{"id":38867,"date":"2008-05-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008"},"modified":"2015-08-11T15:17:56","modified_gmt":"2015-08-11T09:47:56","slug":"ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008","title":{"rendered":"Ananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Ananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n
,, V\n#.\u00a2 -1-\n\nEN THE HIGH comm OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE. 29%! my 09' MAY 2003\nBEFORE   T\nTHE HC)N'BLE MR.JUS'I'i(.1E 9-UBHASHf\"   ' \n  A L\n\n1. Amanda, age 32 years.\nSon of C.Rama.ial1\n\n2. C.Ramajah\n\nAge 52 years  .A\n\n8\/0 iate Chinnapya V\nBoth Nos.1     =  j'\nAt No.20, Agfahara _E:aa*a1*$.ha}li ,  ' \n\nBangaiorc--gS6{}_'.<::. praying to set aside the judgmemt. and ozder\n\n  dt.10". 1.?1.2O{}2 passed by the I Acid}..S.J., Bangalore in\n\n "{31:},A.No.131\/99 and the older dVt.3.4.99 passed by the HI\n _ A_\u00a2icU;.C.M.M., Bangalore in (::.C,No.6328\/1993.\n\n [ This Revision Petition coming cm for \u00a7--Iea:'i;11g this day, the\nV' " 'Court made the following:\n\n \n\n\n\n-2-\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
This Revision is against the judgment of coxzvicticn and
\nsentence passed. by the {IE Add1.C’..M.M., Bangalom $3.1
\n(3.Cl.No.6328\/ 1993 for the o\ufb01ence punishable under Sectiqn 498~<\/p>\n
A of EPC and Sections 3 and 4 of Dowry Pmhibition  ” -.<\/p>\n
2. Case of the. pmgecution is that, the  <\/p>\n
married to accused No.1 on 26.3.1937″‘as< pciiqthc  7. <\/p>\n
F'o1L1* days };}I'.i0I' to the max';'j..'ag::t, :":ag<::\u00a3:–1:\u00a7.ns'z5\u20aci  3 ztc\ufb01
\nRs.10,{)O0\/– by way of   V
\ncomplainant stayed Wi\ufb01\ufb01'  \u00a5\\I(').Q'1"'f0IW\u00a7s0me time.
\nHowever, accused N<)'.$. }.'A\u00ab' ill-Jmating her by
\ndamanding 1I1\u00a7'3"'"?~""    1:7i<:kshaw. When<\/p>\n
complainant  she was sent ta her parents'
\nhouse a,:ud'~s_h{= g\u00e9if\\i.'a: girl chilci, however. accused No.1<\/p>\n
did V,I.:_\u00a7(&3'ntus;':<,x1:1:n:": 1:6 sc\u00e9vthcichiicl nor he came to take h\u00e9r back. It is<\/p>\n
V.   2:11;:-Lg.V=;r\u00a7:\u20ac3.A: "mat the 3.(?3(."311S6d Na.1 got. manied with axxoth\ufb02r<\/p>\n
"w_oIi1._a11:1" Based on the said complaint, the Police<\/p>\n
i11v\u00e9$tigaf;ted.LA matt\ufb01r anti filed the charge sheet.<\/p>\n
'\u00bb  VT  The Vprosecm\ufb01ion in support of its case, got examined the<\/p>\n
'   as PW-I and her father as PW–2 and also got<\/p>\n
" W\ufb01larked Exs.P1 to P3  complaint, wedding card axxd photo.<\/p>\n
4. The learned Magstrate appreciating the evidence of
\nPWS-1 and 2 held that, the accused have eommitte\u00e9 ear} offence
