{"id":38340,"date":"2009-01-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009"},"modified":"2016-08-05T12:39:11","modified_gmt":"2016-08-05T07:09:11","slug":"state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>Civil Revision No.6534of 2008 (O &amp; M)                            -1-\n\n      IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA\n                    AT CHANDIGARH\n\n                               Civil Revision No.6534 of 2008 (O &amp; M)\n                               Date of decision 06.01.2009\n\nState of Haryana and others                                .....Appellants\n\n\n                         versus\n\n\nSh. M. S. Nagra and others                                 .....Respondents\n\nCoram:-     Hon'ble Mr. Justice K. Kannan.\n\nPresent:    Mr. Deepak Jindal, AAG, Haryana.\n\nK. Kannan, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>      1.    The tenant which is the State of Haryana assails the concurrent<\/p>\n<p>orders of eviction passed on the ground of the requirement of the landlord<\/p>\n<p>for own use and occupation.       The landlord&#8217;s contention was that the<\/p>\n<p>property was required for setting up an office of law firm in the premises.<\/p>\n<p>The Rent Controller upheld the contention of the landlord and ordered<\/p>\n<p>eviction on 2.4.2008.    The appellate authority dismissed the appeal on<\/p>\n<p>26.9.2008 affirming the decision of the Rent Controller.<\/p>\n<p>      2.    The contention on behalf of the Government was that the<\/p>\n<p>landlord had no bona fide requirement and that would be seen from the fact<\/p>\n<p>that even after filing of the petition, the property at the second floor and<\/p>\n<p>third floor had fallen vacant and instead of occupying the property the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner had been pursuing the application for eviction of the tenant.<\/p>\n<p>Learned counsel for the revision petitioner contends further that the rent<\/p>\n<p>agreement provided for 3 months notice for termination and such notice had<\/p>\n<p>not been issued.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.    In order to succeed in the petition, the only requirement under<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Revision No.6534of 2008 (O &amp; M)                             -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the relevant statute under Section 13(3)(i) is:\n<\/p>\n<p>             a) he requires it for own use;\n<\/p>\n<p>             b) he is not occupying another residential building in the urban<br \/>\narea concerned;\n<\/p>\n<p>             c) he has not vacated such building without sufficient cause<br \/>\nafter the commencement of the Act in the said urban area;\n<\/p>\n<p>             d)&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.proviso&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.\n<\/p>\n<p>      4.     As regards the first contention that the landlord had obtained<\/p>\n<p>vacant possession of the building at second, third and the fourth floor, it<\/p>\n<p>cannot be a ground to test bonafides of the requirement of the landlord.<\/p>\n<p>That would amount to enabling the tenant to dictate to the landlord which<\/p>\n<p>property he shall occupy.           It bears out in evidence that has also been<\/p>\n<p>rendered in the appellate Court&#8217;s order that the landlord was willing to<\/p>\n<p>accommodate the tenant in possession of any other floor which had fallen<\/p>\n<p>vacant subsequently but the tenant was not prepared to take any other<\/p>\n<p>portion of the building. If a tenant must have a specific preference to the<\/p>\n<p>ground floor, afortiorari, the landlord shall also be entitled to insist a<\/p>\n<p>particular portion of the building as alone being required for personal<\/p>\n<p>occupation. The landlord may have his own reasons for the choice of the<\/p>\n<p>particular floor of the building, considering the fact that it is an evidence<\/p>\n<p>that they were planning to set up a law firm consisting of brothers and they<\/p>\n<p>may believe that access to the clients would be easy only if it is at the<\/p>\n<p>ground floor. The appellate Court has referred to several decisions of the<\/p>\n<p>Supreme Court where it has been pointed out that a tenant cannot plead that<\/p>\n<p>a landlord shall opt for only a particular portion of the building and insist on<\/p>\n<p>not vacating the premises, so long as it is not shown that at the time of the<\/p>\n<p>presentation of the petition the landlord had any other property in<\/p>\n<p>occupation. A landlord cannot be non-suited, except when a subsequent<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Revision No.6534of 2008 (O &amp; M)                            -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>event some other building had fallen vacant which was equally suitable that<\/p>\n<p>violated the statutory requirement as outlined above.<\/p>\n<p>      5.     The counsel for the revision petitioner also contended that a<\/p>\n<p>family partition that has been brought about by the landlord makes it appear<\/p>\n<p>as though the different floors of the building had been allotted to other<\/p>\n<p>brothers and that the landlord had only been allotted the ground floor. This,<\/p>\n<p>according to him, shows the landlord&#8217;s deliberate conduct to hoodwink the<\/p>\n<p>Court to accept his contention for the other hand, in my view, it is indeed<\/p>\n<p>non-issue, even if it had been contended that the family arrangement set up<\/p>\n<p>by the landlord referring to the allotment of the different portions of the<\/p>\n<p>building to other brothers were not true, the petitioner as landlord is entitled<\/p>\n<p>to secure eviction, so long as the requirement for establishing the law firm<\/p>\n<p>continued and that need is found to be not false.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.     It is also strenuously contended by the landlord that the three<\/p>\n<p>months notice had not been issued as was required to be done under the<\/p>\n<p>rental agreement. It has to be pointed out that the agreement that was<\/p>\n<p>executed on 31.1.1995 provided initially for a period of 5 years and the<\/p>\n<p>notice period must be understood as being operative only in existence where<\/p>\n<p>termination was sought even within the period of 5 years. Admittedly the 5<\/p>\n<p>years period had expired. The tenant has continued as a statutory tenant.<\/p>\n<p>The provisions of the East Punjab Rent Restriction Act, 1949 shall be<\/p>\n<p>understood as overriding any other contractual obligation and eviction itself<\/p>\n<p>could be sought only on the grounds mentioned under Section 13. So<\/p>\n<p>considered, there is no necessity for issuance of notice under any of the<\/p>\n<p>provisions of the Rent Control Act.\n<\/p>\n<p>      7.     The orders of the Rent Controller and the appellate Court are<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Revision No.6534of 2008 (O &amp; M)                          -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>well considered and there is no error as regards legality or propriety of the<\/p>\n<p>order to justify intervention in revision proceedings. The revision petition<\/p>\n<p>therefore fails and is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>         8.   The counsel for the petitioner states that the Government has<\/p>\n<p>established Employment Exchange at the demised premises and seeks for at<\/p>\n<p>least six months time for eviction. The plea is partially accepted and the<\/p>\n<p>tenant shall have five months from the date of the order for eviction. No<\/p>\n<p>costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                    ( K. KANNAN )<br \/>\n                                                         JUDGE<br \/>\n06.01.2009<br \/>\nA. KAUNDAL\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009 Civil Revision No.6534of 2008 (O &amp; M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.6534 of 2008 (O &amp; M) Date of decision 06.01.2009 State of Haryana and others &#8230;..Appellants [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38340","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-05T07:09:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-05T07:09:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":940,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009\",\"name\":\"State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-05T07:09:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-05T07:09:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-05T07:09:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009"},"wordCount":940,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009","name":"State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-05T07:09:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-haryana-and-others-vs-sh-m-s-nagra-and-others-on-6-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Haryana And Others vs Sh. M. S. Nagra And Others on 6 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38340","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38340"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38340\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38340"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38340"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38340"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}