{"id":38854,"date":"2009-07-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-04-07T17:00:02","modified_gmt":"2016-04-07T11:30:02","slug":"vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Vijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n
Vijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009<\/div>\n
R.S.A.No. 3405 of 2008 (O&M)                      1\n\n\n\n      In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh\n\n\n                        R.S.A.No. 3405 of 2008 (O&M)\n                        Date of decision: 3.7.2009\n\nVijay Kumar and another\n\n                                                      ......Appellants\n\n                        Versus\n\n\nJeewan Lal and others\n\n                                                 .......Respondents\n\n\nCORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA\n\n\nPresent:   Mr.B.R.Mahajan, Advocate,\n           for the appellants.\n                 ****\n\n\nSABINA, J.\n<\/pre>\n
           Plaintiffs Jeewan Lal, Amit Kumar and Rama Rani filed a<\/p>\n
suit for partition by metes and bounds by way of separate possession<\/p>\n
of plot measuring 169 square yards. The suit of the plaintiffs was<\/p>\n
decreed by the Civil Judge (Jr.Divn.) Amritsar vide judgment and<\/p>\n
decree dated 18.9.2006. Aggrieved by the same, defendants Vijay<\/p>\n
Kumar and Roshan Lal filed an appeal and the same was dismissed<\/p>\n
by Additional District Judge, Amritsar vide judgment and decree<\/p>\n
dated 26.7.2008. Hence, the present appeal by the defendants.<\/p>\n
           Brief facts of the case, as noticed by the Additional
\n R.S.A.No. 3405 of 2008 (O&M)                        2<\/span><\/p>\n
District Judge, Amritsar in para Nos. 2 to 6 of impugned judgment,<\/p>\n
are as under:-\n<\/p>\n
                 “It is the case of the plaintiffs that Ashok Kumar son<\/p>\n
                 of Roshan Lal and Predecessor-in-interest of the<\/p>\n
                 plaintiffs along with defendant No.1 purchased the<\/p>\n
                 property vide registered sale deed dated 16.4.93 for<\/p>\n
                 sale consideration of Rs.20,000\/- from Raj Kumar<\/p>\n
                 and Suresh Kumar sons of Amritsaria Ram of<\/p>\n
                 Verka, tehsil and District Amritsar. During his life<\/p>\n
                 time, Ashok Kumar constructed one shop and a<\/p>\n
                 godown in the property in dispute as he was doing<\/p>\n
                 the business of Hardware, tyres and tubes etc. and<\/p>\n
                 was running the shop therein. On 19.6.98 Ashok<\/p>\n
                 Kumar died intestate. After his death, the plaintiffs<\/p>\n
                 are the only legal heirs of deceased Ashok Kumar,<\/p>\n
                 they are therefore, entitled to one half share out of<\/p>\n
                 the property in dispute. However, after the death of<\/p>\n
                 Ashok Kumar, defendants have turned the plaintiffs<\/p>\n
                 out of their house forcibly in three wearing apparels<\/p>\n
                 and the plaintiff Rama Rani is presently living along<\/p>\n
                 with plaintiffs No.1 and 2 with her parents. Since<\/p>\n
                 the defendants were not admitted the claim of<\/p>\n
                 plaintiffs and were not prepared to partition the<\/p>\n
                 property, to give the due share of the plaintiffs to
\n R.S.A.No. 3405 of 2008 (O&M)                      3<\/span><\/p>\n
               then, hence the necessity has arisen to file the<\/p>\n
               present suit.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
          3.   Plaintiffs brought this suit for partition by way of<\/p>\n
               metes and bounds of plot N o.1046 more fully<\/p>\n
               detailed and described in the heading of the plaint.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
          4.    As plaintiffs No.1 and 2 are minors, the suit has<\/p>\n
               been filed though their mother Rama Rani, plaintiff<\/p>\n
               No.3 and natural guardian.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
          5.     The suit has been resisted by defendants. In the<\/p>\n
               written statement filed by defendants No.1 and 2,<\/p>\n
               several preliminary objections have been raised on<\/p>\n
               the grounds of maintainability , valuation of suit etc.<\/p>\n
               On merits, it has been denied if Ashok Kumar and<\/p>\n
               defendant No.1 purchased the property in question<\/p>\n
               vide sale deed dated 16.4.2003 for a consideration<\/p>\n
               of Rs.20,000\/-. According to the defendants, Ashok<\/p>\n
               Kumar was physically handicapped. He was having<\/p>\n
               very weak eye sight and was not able to do any<\/p>\n
               work. The property was purchased by his father<\/p>\n
               Roshan Lal defendant No.2 along with defendant<\/p>\n
               No.1 for a sale consideration of Rs. 20,000\/- from<\/p>\n
               Raj Kumar and Suresh Kumar son of Amritsaria<\/p>\n
               Ram. The entire sale consideration was contributed<\/p>\n
               by defendant No.2 from his own pocket and nothing
\n R.S.A.No. 3405 of 2008 (O&M)                       4<\/span><\/p>\n
               was contributed by Ashok Kumar. It was also<\/p>\n
               denied if Ashok Kumar during his life time had<\/p>\n
               constructed one shop and a godown in the property<\/p>\n
               in dispute. It has further been denied if Ashok<\/p>\n
               Kumar was doing any business in the shop. In fact,<\/p>\n
               the shop was being run by defendant No.2 under<\/p>\n
               the name and style of R.L.Hardwara Store from the<\/p>\n
               very beginning in the capacity of a tenant under<\/p>\n
               defendant No.1 at a monthly rental of Rs.100\/- and<\/p>\n
               defendant No.2 had been paying the rent regularly<\/p>\n
               to defendant No.1. The entire construction on the<\/p>\n
               plot has been raised by defendant No.1. It has also<\/p>\n
               been denied if the plaintiffs are the only legal heirs<\/p>\n
               of Ashok Kumar. According to the defendants,<\/p>\n
               Seeta Devi, mother of Ashok Kumar is also one of<\/p>\n
               the Class-I legal heirs. Other averments made in<\/p>\n
               the plaint have been denied and in the end, a prayer<\/p>\n
               for dismissal of the suit has also been made.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
          6.   In a separate written statement filed on behalf of<\/p>\n
