{"id":38715,"date":"2009-04-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009"},"modified":"2018-12-01T04:01:20","modified_gmt":"2018-11-30T22:31:20","slug":"m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"M E A Hafeez S\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
M E A Hafeez S\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: V.Jagannathan<\/div>\n
IN THE H\u00a7GH COURT {DP KARNATAKA AT BANC':AL{\u00a7RfE\nDated the 1555 day fApri1 2009 ' V  \n:BEFORE:\n\nTHE I-iON'\u00a7~3LE MR,JUS'\u00a7'ICE :_\u00a5E,JAG\u00e9;N'1\\E';i51f%i\u00a74'v'-- _ V: %\nCIVIL REVISION P}3;'I'1'I'IONA_ Nix. .3gg@;;2g%ea   .k  '  J f\n\nBETWEEN :\n\n1. M.E}.A.Hafeez,\nS\/o late M.E.LTsman, \nAged about 54 yz::'a~.;cf\u00e9:.. f\n\n2. M.U.Nc:-oxjahaaizz,  .\nD\/0 Kate  \nAged abc;ut'?i\u00a7L%'i'yeeirs.\u00a7  \n\n3. \u00a5vi.U.F'ayaz';_\u00bb. '   :\nSf.0..1af\u20ac*..55-E-+;USm.\u00e9Ih_V\" \"\nPgged ahsixt  \u00a7*ea11a, '\n\n4.  .13 .'i~I_ag&@1V1  Sit  ,,  2 _.\nS\/oiatez PvI.i3.U:=;maiI;._ '\nAged a:;;ou:%3::s \n\n\"V '  5. V.   \u00a2 Mtl\ufb02ii\u00e9 @...\u00a7\u00a7afee,\n\n Sir: !at'e._._M.E.Usmaax1,\n'  T\ufb01ggti gahgnui 34': years.\n\n6;. \"'v%'M;u;\"\u00a5fir\u00a7g?=2\u00a7,\n\n Ufa late M.E.Usman,\n1-'xg\ufb01d ahcmt 28 years.\n\n1 n 'T   are 1*\/a Bychanahalli,\n  Block, i{usha1anagaxaT@w12,\n\nSemawarawt.e T311211,\nKo\u00e9agu District.\n.. . Fatiiieners\n\n( 83% Sri M.Na1a_\u00a75ana Bhat for M] s Sub=ba;rao 8:. C,'.{).,\nAdvncattz. )\n\n\n\nAND:\n\n1. The: Chief Execu\ufb01ive Qificer,\nKarnataka. Siate Board Qtf Waldss,\nrepresented by the Chief\nExecutive Officer, Cunningham Road,\nBangalore ~-- 560 ()0 1.\n\n2. The Jamia Masjid, T.  \nKushalanagara, Keciagu; Bistxict,' - ..\nrepresented by its Secretary\u00a7\"'~, ' .   \n\n- ' '  . Respc\u00e9ndents\n\n( By Sri R.i-'sbciui    for R~1.\nSn' (3. R. Goulayg Adxra\u00e9atg jthgif  )\nCivil R\u20ac'f1iS\"i(%3j'~Pe\ufb01\ufb01g\ufb01.:.,\u00a7u1lE\u20ac1 \"l%1\ufb01d\u00a3\u00a7\u00e9\"'V\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9Cti{)11 1 15 of the\n:1. 9.0. agajzm   grci\u00e9r dated 26.7.2098\npassed in Q..V.s;r~$:g.?? i4;2E>\"\u00e9:3\u00ab. \ufb01g  \ufb01le of the Presiding\nO\ufb02icer;    Vlviyssre Division, Mysore,\ndismissing' gihe \ufb02ied, Section 83(2) of the Wald\" Act\nread witii Qfcier 7;' R23:  4z.Jht: 0. P111. praying to declare the\nouiexy .. pas\u00e9;Ie3,V'  \"'-K\u00e9w;NCR\/115100\/23:39:-92 dated\n\n   as  void and iizaperativm and far\n\n \u00bbc@:i335a\u00a7:q1.1c1z\ufb01.~3,i 'i1=,__1ief of injunc\ufb01on.