{"id":37667,"date":"2009-01-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009"},"modified":"2016-12-03T12:31:19","modified_gmt":"2016-12-03T07:01:19","slug":"simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Simarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Simarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009<\/div>\n
FAO No. 65-M of 1999                                           -1-\n\n                                       ****\n\n\n       IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                       CHANDIGARH\n\n\n                          FAO No. 65-M of 1999\n                          Date of decision: 20.01.2009.\n\n\nSimarjeet Kaur                                           ...Appellant\n\n                                     Versus\n\nParampreet Singh                                     ...Respondent\n\n\nCORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND.\n\n\nPresent:    Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate, for the appellant.\n\n            Mr. G.S.Bal, Advocate for the respondent.\n                                *****\n\nS.D.ANAND, J.\n<\/pre>\n
            A petition filed by the respondent-husband under Section 13 of<\/p>\n
the Hindu Marriage Act (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”), for dissolution<\/p>\n
of marriage, was allowed by the learned Trial Judge by upholding the plea<\/p>\n
that the appellant-wife    had been proved to be suffering from mental<\/p>\n
disorder of such a kind and to such an extent that the husband cannot be<\/p>\n
reasonably expected to live with her. That plea was subject of issue no.1<\/p>\n
which was decided in favour of husband and against the wife. Even under<\/p>\n
issue no.2, the plea of cruelty was upheld by the learned Trial Court in<\/p>\n
favour of the husband and against the wife.\n<\/p>\n
            I have heard Mr. Ashok Singla, learned counsel              for the<\/p>\n
appellant and Mr. G.S.Bal, learned counsel for the respondent and have<\/p>\n
carefully gone through the record.\n<\/p>\n
            In order to obtain the invalidation of the finding recorded by the
\n FAO No. 65-M of 1999                                           -2-<\/span><\/p>\n
                                       ****<\/p>\n
learned Trial Court under issue no.1, learned counsel for the appellant<\/p>\n
argues that there is complete want of acceptable evidence on record to<\/p>\n
prove that appellant-wife was, infact, suffering any mental disorder. The<\/p>\n
plea raised in the alternative, is that the mental disorder (even if proved to<\/p>\n
exist) was not of type which could justify the dissolution of the matrimonial<\/p>\n
ties.). In support of the averment, learned counsel draws sustenance from<\/p>\n
Ram Narain Gupta Vs. Smt. Rameshwari Gupta AIR 1988 Supreme<\/p>\n
Court 2260, Champa Vs. Balwant 1985 (2) Cur. L.J. 279 and Prakash<\/p>\n
Kumar Bachlaus Vs. Smt. Chanchal @ Jaya 2007 (4) R.C.R.(Civil) 152.<\/p>\n
              Learned counsel for the respondent-husband resisted the plea<\/p>\n
by arguing that the appellant had been proved on record to have<\/p>\n
undergone treatment at the hands of various experts in the field and that<\/p>\n
her mental condition does not admit of continuation of matrimonial<\/p>\n
relationship. Qua the judicial pronouncements relied upon on behalf of the<\/p>\n
appellant, it was argued that those are not applicable to the facts and<\/p>\n
circumstances of the case before this Court.\n<\/p>\n
              I have given my careful thought to the respective pleas of the<\/p>\n
parties in the context of finding under issue no.1.        I have not been<\/p>\n
persuaded to find any fault with that finding.\n<\/p>\n
              Before appreciating the evidence in the context, it requires<\/p>\n
pertinent notice that the respondent-husband has raised a precise plea<\/p>\n
that the appellant had been suffering from mental disorder of the indicated<\/p>\n
kind. As against it, the appellant wife had throughout denied that allegation<\/p>\n
in toto. The plea on behalf of the appellant-wife has been found to be<\/p>\n
unacceptable.     PW-2 Dr. Anil Goyal holds a post-graduate degree in<\/p>\n
Psychiatry.    He testified on oath that he examined the appellant on<\/p>\n
2.3.1995 and she was diagnosed as patient suffering Manic depressive
\n FAO No. 65-M of 1999                                              -3-<\/span><\/p>\n
                                       ****<\/p>\n
psychosis, manic type. It is also in his statement that the disease she was<\/p>\n
suffering from is a type of mental unsoundness.           In that disease, the<\/p>\n
patient develops aggressive and violent behaviour.               The appellant<\/p>\n
remained admitted in the hospital upto 11.3.1995 was she discharged on<\/p>\n