\npunishable under Section 498-A IPC and Sect:ione_ 3–Vu4 of
\ngum Prohibitien Act 3136. sentenced the
\nfor two years’ 8}. a11d R’s.1,{}(){)\/ – f:;1e\u00bb.a3;;d
\n2 years far an o\ufb01enee punishable      J
\nrwoh\ufb02eeon Act and \ufb01ne of=Rs4goee;\u00a7:eaee;”\u00a7;e\u00a2\u00a2eegL fee
\naccused to Iimdergo further    SJ. As far
\nas aceused N03 is coz1eAe;x..1V:”;e:\u00a71,’\u00ab.V\u00a7she  on due-admoxiitien
\nunder Section 4\u00bb of Pxobggtioeof<\/p>\n
5.  1$ies.\u20ac1_  by the judgment of<\/p>\n
co11vieti0iie’a2I.1.\u00a7i1:Vse1;i\ufb01:11cefiled  Appeal No. 131\/ 1999* The
\niea1’z1e(i”A_\u00abSe$’:.sio1is I.*e-appreciation of the evidence,
\ncoxzeurredx  ibis A’.\ufb01i1duii1gs of the learned Magistrate axzd<\/p>\n
 . t dismssga em .\ufb01j)’pea_]_,_.__\u00ab .\n<\/p>\n
 ‘ Counsel :;-lppearing for the accused submits<\/p>\n
  evidence of the proeeeu\ufb01on do not prove the
\n otTenee.V:__A_t;:uz1ishab1e either umier Section 498-\u00abA of (3r.P.C. or
\n“ii SCCti_()I}$ 3 and 4 of the Dofwxy Prohibition Act. He
\n  e\ufb01tzbmitted that, except the complainant and her father’s self-
\n‘serving testimony, no other evidence is produced before the<\/p>\n
leazmezi Magistrate. Even the entire evidence produced by the<\/p>\n
-4.\n<\/p>\n
prosecution do not prove the mgmdients required under Section<\/p>\n
4~98~A Cr.f3.C. He aiso submitted. that the eomplairxant\ufb01ve\u00e9i with<\/p>\n
accused No.1 for 3 years and it is 110%; in dispute arid’ this
\nperiod, at eo point of time, there had been  pf
\ndowry harassment or demand. FuI’\ufb011\u20acI_\ufb02f1\u20ac   <\/p>\n
even fifodueed any material 03: evid\u20ac4ncf{;.Adie:”  The ‘i<\/p>\n
said period, the accused had.’dViI1ej:;teaVtied er <\/p>\n
and there is no efher  eiiiddeeee  any other
\nwitness has been    because the
\ncomplement haemade  ground to convict<\/p>\n
“the accused,  ’tilt   beyond reasonable<\/p>\n
doubt by   and the evidence of<\/p>\n
PWe– dddeontxadie\ufb01ng each other. He<\/p>\n
eubmit:ie:\u00a7_ teat’  without even eoneidezring<\/p>\n
the  Seefieed\u00e9:498-A Cr.P.C.1. and Sections 3 and 4 0f
\n V.  ., i.AP2ehi\u00a7;itie’d}{e{Vand solely on the evidence of PWS-1 ‘and 2
\n   :\u00a3fi%\u00a7:<?C1'\u00a3St3(i Nos. 1 and 2.\n<\/p>\n
d d% 7: .’:Vd:S:\ufb01ei.:;(1.H.Ja.dhav, learned State Pxlblic Prosecutor
\n s11bI\ufb01it;%ed ‘chat. the complainant has pmved the ingzedients ef
\n“id-V  498-1’; Cr.P.C. The prosecution bee examined the<\/p>\n
  Vd\ufb02omplainant, the complainant being the wife and who has
\nR undergone the iii\u00bb-t;reatment has clearly stated in her evidence.