\n\nV p\u20ac:1'f\u00a7'x:io::'x coming on for admission this ciay, the\n\nco\ufb01fit m;:{\u00e9c\"iEf1e fmilowing :\nO R I} E R\n\nT118 cmnplaint \ufb01led by R62 Jamia Masjid. before\n\n R-- 1 Chief EX\u20acC1.itiV(? Officer, Eamataka State Board of\n\nWakffs, allegng that the petitianers have encroached\n%~\n\n'I\n\n\n\n3\nupgn the wai\u00e9' property, led to an order being passed by\n\nR} by holding that tilt': premises which are nmntioned\n\nin the conxpiaint schedule are wakf properties arici-3:116\n\npetitioners, W113 have bean in csccupation \n\nwit.hout. any p\u20acI'II1iSSi0I1 from the Wakf BQg1:f:d~-,..ti:f,F:\"rt%fl\u00a7fe;\u00ab--T K  \n\nhave to deliver pcssession of thejpre:1ii$6'S__ if: q11es\"iiQf1_;Q:'\n\nR- 1. Thizs ertier 91\" R? ~::;attc::\u00a5' <41" the suit\n\ufb01ifzd by the p\u20actt\u00a7.?iDI3\u20acZfS"i;1%1:d\u20aciZ 'V'--V cf the Wakf\nAct, 1995 ._    for a declaratien\nthat t:h\u00a7:  is null and void and\niI1{)}J\u20acI:;:3\ufb015ZiVt3,A  for consequential relief of\n\npemnanefz\ufb01 * \u00a711'}i,:1f1\u20acitic\u00bb:r1 _restraining the respondents<\/pre>\n
heif\ufb01ji\ufb02v f:m1’I1 \u00e9xuiic\ufb01rferirxvg with the peaceful possession and<\/p>\n
 \u00bbe:r:}Qy1’r:ent*Qf*–$1_1e $111: premises by the petitioners.<\/p>\n
   suit was C01″1tf:Sted by the respondents<\/p>\n
‘V’-..her\u20aci1i,VVf._\u00e9\u00a71d the 16aI”I}\u20ac\u00e9 judge of the trial court, after<\/p>\n
 ,ii”a:_::\u00a7?;;1g necessary issues and Consi\u00e9ering ‘Chg snridanca<\/p>\n
 __pia::t\u20acd and upon healing tha C\ufb01ilil\ufb01fii for tha partie$,<\/p>\n
ultimatsly dismissed the suit of the plaintiffs 1.8., the<\/p>\n
p(*:f.ii1i\u20ac)1″1\u20acI’S h\u20ac:I”SiI”\u00a3. Aggiaved by the said arder ef the<\/p>\n
.%<\/p>\n
,,\/<\/p>\n
4<\/span>
\ntrial court, this revision petition is pIf’t3f(‘:1T\u20ac(i unclar<\/p>\n
S\u20acCti01″1 1155 0f this C.P.Ci. read with Section 83(9) of thfi<\/p>\n
Am.\n<\/p>\n
3. It is {ha case of the petitioners thai: t_i1e}gf’i”;a;v\u00a2<\/p>\n
in possessien and enjoyment of the “”pr\u20ac-qjjertie\u00e9  <\/p>\n
which are in S.N0.  I   S.N0.\n<\/p>\n
82\/*2 nmasuring   Inttasuring
\n0.18 acres  ..:;s}it:1at;\u00a7\u00e9\u00e9V:1″   Towza,
\nS0mawa1>ap\u00e9\u00a3\ufb01\u00a7;\u00ab\u00ab._  ::i\u00a7i$\ufb01;i\u00e9t, and it is their
\nftlgrthezg’  cf’ possemion $0 enjaye\u00e9
\nby t.l2eV:V’pefi\ufb01on:\u00a7”‘;?\u00a7; Cf.()I\u00a71I11it:tr3\u00a3: insiittzted a<\/p>\n
suit in  V :1’\u00a734,~,{i2 for the relief of deciaratiun<\/p>\n
 5i=’\u20ac<;z):ver:gf c;f"d;3rr2ages and thgrugh the said Sliit was<\/p>\n
 _d'\u20ac:<\u00a7frct:rii-_j.i;';.. 3E':3g\u00e9z:.:\u00a7;1r at' {\u00a316 Jamia Masjid. Committse, an<\/p>\n
  p61:i\ufb0103"l\u20acI'S in R.A.N<:~.. E25\/1975, the<\/p>\n
"..,'\u00a7u{1g{Ii.E;Ii"i; of {ha itriai cent: was sat aside anti {ha suit<\/p>\n
V":V'f.$3. S.u4'i_iisI11iss\u20acrd and this led {ha Jamia Masjid Cemrrlittee<\/p>\n
  prefer second appeal to this court: in R.S.A.No.<\/p>\n
 566 ,1 .1978 321d the said appea\u00e9 was also dismissed.<\/p>\n
y<\/p>\n
la.)<\/p>\n
4. S”\u00a31bS\u20acq{1\u20ac1’1\ufb01\u00a7f, in the year 1999, a1’1othe:r suit was
\n\ufb01led by ihe. [I3I’\u20acS\u20ac1’1t R42 and it was in C}.S.N0. 4;’ 199% in<\/p>\n
