{"id":38845,"date":"2010-10-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010"},"modified":"2015-08-20T00:33:05","modified_gmt":"2015-08-19T19:03:05","slug":"k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 17929 of 2008(H)\n\n\n1. K.P.MOHANAN, KADAVATH PURAYIL,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION,\n\n3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,\n\n4. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION,\n\n5. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER,\n\n6. SPECIAL DEPUTY TAHSILDAR,\n\n7. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, KSEB,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.M.PAREETH\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.C.K.KARUNAKARAN, SC FOR KSEB\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\n\n Dated :05\/10\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n               T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J.\n                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n                  W.P.(C). No.17929\/2008-H\n                ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~\n\n           Dated this the 5th day of October, 2010\n\n                      J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>    The petitioner challenges the proceedings Ext.P10 by<\/p>\n<p>which  the  Appeal  Petition  filed  by  him,  against  the<\/p>\n<p>assessment  of  unauthorised   additional  load, has   been<\/p>\n<p>rejected confirming the demand.\n<\/p>\n<p>    2.   The amount in question, namely, Rs.1,02,724\/- plus<\/p>\n<p>surcharge  was  remitted  by   the  petitioner  during  the<\/p>\n<p>pendency of the proceedings.     Now, what remains is the<\/p>\n<p>claim for refund.\n<\/p>\n<p>    3.   It is submitted by the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner that the petitioner&#8217;s Unit is a Small Scale<\/p>\n<p>Industrial  Unit   with  consumer   No.18051.    Initially,<\/p>\n<p>connected load was 30HP.    But the Unit could not start<\/p>\n<p>functioning for various reasons.  The petitioner was paying<\/p>\n<p>the monthly minimum current charges in order to maintain<\/p>\n<p>the  service  connection.     The  petitioner  applied  for<\/p>\n<p>additional power allocation and it was granted by providing<\/p>\n<p>15 HP power allocation w.e.f April 2002.    A new meter was<\/p>\n<p>installed from 24\/03\/2003.   But, according to him, due to<\/p>\n<p>short circuit it was burnt two days after its improper<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.17929\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                -:2:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>fixing.     Ext.P2 is the true photograph produced in support<\/p>\n<p>of the above plea. The situation continued till October,<\/p>\n<p>2004.     The petitioner paid monthly demands upto February,<\/p>\n<p>2003 and no payment was made from March, 2003 since no<\/p>\n<p>meter was installed after the burning of the same.    But, in<\/p>\n<p>April, 2003 the Sub Engineer of the Section inspected the<\/p>\n<p>Unit and reported that there was an additional load of 18HP<\/p>\n<p>and the monthly demand was to be enhanced from Rs.1035\/- to<\/p>\n<p>Rs.2205\/-.      However, no site mahazar was prepared and the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was not informed of the alleged inspection also.<\/p>\n<p>It is pointed out that even though 40HP motor was kept in<\/p>\n<p>the premises, that was not connected to the mains and the<\/p>\n<p>allocation     of    the unauthorised  connected load is   not<\/p>\n<p>correct.       Reliance is placed on Ext.P3 a report dated<\/p>\n<p>29\/07\/2004 submitted by the third respondent to the second<\/p>\n<p>respondent wherein various aspects have been pointed out.<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P4 is the proceedings whereby he was granted additional<\/p>\n<p>power allocation of 15HP. But even after this he could not<\/p>\n<p>commence production because of various problems.     According<\/p>\n<p>to the petitioner there was no meter or connection from<\/p>\n<p>April 2003 to September 2004 and at the end of September,<\/p>\n<p>2004 the meter was changed and he is liable to pay the<\/p>\n<p>charges from October, 2004 to May 2005. Ext.P5 is the<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.17929\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                 -:3:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>demand, which was disputed by him in Ext.P6.        It is pointed<\/p>\n<p>out that thereafter, based on an interim order passed by<\/p>\n<p>this Court on 14\/10\/2008 in this writ petition, an amount<\/p>\n<p>of Rs.1,31,327\/- has been paid.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.      Ext.P6    filed  before   the   Consumer Forum  was<\/p>\n<p>transferred to the Deputy Chief Engineer in the light of<\/p>\n<p>Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003 which resulted in<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P10 Order.         The learned counsel for the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>submitted that all the points raised by the petitioner have<\/p>\n<p>not been considered in Ext.P10.        It is pointed out that the<\/p>\n<p>allocation     of    the  unauthorised   connected  load is  not<\/p>\n<p>correct.       