               defendant No.3, it has been pleaded that the<\/p>\n
               replaying defendant being the mother of deceased<\/p>\n
               Ashok Kumar is also one of the legal heirs of Ashok<\/p>\n
               Kumar and is entitled to share of Ashok Kumar in<\/p>\n
               equal share along with the plaintiffs.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
\n R.S.A.No. 3405 of 2008 (O&M)                            5<\/span><\/p>\n
            On the pleadings of the parties, following issues were<\/p>\n
framed by the trial Court:-\n<\/p>\n
            “1.        Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to partition<\/p>\n
            by metes and bounds by way of separate possession as<\/p>\n
            prayed for? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
            2.            Whether    the   plaintiffs   are   entitled   to<\/p>\n
            permanent injunction as prayed for? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
            3.          Whether Ashok Kumar son of Roshan Lal and<\/p>\n
            defendant No.1 have purchased the property in dispute<\/p>\n
            vide registered sale deed dated 16.4.1993? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
            4.          Whether the plaintiffs are only leagal heirs of<\/p>\n
            deceased Ashok Kumar? OPP<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
            5.         Whether the suit of the plaintiffs          is not<\/p>\n
            maintainable?\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
            6.         Whether the plaintiffs have come to the court<\/p>\n
            with clean hands ? OPD<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
           7.           Relief. “<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
           After hearing learned counsel for the appellants, I am of<\/p>\n
the opinion that the present appeal deserves to be dismissed.<\/p>\n
           The case of the plaintiffs was that Ashok Kumar had<\/p>\n
purchased the suit property along with Vijay Kumar-defendant No.1<\/p>\n
vide sale deed dated 16.4.1993 for valuable consideration of<\/p>\n
Rs.20,000\/- from Raj Kumar and Suresh Kumar.                Ashok Kumar<\/p>\n
constructed one shop and godown in the property in dispute and was
\n R.S.A.No. 3405 of 2008 (O&M)                          6<\/span><\/p>\n
running his business. However, Ashok Kumar died on 19.6.1998 and<\/p>\n
hence, plaintiffs being his legal heirs were entitled to half share in the<\/p>\n
suit property. Plaintiffs were, however, thrown out of the property in<\/p>\n
dispute by the defendants. The case of the defendants, on the other<\/p>\n
hand, was that Ashok Kumar was a physically handicapped person<\/p>\n
and was having weak eye sight. Property had been purchased by<\/p>\n
defendant No.2 along with defendant No.1 for a sale consideration of<\/p>\n
Rs.20,000\/- from Raj Kumar and Suresh Kumar.              The entire sale<\/p>\n
consideration was contributed by defendant No.2 Roshan Lal, father<\/p>\n
of Ashok Kumar.\n<\/p>\n
            The    parties are closely related to each other. The<\/p>\n
execution of the sale deed in question is not much in dispute. The<\/p>\n
dispute is only as to whether the sale deed had been executed by the<\/p>\n
vendors in favour of Ashok Kumar and Vijay Kumar-defendant No.1<\/p>\n
or in favour of Roshan Lal-defendant No.2 along with defendant<\/p>\n
No.1. Both the Courts below have held that the sale deed Ex.P-1<\/p>\n
clearly shows that the property in question was purchased by Ashok<\/p>\n
Kumar and Vijay Kumar sons of Roshal Lal. Apparently, after the<\/p>\n
death of Ashok Kumar, dispute has arisen between the plaintiffs, who<\/p>\n
are the widow and minor children of deceased Ashok Kumar, and<\/p>\n
defendants. The plea taken by the defendants that defendant No.2<\/p>\n
was a tenant in the suit property was not substantiated on record. In<\/p>\n
fact, defendant No.1 himself stated that Roshan Lal was sitting on<\/p>\n
the suit property as his father and not in any other capacity. It has
\n R.S.A.No. 3405 of 2008 (O&M)                        7<\/span><\/p>\n
also been noticed by the learned Additional District Judge, Amritsar<\/p>\n
that Vijay Kumar-defendant No.1, while appearing in the witness box<\/p>\n
as DW-6 had admitted that he was ready to give half share in the suit<\/p>\n
property to the plaintiffs.\n<\/p>\n
               In these circumstances, no interference is warranted by<\/p>\n
this Court.\n<\/p>\n
              No substantial question of law arises in this regular<\/p>\n
second appeal. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.<\/p>\n
                                               (SABINA)
\n                                                JUDGE<\/p>\n
July 03, 2009
\nanita\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Punjab-Haryana High Court Vijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009 R.S.A.No. 3405 of 2008 (O&M) 1 In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh R.S.A.No. 3405 of 2008 (O&M) Date of decision: 3.7.2009 Vijay Kumar and another ……Appellants Versus Jeewan Lal and others …….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38854","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nVijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Vijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-07T11:30:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Vijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-07T11:30:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1269,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Vijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-07T11:30:02+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Vijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Vijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Vijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-07T11:30:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Vijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-07T11:30:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009"},"wordCount":1269,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009","name":"Vijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-07T11:30:02+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/vijay-kumar-and-another-vs-jeewan-lal-and-others-on-3-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Vijay Kumar And Another vs Jeewan Lal And Others on 3 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38854"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38854\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}