which the reiicif Qf declaratiori and iI1juI}CTiGB_ “*\u00ab’_g\u00a5’E;S<\/p>\n
szmght and ageing: the order passed in   ‘<\/p>\n
injmacticn relief sought, the peiitioners p\u00a3”&f\u00a7::’1*ed_j’&.a;i2j.<\/p>\n
appeal in M.A.Na. 4\/1999  <\/p>\n
aiiuwad and the 0rd\u00e9;:’\u00ab._..\u20ac:f_ 539,5 Set aside and
\nthe suit in O.S.NQ. 4\/:v_\u00a7\u00a7:}\u00a3:v\u00bb,\u00a2i\u00a7s131issed\u00a7 it is
\nalso the   f;tv.?\u00a7.;\u00ab.”‘1V%Vl”d:’\u00e95’e\u00ab3;:1’li<::I* to tha above
\nsuit,    {).S.Na. :12\/1997
\nand  gismissed fo\ufb02owing 21 111613111} \ufb01i\ufb01d<\/p>\n
by th\ufb01 pia\u00e9xfzti\ufb02" f\u00a7'i''':\u20ac:\u00a3*<3iI';, '—-:.,. '<\/p>\n
    herein filed the ctzampiajm; before<\/p>\n
    order gyass\ufb01d by R-1 requixting the<\/p>\n
pIctii:i 0I1<\u00e9r'S['j_ ti': dtizliv\ufb01z' vacant poss\ufb01ssien 9f the Suit<\/p>\n
 prezhis\u00e9g was again qumtioned before this <:;m.1:*: by the<\/p>\n
A \u00a7\u00a7 \u20ac\u20aciii_Qn&rs in Writ Petition Na. 27188\/2003 and by<\/p>\n
'  <\u00a7:\u00a7f'de:tf* dated 17.6.2003? this court. diS\u00a7JOE\u00a7\u20ac(i cf E114: 'ii:'I'i'{<\/p>\n
'4 petition by abserving that the pstitieners have Gther<\/p>\n
aitatrzativa efficacious r\u00e9medy 1:0 pursue undar the \ufb01at<\/p>\n
2:\u00bb<\/p>\n
gal<\/p>\n
and, tkierefsxr\ufb01, th\ufb01 W"\u00a7f'i\u00a7; petiticii was f\ufb01jac\u00e9iied by 'gi?iI';g<\/p>\n
three: m0I1thS tima to the g3etiti:m\u20ac1"$ in apggifuagkxli \u00e9'z:_{1\u00e9<<\/p>\n
appm'pI'iat;<: aL:1:h01'i\u00a3:ies. It is thereafter  ';1.\u00a7::\u00a7*e:.st;figt  <\/p>\n
suit in O.S.\u00a7\\E0. 14\/2083 was i'T;1cd…\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7; <\/p>\n
Iaading 3:0 cen\ufb01tma\ufb01on of the Cz'r:i_f1" by _i\u00a77R– i  u<\/p>\n
herein and i_:hr:: suit 0f the  <\/p>\n
6. The iearued cs1:1\u00a7s\u00a7 f:\u00a73~_  ref-311*i:’:g* 1:0
\n31;}: the ab0v\u20ac’.Vfz1\u00a2:ts,   Vx\ufb01etitiorzers have
\nbeen in    have been
\nme11iiQ-1:\u00bb<\/p>\n
,1<\/p>\n
‘E’
\n5<\/span><\/p>\n
the suit. pren1ises for a bag p<:1'iod 0f \ufb01lms arid ever": the<\/p>\n
\ufb01lldiiilg of the trial cmlrt on isssue No.3 if} OQEE—,No.<\/p>\n
184\/ 19471.2 as regar\ufb01g the petitieners <\/p>\n
the title 1)}; \u00a3idV\u20acI'S\u20ac pas:-"$633103 is alse iI1M_f\u00e9\u00a7v;Qu:* "0f 'E".\u00a71{',  _& <\/p>\n
petitioners and $9 313:) the \u00a7\u00e9nsv_;%&:.V to -1'is_$}1.:<,';\u00bb.__<\/p>\n
c0:1<:\u20ac:':1i11g jurisciictien. I}:1derA'\ufb01i\u20ac::se Ci:*\u00e9.L\u00a7:n1S!fa::(:.\u00e9'$, <\/p>\n
the iInpug1\u20ac:(:i ordier p:%\u00a7fs\u20ac{1'A.v_b}';Vj_jiz\ufb01lajgci trial judge is<\/p>\n
nut $u$tainable..\u00a7.:1 law.-H  .  V<\/p>\n
?. it is ;'\u20aci}V:'\u00bb%;:i;  Masjicl C0111mii:tee
\nwas 'it: \ufb01}.{\u00a7'~.\u20ac\u00bb8_}"1i'C\u00a7\u00a7"  I't':3f\u20aci'ITt3(Zi to above
\nand t}ii:A {3E_eseIii:':'I\u20acv\u00a72'?\u00bb.i\u00a7\u00a7–.i"%fig: same Jamie. Masjid, but a<\/p>\n
