{"id":38869,"date":"2008-11-21T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-20T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008"},"modified":"2015-01-30T07:56:10","modified_gmt":"2015-01-30T02:26:10","slug":"sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sree Gajanana Motor Transport … vs The Regional Transport Authority … on 21 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sree Gajanana Motor Transport … vs The Regional Transport Authority … on 21 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ravi Malimath<\/div>\n
-1-\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKLA AT \n\nDATED THIS THE 2 zap my OF' NOVEM'\u00a33~;3uR ;..:2(.)08 A  \"  \n\nBEFo$E j'\nTHE H'C)N'BLE MR.JFJ3TICE MAL1;s4iAi'ri';  %\nWRIT PETr1'I0N Nofi-3Qc3;_>, O\u00a7\"g._( i(J'?(M:V}\nBETWEEN :\n\n1 SREE GA;}AN'AN:'%v:isa\u00a701'Qi?_   %.\nTRAN$Pg'r CQMPANY. Lzmrma\n\n; SAG1?kR,.,SH'\u00a7Mi)GA m..<s'1'RIcr,\n'RESP. BY'\u00a3'FS "\u00a32'XE:\u00a73U'I'IVE DIRECTOR,\nS:'i.P. su9_H\u00a7.::a:R~ -._1\\_IAYAK,\n3\/ 'O._4Si*i..S;E.J.I*\u00a5.AY5K,\n%   A3313 ABQUT'-54 YEARS,  PETITIONER\n\n% *  %,  329:; as PARASARA KUMAR, ADVOCATE)\n\n' '  THE\u00a7"\u00a72EGI0NAL TRANSPORT\n\n AU'l'HORI'1'Y, UDUPI\n\n#   V' % THE SECRETARY\n\n REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY,\nUDUPI.\n\n 3 THE PARTNER\n\nDURGAMBA MOTORS,\n0ZL<*'"\n\n \n\n\n\n-2...\n\nNH?-17, KUNDAPURA,\nUDUPI.\n\n4 $1915. N'E1i."FHA SATHISH\nW\/O SATHISH KUMAR\nMARGONI GATE,\nSRIRAM TRAWLS,    %\nVALACATIA,MANGALORE,\u00bb\u00bbI),K.  * 'V\n\n5 SmtISAMMA  \nW\/O LATE K.A.MQELAMMED \nRUBIA COMPOUN\u00a3),--.._ "~.__ *   \n0PP;()ASC1A HIGH SCHOQL,   \nJEPPU,MANCrALORE~,~~--D;I{. '   RES-PONDENTS\n\n(I:3y"S:ri :   &  SRIKANTH A,\nADvocATE:\u00a7,;?0R _\/'R:-3 S1nt.M.C.NAGASHREE,\nHCGP, FOR 11243 (as R.~:_'2',,.':?.--1'i RLOKESH,\nADVOCATE, I3'fL_)I\u00a5'\u00a3.I%\u00bbfA3'j_;.\n\n"   vv .P.1s"F1LED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227\n\n\u00bbA  TI~EE'\u00abCONSTI'FUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH\n V PASSED BY THE R1 VIDE DT. 7.10.2005\n'-- A IN' GRAN'T;iN'G THE VARIATKJN OF' CONDITION OF\n\ni?ERM'I'l_' 0N THE ROUTE THLRTHAHALL1 TO\nMANGALORE 8; BACK WAY 014' CURTAILMENT OF THE\nROUTE E-'ROM BIDAKAL KA'I"}f'E TO BRAHMAVARA AND\n\n AA VKD.EVLATION OF' THE ROUTE FROM BIDAKAL KATTE\n'  -AND  VIBE ANX~D.\n\nTHIS PE'I'I'l'ION COMING ON FOR HEARING THIS\n\n' DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-\n\nst\ufb02cw\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
The petitioner aggrieved by the  {)3} _  <\/p>\n
the Secretary, Regional   X<\/p>\n
respondent to re\ufb01x the timings oftitze  of  L’<\/p>\n
conditions of permit, the petittolzer   appeal
\nbefore the Presiding’   State V:’I”ransport
\nAppellate ‘I’rib1_1_na1,  ‘arm; virtue of the<\/p>\n
impugaed       vide Axmexure-H<\/p>\n
and    dismissed the appeals.\n<\/p>\n
Hence,    ” V’ ”\n<\/p>\n
”   The” “oniy… \u00abcontention raised by the learned<\/p>\n
 I   petitioner is that notwithstanding his<\/p>\n
ooittelt’  in the said matter the order passed by<\/p>\n
 the R~.’f;z\u00a7.Vdeserves to be set aside on the sole ground of<\/p>\n
A “:t:V’_noti\u00a7_app1iea.tion of mind. He submits that the Presiding<\/p>\n
V’   Qf\ufb01cer of the Appellate Tribunai passed a common order<\/p>\n
by clubbing 72 eases together. This clearly shows that<\/p>\n
there is non-application of mind while passing the<\/p>\n
%LJ,<\/p>\n
impugned order. On this gmuiid alone the impugned<\/p>\n
orders will have to be liable to be set aside.<\/p>\n
3. On the other ha11:;i,….tIf;e  <\/p>\n
appeann’ g for respondents ~  <\/p>\n
does not impose a eondiit:ion.,_ the  gve-it<\/p>\n
reasons for the order, M0rt3Q’.’PJ’,–. ‘a..of,.the order<\/p>\n
passed by the   and every case<\/p>\n
was  “orders have been passed.\n<\/p>\n
He fmther  concurrent \ufb01nding of fact<\/p>\n
sho3:dci_ not   by this Court and hence<\/p>\n
 i s;.::::\u00a2niz\u00e9s that the cpg\ufb01uon be rejected.<\/p>\n
-45′ -.iA\u00a7ot\\Nit11standiI1g the contentions of the<\/p>\n