\nThis is supported by the evidence of her father and if this<\/p>\n
9″ ”\n<\/p>\n
.5-\n<\/p>\n
evidence is not shaken in the cross-examination, it is accegatable
\nand the prosecution has proved the guilt. of the accueed beyond
\nreasonable doubt and both the crrurtss have conc’t_;u.ix\u00a7}:n\ufb01y feund<\/p>\n
that the offence is proved” In such  \ufb01le<\/p>\n
ju:risciict:icm 13$” the revieional court beiz*1g_–  is u no<\/p>\n
scope for interfexence  the judigmegztiecif   f<\/p>\n
8. PW-1 is the   shegot
\nmarried to accused Neg on ’19&\u00a7’?\ufb01:  is filed in
\n1993. This shows  –.],\u00a3V393, the relationship
\nVbetween the e.;s.eusec1″” ‘isihc\ufb02i  \u00a7jde;p}ainm1t was not
\ndisturbed.’    .s;\u00e9f:\u00bb1_s\u20ac during this period,
\ncertaitxly   independent W”.it[},\u20acSS er
\nthe  zg\ufb01eged ill-\ufb01xeatment towarda dowry
\nziemanc\ufb01    of the complainant and he being the<\/p>\n
interested wifiieee, the only evidence 01′ PW\u00bb? is mist sufficient. to<\/p>\n
  .jz’ii1eged dewry hamssmem: “under Sectione 3 and 4 of<\/p>\n
A   Act and \ufb01irther the harassment: a\ufb02eged by the<\/p>\n
c\u00e9znp}.giii1aa:\u00a7t is also not supperted by any cixrzumstaritial<\/p>\n
 AA evidenere. T136 learned Magistrate has placed more reliance on
\n” *..VV’1he.\u00abA’Astateement of the complainant that she refused to gun to the<\/p>\n
.;%husbaz1d’s house even after the husband e\ufb02emd to take her<\/p>\n
back, on the said ground, he has aiieged that, the complainant<\/p>\n
was i11\u00ab~1:Iea’ted. Drawing of inference based on such smtement.<\/p>\n
593$<\/p>\n
.g.\n<\/p>\n
in my opinion, is not justified by the learned Mag’s’trate. The
\noffence has to be gxroved beyond reasonable by cogent evide\ufb01iicc,
\nwhich would clearly establish that the accused have *
\nan Offence and if there is doubt or the evidence is i3.1′.s.1ii”%i_f’3:\u00e9ciejeV?\u00a3:.,VV H
\nbene\ufb01t. shot\ufb02d gen in favour of the accused;  ” ‘ ‘ V ‘<\/p>\n
9. Further, no other material    by VV
\ncoxnplahmnt. except the wedding     eve
\nc1cc.ume11ts only prove that  \u00ab between the
\naccused. No.1 and the  either the
\nharassment or ziemagzzeig’ ef  ‘    allegation of
\ndemand ef Rs.10\u00a7G’Cii’.[  stated that tile
\namoxmt. Wee qogi Gowda whereas, PW-1 in
\nher evidence   s’tated_. amount was borrewed from
\none Shivafaeai  Centefexdieiion in the evidence cf PWe-1
\n  :\u00a7s\u00a75   money’ bormweci, there is no other
\nin\u00a21e;g\u00a7e;g\u00a71e::t% :iv\u00abi:t.1′;\u00a7eVee. ‘evide:1cix1g the alleged demand ef dowry or<\/p>\n
.;,aym\u00a7:::__: of  in such cueumstmxeee, placing reliance
\n_V’e’e.’:A:5g’leiy on the }:.e1f–se1vi1;zg statement of the PW:-;~1 and 2 is not
\n conviction. In my opinion, tlzough this is revision,<\/p>\n
V” “w’hez1V’i3{1e evidence on xecerd does not prove the offence, the<\/p>\n
” A xevisiona} court can iarxterfere with the judgment of conviction.<\/p>\n
cw”\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
-7.\n<\/p>\n
Accordjxxgly, the Revision Petition is allow\u00e9zd. The
\ngudgxnent. of conviction and sentence passed by” the HI
\nAdd.i.C.M.M., Bangalore in (3.(3.N0.6328\/1993 fo1’_4vt1Vm,_:’0\ufb01’e12cc<\/p>\n
punishable under Section 4-98-A of IPC and Sect\u00e9k\ufb01-.:i3*\u00ab\u00bbf\u00a7v:~ pf<\/p>\n
Dowry Prolcxibition Act. is. set aSide.\n<\/p>\n
in Crimixzual Appeal No.131\/ 1999     \u00ab.1<\/p>\n
are e11t;\u00a3t1cd for the refund of the\ufb01ne eiin\ufb01eutxt.  A . VV .<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Ananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008 Author: Subhash B.Adi ,, V #.\u00a2 -1- EN THE HIGH comm OF’ KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE. 29%! my 09′ MAY 2003 BEFORE T THE HC)N’BLE MR.JUS’I’i(.1E 9-UBHASHf” ‘ A L 1. Amanda, age 32 years. Son of C.Rama.ial1 2. C.Ramajah […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38867","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAnanda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-11T09:47:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-11T09:47:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1171,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008\",\"name\":\"Ananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-11T09:47:56+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-11T09:47:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008","datePublished":"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-11T09:47:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008"},"wordCount":1171,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008","name":"Ananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-05-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-11T09:47:56+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ananda-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-29-may-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ananda vs The State Of Karnataka on 29 May, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38867","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38867"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38867\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38867"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38867"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38867"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}