1'agist.t:red I<.:31e'.  I$\u00a7eir.:1*t}*\u00a3i\u00e9iess, the \ufb01ndings recordad in<\/p>\n
 '~  _tft1f:i_ "i;3a__;:,1;i\u20ac17 sui \u20acs;———-ti:er\u20acfere, Qpezrate as res judicaia<\/p>\n
 "p1:*\u00e9;:=\u00a7\u00a2nt respondexzis more so when R-1 Wakf<\/p>\n
  the. preperty thrtmgh R-2. The leammd<\/p>\n
 ..,co1111s~':Vl_\u00e9i~;1sa s\ufb01sngly cantended that in ortzier to bewme<\/p>\n
V':-V property, there has 1:0 136 deiivery 31" possession<\/p>\n
   aggnd, in the instant case, the petiti0ne1*s have been in<\/p>\n
cantinuens pessessia\ufb01 of the three items which are the<\/p>\n
subject mattar 0f' the suit via, house, hittalu and vacaxxt<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\nsite. The1’ef0:*e\u00a7 the fmding reear\u00e9ed by the learzmd trial<\/p>\n
judgrc cannot be upheld in iaw both 013 facts asVjs${<:2;'ii.uas<\/p>\n
in iaw. The ieamtled munsei aisc: made refer\u00a7*;iiC<\u00e9..'_'t\u00a3\u00a7 _f;\ufb01<f:"\u00ab _<\/p>\n
provisiefss contained in Omar 23 sggue :(4;k,%%ai:i;i\u00a2r%-2 mag-;% \u00ab x <\/p>\n
2, and Ordar 23 R1236 3(a) $9 (:Q i;;1]:\u00e911.d   \ufb01\u00e9\u00e9 <\/p>\n
earlier suit was disnjissed   any
\nliberty bemg rese11.rt:r:Vi%"4-..f;:'1*1f:3;A "\ufb01_}j1"1g subsequent
\nsuit, therefore, {:1-:}\u00a73:$    '  V<\/p>\n
8. in      centmatiens, the
\nieanaezi”   placed reiiance 0:51
\nthe d\u00a7::_i’sie\u00a7_1″1::~:V  19*r3(1) Mys.L.J. 1.93, AER<\/p>\n
1979 sC sS1,’V 2\ufb01{)=\u00a7(.1)’E;s\u00a73.r,L.J, 2250, AIR 2091 Calcutta<\/p>\n
~\u00ab,1e2;Lv%\u00ab:%(2\u00a7p<:%)2 s{<i:s::%&&M:.;::1 and A112 :9?9 so 23%. In the<\/p>\n
  _ Gf iaw laid down in the afarementicned.\n<\/p>\n
d7\u00a2’:_i$i:313_$ ‘a\ufb01iigriz 13:16 cantentiens put fgrward as above, the<\/p>\n
 ._1@a,::{1er:};’ “r::m1:1$e1 far the petiti0:1e.:r*ss saught. fer setting<\/p>\n
“\u00ab gs?\u00e9id\u00a7i=’:_\u00ab 131$ or-tier, whiaia is i1::1p’u\u00a71eci in this i{‘\u20ac’ViSiOi1<\/p>\n
”  ,.. A ” p\u00e9ztitian,<\/p>\n
 5,’ On the 93217161′ han\u00e9, the Ieamsd cmlnsel fer Rm}<\/p>\n
Wakf Beard, at f\u00a7:e outset, gubmitted that the pren\ufb01ses
\n\/\/<\/p>\n
-6
\nt<\/p>\n
1:\n<\/p>\n
aspects have baen considered by the learried judge 0f<\/p>\n
the Uiai 00311. in the, Course 6f the i\ufb021p2.1g1\u20acd order and,<\/p>\n
as such, this mvisien petiticsn lacks merit and is ij:a\ufb02\u00a7l’e_te<\/p>\n
be dismissed. Refarence was also: magii\u00e9i ‘  _i\ufb013\u00a7::”\u00ab _<\/p>\n
admissicm made by P.Ws.1 and 2  ‘w <\/p>\n
exagminatiori in this mgard. M\u00a3}reevs_*:3, the -sI”_’zbJi1j<\/p>\n
made is that the  A   Masjici
\nCommittee did mat   beirlg decided
\nby U16 snug;  ‘&’z1’:’11i”i\u20acS\u20act factors inte
\naccount, tiixsrg.   \ufb01gs rightly dismissed<\/p>\n
13. Referfh\u00e9g   of the Amt, the submission<\/p>\n
 1119.;”1g%%’::’ ‘is. thai’   Board itself may collect the<\/p>\n
 ‘r\u00e9tgarding any property which it has reason<\/p>\n
