{"id":3785,"date":"2010-06-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-06-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010"},"modified":"2017-02-07T01:28:54","modified_gmt":"2017-02-06T19:58:54","slug":"mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 213 of 2004()\n\n\n1. MANSOOR. C., S\/O. E.K. HAMSA HAJI,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. C. ASLAM, S\/O. ABDULRAHIMAN KUTTY,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. GAFOOR. K.U., S\/O. UMMER,\n\n3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE\n\n4. K. ABDULKHADER, S\/O. ANDARU,\n\n5. MR. P. RAGHAVAN, S\/O. KANDANKUNHI,\n\n6. THE BRANCH MANAGER, NATIONAL INSURANCE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.K.MUHAMMED\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.MATHEWS JACOB (SR.)\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :15\/06\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n              A.K.BASHEER &amp; P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                         M.A.C.A.No.213 OF 2004\n                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                     Dated this the 15th day of June, 2010\n\n                                 JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>       In this appeal under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, the<\/p>\n<p>claimant in O.P.(MV)No.777\/1998 of Motor Accidents Claims<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal, Kasargod challenges the judgment and award of the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>dated July 31, 2003 awarding a compensation of Rs. 1,56,900\/- for the<\/p>\n<p>loss caused to him on account of the injuries sustained by him in a<\/p>\n<p>motor accident.\n<\/p>\n<p>       2.   The facts leading to this appeal in brief are these :<\/p>\n<p>       The claimant was aged 28 the time of the accident and used to<\/p>\n<p>earn Rs. 25,000\/- per month as a Sales Manager in a private firm. On<\/p>\n<p>July 25, 1998 at about 5.p.m., the claimant was travelling as a<\/p>\n<p>passenger in a Maruthi Car bearing Reg.No.KL 12\/8708 from<\/p>\n<p>Vadakara to Mangalore which was driven by the first respondent.<\/p>\n<p>When they reached at Mailatty near Poinachi in National Highway 17,<\/p>\n<p>it collided head on with a lorry bearing Reg.No.14\/6469 . The claimant<\/p>\n<p>sustained serious injuries. According to the claimant, accident occurred<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.213\/04                       2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>due to the rash and negligent driving of the offending Maruthi car by<\/p>\n<p>first respondent. First respondent as the driver, second respondent as<\/p>\n<p>the owner and third respondent as the insurer of the offending Maruthi<\/p>\n<p>car are jointly and severally liable to pay compensation to the claimant.<\/p>\n<p>Claimant claimed a compensation of Rs. 10 lakhs.<\/p>\n<p>       3.    Respondents 1 and 2, the driver and owner of the offending<\/p>\n<p>car filed a joint written statement admitting the accident, but contended<\/p>\n<p>that the accident occurred due to the negligence on the part of the<\/p>\n<p>driver of the lorry. The third respondent, the insurer of the offending<\/p>\n<p>Maruthi Car filed a written statement admitting the policy.<\/p>\n<p>       4.    In the light of the contentions raised by respondents 1 to 3,<\/p>\n<p>the driver, owner and the insurer of the lorry involved in the accident<\/p>\n<p>were impleaded as additional respondents 4 to 6 in the O.P.<\/p>\n<p>Respondents 4 and 5, the driver and the owner of the lorry remained<\/p>\n<p>absent before the Tribunal. The 6th respondent, the insurer of the lorry<\/p>\n<p>filed a written statement admitting the policy, but contended that the<\/p>\n<p>accident occurred due to the negligence on the part of the driver of the<\/p>\n<p>Maruthi Car.\n<\/p>\n<p>       5.    This O.P. was jointly tried along with O.P.(MV)<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.213\/04                        3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>No.721\/1998, filed by another injured passenger and a common award<\/p>\n<p>was passed. PW1 was examined and Exts.A1 to A14 series and<\/p>\n<p>Ext.X1 disability certificate of the claimant were marked on the side of<\/p>\n<p>the claimant before the Tribunal.         No evidence was adduced by<\/p>\n<p>contesting respondents. The Tribunal on an appreciation of evidence<\/p>\n<p>found that the accident occurred due to the rash and negligent driving<\/p>\n<p>of the offending Maruthi Car by first respondent and awarded a<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs. 1,56,900\/- with interest @ 9% per annum from the<\/p>\n<p>date of petition till realisation and proportionate cost. The claimant has<\/p>\n<p>come up in appeal challenging the quantum of compensation awarded<\/p>\n<p>by the Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.    Heard the counsel for the appellant\/claimant and the<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the third respondent\/Insurance Company.<\/p>\n<p>      7.    The accident is not disputed. The finding of the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>that the accident occurred due to the negligence on the part of the first<\/p>\n<p>respondent is not challenged in this appeal.         Therefore, the only<\/p>\n<p>question which arises for consideration is whether the claimant is<\/p>\n<p>entitled to any enhanced compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>      8.    The claimant sustained the following injuries as revealed<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.213\/04                      4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>from Ext.A3, the copy of the wound certificate and Ext.A4, discharge<\/p>\n<p>summary issued from the hospital.\n<\/p>\n<p>     1.     Lacerated wound over the left eyebrow 2 x 1 cm.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2.     Laceration over the lower lip on the right side<br \/>\n            1.5 cm. x = cm.\n<\/p>\n<p>     3.     Lacerated wound of 3x 3 cms. on the right forearm middle<br \/>\n            1\/3rd .\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.     