that date as a controlled patient but she was advised to continue the<\/p>\n
treatment indicated in the bed head ticket.          The continuation of that<\/p>\n
treatment was ordered as she had not fully been cured. Dr. Goyal, pointed<\/p>\n
out that the disease aforementioned is not permanently curable because<\/p>\n
relapses re-occur with variable intervals. Inability on the part of Dr. Goyal to<\/p>\n
identify the patient as the relevant patient is of no significance in view of the<\/p>\n
fact that it was none else or other than the appellant himself who had<\/p>\n
conceded her hospitalisation in the concerned hospital for the period<\/p>\n
2.3.1995 to 11.3.1995.\n<\/p>\n
             Thereafter, the appellant had been under the treatment of Dr.<\/p>\n
S.K.Tiwari of Tiwari Psychiatric Nursing Home for the period 3.11.95 to<\/p>\n
23.12.95. Dr. Tiwari testified    that he treated the appellant for duration<\/p>\n
aforementioned and that he also treated her off and on between March,<\/p>\n
1996 to January 18, 1997.        Besides identifying the appellant who was<\/p>\n
present in the Court on the date the statement of Dr. Tiwari was recorded,<\/p>\n
he also averred that the appellant had been diagnosed to be a patient of<\/p>\n
manic depressive psychosis, manic type. It is also in his testimony that<\/p>\n
father of the appellant was also suffering from that very disease.            He<\/p>\n
testified on the basis of history of the patient indicated in the bed head<\/p>\n
ticket which he produced as Ex. A1. He also testified that the appellant<\/p>\n
used to beusually accompanied by her mother and that signature of Jarnail<\/p>\n
Singh a (brother of the appellant) also available on the record as guardian<\/p>\n
of the patient. It is also in his testimony that the appellant had a history of
\n FAO No. 65-M of 1999                                             -4-<\/span><\/p>\n
                                       ****<\/p>\n
1-1\/2 years of illness prior to 3.11.1995. Besides it, Dr. Tiwari testified that<\/p>\n
electro convulsant therapy was given to the appellant. Apart therefrom, Dr.<\/p>\n
Rajesh Bali of Mohan Dai Oswal Memorial Hospital, Ludhiana produced<\/p>\n
the bed head ticket Ex. A3 of the appellant. He does not claim to be<\/p>\n
Psychiatrist. He only produced the bed head ticket. The Court need not<\/p>\n
doubt the correctness of that record because the appellant herself<\/p>\n
conceded in the course of her testimony         that she had been taken to<\/p>\n
Mohan Dai Oswal Memorial Hospital, Ludhiana on 18.4.1995. She tried to<\/p>\n
offer an explanation that she had been forcibly taken to the hospital on<\/p>\n
7.4.95, 21.4.95, 11.5.95, 3.1.96 and 15.5.96. Besides conceding that it is<\/p>\n
her mother who used to accompany her at times, she also conceded that<\/p>\n
she remained under the treatment of Dr. S.K.Tiwari from 3.11.1995 to<\/p>\n
23.11.1995 and again from March, 1996 to January, 1997. As it is own<\/p>\n
averment of the appellant that she had been residing at her natal house<\/p>\n
since 28.2.1996, it is apparent that she has been undergoing treatment<\/p>\n
from Dr. S.K.Tiwari only after she has gone over from matrimonial house to<\/p>\n
her natal house.\n<\/p>\n
             It is further apparent from the medical record maintained at<\/p>\n
Mohan Dai Oswal Memorial Hospital, Ludhiana that the appellant had been<\/p>\n
there for check up, for the first time, on 18.2.1995. The case history shows<\/p>\n
that she was accompanied by her husband on that visit. She had been<\/p>\n
brought over after an altercation at home and that she had felt infuriated for<\/p>\n
not being allowed by the mother-in-law to attend a particular wedding, that<\/p>\n
she had threatened to kill herself and that she had locked herself up in a<\/p>\n
room and that she had injected insecticide. It is also recorded in the case<\/p>\n
history that she had suicidal tendency. Her mother denied all those facts in<\/p>\n
toto.   Her mother even went to the extent of denying that Jarnail Singh, a
\n FAO No. 65-M of 1999                                           -5-<\/span><\/p>\n
                                     ****<\/p>\n
brother of the appellant, ever accompanied the appellant to the hospital of<\/p>\n
Dr. Tiwari at Bathinda. As already noticed, the signatures of Jarnail Singh<\/p>\n
as guardian of the appellant, appear on the relevant record.<\/p>\n
            The fact that the appellant had locked herself up in a room<\/p>\n
was also testified on oath by PW-7 Charna. He proceeded to testify that<\/p>\n
the room was broken upon and it was found that wearing apparels of the<\/p>\n
appellant smells pesticide.\n<\/p>\n
            Learned Trial Court appropriately noticed that Jarnail Singh,a<\/p>\n