 the wakf pmgrerty and if any questiml<\/p>\n
–V re1z\u00a7f:i:;g’V :1j;.:;} i\u00a7*heiit1ar ‘\u00a3113 property is wakf preperty of H01:<\/p>\n
 : .,2:A’:*i:~:r:’,.s, then, after Inakizzg nacessaxy enquiry, the Board<\/p>\n
  ‘A\u00e9iecide the said quastion and its decisian sha\ufb02<\/p>\n
” E\ufb01came \ufb01nai uniess I’\u20acVGk\u20acd or modifieci by the<\/p>\n
‘}”‘r*ibu;::1a.E. 111 {I33 instant Cami; the decisiam taiic-31 by thx:<\/p>\n
jg,\u00bb<\/p>\n
xi<\/p>\n
under challenge: passed by the learned trial jL1:;i:g<?.  in<\/p>\n
O.S.No. 14\/2003.\n<\/p>\n
16. FIUH1 what has been submitted _by~   ” 2 <\/p>\n
counsel fer the parti\u00e9s 313d  .’thfe1.ig”\u00a7:L.__. t.”i;s <\/p>\n
mat\u00e9rial placed, it is net 111′ d\u00a7SpLZVf\u00a3?V_f}13\u00a5L tiic\u00e9 iffsenis <\/p>\n
which are S.Nc:}. 82\/1 I11c=:a.s1._1v%*:i’I7;’g \u20ac}’._v()1a   82\/
\nmeasurhlg (3133 aL\u00ab::1″eV:\u00ab%3a..”.t_..1V:t:1  \ufb01t\u00e9estxing 0.18 acre
\nwart: dec}3.1’e\u00a71 \u00e9  be   ViI’t1,1\u20ac:”i ef the
\ngazette    T136 said
\nzleti\ufb01cati\ufb01zfi.iI;3}s0- .V:”<\u00a7:\u00a7}\u00e9iv\u00e9:dV.–  1*r::ct:i1?'ic::a'i:i<3n of the
\naI1trie\u00a7'*._wh_icif iij\ufb01mlijlisheci in the gazstta on<\/p>\n
'29. 1. 199\u00a5\u00a7:.Lf1'i1r:V $aiAd..v:jQ..\u00a75\ufb01cati0n was :10: C_{L1\u00a7'.iSt.i0I"_{\u20acid by<\/p>\n
  the\ufb01egii\ufb01iozg\ufb01rsaij\ufb01tfefxtte' any farum. Section E: of the Act<\/p>\n
  iii;-spate regarding Waid' makes it. \u00a331331' that<\/p>\n
a  A'g\u00a7\u00e9:r$011,"V'L:w1"i0 is i11te:r'<:st\u20ac<:i in any pr0"pe1"tiy and is<\/p>\n
agg\ufb01ev\u00e9\ufb01  the said _prop\u20ac1*ty being \u00e9azziared. as a vsral\ufb01<\/p>\n
A "if in tha list, may iI'1Stit'LIiZ(': a suit in tha Tribtmal<\/p>\n
'  \u00a35; decide the C}i.l\u20acS'fi{3I"}. as regards the: nature cf the<\/p>\n
 property being wakif p'r0pe1*ty 01* 0ti1erWise and the order<\/p>\n
Qf the 'I':iE3L1:1afi in such nzatterg shall become finai and<\/p>\n
3-\/\/'<\/p>\n
,?\n<\/p>\n
14<\/span>
\nthe proviso fm*th\u20ac:r makas it iziear tint mi) suit shall bf?<\/p>\n
em.e;’$;aj:1\u00ab:-:d 135.: {ha ‘\u00a3’1’ibu;r1al after expiry (sf \u00a33116 yea:1’*f;’0m<\/p>\n
the data of }Z)’LZb}_iC8.Eif3I’}. 01″ the list {if Wald’. in  <\/p>\n
case, the Ilotificatian is of the year 1972 an\u00a3i..vV1:1?}_:*\u20acL’t}”1a11T_4 <\/p>\n
37 ysars hava eiapseci. The said b?'(’14{;:11i_f’fa{_32:’1′?L”fi(“;3If\u00a7; ‘-3r’;3:.a,js;”irV1::;ii\u00ab<\/p>\n
been challenged before any fI’riE::1,1f1a}.”=.The1f:::\u00a7;-fa’, ‘ti1\u00e91’\u00e9”is <\/p>\n
merit in the s1:b1ni.ssion  t1.j.\u20ac  cV{:$}1%1V,Hse1 fer
\nR-1 that the: suit its\u00a7:1fA_   of tbs
\npmper\ufb01y   ‘  not have heel:\n<\/p>\n
fiisd a\u00a7’t.:_:_:f   Ex\u00e9lareaver, no
\nsuch   13:: the :10t.ificati0:1 as on
\nc1a\u20ace.’4’M’n’<\/p>\n
3.’?  ‘3-“&s=\u00a7’.a.r air;  piaced Eggs the ieamed Counsel for<\/p>\n
