{"id":38942,"date":"2008-03-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008"},"modified":"2016-10-28T17:57:05","modified_gmt":"2016-10-28T12:27:05","slug":"naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nBail Appl No. 1041 of 2008()\n\n\n1. NAUFAL.P.K., ALIAS IKRU,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTOOR\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.C.PRABIN BENNY\n\n                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT\n\n Dated :10\/03\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                          R. BASANT, J.\n\n           ````````````````````````````````````````````````````\n         B.A. Nos. 1041, 1044 and 1209 OF 2008\n           ````````````````````````````````````````````````````\n           Dated this the 10th day of March, 2008\n\n                             O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>           These applications are for anticipatory bail. The<\/p>\n<p>petitioners face allegations in a crime registered alleging<\/p>\n<p>offences punishable, inter alia, under sections 452, 354 and<\/p>\n<p>323 IPC. The crux of the allegations is that the 1st accused<\/p>\n<p>had entrusted a mobile phone with the de facto complainant<\/p>\n<p>for sale thereof.      The same was allegedly sold but the<\/p>\n<p>proceeds were not handed over to A1.                  Because of this<\/p>\n<p>animosity,   the    three     accused      persons       allegedly had<\/p>\n<p>trespassed into the residential building of the de facto<\/p>\n<p>complainant.     He was allegedly assaulted and hurt was<\/p>\n<p>caused to him. The mother of the de facto complainant was<\/p>\n<p>allegedly assaulted indecently. The incident took place on<\/p>\n<p>6.1.08.   Crime has been registered.                Investigation is in<\/p>\n<p>progress. The petitioners apprehend imminent arrest.<\/p>\n<p>BA.1041\/08 &amp; connected cases<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                : 2 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      2.   The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners are innocent. In fact, the disputes have been<\/p>\n<p>settled between the de facto complainants(CWs 1 and 2, the<\/p>\n<p>son and the mother) and the petitioners. He has no grievance<\/p>\n<p>now.    He has sworn to an affidavit before an Advocate. In<\/p>\n<p>these circumstances, anticipatory bail may be granted to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners, it is prayed.\n<\/p>\n<p>      3.   Notice was given to the learned Public Prosecutor.<\/p>\n<p>The learned Public Prosecutor, after taking instructions,<\/p>\n<p>submits that to the best knowledge of the investigator no bona<\/p>\n<p>fide settlement has taken effect. It is submitted that the de<\/p>\n<p>facto complainant and his mother were threatened to submit<\/p>\n<p>that there is no willing and voluntary settlement. In these<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, the alleged settlement may not be reckoned<\/p>\n<p>as a relevant circumstance to grant anticipatory bail to the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners. In any view of the matter, the petitioners may not<\/p>\n<p>be granted anticipatory bail, it is submitted.<\/p>\n<p>      4.   The learned counsel for the petitioners submit that<\/p>\n<p>BA.1041\/08 &amp; connected cases<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                : 3 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>the investigating officer has animus against the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>and that is why such stand is taken by the investigating<\/p>\n<p>officer. The learned counsel for the petitioners pray that the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners may be given an opportunity to surrender before<\/p>\n<p>the learned Magistrate and seek regular bail without the<\/p>\n<p>threat\/risk of their arrest by the police and going into police<\/p>\n<p>custody except through court.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5.   Having considered all the relevant circumstances, I<\/p>\n<p>am satisfied that directions under section 438 Cr.P.C. can be<\/p>\n<p>issued in favour of the petitioners to enable them to surrender<\/p>\n<p>before the learned Magistrate and seek regular bail without<\/p>\n<p>the threat and risk of arrest by the police and incarceration<\/p>\n<p>before they go into the custody of the court. They can, I am<\/p>\n<p>satisfied, be given an opportunity to surrender before the<\/p>\n<p>learned Magistrate and seek regular bail.<\/p>\n<p>      6.   In the result, these petitions are allowed. Following<\/p>\n<p>directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C in favour of<\/p>\n<p>the petitioners.\n<\/p>\n<p>BA.1041\/08 &amp; connected cases<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                : 4 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>     i)    Petitioners shall surrender before the learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate having jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 17.3.08. They<\/p>\n<p>may, after giving prior notice to the Prosecutor in charge of<\/p>\n<p>the case, apply for bail. The learned Magistrate must pass<\/p>\n<p>appropriate orders on such application by the petitioners and<\/p>\n<p>any other application to be filed by the police. The petitioners<\/p>\n<p>shall thereafter abide by the orders to be passed by the<\/p>\n<p>learned Magistrate.\n<\/p>\n<p>     (ii)  If the petitioners do not appear before the learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above<\/p>\n<p>shall thereafter stand revoked and the police shall thereafter<\/p>\n<p>be at liberty to arrest the petitioners and deal with them in<\/p>\n<p>accordance with law, as if these directions were not issued at<\/p>\n<p>all.\n<\/p>\n<p>     (iii) If they were arrested prior to 17.3.08, they shall be<\/p>\n<p>released from custody on their executing a bond for<\/p>\n<p>Rs.25,000\/- undertaking to appear before the learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistrate on 17.3.08.\n<\/p>\n<p>BA.1041\/08 &amp; connected cases<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                : 5 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      7.   The learned Public Prosecutor submits that he has<\/p>\n<p>information that the 1st accused has already been arrested by<\/p>\n<p>the police in connection with some other case. The learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the 1st accused is not sure of that circumstance. If<\/p>\n<p>the 1st accused has been so arrested, needless to say, the<\/p>\n<p>police or the petitioner can move the court concerned to get<\/p>\n<p>his arrest recorded in the instant case and then seek regular<\/p>\n<p>bail.\n<\/p>\n<p>      8.   Needless to say, it shall be open to the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>to satisfy the learned Magistrate      that Cws 1 and 2 have<\/p>\n<p>willingly and voluntarily settled the disputes and compounded<\/p>\n<p>the offence.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                            (R.BASANT, JUDGE)<br \/>\naks<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM Bail Appl No. 1041 of 2008() 1. NAUFAL.P.K., ALIAS IKRU, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KATTOOR &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :SRI.C.PRABIN BENNY For Respondent :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice R.BASANT [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38942","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-28T12:27:05+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-28T12:27:05+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":738,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008\",\"name\":\"Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-28T12:27:05+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-28T12:27:05+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-28T12:27:05+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008"},"wordCount":738,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008","name":"Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-28T12:27:05+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/naufal-p-k-vs-sub-inspector-of-police-on-10-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Naufal.P.K. vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 10 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38942","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38942"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38942\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38942"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38942"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38942"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}