{"id":38109,"date":"2010-09-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010"},"modified":"2018-06-11T09:27:46","modified_gmt":"2018-06-11T03:57:46","slug":"mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of &#8230; on 14 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of &#8230; on 14 September, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 2849 of 2008(L)\n\n\n1. MRS. GITA SUBBA RAO,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. BRANCH MANAGER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.T.L.ANANTHASIVAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.THOMAS MATHEW NELLIMOOTTIL\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\n\n Dated :14\/09\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.\n                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n                  W.P.(C). No.2849\/2008-L\n                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n          Dated this the 14th day of September, 2010\n\n                      J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>    The writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking<\/p>\n<p>for a direction to the respondents to make the payment of<\/p>\n<p>the amount covered under Ext.P2 insurance policy which was<\/p>\n<p>due for payment as early as on 06\/02\/2005.\n<\/p>\n<p>    2.   The case of the petitioner is that her husband,<\/p>\n<p>Dr.A.N.Subba Rao had taken an insurance policy No.66481751,<\/p>\n<p>under the caption &#8216;Twenty Year Money Back Policy with<\/p>\n<p>Profits&#8217;, in the year 1985, for a sum of Rs.1,00,000\/- and<\/p>\n<p>she was the nominee.   His whereabouts were not known from<\/p>\n<p>August 1999 and all her efforts to trace him out did not<\/p>\n<p>succeed.  He was working as a Neurosurgeon in the Medical<\/p>\n<p>Trust Hospital, Ernakulam.    He had executed a Will dated<\/p>\n<p>15\/05\/1989 in favour of the petitioner, and their son and<\/p>\n<p>daughter.   Since the petitioner&#8217;s husband&#8217;s whereabouts<\/p>\n<p>were not known for a period of more than seven years, she<\/p>\n<p>filed an application for grant of Letters of Administration<\/p>\n<p>with the Will annexed.     This Court, by Ext.P1 Judgment<\/p>\n<p>granted relief.   It was held that since he was not heard<\/p>\n<p>for more than seven years after he disappeared, it is<\/p>\n<p>presumed, under Section 108 of the Evidence Act, that<\/p>\n<p>Dr.A.N.Subba  Rao  is  dead.    Thereafter, the  petitioner<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.2849\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                -:2:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>approached the first respondent for the insurance amount<\/p>\n<p>which had matured on 06\/02\/2005 and the original policy was<\/p>\n<p>also handed over, a copy of policy is produced as Ext.P2<\/p>\n<p>herein.      It shows that the she is the nominee under the<\/p>\n<p>policy.      Various correspondences ensued and finally, by<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P7, she was informed to produce legal evidence of title<\/p>\n<p>from a court of law.           According to her, in spite of<\/p>\n<p>production of all documents and the claim statement the<\/p>\n<p>respondents refused to make the payment.         It is in these<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, she has sought for a direction for payment<\/p>\n<p>of the amount covered by the policy with bonus and interest.<\/p>\n<p>     3.      The respondents have filed a counter affidavit.<\/p>\n<p>It is pointed out in the counter affidavit that even though<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner was the nominee, the policy was assigned to<\/p>\n<p>the    Housing      Development  Finance   Corporation  Ltd  on<\/p>\n<p>12\/09\/1989 and it was re-assigned by HDFC Ltd to the life<\/p>\n<p>assured on 29\/12\/1999.         Thereafter, there was no fresh<\/p>\n<p>nomination under the policy.        Therefore, in the absence of<\/p>\n<p>a fresh nomination, the petitioner is not entitled for<\/p>\n<p>release of the amounts of the policy.            It is further<\/p>\n<p>pointed out that if there is no nomination of the policy,<\/p>\n<p>the title is open and claim has to be settled to the legal<\/p>\n<p>representatives\/heirs of the deceased policy holder who<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.2849\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               -:3:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>prove title to the policy moneys.         The said requirement<\/p>\n<p>has not been satisfied by the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.      The learned counsel for the petitioner raised<\/p>\n<p>various contentions pointing out that a reading of Ext.P1<\/p>\n<p>Judgment     will    show  that  this  Court   had  drawn   the<\/p>\n<p>presumption under Section 108 of the Evidence Act to hold<\/p>\n<p>that Dr.A.N.Subba Rao is dead.         