  31fi\u20ac\u00bb. _Vpe:iiiiQr;\u00a7\u00e9i=$__ C211 proviso to Section ‘”?(1) of the Act is<\/p>\n
‘(::)z;1\u20ac:\u00a7:”5\u00a3ir::;5i’;-__t;ii,t\u00e9’V said pmvisca mentions that whera any<\/p>\n
~V c;L1t$\u00e9ti;<3i9::,V.1*i5a5$ been heard and \ufb01zlailjsg ciecided by the civii<\/p>\n
 .,cirs;13".\u00a7 iii a suit institut\ufb01d before c01nme:1{:em&mi of the<\/p>\n
—   \ufb02ue Tribune} shall 110$: reopen Susi: questions. in<\/p>\n
 Wi’:’i’:1\u00ab.S.No. 184\/1972, the n<:rt.i:f"1cat;ir;\u00bbz1 EX.D-'2<\/p>\n
\/T"\n<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
\u00a35<\/p>\n
was never caliztd in t:;jL16s\u00a5jcm in @115 said Sui’: but, on the<\/p>\n
ether 11a:1a:i, the suit. was resisted by the petiti\u20ac}1’1\u20ac=\u00a7i;:-:T.11<\/p>\n
the goxmd \u00a31333′: tile}! are ii] p0sst3s$io1″1 ef t11\u00e9:;’sii\u00a7.:;.i.\ufb01\u20ac\u00a3Ea;_\u00a7\u00a7.;.<\/p>\n
But, \ufb01tie {G th\ufb01f suit items was :1r;=.i:__ “–S\u20acf\u00a7j’i(}{1S  <\/p>\n
cozztmversy bemrsezi tha pa3:’\u00a3i\u20ac::s.[‘<\/p>\n
18. The next; aspect is tiz\u00e9fivit\u00e9ls p\u00e9iitisiagfs,_zi\u00a7p;{a:;ai:3’1ed ” V<\/p>\n
this cmxrt in ‘\u00a3\u00a7}’.P.N0._. 27 138,’-ii(}\u00a3f)3′ -~.._a1″1d’ \u00a3i12;*::st.i\u00bb.;\u00a7n<3d the<\/p>\n
order passed.'   the Ieamad
\nSingle JL1\u20aci gVf\u00a7:_"—0:1:"' " '?Vif:i~\u00e9;'-:.vg:;:}s;:1f\u00a7:;'4'_ v\ufb01f;i.}.:: re3'e.e:ti11g the wlit
\np+::t.iti0:1;–~~T.   "p<i\u00a5;i'1fi011ers in apprnzactx<\/p>\n
a;3p1'9;\u00a7;1fi.a\u00a5;\u00a2 'a_.:i\u00a3&\u00a75\u00e9;3:fit"3;r4 %V's.;1f:i:?'_;e19 the Act as regards the<\/p>\n
i111p11g:i;c:c\u00a7"L'–=sf;1*:ie:r lf\ufb01a\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01ii by K4 is C\u20ac3I1C\u20acI'\ufb02\u20ac';\u00a3ii, it is<\/p>\n
 V.  thair\u00e9safp\ufb01, \ufb01iaat; "1'_h::…\u00a7:\u00bb:atiti0n6;'s \ufb02ied the: Suit. in qu\u00e9siieza<\/p>\n
 'L\u00a7\u00a3i:i{%:f  –83(2) of thfr": Act: far dac:Earat.i0n that 1:116<\/p>\n
:35:'r~d\u00e9:" passi\u00e9g\ufb01. .\u00a7'::y R\u00bb: is nu}: and Veizi urlder Section 54 9f<\/p>\n
 the $31."\n<\/p>\n
A ~ “- ,Er; the <3{)UI'S\u20ac 01' his erder, the 1e3:'1'1$d trial judge<\/p>\n
'  3330 refsrred to the avi\u00e9encea of P.Ws, 1 and 2 and ajrrived<\/p>\n
'4 at am CQXECIIISEOE that the dacuments \u00a7:2mduv::ed by the<\/p>\n
pctitimzxi\ufb01rs viz', EXs.P\u00ab1 'E0 113 am thaxxiseivas are \ufb02at<\/p>\n
9\/<\/p>\n
1; P<\/p>\n
iii:\n<\/p>\n
S’L1’ffi{)i\u20acI}{, ti) pram Ilsa: 0116 Abdt\ufb02la was 1316 abseiute<\/p>\n
0wm:1′ of the Suit. prapertim and the Wi{I1\u20ac$S\u20acS E:\u00a7<:af:;iI1_eci<\/p>\n
01': brahaif of the p\u20ac:titsZ0m:rs alga a.<;imi'\u00a3_it;ed  _<\/p>\n
that \ufb01'1e:"e are no dG\u20ac3:L11I1f3:I1tS {.0 sffgow t;h.at.' vt\u00a7ix:3""a1%:AV:E1_\u00e9 " =<\/p>\n
{)'i'i.?"1"}\u20ac1'S 0f the suit p1'pe;1*tj.?    mat ilfidi\ufb01l” the fact and abet:<\/p>\n