brother of the appellant did not enter the witness box to deny the allegation<\/p>\n
of the husband that the appellant was suffering from mental disorder of the<\/p>\n
averred type and that he had been accompanying the appellant to the<\/p>\n
hospital of Dr. Tiwari at Bathinda. As already noticed, the mother of the<\/p>\n
appellant adopted an attitude of complete denial which (attitude)is proved<\/p>\n
on the record to be false.\n<\/p>\n
            At the trial, the appellant tried to raise a plea that her husband<\/p>\n
would pass stool in the room itself and would require her to clean it up.<\/p>\n
That plea does not require consideration inasmuchas it was not even<\/p>\n
suggested to the respondent in the course of cross-examination. It was<\/p>\n
also not reiterated by the appellant herself or her mother who appeared as<\/p>\n
RW-3.\n<\/p>\n
            In the light of the foregoing discussion, I have no hesitation in<\/p>\n
holding that finding recorded by the learned Trial Judge on point of cruelty<\/p>\n
is relate-able to the material obtaining on the file. The respondent-husband<\/p>\n
had led affirmative evidence to prove the allegation in the relevant behalf;<\/p>\n
whereas the mother of the appellant denied that allegation in toto but her<\/p>\n
testimony has been proved to be false. In the light of the allegations in the<\/p>\n
relevant behalf and also denial thereof, the production of Jarnail Singh
\n FAO No. 65-M of 1999                                           -6-<\/span><\/p>\n
                                      ****<\/p>\n
assumed added importance but he was examined at the trial. That finding<\/p>\n
shall stand affirmed.\n<\/p>\n
             Insofar as the allegation pertaining to cruelty is concerned, it<\/p>\n
was admitted by the appellant that she had launched a prosecution under<\/p>\n
Section 498-A IPC against the respondent and members of her in-laws<\/p>\n
family. In this case too, she levelled a false allegation that the respondent<\/p>\n
would pass stool in the room and would require her to clean it up. The<\/p>\n
appellant had, thus, been correctly held to have caused mental cruelty to<\/p>\n
the respondent-husband. The making of false allegation in the pleadings<\/p>\n
can also be taken to be an act cruelty. In that view of things, I have no<\/p>\n
hesitation in affirming the finding recorded by the learned Trial Court on<\/p>\n
point of cruelty.\n<\/p>\n
             In the light of the fore-going discussion, the appeal is held to<\/p>\n
be denuded of merit and is ordered to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
January 20, 2009                                  (S.D.Anand)\nPka                                                  Judge\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Simarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009 FAO No. 65-M of 1999 -1- **** IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO No. 65-M of 1999 Date of decision: 20.01.2009. Simarjeet Kaur …Appellant Versus Parampreet Singh …Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.D.ANAND. Present: Mr. Ashok Singla, Advocate, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37667","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSimarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Simarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-03T07:01:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Simarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-03T07:01:19+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1578,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Simarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-03T07:01:19+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Simarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Simarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Simarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-03T07:01:19+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Simarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-03T07:01:19+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009"},"wordCount":1578,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009","name":"Simarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-03T07:01:19+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/simarjeet-kaur-vs-parampreet-singh-on-20-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Simarjeet Kaur vs Parampreet Singh on 20 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37667","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37667"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37667\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37667"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37667"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37667"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}