{"id":37936,"date":"2010-11-23T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-22T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010"},"modified":"2017-05-31T23:11:47","modified_gmt":"2017-05-31T17:41:47","slug":"the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 2762 of 2008()\n\n\n1. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE SECRETARY, KOLLAM AUTOMOBILE\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. PRADEEP.G. S\/O.GANESHAN, KURUPUMVEETTIL\n\n3. BABYKUTTY AMMA, W\/O. DECEASED AYYAPPAN\n\n4. ANOOP,S\/O.DECEASED AYYAPPAN PILLAI,\n\n5. ANUPAMA, S\/O.DECEASED AYYAPPAN PILLAI,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.VPK.PANICKER\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.R.ARUN RAJ\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI\n\n Dated :23\/11\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n              A.K.BASHEER &amp; P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.\n                       - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                         M.A.C.A.No.2762 OF 2008\n                   - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                  Dated this the 23rd day of November, 2010\n\n                                 JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Barkath Ali, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>     Appellant is the third respondent Insurance Company in<\/p>\n<p>O.P.(MV)No.980\/2004 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal,<\/p>\n<p>Punalur. In this appeal the appellant challenges the judgment and award<\/p>\n<p>of the Tribunal dated March 11, 2008 awarding a compensation of<\/p>\n<p>Rs. 2,32,200\/- to the claimants, who are respondents 3 to 5 in this<\/p>\n<p>appeal, for the loss caused to them on account of the death of deceased<\/p>\n<p>Ayyappan in a motor accident.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2.     Claimants are the wife and the two children of deceased<\/p>\n<p>Ayyappan. The accident happened on May 28, 2004 at Kadappakkad in<\/p>\n<p>Kollam district while the deceased Ayyappan was riding the scooter, he<\/p>\n<p>was knocked down by the bus bearing Reg.No.KL\/3\/A\/4149 driven by<\/p>\n<p>the second respondent on the Kollam-Chenkotta public road near<\/p>\n<p>Aaramar Hotel, Kadappakkad. Deceased sustained serious injuries and<\/p>\n<p>he succumbed to the injuries sustained while undergoing treatment in<\/p>\n<p>the District Hospital, Kollam.         Alleging negligence against the second<\/p>\n<p>respondent in the O.P., the claimants filed the O.P. before the Tribunal<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.2762\/08                    2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>claiming a compensation of Rs. 5,00,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.    Respondents 1 and 2 in the O.P., the owner and the driver<\/p>\n<p>of the offending bus remained absent before the Tribunal. The third<\/p>\n<p>respondent\/appellant, the insurer of the offending bus filed a written<\/p>\n<p>statement admitting the policy .\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.    Pws 1 to 3 were examined and Exts.A1 to A10 and Ext.X1<\/p>\n<p>were marked on the side of the claimant before the Tribunal. Ext.B1<\/p>\n<p>was marked on the side of the third respondent. On an appreciation of<\/p>\n<p>evidence, the Tribunal awarded a compensation of         Rs. 2,32,200\/-<\/p>\n<p>with interest @ 7.5% per annum from the date of petition till realisation<\/p>\n<p>and a cost of Rs.1500\/- The Tribunal has also found that there was<\/p>\n<p>violation of the condition of the policy as second respondent has no<\/p>\n<p>valid driving licence at the time of the accident and allowed the third<\/p>\n<p>respondent to recover the compensation amount from respondents 1<\/p>\n<p>and 2. The third respondent Insurance Company has now come up in<\/p>\n<p>appeal challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal as well as the above finding of the Tribunal regarding the<\/p>\n<p>negligence on the part of the second respondent, the driver of the bus.<\/p>\n<p>      5.    Heard the counsel for the appellant Insurance Company and<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.2762\/08                      3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the counsel for the claimants.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.    The following points arise for consideration :<\/p>\n<p>            1.     Whether the finding of the Tribunal that the<br \/>\n      accident occurred due to the negligence of the second<br \/>\n      respondent can be sustained ?\n<\/p>\n<p>            2.     Whether the compensation awarded by the<br \/>\n      Tribunal is excessive ?\n<\/p>\n<p>      Point No.1<\/p>\n<p>      7.    The accident is not disputed. The fact that the deceased<\/p>\n<p>died as a result of the injury sustained in the accident is also admitted.