magif\u00e9\u00e9  0%3$\u00e9ri:.\u00e9\u00a7;fjQr\u00a7 to the effect that the ;:z\u00e93t_i:i0:1\u20ac:”s<\/p>\n
  \u00a51’c:.:t<\u00a7i1":  (:ha.1ie11ge:.:i the gagettc: noi:ificat.io11<\/p>\n
'.1-Eli';  Hate of {\u00a318 ohgezwatrimxa made by this<\/p>\n
V -' 1i i’E:..\u00a7:’i:’ \u00a7,’\u00a5.{ P\u00a7\u00a7\\E'{;. 2?_338\/2803, 616 Eaarmed iir\u00e9a}. judge<\/p>\n
K x ” 4_h\u20ac:V}5:’i that the, suit; was \ufb01led by Ufl\ufb01 pe’i:it,iox1eI’s 1101: E9<\/p>\n
 \u00a7*,’.-*.=j,f\u00a7_\u00bb”a:.”1A)A1:’:si’:1 their right, $11116 or interast over the suit<\/p>\n
” w;i’I’01;\u00bbe1*t}* and, therefore, the suit that was \ufb011r:d against<\/p>\n
the ordar passe\u00e9 by Rwl is net maintaimable,<\/p>\n
2%<\/p>\n
-\\\u00a5<\/p>\n
the otllex’, and the third decision reported in AIR 1979<\/p>\n
SC: 289 lays down {ha law that where ~<\/p>\n
possessien sf 3 sixarxgei’ is included in th\ufb01  _<\/p>\n
under $\u20ac:(:i:i0n 5422), the strangex’  13.9: L:3′:t:i\u20ac:-;::’\u00a7.=}\u00e9iig’;51i;.i<,:1;3 <\/p>\n
to file suit within one year Bfid the }:i'St iS"i1C)'i:.\u00a3fO"fiC1i;?,.$iE%sf:'<\/p>\n
agai\ufb02st him.\n<\/p>\n
2 1. These: thre\ufb01 decgi\ufb01rgri\u00e9\u00e9’  v”‘\u00bb’$;::;;}1icable to thf’:<\/p>\n
\ninstant case ,   \ufb01rs: decision is\nconcemedg'    the triai court has\n the evidence and the\n<\/pre>\n
adlnis\ufb01igx\ufb01  fg\ufb01titian\ufb01rs’ W’it[1(3SS\u20acS {E1831 no<\/p>\n
d@c11:11\u20ac:t1\u00a3”*\u00a3itg!C i\u00e9\u00e9afs-“Vt;’aC\u20acd by the pcititionars 111<\/p>\n
c<\/p>\n
 ..v_’res3\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7;C’\u00a3.\\\\.% (sf $51365 “mist properties and seeorzdly, the<\/p>\n
 _ Iio\ufb01iiicatigm\u00e9”i:s;$Lf,ad in 1972 had remained Lxncha\ufb01enged<\/p>\n
:i11_1;]h:s  <\/p>\n
 __22. ‘  as the other dacisiens are cansemed, AIR<\/p>\n
A ” ‘ SC 2289 is also irxapplicabla because that was a<\/p>\n
‘  C3861 W}f1\u20acI’\u20ac E136 Strang\ufb01r was found ta be a non\u00bb-1133511131,<\/p>\n
whereas, in the iimtant same, it is net in di$f.3i1t\u20ac that the<\/p>\n
petitionars are :31} 111113111113 and acctording to the leaxfned<\/p>\n
}<\/p>\n
-5!<\/p>\n
2a
\nthat the eariier suits \ufb02ied were withdrawn withaut.<\/p>\n
raservmg any Iiberty to file any fresh suit. But, x&\u20acf18.: is;<\/p>\n
to be noted is that the present R~:2 was met. tiaa.’<\/p>\n
in the eariier stlits inasmuch as the eagriicitf were  <\/p>\n
\ufb01led by L1m*e@’s{e1″‘ed body <\/p>\n
reg’si:c:r\u00a2:d body aiollg with  _v’Fh \u00e9’  Board as<\/p>\n
such was not a   “txi;(\u00a7~\/.51;its. AS far as\u00bb<\/p>\n
the later suit \ufb02aw ir1 .1–‘)9’;;}’V is ;:4:)IiI:E;.1’if1t:a?::i;,'”‘{1?:a”t was axse<\/p>\n
Wit11d1″awn. J11  m\u00e9s\u00e9z. _Vsui;%:;*{,’- ,th\u00e9”‘g;a.zet1:e noti\ufb01cation
\n\u00e9at\ufb01d 2_2_:5.”}.9′?2.;_,wa3 _:’1e3}\u00e91=’-  isg\u00e9ua at all nor was there<\/p>\n
any f’1i’2__ciir_tg   gazette 110tiiicatio:1 Ex.D–2.
