{"id":38096,"date":"2009-07-31T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009"},"modified":"2018-11-02T17:37:49","modified_gmt":"2018-11-02T12:07:49","slug":"pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Pushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court<\/div>\n
Pushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 19165 of 2006(F)\n\n\n1. PUSHAKARI, W\/O. LATE DOMINIC YOYHANNAN,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.K.SATHEESH\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL REHIM\n\n Dated :31\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n                    C.K.ABDUL REHIM, J.\n                    ------------------------------\n                  W.P.(C)No.19165 OF 2006\n                    ------------------------------\n             Dated this the 31st day of July, 2009\n\n                        J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n
                        ———————-\n<\/p>\n
      1.   The petitioner is the widow of a veteran freedom<\/p>\n
fighter, Sri:Dominic Yohannan, who participated in “Punnapra-<\/p>\n
Vayalar movement” during the period of national freedom<\/p>\n
struggle and who was convicted and sentenced in a criminal case<\/p>\n
registered in connection with the said movement.              The<\/p>\n
Government of India had recognized the “Punnapra-Vayalar<\/p>\n
movement” as part of a national freedom struggle, for the<\/p>\n
purpose of granting “Swatantratha Sainik Samman Pension”,<\/p>\n
with effect from 20.1.1998. Thereafter the petitioner submitted<\/p>\n
application for pension on 27.3.1998. Since her application was<\/p>\n
not disposed of, she along with two other similarly situated<\/p>\n
persons have approached this Court in O.P.8706\/01. But during<\/p>\n
pendency of that writ petition, through Ext.P4 order, the<\/p>\n
petitioner was granted monthly pension, with effect from<\/p>\n
26.12.2000. According to the petitioner the pension ought to<\/p>\n
have been granted with effect from 20.1.1998, the date on which<\/p>\n
the “Punnapra-Vayalar movement” was recognized as part of<\/p>\n
national freedom struggle, or at least with effect from 31.3.1998,<\/p>\n
i.e: the date on which her application was received by the<\/p>\n
W.P.(C).19165\/06                   2<\/span><\/p>\n
respondents.\n<\/p>\n
      2.    This Court while disposing of O.P:8706\/01, in Ext.P5<\/p>\n
judgment directed the respondent to look into the claim of the<\/p>\n
petitioner with respect to arrears, in accordance with law and to<\/p>\n
take a decision within a period of three months from receipt of<\/p>\n
the representation to be submitted by the petitioner along with<\/p>\n
copy of the judgment. In Ext.P5 Judgment this Court observed<\/p>\n
that, “Once the Government of India finds entitlement to pension for<\/p>\n
freedom fighters. I do not understand any justification for denying the<\/p>\n
arrears since the entitlement of pension is on the declaration that the<\/p>\n
petitioners are freedom fighters. After all such freedom fighters do not<\/p>\n
claim interest on arrears.”  Ext.P6 is the representation submitted<\/p>\n
in this regard. But the petitioner’s claim for arrears was denied<\/p>\n
through Ext.P7, stating that the application of the petitioner,<\/p>\n
forwarded by the State Government, was received by the<\/p>\n
respondents only on 26.12.2000 and hence the pension was<\/p>\n
granted with effect from that date only.\n<\/p>\n
      3.    Petitioner had produced Ext.P8, which is a counter<\/p>\n
affidavit filed by the respondent in another writ petition, WP(C).<\/p>\n
No:19614\/04. It is revealed that in an identical case for grant of<\/p>\n
dependent family pension with respect to participation in<\/p>\n
“Punnapra-Vayalar movement” the earlier order was reviewed<\/p>\n
W.P.(C).19165\/06                  3<\/span><\/p>\n
and pension was sanctioned from an ante-date of 20.1.1998<\/p>\n
onwards. Petitioner is seeking relief based on Ext.P8 and claims<\/p>\n
that an identical treatment need be ensured.\n<\/p>\n
      4.    If the respondents had allowed pension in other cases<\/p>\n
with effect from 20.1.1998, i.e: from the date of recognition of<\/p>\n
“Punnpra-Vayalar movement” as part of national freedom<\/p>\n
struggle, I find no reason as to why similar benefit should not be<\/p>\n
granted in the case of petitioner also. In this regard learned<\/p>\n
counsel for the petitioner had brought to my notice a Division<\/p>\n
Bench decision of this Court in Union of India Vs. Radhamony<\/p>\n
(2005 (4) KLT 27).        In that case this Court held that the<\/p>\n
eligibility for grant of pension is from the date of receipt of the<\/p>\n
original application. Referring to the decision of the Hon’ble<\/p>\n
Supreme Court in Mukund Lal Bhandari Vs. Union of India<\/p>\n
(1993 Supp.(3) SCC 2) this Court held that an earlier Division<\/p>\n
Bench decision in Krishnan Kutty Vs. Union of India (2003<\/p>\n
(1) KLT 21) in which it is held that the entitlement is from<\/p>\n
20.1.1998 i.e.:from the date of recognition of the movement as<\/p>\n
national freedom struggle, is not good law. It is held that, as<\/p>\n
observed in Mukund Lal Bhandari’s case (cited supra) the<\/p>\n
entitlement is from the date on which the original application is<\/p>\n
received whether, the application is filed with or without the<\/p>\n
requisite evidence.\n<\/p>\n
W.P.(C).19165\/06                  4<\/span><\/p>\n
     5.     In the case at hand the petitioner was allowed pension<\/p>\n
only from 26.12.2000 assigning the reason that the petitioner’s<\/p>\n
application, forwarded by the State Government along with their<\/p>\n
report, was received by the respondent only on that date. But<\/p>\n
from Ext.P2 Postal Acknowledgement Card it is evident that the<\/p>\n
original application (Ext.P1) dt:27.3.1998 was received at the<\/p>\n
Office of the Deputy Secretary of the respondent on 31.3.1998.<\/p>\n
Therefore going by the directions contained in Mukund Lal<\/p>\n
Bhandari’s case, which is followed in Radhamony’s case, it is<\/p>\n
to be held that the petitioner is entitled to get pension w:e:f:<\/p>\n
31.3.1998.\n<\/p>\n
     In such circumstances the writ petition is disposed of<\/p>\n
directing the respondent to sanction “Swatantrata Sainik<\/p>\n
Samman Pension” to the petitioner with effect from 31.3.1998<\/p>\n
onwards, in modification of the earlier orders allowing such<\/p>\n
pension w:e:f: 26.12.2000. The arrears in this regard shall be<\/p>\n
disbursed to the petitioner within a period of two months from<\/p>\n
the date of receipt of a copy of the Judgment.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                  C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n
okb<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Kerala High Court Pushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 19165 of 2006(F) 1. PUSHAKARI, W\/O. LATE DOMINIC YOYHANNAN, … Petitioner Vs 1. UNION OF INDIA REPRESENTED BY … Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.K.K.SATHEESH For Respondent :SRI.P.PARAMESWARAN NAIR,ASST.SOLICITOR The Hon’ble MR. Justice C.K.ABDUL […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38096","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nPushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Pushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-02T12:07:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Pushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-02T12:07:49+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":813,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Pushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-02T12:07:49+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Pushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Pushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Pushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-02T12:07:49+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Pushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-02T12:07:49+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009"},"wordCount":813,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009","name":"Pushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-02T12:07:49+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/pushakari-vs-union-of-india-represented-by-on-31-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Pushakari vs Union Of India Represented By on 31 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38096","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38096"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38096\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38096"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38096"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38096"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}