V.   peti\ufb01oner and the submissions of the learned counsel<\/p>\n
i “‘.i’o1**the respondents it is a, fundamental principle of iaw<\/p>\n
 “-‘tiiat no order could be sustained unless there is an<\/p>\n
appiioa\ufb01on of mind. In the instant case, prima facie it<\/p>\n
W”\n<\/p>\n
35<\/span><\/p>\n
appears that there is no application of mind”‘*~–wh\ufb02e<\/p>\n
passing the impugxed orders by the 211″  <\/p>\n
the 72 cases have been taken together V:iaj’_._ <\/p>\n
which pre~–supposes lack of  <\/p>\n
passing the order. This gfound  is  verio1igf1eto”~ s’<\/p>\n
set aside the order.\n<\/p>\n
5. For the  the folkowing<\/p>\n
0I’CiCI’Z’-4′  –.  . _
\n1’1} The  V_.7.- 102005 vzide Annexure-\u00abB<\/p>\n
passed the  respondent in Subject No. 106\/O2~03<\/p>\n
   c37;1er”dVa’E*x*:-\u20ac;”24~’?-2006 vide Atmexure–E passed<\/p>\n
  \/O2-03 by the 23*’ respondent and the<\/p>\n
 ciatcjf 15-10-2007 vide Annexum–H passed in<\/p>\n
 Appea1:’_ No.1573\/52006 by the Tribunal and also the<\/p>\n
V’:-‘ dated 18~ I0\u00bb-2007 passed in Appeal<\/p>\n
‘    157 1\/2006 vide Annexure~J passed by the Tribunal<\/p>\n
are hereby quashed.\n<\/p>\n
\/Ar”\n<\/p>\n
” .rS’i\u00a7<\/p>\n
-5…\n<\/p>\n
2] The matter stands remitted A’ 1*”<\/p>\n
respondent with a direction to pass :VA(\u00a7rderT$’ <\/p>\n
accordance with law.\n<\/p>\n
In View of the fact that the  <\/p>\n
operating the services the   i\ufb01disturbed
\nuntil \ufb02esh orders a:\u00e9e”jmatie.ie_ .A  ~  _
\nWrit peeuon  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sree Gajanana Motor Transport … vs The Regional Transport Authority … on 21 November, 2008 Author: Ravi Malimath -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF’ KARNATAKLA AT DATED THIS THE 2 zap my OF’ NOVEM’\u00a33~;3uR ;..:2(.)08 A ” BEFo$E j’ THE H’C)N’BLE MR.JFJ3TICE MAL1;s4iAi’ri’; % WRIT PETr1’I0N Nofi-3Qc3;_>, O\u00a7”g._( i(J’?(M:V} BETWEEN : 1 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSree Gajanana Motor Transport ... vs The Regional Transport Authority ... on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sree Gajanana Motor Transport ... vs The Regional Transport Authority ... on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-01-30T02:26:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sree Gajanana Motor Transport … vs The Regional Transport Authority … on 21 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-30T02:26:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":453,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Sree Gajanana Motor Transport ... vs The Regional Transport Authority ... on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-01-30T02:26:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sree Gajanana Motor Transport … vs The Regional Transport Authority … on 21 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sree Gajanana Motor Transport ... vs The Regional Transport Authority ... on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sree Gajanana Motor Transport ... vs The Regional Transport Authority ... on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-01-30T02:26:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sree Gajanana Motor Transport … vs The Regional Transport Authority … on 21 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-30T02:26:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008"},"wordCount":453,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008","name":"Sree Gajanana Motor Transport ... vs The Regional Transport Authority ... on 21 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-20T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-01-30T02:26:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sree-gajanana-motor-transport-vs-the-regional-transport-authority-on-21-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sree Gajanana Motor Transport … vs The Regional Transport Authority … on 21 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38869"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38869\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}