<\/p>\n<p>The Tribunal found that the accident occurred due to the negligence of<\/p>\n<p>the second respondent, the driver of the offending bus. Counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>appellant\/Insurance Company argued that as this is a case of collision<\/p>\n<p>between the two vehicles, there was also negligence on the part of the<\/p>\n<p>deceased who was riding the scooter. We find no merit in the above<\/p>\n<p>contention. On the side of the claimant, Exts.A1 to A10 were marked<\/p>\n<p>and Pws 1 to 3 were examined. It is admitted that police has charged<\/p>\n<p>the case against the second respondent which is also evidenced by<\/p>\n<p>Ext.A5, copy of the police charge. PW1, the first claimant has testified<\/p>\n<p>that the accident occurred due to the negligence of the second<\/p>\n<p>respondent . She was not even cross-examined by the counsel for the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.2762\/08                   4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>third respondent. The evidence of PW1 coupled with Ext.A5 police<\/p>\n<p>charge clearly shows that the accident occurred due to the negligence<\/p>\n<p>of the second respondent, the driver of the offending bus. Therefore,<\/p>\n<p>we confirm the finding of the Tribunal on this point.<\/p>\n<p>      8.   The next question for consideration is whether the<\/p>\n<p>compensation awarded by the Tribunal is excessive.      The Tribunal<\/p>\n<p>awarded a total compensation of Rs.2,32,000\/- . The break up of the<\/p>\n<p>compensation awarded is as under :\n<\/p>\n<pre>           Loss of dependency     - Rs. 2,22,200\/-\n           Transportation         - Rs.    2,000\/-\n           Funeral expenses       - Rs.    3,000\/-\n           Pain and suffering     - Rs.    5,000\/-\n\n\n<\/pre>\n<p>      9.   Counsel for the claimant argued that the Tribunal fixed the<\/p>\n<p>monthly income of the deceased as Rs. 5555\/- which is on the higher<\/p>\n<p>side as the first claimant would be receiving family pension as the<\/p>\n<p>deceased was an ex-military person. There is no substance in the above<\/p>\n<p>contention. It is not disputed that the claimant was a retired Subedar<\/p>\n<p>from Military Engineering Services. Ext.X1 the relevant documents<\/p>\n<p>show that he was drawing a pension of Rs. 2189\/-.         PW2 is the<\/p>\n<p>Manager of State Bank of Travancore, Kilikolloor branch who proved<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.2762\/08                       5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Ext.X1.    Further, Ext.A10 salary certificate issued by PW3, the<\/p>\n<p>Manager of the Boots and Boots Company, Kollam shows that<\/p>\n<p>deceased was drawing a salary of Rs.6,000\/- per month. Taking into<\/p>\n<p>consideration all these aspects, we feel that the monthly income fixed<\/p>\n<p>by the Tribunal as Rs. 5555\/- appears reasonable. After deducting 1\/3<\/p>\n<p>for his personal expenses, the balance amount of Rs. 44,440\/- was fixed<\/p>\n<p>as his annual contribution to his family.      The Tribunal adopted a<\/p>\n<p>multiplier of 5 as the deceased was aged 63 at the time of the accident<\/p>\n<p>and awarded      Rs.2,22,200\/- for loss of dependency. Taking into<\/p>\n<p>consideration the above facts and in the circumstances of the case, we<\/p>\n<p>feel that the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and<\/p>\n<p>reasonable and is not excessive. That being so, the appeal has to be<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      In the result, the appeal is dismissed. No cost.<\/p>\n<p>                                           A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                                         P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>sv.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.2762\/08    6<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">MACA.No.2762\/08    7<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 2762 of 2008() 1. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE SECRETARY, KOLLAM AUTOMOBILE &#8230; Respondent 2. PRADEEP.G. S\/O.GANESHAN, KURUPUMVEETTIL 3. BABYKUTTY AMMA, W\/O. DECEASED AYYAPPAN 4. ANOOP,S\/O.DECEASED AYYAPPAN PILLAI, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37936","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-31T17:41:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-31T17:41:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":927,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010\",\"name\":\"The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-22T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-31T17:41:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-31T17:41:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-31T17:41:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010"},"wordCount":927,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010","name":"The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-22T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-31T17:41:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-vs-the-secretary-on-23-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Oriental Insurance Co.Ltd vs The Secretary on 23 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37936","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37936"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37936\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37936"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37936"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37936"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}