The    Deputy Chief    Engineer has  accepted  the<\/p>\n<p>contentions of the concerned officers without verifying the<\/p>\n<p>real facts.       My attention was invited to Regulation 27A(4)<\/p>\n<p>(i) of the Kerala Electricity Supply Code, 2005 which<\/p>\n<p>provides as follows:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>                   &#8220;In case of prejudicial use of power supply,<\/p>\n<p>             the Licensee should draw mahazar at the time of<\/p>\n<p>             inspection when such prejudicial use is detected.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>             The mahazar shall be drawn in the presence of the<\/p>\n<p>             Consumer or his representative along with two<\/p>\n<p>             other    witnesses  who   shall   sign  the  mahazar<\/p>\n<p>             report. One copy of such report shall be handed<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.17929\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                               -:4:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>             over under acknowledgment of the Consumer or his<\/p>\n<p>             representative.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that this<\/p>\n<p>is a mandatory process even under the earlier regulations,<\/p>\n<p>and the absence of mahazar vitiates the order itself.<\/p>\n<p>     5.      Whether there was any unauthorised connected load<\/p>\n<p>has to be assessed only on the basis of the materials.      The<\/p>\n<p>Deputy Chief Engineer has really presumed that there was an<\/p>\n<p>unauthorised       connected  load    whereas   the  petitioner<\/p>\n<p>maintains the stand that the 40HP motor was never used.<\/p>\n<p>Herein, the report, Ext.P3 is relevant.        It is not clear<\/p>\n<p>from the order Ext.P10 whether the report was available<\/p>\n<p>before the Deputy Chief Engineer.\n<\/p>\n<p>     6.      The respondents have filed a counter affidavit<\/p>\n<p>supporting Ext.P10 order.\n<\/p>\n<p>     7.      The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted<\/p>\n<p>that as the relevant materials have not been considered by<\/p>\n<p>the Deputy Chief Engineer, the order cannot be supported.<\/p>\n<p>     8.      The question is whether actually there was any<\/p>\n<p>unauthorised connected load.        The internal reports if any<\/p>\n<p>of the officers are not discussed in Ext.P10.        Ext.P3 has<\/p>\n<p>also not been brought to the notice of the Deputy Chief<\/p>\n<p>Engineer.       The conditions of supply and the regulations<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C). No.17929\/2008<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                -:5:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>which are in force prior to the Supply Code also, according<\/p>\n<p>to the learned counsel for the petitioner, necessitate for<\/p>\n<p>the drawing of a mahazar and supply of the copy of the same<\/p>\n<p>to the petitioner also. But this was never done.<\/p>\n<p>     9.      All   these  are  matters   for  the  Deputy Chief<\/p>\n<p>Engineer to consider afresh.         In that view of the matter,<\/p>\n<p>Ext.P10 is quashed.       There will be a direction to seventh<\/p>\n<p>respondent      reconsider  the   matter   with  notice to   the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.        All  the relevant    materials including  the<\/p>\n<p>original of Ext.P3 will be called for and after hearing the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner, appropriate orders will be passed within a<\/p>\n<p>period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of<\/p>\n<p>this Judgment.        Ultimately, if the petitioner is found<\/p>\n<p>entitled for refund, the amount will be refunded within a<\/p>\n<p>reasonable time.\n<\/p>\n<p>     The writ petition is disposed of as above. No costs.<\/p>\n<p>                            (T.R. Ramachandran Nair, Judge.)<\/p>\n<p>ms<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 17929 of 2008(H) 1. K.P.MOHANAN, KADAVATH PURAYIL, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, &#8230; Respondent 2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, 3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, 4. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, 5. DEPUTY [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-19T19:03:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-19T19:03:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":963,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010\",\"name\":\"K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-19T19:03:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-19T19:03:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-19T19:03:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010"},"wordCount":963,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010","name":"K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-19T19:03:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/k-p-mohanan-vs-kerala-state-electricity-board-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"K.P.Mohanan vs Kerala State Electricity Board on 5 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38845"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38845\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}