\n‘1’heI'<3f0:*65f'\u00a3.1":*r:v C\u20ac;n\u20aci:\u00a71t;i\u00a7::.\u00bb41\u00a7Vi.1t folward that the S-'L1iT.S fiiad<\/p>\n
lat:-,2.  En'-' ._f;i\u00a7i:e by the resp011ti\u20ac:nts herein were hit:<\/p>\n
 by, principle sauna: in  way {3QiI1\u20ac tag the<\/p>\n
"asS;–\u00e9.snta::*;<\ufb01\u20ac:'~;\u00bb._0i',.t\u00a7ie petitioners as the patizisners liav\u00e9 net<\/p>\n
qu\u00e9stiiitge\u00e9i "vibe said gazaaite. nati\ufb01catian iaisuse in 1972<\/p>\n
K x V  befztgm  .f0r1:zm til} this date. As $3.161}, the: ruling cited<\/p>\n
  H113 :'\u20acga;rt:1 alga cajmgmt help the C888 of Chi?<\/p>\n
V'  '\ufb01netitiaiieirs. E\/<\/p>\n
x)<\/p>\n
22<\/span>
\n‘L116 suit pmperties h\ufb01jif\ufb01 b\ufb01en pI’C!V\u20ac:Ci to be sf Waicf by<\/p>\n
LISE1’.\n<\/p>\n
:28. The abav\ufb01 decisions apply ‘:0 the t:as{:””‘o:1V”.<\/p>\n
inaszxzuch as both the trial cou1’ff’.a,$e_$1?\u00e9il \u00a3\u00a71s_ R.–_}’.f3 “r_\u00a7i*d\u00e91”. _<\/p>\n
co1:2.(:11r1’ent}y held that . r$z.;it \u00a7:’:;_perf\u00a7t3,s   <\/p>\n
pmpertieg and the  f01tV’S%3;5\u00a71 Ea\u00bb \ufb01’11diiig’-is..v*i:1’aced 1:0
\nthe gazette net\ufb01icati\ufb01\ufb01 and the said
\nxioti\ufb01oaiian  even after 3%;\n<\/p>\n
dccades.   .  is ‘ct}I1C:..L1’r\u20ac1i\u20ac flnd\ufb01\ufb02gs
\nof fact”  tha suit property as
\naxsakf  :’3js}hhe::1 that \ufb01nding is based 011<\/p>\n
the ga33:f\u00e9’\u00ab..I:\u20ac3\u20ac\u00a7i\u00a7W{:ai;i-\u00a2;>i1i”n0 f ‘(ha yaar 19?} which is IIGZ<\/p>\n
  A}3\u00e9\u00a7 ‘f..i1\u20ac;””‘i\u00a7f3ti?Ii0I1\u20aci1’S hitharta in any cf the<\/p>\n
 _ f:i1:”j,i:\u00b0;1,”‘*v.i.,1;’A  ..f{1<\/p>\n
V…)<\/p>\n
Si)\u00bb in the result, 1 pags the foilowing Qrder:<\/p>\n
The 1’\u20acViSiQI} p\ufb01tiii\ufb02ll is ciismisaed.<\/p>\n
0150\/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court M E A Hafeez S\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009 Author: V.Jagannathan IN THE H\u00a7GH COURT {DP KARNATAKA AT BANC’:AL{\u00a7RfE Dated the 1555 day fApri1 2009 ‘ V :BEFORE: THE I-iON’\u00a7~3LE MR,JUS’\u00a7’ICE :_\u00a5E,JAG\u00e9;N’1\\E’;i51f%i\u00a74’v’– _ V: % CIVIL REVISION P}3;’I’1’I’IONA_ Nix. .3gg@;;2g%ea .k ‘ J f BETWEEN […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38715","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nM E A Hafeez S\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M E A Hafeez S\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-30T22:31:20+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"16 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M E A Hafeez S\\\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-30T22:31:20+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":2735,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009\",\"name\":\"M E A Hafeez S\\\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-30T22:31:20+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M E A Hafeez S\\\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M E A Hafeez S\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M E A Hafeez S\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-30T22:31:20+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"16 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M E A Hafeez S\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-30T22:31:20+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009"},"wordCount":2735,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009","name":"M E A Hafeez S\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-30T22:31:20+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/m-e-a-hafeez-so-lt-e-usman-vs-thechief-executive-officer-on-15-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M E A Hafeez S\/O Lt E Usman vs Thechief Executive Officer on 15 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38715","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38715"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38715\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38715"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38715"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38715"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}