Degloving injury to left forearm on the dorsal aspect.\n<\/p>\n<p>     5.     Deformity over the right thigh with contusion.\n<\/p>\n<p>     6.     Swelling over the left knee with tenderness\n<\/p>\n<p>     7.     Swelling and tenderness over the left ankle.\n<\/p>\n<p>     8.     Lacerated wound of 5 x 2 cm. over the left leg.\n<\/p>\n<p>     9.     X &#8211; ray revealed fracture of radius of left forearm<br \/>\n            with dislocation.\n<\/p>\n<p>     9.     He was admitted in the hospital on July 25, 1998 and was<\/p>\n<p>discharged on August 16, 1998. Ext.A8, the certificate of disability<\/p>\n<p>issued by the Doctor shows that claimant has now a permanent<\/p>\n<p>disability of 30%. Ext.X1, the certificate issued by the District Medical<\/p>\n<p>Board shows that he has a permanent disability of 25%.<\/p>\n<p>     10.    The    Tribunal   awarded     a   total    compensation   of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,56,900\/-. The break up of the compensation awarded is as under :<\/p>\n<pre>     Loss of earning                      - Rs. 7,200\/-\n     Extra nourishment                    - Rs. 2,500\/-\n     Treatment expenses                   - Rs.35,000\/-\n     Pain and suffering                   - Rs.15,000\/-\n     Disability                           - Rs.97,200\/-\n\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.213\/04                       5<\/span>\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>      11.    Counsel for the claimant sought enhancement of the<\/p>\n<p>compensation for the disability caused, loss of amenities and enjoyment<\/p>\n<p>of life and for the disfigurement caused.\n<\/p>\n<p>      12.    The Tribunal took the monthly income of the claimant as<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 1800\/- and adopted a multiplier of 18 and accepted the percentage<\/p>\n<p>of disability as 25% as mentioned in Ext.X1 and awarded Rs. 97,200\/-<\/p>\n<p>for the disability caused. The claimant was aged 28 at the time of the<\/p>\n<p>accident and was working as a Sales Manager in a private firm earning<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 25,000\/- per month as seen from Ext.A9 and Ext.A10. Taking into<\/p>\n<p>consideration the above aspect, we feel that his monthly income can be<\/p>\n<p>reasonably fixed at Rs. 2,250\/-. The multiplier adopted by the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>as 18 and the percentage of disability as 25% as assessed by the<\/p>\n<p>Medical Board in Ext.X1 are not seriously challenged. Thus calculated<\/p>\n<p>for the disability caused, the claimant is entitled to a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,21,500\/- ( 25% x 2250 x 12 x 18). Thus on this count, the<\/p>\n<p>claimant is entitled to an additional compensation of Rs. 24,300\/-.<\/p>\n<p>      13.    No compensation was awarded for the loss of amenities and<\/p>\n<p>enjoyment of life. The Tribunal has noticed that his left lower arm is<\/p>\n<p>disfigured and there were scar marks of the operation on the same. His<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.213\/04                      6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>left foot was also swelling. Taking into consideration all these aspects,<\/p>\n<p>we feel that for the loss of amenities and enjoyment of life, a<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs. 10,000\/- would be reasonable.       As regards the<\/p>\n<p>compensation awarded under other heads, we find the same to be<\/p>\n<p>reasonable and therefore are not disturbing the same.<\/p>\n<p>      14.   In the result, the claimant is entitled to an additional<\/p>\n<p>compensation of Rs. 34,300\/-. He is entitled to interest @ 9% per<\/p>\n<p>annum from the date of petition till realisation and proportionate cost.<\/p>\n<p>The third respondent being the insurer of the offending vehicle shall<\/p>\n<p>deposit the amount before the Tribunal within two months from the<\/p>\n<p>date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The award of the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>is modified to the above extent.\n<\/p>\n<p>      The Appeal is disposed of as found above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                       P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE<br \/>\nsv.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.213\/04    7<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 213 of 2004() 1. MANSOOR. C., S\/O. E.K. HAMSA HAJI, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. C. ASLAM, S\/O. ABDULRAHIMAN KUTTY, &#8230; Respondent 2. GAFOOR. K.U., S\/O. UMMER, 3. THE BRANCH MANAGER, ORIENTAL INSURANCE 4. K. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3785","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-06-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-06T19:58:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-06T19:58:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1094,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010\",\"name\":\"Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-06-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-06T19:58:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-06-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-06T19:58:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010","datePublished":"2010-06-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-06T19:58:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010"},"wordCount":1094,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010","name":"Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-06-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-06T19:58:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mansoor-c-vs-c-aslam-on-15-june-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mansoor. C. vs C. Aslam on 15 June, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3785","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3785"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3785\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3785"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3785"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3785"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}