\n<p>    frxat&#8230;ir: the that legatti he had also lodged a<br \/>\n That the respondent\/complainant has got<\/p>\n<p>   manager and got marked Exs.P.9 and 13.10,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;eeopies ef;.letiger extracts. Ex.P.12 is the complaint lodged by<\/p>\n<p>Itisthecascofthc<\/p>\n<p>_    re\u00e9spondent\/complainant that the petitiona&#8217;\/accused while<br \/>\n \u00bb.  taking the lean had askedfor self cheques and aeoordingty<\/p>\n<p>were drawn by the<br \/>\nQ .Q:.~.\u00abu:~1\/&#8211;~&#8211;\n<\/p>\n<p>Exs.P- 13 to P16<\/p>\n<p>respondent] complainant and handed over the same: to the<br \/>\npetitioncr\/accusad hcnein and the cheques  to<\/p>\n<p>bank for cnmhament by a   <\/p>\n<p>respondent\/eozraplainant. He is  3 <\/p>\n<p>in his cvidcmcc has stated   Tor  <\/p>\n<p>mspondent\/complainant as<br \/>\nthe cheques from the  and carried<br \/>\nthe same to the  A    got than<br \/>\ncncashed and    was taken by the<br \/>\n the discharge of the said<br \/>\nsum  to 13.3 came to be is-sum by<\/p>\n<p>the  in favour of respondent]<\/p>\n<p> &#8211;   VIA&#8217;-&#8216;.&#8217;Wv\u00ab..3.is the bank omciai who has sfsmd that<\/p>\n<p>  to R3 were drawn an the account<\/p>\n<p> the petitioner\/accused in which he was<\/p>\n<p> _&#8217;wor}s&#8217;:ing &#8216;:asi a bank of\ufb01cial. He has also statad that the<\/p>\n<p>A 5.&#8217; had instructed for stop-payxgncnt of the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;    cheques. The letter issued by the petitioner\/aocused is<\/p>\n<p> ~  marked as Ex.P.17. The petitioncr\/accused denying&#8217; his<\/p>\n<p>liability and contending that the cheques was forcibly<\/p>\n<p>taken, in proof oi&#8217; the said oomerrtiorx cxamirmd I).W.1 and<br \/>\nanother Witness D.W.2. The trial Court as  \ufb01rst<br \/>\nappellate Court held that the petitioner]  <\/p>\n<p>taken a loan of Rs.3,50,000\/-  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>towards the discharge of the sariagf:    45<\/p>\n<p>Exs.P.1 to P.3. The choqtioaon  &#8216;iosjtiiod<br \/>\nwith bank endorsemexjaz as  T_  issue of<br \/>\nlegal notice as the  to make good<br \/>\nthe same wi\ufb02ui\ufb01 the  15 days from the<br \/>\ndate or    petitioner\/accused has<\/p>\n<p>NJ. Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>.   C.3\u00a7~.&#8221;;t  on behalf of the peti\ufb01onor\/accuw<\/p>\n<p>  which is claimed to have been given to<\/p>\n<p>\u00abiiospondent\/cmxnplairzant undor self-cheque has<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; W H &#8216;T mnot him at all and it is, some ottler person Le. P.W.2<\/p>\n<p>  iv?ho&#8217;f1ad withdrawn the money and had not paid the money<\/p>\n<p>VT  &#8221;  the petitioner] accused and thus respondant\/compiainant<\/p>\n<p>has failed to establish that the loan amount was gvon no the<\/p>\n<p>\u00a3;Q_LL~.\u00a3,i.5\\~V&#8212;\n<\/p>\n<p>petitioner\/accused. It is further  the<br \/>\nrespondent] complainant had paid   0f<br \/>\nRs.15,000\/- and mainly the  <\/p>\n<p>taken all the cheques in :33 in ailjsuxjiqf  <\/p>\n<p>contention of the learned c:\u20aciriL1_1_}s&lt;:l i&#039;az);_&#039;t&quot;&quot;f_hVt.&#039;:<br \/>\nwould not cnurc to the   accused in<br \/>\nView of the fact ma;%[%\u00a7;;e  by him<br \/>\nunder kction 200     a mcnmn of the<br \/>\n  taken the cheques.\n<\/p>\n<p>There    having taken a sum of<br \/>\nRs.  rcsponsdent\/heaz\ufb01xl. On.\n<\/p>\n<p>the ot11c;r&#8221;&#8211;\u00ab  pleaded in i E&#8217;x.P.3 that the<\/p>\n<p>  in \ufb01nancial distress and though he<\/p>\n<p> the amount takm1 as loan, the<\/p>\n<p>respond\u00a2;1t;:\u00a75\ufb011p1a1nant had forcibly taken the said<\/p>\n<p> __&lt;:heq&#039;ua: s t.as security and had presented the same for<\/p>\n<p>  5 This would clearly establish that the<\/p>\n<p>V&#039; p:E&#039;;titi0nCI&#039;f8.0CEiSCd had taken loan \ufb01mra the<\/p>\n<p> ~ u respondant\/complainant. In addition to the same, it is also<\/p>\n<p>not stated in the reply notice m.P.7 that the loan amount<\/p>\n<p>was taken by P.W.2 and not by the pc\ufb01\ufb01a\ufb01grfagcused<\/p>\n<p>herein. Thus it is Well established that who<\/p>\n<p>had taken loan amount of Rs.3,_59\u00bb.0OO\/&#039;   <\/p>\n<p>to I&#8211;&#039;.3. The cheques towards th&lt;: &#039;dis\u00ab.haI&#039;g*&#039;f &#039;iv 6&#039; A\u00e9&quot; J<\/p>\n<p>earlier stated the cheque\u00e9<br \/>\nwithout encashmcnt gnd   payman&#039;.