After appreciating the<\/p>\n<p>evidence adduced, this Court was satisfied that Ext.P6 Will<\/p>\n<p>produced therein, has been proved in accordance with law as<\/p>\n<p>one duly executed by late Dr.A.N.Subba Rao.        Accordingly,<\/p>\n<p>Letters of Administration with Ext.P6 Will attached was<\/p>\n<p>ordered to be issued.      It is pointed out that in the light<\/p>\n<p>of the same, title of the petitioner and children has been<\/p>\n<p>proved.     It is further pointed out that as policy has been<\/p>\n<p>re-assigned      as  evident from   the endorsement  in  Ext.P2<\/p>\n<p>itself, the nomination survives going by the effect of the<\/p>\n<p>proviso to Section 39(4) of the Insurance Act, 1938 (for<\/p>\n<p>short &#8216;the Act&#8217;).       It is also pointed out that being the<\/p>\n<p>legal representative, she is entitled to claim the above<\/p>\n<p>amount.     It is pointed out that there is no merit in the<\/p>\n<p>contentions raised by the respondents.\n<\/p>\n<p>     5.      Section 38 of the Act relates to Assignment and<\/p>\n<p>transfer of insurance policies.      The nomination by a policy<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.2849\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                -:4:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>holder is covered by Section 39 of the Act.       Sub-section 4<\/p>\n<p>of Section 39 of the Act reads as follows:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                   (4) A transfer or assignment of a policy<\/p>\n<p>             made    in  accordance   with  section   38   shall<\/p>\n<p>             automatically cancel a nomination:<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><p>                   [Provided that the assignment, of a policy to<\/p>\n<p>             the insurer who bears the risk on the policy at<\/p>\n<p>             the time of the assignment, in consideration of a<\/p>\n<p>             loan granted by that insurer on the security of<\/p>\n<p>             the policy within its surrender value, or its<\/p>\n<p>             reassignment on repayment of the loan shall not<\/p>\n<p>             cancel a nomination, but shall affect the rights<\/p>\n<p>             of   the  nominee  only   to  the  extent  of   the<\/p>\n<p>             insurer&#8217;s interest in the policy.]<\/p>\n<p>Going by Sub-section 4 of Section 39 of the Act once there<\/p>\n<p>is assignment of a policy in accordance with Section 38,<\/p>\n<p>there will be an automatic cancellation of the nomination.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Going by the the proviso to Sub-section 4 of Section 39,<\/p>\n<p>when an insurer bears the risk on the policy at the time of<\/p>\n<p>assignment, in consideration of a loan granted by that<\/p>\n<p>insurer on the security of the policy within its surrender<\/p>\n<p>value, or its reassignment on repayment of the loan shall<\/p>\n<p>not cancel a nomination, but shall affect the rights of the<\/p>\n<p>nominee only to the extent of the insurer&#8217;s interest in the<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.2849\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                -:5:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>policy.      Therefore, in such cases, when there is a re-<\/p>\n<p>assignment, it will not cancel the nomination.          Herein,<\/p>\n<p>going    by   the    endorsement in   Ext.P2, there  is  a  re-<\/p>\n<p>assignment of the policy.        Of course, there is no fresh<\/p>\n<p>nomination.      But, still going by the proviso of the Act, in<\/p>\n<p>the   light     of   the  re-assignment,  the  nomination  will<\/p>\n<p>actually resurrect.\n<\/p>\n<p>     6.      At any rate, the said issue need not deter this<\/p>\n<p>Court from granting the relief, in the light of the fact<\/p>\n<p>that the husband of the petitioner had been declared as<\/p>\n<p>dead as per Ext.P1 by drawing the presumption under Section<\/p>\n<p>108 of the Evidence Act.        Ext.P1 Judgment is in favour of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner and her children.        Going by the same, the<\/p>\n<p>Letters of Administration has been issued with Ext.P6 Will<\/p>\n<p>therein.      Naturally, when a person is dead, going by the<\/p>\n<p>terms of the policy itself, the legal representatives are<\/p>\n<p>entitled     for    the  benefit of   the  policy.   Therefore,<\/p>\n<p>evidently, Ext.P1 will come to the help of the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>in the light of the fact that Dr.A.N.Subba Rao is declared<\/p>\n<p>as dead by this Court.        Further, in the light of Ext.P1,<\/p>\n<p>the title to the property is also established.      Section 273<\/p>\n<p>of the Indian Succession Act embodies this principle.<\/p>\n<p>     7.      