<br \/>\nThe statutory   issued to the<br \/>\npetitioner\/ao.;:;;gs;;e;j,   the terms of the<br \/>\nnotice    \ufb01nding of the Courts<br \/>\nbelow   guilty or the offence<br \/>\n   of the N.I. Act, (lacs not call<br \/>\nfor   &quot;\n<\/p>\n<p> is \u00e9ii&#8217;bm\u00a3t*..ed by the pctitiancr\/accused since he<\/p>\n<p> distress had borrowed a sum of<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;from the Iespondent\/complahlant. Despite<\/p>\n<p>bcst&#8217;eff\u00a71ff.sv he could not organise to rcpay the said amount<\/p>\n<p>A  were several creditors to whom petitioner\/accused<\/p>\n<p>V.    liable and he has been mobilising funds from all<\/p>\n<p> \u00bb  resources to satis\ufb01r all the creditors. Even now he is in<\/p>\n<p>\/\\JZs.uq.L:~ 1&amp;-M<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01nancial di\ufb01iculties arid as such he sub1:x;z.!2.VtV_s-.:&#8217;_ t11at the<\/p>\n<p>sentence imp\ufb02scd for the pravw <\/p>\n<p>excessive and a lenient View shogxldbe taker:  _&#8217;i1V3:*. <\/p>\n<p>the sentence. Taking into accoi3;1t;&#8217;th:\u00a7   &#8216;A<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner\/accused, 1   harsh<br \/>\nand excessive and the   Hence,<\/p>\n<p>the following:\n<\/p>\n<p>The  a\ufb02owed. The order of<br \/>\n   affcxmw punhhable under<br \/>\n af  bon\ufb01rmed. The smtcnee for the<br \/>\nsaid s    %a-gm: and in Lieu the petitioner 3<\/p>\n<p>% %   \ufb011%$ofRs.4,00,000\/- in defmlt to undergo<\/p>\n<p>   six mantlls. Fine amount on rcoavery<\/p>\n<p>shai &#8216;1   \ufb01x respondcntmonaplainam; F1nc&#8217; amount<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; U H   is mm due deduction. Thcbalance of the<\/p>\n<p>   shanbc deposited with in a period of two months from<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\u00b0'&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221; sa\/~.\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n<p>Sbb\/&#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008 Author: R.B.Naik m mm HIGH sound&#8217; or KARNATAKA, BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 26?&#8221; DAY 09 JUNE zoeajj BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE CRIMINAL REVISION P_\u00a3_3&#8217;FfP;QN NQ;\u00ab2*L*5\u00a7f.(\u00a7F:&#8217;2_Q{36 &#8216; \u00bb BETWEEN Sri.Gopa1akrishna &#8216; Aged about 51 years, _ S\/o I{.N.Kamath, &#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-376","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-11T20:41:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-11T20:41:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":946,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-11T20:41:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-11T20:41:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-11T20:41:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008"},"wordCount":946,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008","name":"Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-11T20:41:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-gopalakrishna-k-kamath-vs-smt-chitrakala-prabhu-m-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Gopalakrishna K Kamath vs Smt Chitrakala Prabhu M on 26 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=376"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/376\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=376"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=376"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=376"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}