There is no dispute that the petitioner is the<\/p>\n<p>wife    of   Dr.A.N.Subba   Rao.     The objection whether  the<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.2849\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                -:6:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>petitioner should have filed a suit and not a writ petition<\/p>\n<p>which is raised in the counter affidavit, need not deter<\/p>\n<p>the   Court     from  issuing  a   direction  when no  disputed<\/p>\n<p>questions of facts are available for adjudication.         That<\/p>\n<p>the policy has been issued in favour of Dr.A.N.Subba Rao<\/p>\n<p>and the petitioner was a nominee under the policy are not<\/p>\n<p>disputed.     That the policy is matured is also not disputed.<\/p>\n<p>In that view of the matter, the Corporation being a public<\/p>\n<p>authority,     this   Court will    be  justified in issuing  a<\/p>\n<p>mandamus.      Further the writ petition was admitted and was<\/p>\n<p>pending for the last more than two years.\n<\/p>\n<p>     8.      The learned counsel for the petitioner placed<\/p>\n<p>reliance upon the Judgment of the Bombay High Court in W.P.<\/p>\n<p>(C).No.999\/2006 to point out that in similar circumstances,<\/p>\n<p>after drawing the presumption under Section 108 of the<\/p>\n<p>Evidence      Act,   the   Bombay    High  Court  directed  the<\/p>\n<p>Corporation to pay the petitioner therein the entire sum<\/p>\n<p>assured with accrued bonus and interest at the rate of 12%<\/p>\n<p>per annum from 13\/11\/1995 till payment.\n<\/p>\n<p>     9.      Herein, the policy has matured in the year 2005<\/p>\n<p>and the amount remains with the Corporation even now.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore, actually, the petitioner will be entitled for<\/p>\n<p>the payment of reasonable interest also for the delayed<\/p>\n<p>payment.      Therefore, the writ petition is allowed.    There<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.2849\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                             -:7:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>will be a direction to the first respondent to disburse the<\/p>\n<p>amount covered by policy No.66481751 (sum assured) along<\/p>\n<p>with accrued bonus and interest at the rate of 8% per annum<\/p>\n<p>from 06\/02\/2005 till the date of payment.      Since it is<\/p>\n<p>pointed out that the petitioner&#8217;s daughter&#8217;s marriage is<\/p>\n<p>scheduled to be held in November, 2010 the amount will be<\/p>\n<p>disbursed on or before 30th October, 2010. No costs.<\/p>\n<p>                         (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)<\/p>\n<p>ms<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of &#8230; on 14 September, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 2849 of 2008(L) 1. MRS. GITA SUBBA RAO, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA, &#8230; Respondent 2. BRANCH MANAGER, For Petitioner :SRI.T.L.ANANTHASIVAN For Respondent :SRI.THOMAS MATHEW [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38109","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of ... on 14 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of ... on 14 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-11T03:57:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of &#8230; on 14 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-11T03:57:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1440,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of ... on 14 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-11T03:57:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of &#8230; on 14 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of ... on 14 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of ... on 14 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-11T03:57:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of &#8230; on 14 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-11T03:57:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010"},"wordCount":1440,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010","name":"Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of ... on 14 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-11T03:57:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mrs-gita-subba-rao-vs-life-insurance-corporation-of-on-14-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mrs. Gita Subba Rao vs Life Insurance Corporation Of &#8230; on 14 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38109","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38109"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38109\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38109"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38109"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38109"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}